Management of pelvic fracture urethral injuries in the developing world

The Burden of Plastic Surgery in Rural Kenya: The Kapsowar Hospital Experience

Purpose

Both governmental and nongovernmental training programs are expanding efforts to train the next generation of plastic surgeons who will work in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Sufficient training is dependent on acquiring the appropriate skillset for these contexts. Few studies have characterized the spectrum of practice of plastic surgeons in LMICs and their relative disparity.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review on all patients who received plastic surgery at a single institution in rural western Kenya from 2021 to 2023. Data such as diagnoses, procedures, and home village/town of residence were collected. Patient home location was geomapped using an open-access distance matrix application programming interface to estimate travel time based on terrain and road quality, assuming patient access to a private vehicle and ideal traveling conditions. Descriptive statistics were performed.

Results

A total of 296 patients received surgery. Common procedures included treatment of cleft lip/palate (CLP), burn reconstruction, and reconstruction for benign tumors of the head and neck. The average distance to treatment was 159.2 minutes. Increased travel time was not associated with time to CLP repair (P > 0.05). Increased travel time was associated with delayed treatment for burns (P = 0.005), maxillofacial trauma (P = 0.032), and hand trauma (P = 0.016).

Conclusions

Training programs for plastic surgeons in LMICs should ensure competency in CLP, flaps, burn reconstruction, and head and neck reconstruction. Our novel use of an application programming interface indicates that international partnerships have been more successful in decreasing treatment delays for CLP patients, but not other reconstructive procedure patients. Expanded commitment from international partners to address these reconstructive burdens in LMICs is warranted.

Precise treatment of pelvic fracture urethral injury associated with urethrorectal fistula

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of a new strategy of transperineal anastomotic urethroplasty (TAU) with proximal transection in treating pelvic fracture urethral injury (PFUI) associated with urethrorectal fistula (URF).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients treated by TAU with proximal transection and fistula repair for PFUI associated with URF was performed between August 2013 and July 2022. Information on demographics, peri-operative variables, and postoperative follow-up outcomes was collected. Successful surgery was defined as restoration of a uniform urethral calibre using flexible cystoscopy (third postoperative month) without strictures or leakage, with no further interventions required. Functional outcomes, including erectile function (assessed using the five-item International Index of Erectile Function) and urinary continence, were assessed.

RESULTS

Forty patients diagnosed with PFUI associated with URF and treated by TAU with proximal transection and rectal fistula repair were enrolled. Six patients (15.0%) had a history of failed urethral reconstruction. The mean stenosis length and fistula diameter were 2.9 cm and 1.2 cm, respectively. All patients underwent faecal diversion before urethroplasty. After a median (range) follow-up of 45 (3-115) months, the final success rate was 90.0% (36/40). Postoperative complications included haematoma in three patients, epididymo-orchitis in three, wound infection in one, wound bleeding in one, delayed wound healing in three, and wound numbness in three. The overall incidence of postoperative erectile dysfunction reached 75.0%, with a median (range) score of 9 (0-19). Normal continence was achieved in 31 patients (77.5%). Occasional incontinence without the need for urinal pads occurred in eight patients, whereas one patient required urinal pads.

CONCLUSIONS

Transperineal anastomotic urethroplasty with proximal transection is a precise and effective surgical strategy for treating PFUI associated with URF. This strategy ensures a high success rate and improves surgical efficiency.

Redo inferior pubectomy for failed anastomotic urethroplasty in pelvic fracture urethral injury

Objectives

To assess the effect of redo inferior pubectomy on the management of complicated pelvic fracture urethral injury (PFUI) in patients with a history of failed anastomotic urethroplasty.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed all patients receiving redo anastomotic urethroplasty with redo inferior pubectomy for failed PFUI between January 2010 and December 2021. Patients with incomplete data and those who were lost to follow-up were excluded. Successful urethroplasty was defined as the restoration of a uniform urethral caliber without stenosis or leakage and further intervention. Functional results, including erectile function and urinary continence, were evaluated. Descriptive statistical analyses were then performed.

Results

Thirty-one patients were included in this study. Among them, concomitant urethrorectal fistula occurred in 2 patients, and concomitant enlarged bladder neck occurred in 1. The stenosis site was the bulbomembranous urethra in 2 patients and the prostatomembranous urethra in 29. The mean length of urethral stenosis in all patients was 3.1 cm (range, 2.0-5.0 cm). After a mean follow-up of 34.6 months, the final success rate was 96.8%. The incidence of erectile dysfunction reached 77.4% (24/31). Normal continence was achieved in 27 (87.1%) patients. One patient developed urinary incontinence of grade II requiring urinary pads because of an enlarged bladder neck. According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, postoperative complications of grade I occurred in 7 patients and grade II in 4.

Conclusions

Repeat anastomotic urethroplasty with repeat inferior pubectomy provides reliable success rates for failed PFUI. In complicated cases, it should be known and mastered.

"Primary" bulbar urethral ischemic necrosis following pelvic fracture urethral injury: A rare surgical challenge

Ischemic necrosis of the bulbar urethra in a patient with pelvic fracture urethral injury without a prior history of surgical intervention is extremely rare and results in long-segment obliterative strictures that are difficult to manage. Instead of the more traditional approach of vascular reconstruction followed by transpubic end-to-end urethroplasty, these patients are better managed by up-front urethroplasty with a tubed flap or as a staged procedure with grafting and tubularization. Herein, we report a case of primary bulbar urethral ischemic necrosis due to pelvic fracture managed with tubularized preputial flap (McAninch flap) urethroplasty.

Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Delayed Anastomotic Urethroplasty for Male Pelvic Fracture Urethral Injury at a Japanese Referral Center

We aimed to assess the surgical and patient-reported outcomes of delayed anastomotic urethroplasty (DAU) for pelvic fracture urethral injury (PFUI). We included 211 male patients who underwent DAU for PFUI. DAU success was considered when the urethral lumen was sufficiently large for the passage of a flexible cystoscope, without additional treatment required. The patients completed the lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)-related quality of life (QOL) questionnaire (scores: 0, not at all; 1, a little; 2, somewhat; 3, a lot), EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D), and EQ-5D visual analog scale (EQ-VAS). Postoperative overall satisfaction was evaluated using the following responses: “very satisfied,” “satisfied,” “unsatisfied,” or “very unsatisfied.” DAU was successful in 95.3% cases, with a median postoperative follow-up duration of 48 months. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that “greater blood loss” was an independent predictor of failed urethroplasty. Questionnaire responses were obtained from 80.1% patients. The mean LUTS-related QOL, EQ-5D score and EQ-VAS improved significantly from 2.8, 0.63 and 54.4 at baseline to 0.9, 0.81 and 76.6 postoperatively (p < 0.0001 for all parameters). Moreover, 35.5% and 59.2% of the patients responded being “satisfied” and “very satisfied,” respectively, with their DAU outcomes. DAU not only had a high surgical success rate, but also a significant beneficial effect on both LUTS-related QOL and overall health-related QOL.

Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of male pelvic fracture urethral injury

The management of male pelvic fracture urethral injury remains a urological challenge. Pelvic fracture urethral injury can be associated with sequelae, such as urethral gap, erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence. Delayed anastomotic urethroplasty, the gold standard treatment for urethral gaps caused by pelvic fracture urethral injuries, is technically demanding, and reconstructive urologists should preoperatively obtain as much detailed anatomical information as possible. A combination of antegrade and retrograde urethrography is the fundamental preoperative evaluation, but it cannot accurately assess the urethral gap length, the degree of lateral prostatic displacement, the anatomical relationship of the urethra with its surrounding structures (such as the rectum and dorsal venous complex) or periurethral problems (such as minor fistulae or cavitation). To make up for these limitations of urethrography, magnetic resonance imaging has emerged as a non-invasive, multiplanar and high-resolution modality for the evaluation of pelvic fracture urethral injury. Magnetic resonance imaging has excellent soft-tissue contrast, and can clearly show the urethra and periurethral tissues without the effects of radiation, thus enabling clinicians to anticipate the required ancillary techniques for delayed anastomotic urethroplasty and to predict functional outcomes, such as erectile function and urinary continence, after delayed anastomotic urethroplasty. This review discusses the role of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of pelvic fracture urethral injury and its impact on patient management.

Sexual function following pelvic fracture urethral injury and posterior urethroplasty

Background

To evaluate erectile and sexual function after pelvic fracture urethral injury (PFUI) by performing a retrospective review of a large multi-center database. We hypothesized that most men will have erectile dysfunction (ED) and poor sexual function following PFUI, which will remain after posterior urethroplasty.

Methods

Using the Trauma and Urologic Reconstructive Networks of Surgeons (TURNS) database, we identified PFUI patients undergoing posterior urethroplasty. We excluded patients with incomplete demographic, surgical and/or questionnaire data. Sexual Health Inventory of Men (SHIM), Male Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ), and subjective changes in penile curvature were collected before urethroplasty surgery and at follow-up. We performed descriptive statistics for erectile and ejaculatory function using STATA v12.

Results

We identified 92 men meeting inclusion criteria; median age was 41.7 years and BMI was 26.5. The mechanism of injury was blunt in all patients, and average distraction defect length was 2.3 cm (SD 1.0 cm). In the 38 patients who completed both pre and post-operative SHIM questionnaires, the mean SHIM score was 10.5 (SD 7.0), with 63% having severe ED (SHIM <12). The median follow-up was 5.6 months and the mean post-operative SHIM was 9.3 (SD 6.5), with 68% having severe ED. The mean change in SHIM score was −1.18 (SD 6.29) with 6 (16%) patients reporting de novo ED (≥5 point decrease in score). Of the men with pre-operative MSHQ data, 46/74 (62.1%) had difficulty with ejaculation, 25/35 (71%) had change in penile length, and 6/33 (18%) reported penile curvature. In men with post-operative MSHQ, 19/44 (43%) expressed difficulty with ejaculation, 23/32 (72%) had change in penile length, and 9/33 (27%) reported penile curvature.

Conclusions

There is a high rate of severe ED, both following PFUI and remaining after posterior urethroplasty. Additionally, rates of ejaculatory difficulty and patient perceived changes in penile length and curvature underscore the complex nature of the impact of these injuries on sexual function beyond simple erectile function.

Efficacy of re-do urethroplasty for post-traumatic urethral stricture: An analysis of the anatomical and functional outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy of re-do urethroplasty for post-traumatic urethral stricture in terms of anatomical and functional outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 48 patients who underwent re-do urethroplasty for post-traumatic urethral stricture due to perineal trauma (n = 21) and pelvic fracture urethral injury (n = 27) between October 2010 and March 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were followed by uroflowmetry, post-void residual volume assessment and 17-Fr flexible cystoscopy after re-do urethroplasty. Successful urethroplasty was defined as having a urethral caliber adequate for the passage of a cystoscope and requiring no additional treatments. Patients completed a validated patient-reported outcome measure for urethral stricture surgery, including overall satisfaction, and the sexual health inventory for men.

RESULTS

The type of re-do urethroplasty was anastomotic urethroplasty in 45 (94%) patients and buccal mucosa urethroplasty in three (6%) patients. Urethroplasty was successful in 47 (98%) patients (median follow up 35 months, interquartile range 21-75). The patient-reported outcome measure for urethral stricture surgery and Sexual Health Inventory for Men were assessed in 36 (75%) patients, and the mean lower urinary tract symptom-specific quality of life, EuroQol-5D and EuroQol-visual analog scale scores improved from 2.86, 0.63 and 54.17 preoperatively to 0.78 (P < 0.001), 0.86 (P < 0.001) and 76.94 (P < 0.001) postoperatively, respectively. The pre- and postoperative mean Sexual Health Inventory for Men scores (5.92 and 4.94, respectively) did not significantly differ (P = 0.318). All 36 patients were satisfied with their urethroplasty outcomes, with 20 (56%) very satisfied patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Re-do urethroplasty for post-traumatic urethral stricture shows a high success rate and beneficial effects on both anatomical and functional outcomes.

The value of magnetic resonance imaging geometric parameters in pre-assessing the surgical approaches of pelvic fracture urethral injury

Background

To investigate the correlation between the magnetic resonance urethrography and the surgical approach and complexity for the patients with pelvic fracture urethral injury (PFUI) by combining the geometry with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methods

Forty-three male patients with PFUI (part of the patients complicated with rectal injury) from January 2016 to December 2018 were analyzed in this retrospective research. All the patients underwent a delayed anastomotic urethroplasty and were divided into 2 groups according to the approaches (simple perineal approach or inferior pubectomy). For magnetic resonance urethrography, we measured and calculated the geometric parameters such as the gap distance between two urethral ends, the pubourethral vertical distance (PUVD), and the rectourethral median distance (RUMD).

Results

Of the 43 patients, 16 underwent inferior pubectomy and 27 underwent simple perineal approach. The numbers of patients with and without rectal injury history were 17 and 26, respectively. The operation time and intraoperative blood loss was significantly higher in the inferior pubectomy group. Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that gap distance and PUVD were independent factors of the surgical approaches. The accuracies were 83.7% and 67.4% respectively in the ROC curve analysis. In addition, the RUMD was significantly shorter in the patients with rectal injury history (1.4, 1.8 cm).

Conclusions

Longer gap distance and shorter PUVD were the two independent factors of the inferior pubectomy approach. Furthermore, among the patients with rectal injury history, the tissue posterior to the urethra was often weaker and should be carefully handled during the surgery.

Trial registration

This research has been registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. The registration number is ChiCTR2000030573.