Characterization of intracalyceal pressure during ureteroscopy

Scoping Review of Experimental and Clinical Evidence and Its Influence on Development of the Suction Ureteral Access Sheath

The ureteral access sheath (UAS) has been a boon and a bane in flexible ureteroscopy (FURS), with its merits and demerits well established. Its design and dimensions were instrumental in reshaping the way flexible scopes were used and were key adjuncts to establishing retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) as a standard of care in the endourological management of renal stones. With the ever-changing landscape of RIRS over the decades shaped by technological advancements in lasers and flexible scopes, the UAS has also continuously evolved. The utility of suction in endourology has recently changed the way RIRS is performed and is a game changer for FURS outcomes. With strong clinical and experimental evidence to support its use, the UAS has undergone a transformative change in the recent past, with its ability to monitor intrarenal pressure and provide a superior vacuum-cleaner effect that improves the trifecta of RIRS, namely an improved single-stage stone-free rate (SFR), minimise complications, and reduce reinterventions. Our comprehensive review outlines the key clinical and experimental evidence and traces the developments that were key to modifying the traditional UAS into a flexible and navigable suction ureteric access sheath (FANS) and highlights how the design and modifications, in turn, influence the ability to push the boundaries of RIRS.

Intrarenal pressure detection during flexible ureteroscopy with fiber optic pressure sensor system in porcine model

To validate the feasibility of a fiber-optic pressure sensor-based pressure measurement device for monitoring intrarenal pressure and to analyze the effects of ureteral acess sheath (UAS) type, surgical location, perfusion flow rate, and measurement location on intrarenal pressure (IRP). The measurement deviations and response times to transient pressure changes were compared between a fiber-optic pressure sensing device and a urodynamic device IRP in an in vitro porcine kidney and in a water tank. Finally, pressure measurements were performed in anesthetized female pigs using fiber-optic pressure sensing device with different UAS, different perfusion flow rates, and different surgical positions at different renal calyces and ureteropelvic junctions (UPJ). According to our operation, the result is fiber optic pressure sensing devices are highly accurate and sensitive. Under the same conditions, IRP varied among different renal calyces and UPJ (P < 0.05). IRP was lowest at 50 ml/min and highest at 150 ml/min (P < 0.05). Surgical position had a significant effect on IRP (P < 0.05). 12/14 Fr UAS had a lower IRP than 11/13 Fr UAS. Therefore fiber optic pressure sensing devices are more advantageous for IRP measurements. In ureteroscopy, the type of ureteral sheath, the surgical position, the perfusion flow rate, and the location of the measurement all affect the intrarenal pressure value.

Fluid dynamics within renal cavities during endoscopic stone surgery: does the position of the flexible ureteroscope and ureteral access sheath affect the outflow rate?

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of ureteroscope position within renal cavities as well as different locations of the tip of the ureteral access sheath (UAS) on fluid dynamics during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective observational clinical study was performed. Measurements with a flexible ureteroscope placed in the upper, middle and lower calyces were obtained with the tip of the UAS placed either 2 cm below the pyelo-ureteric junction (PUJ), or at the level of the iliac crest.

RESULTS

74 patients were included. The outflow rates from the middle and upper calyxes were statistically significantly higher compared to the lower calyx, both with the UAS close to the pyelo-ureteric junction and at the iliac crest. When the UAS was withdrawn and positioned at the level of the iliac crest, a significant decrease in outflow rates from the upper (40.1 ± 4.3 ml/min vs 35.8 ± 4.1 ml/min) and middle calyces (40.6 ± 4.0 ml/min vs 36.8 ± 4.6 ml/min) and an increase in the outflow from the lower calyx (28.5 ± 3.3 ml/min vs 33.7 ± 5.7 ml/min) were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that higher fluid outflow rates are observed from upper and middle calyces compared to lower calyx. This was true when the UAS was positioned 2 cm below the PUJ and at the iliac crest. Significant worsening of fluid dynamics from upper and middle calyces was observed when the UAS was placed distally at the level of the iliac crest. While the difference was statistically significant, the absolute change was not significant. In contrast, for lower calyces, a statistically significant improvement was documented.

Effect of nephrostomy sheath size on renal pelvic pressure during endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery: artificial kidney model study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the intrarenal pelvic pressure in endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery using an artificial kidney model.

METHODS

An artificial kidney model was created using the Urovac evacuator™. Four sizes of nephrostomy sheaths (MIP-L: 25/26 Fr, MIP-M: 16.5/17.5 Fr, MIP-S: 11/12 Fr, MIP-XS: 8.5/9.5 Fr) and two sizes of ureteral access sheaths (12/14 Fr and 10/12 Fr) were installed into the model. For each combination of nephrostomy and ureteral access sheath, renal pelvic pressure was measured with and without insertion of the retrograde flexible ureteroscope. Irrigation from the nephroscope was adjusted to 40-160 mmHg using an automatic irrigation device, and the irrigation of the ureteroscope was by spontaneous dripping at 80 cmH2O. Conditions were measured six times, and the renal pelvic pressure was compared in different conditions.

RESULTS

Without ureteroscope insertion through the ureteral access sheath, the renal pelvic pressure never exceeded 30 mmHg. Meanwhile, when the ureteroscope was inserted, the renal pelvic pressure increased as the nephrostomy sheath and ureteral access sheath became narrower and as the irrigation pressure increased. Intrarenal pelvic pressure exceeded 30 mmHg when the irrigation pressure was increased in 12/14 Fr ureteral access sheath when MIP-XS was used, and in 10/12 Fr ureteral access sheath when MIP-XS and MIP-S were used.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a thin nephrostomy sheath in endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery can lead to increased intrarenal pelvic pressure. Although our results are from an artificial kidney model, special care is suggested to be required when using a retrograde flexible ureteroscope simultaneously in treatment of patients.

Intrarenal pressures during flexible ureteroscopy: an insight into safer endourology

OBJECTIVES

To assess intrarenal pressures (IRPs) and complication rates after flexible ureteroscopy (fURS), and to assess factors that contribute to raised IRPs and postoperative complications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After informed consent patients underwent fURS under general anaesthesia. The transducer of a 0.3556 mm (0.014″) pressure guidewire was placed in the renal pelvis for live recording of IRPs. The fURS procedures were performed in a routine manner under antibiotic cover with the aim of dusting the calculus to completion. The operating surgeon was blinded to the live-recorded IRPs.

RESULTS

A total of 40 fURS procedures were performed in 37 patients (26 male and 11 female). The mean age was 50.5 years. As a cohort, the mean of average IRPs was 34.8 mmHg and the mean of maximal IRPs was 128.8 mmHg. Pearson's correlation showed a significant inverse correlation between the mean IRP and age (r[38]: -0.391, P = 0.013). Three cases experienced postoperative deviations from uncomplicated recovery, with two being hypotensive and one case being both hypotensive and hypoxic. Three cases returned to the emergency department within 30 days of surgery, with two cases of flank pain and one case of urosepsis with positive urine cultures. The patient presenting with urosepsis had exhibited IRPs exceeding the mean.

CONCLUSION

The IRPs changed significantly from normal baseline levels during routine fURS. The mean IRP during fURS correlates with patient age, but not with other factors. The IRP may be related to increased complication rates at fURS. Understanding factors that influence IRP will allow urologists to better manage this intraoperatively.

How to measure intra-renal pressure during flexible URS: Historical background, technological innovations and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION

High intrarenal pressure (IRP) is a potential risk factor for infectious complications related to URS. Methods to lower IRP have been described. However, it is still not possible to assess live IRP values during URS. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature regarding endoscopic methods to measure IRP during URS.

METHODS

A systematic search and review of Medline, PubMed and Scopus was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta Analysis (PRISMA) checklist and a narrative synthesis of the study results was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 19 articles were included in the review. Four non invasive (i.e. endoscopic) methods to measure IRP were reported: ureteral catheter, sensor wire, pressure sensor proximal to an irrigation system and a novel ureteral access sheath that integrates suction, irrigation, and IRP measurement.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide here a comprehensive overview of the reported clinical measuring systems of IRP during URS. The ideal system has not been developed yet, but urologists will be able to measure IRP during their daily practice soon. The implications of having this type of data during surgery remains unknown. Systems that could integrate irrigation, suction, IRP and temperature seems to be ideal.

Automatic irrigation system with a fiber-optic pressure sensor regulating intrapelvic pressure for flexible ureteroscopy

Increased intrapelvic pressure (IPP) due to irrigation during flexible ureteroscopy (f-URS) can pose a risk of postoperative severe urinary tract infection associated with pyelovenous backflow. An automatic regulation system for maintaining safe IPP levels could enable surgeons to perform f-URS safely without postoperative complications. This study aimed to assess the measurement accuracy of an ultra-miniature fiber-optic pressure sensor incorporated into a small-caliper ureteroscope for assessing IPP and to develop an automatic irrigation system linked to this sensor. A porcine kidney was used for the ex vivo experiment. The nephrostomy catheter, connected to the conventional pressure transducer, was placed on the renal pelvis to evaluate the actual IPP (a-IPP). For measuring IPP using the fiber-optic pressure sensor (fo-IPP) built into the f-URS, a diaphragm pressure sensor of Φ250 μm was used. To establish an irrigation system, the optimal proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller was explored to accurately adjust the irrigation pump flow rate. A high correlation between a-IPP and fo-IPP was confirmed across irrigation pressure values of 60-180 mbar (all, r ≥ 0.7, p < 0.001). When performing bolus irrigation, although fo-IPP showed relatively a higher peak value than a-IPP, the response time of fo-IPP was equivalent to that of a-IPP. After PID parameter optimization, our automatic irrigation system based on fo-IPP smoothly and accurately regulated the intended IPP set in the 5-20 mmHg range without overshooting. We successfully developed and demonstrated an automatic irrigation system regulating IPP based on the PID controller for f-URS, utilizing a fiber-optic pressure sensor. Further research, including in vivo studies, will be needed to assess clinical feasibility.

Comparison of traditional and novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscope to treat unilateral renal calculi

OBJECTIVES

To compare the safety and efficacy of novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath (NTFS-UAS) and traditional ureteral access sheath (T-UAS) combined with flexible ureteroscope for treating unilateral renal calculi.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The clinical data of 214 patients with unilateral renal calculi treated by NTFS-UAS (n = 102) and T-UAS (n = 112) combined with flexible ureteroscope from August 2021 to April 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. Demographic characteristics, stone-related parameters, operative time, stone-free rates (SFR), hospitalization time and complication rate (CR) were analyzed.

RESULT

No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of demographic characteristics, stone-related parameters, intraoperative CR, and hospitalization time. The operative time of NTFS-UAS group was significantly shorter than T-UAS group (55.25 ± 11.42 min vs. 59.36 ± 15.59 min; P = 0.028). The NTFS-UAS group obtained significantly higher SFR on 1 day postoperatively (86.3% vs. 75.0%; P = 0.038), and higher SFR on 30 days postoperatively than T-UAS group (91.2% vs. 81.3%; P = 0.037). The hemoglobin loss of NTFS-UAS group (- 0.54 ± 0.69 g/dl) was significantly lower than T-UAS group (- 0.83 ± 0.66 g/dl; P = 0.002). There was a significantly lower incidence of overall CR (11.8% vs. 22.3%; P = 0.041), and infectious CR (8.8% vs. 18.8%; P = 0.037) in the NTFS-UAS group.

CONCLUSION

Compared to T-UAS combined with flexible ureteroscope for treating unilateral renal calculi, NTFS-UAS had superiority in higher SFR on 1 day and 30 days postoperatively. Shorter operation time, lower hemoglobin loss, lower incidences of overall and infectious CR were observed in NTFS-UAS group.

REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE

ChiCTR2300070210; April 5, 2023.

In vivo ureteroscopic intrarenal pressures and clinical outcomes: a multi-institutional analysis of 120 consecutive patients

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the pressure range generated in the human renal collecting system during ureteroscopy (URS), in a large patient sample, and to investigate a relationship between intrarenal pressure (IRP) and outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective multi-institutional study was conducted, with ethics board approval; February 2022-March 2023. Recruitment was of 120 consecutive consenting adult patients undergoing semi-rigid URS and/or flexible ureterorenoscopy (FURS) for urolithiasis or diagnostic purposes. Retrograde, fluoroscopy-guided insertion of a 0.036-cm (0.014″) pressure guidewire (COMET™ II, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) to the renal pelvis was performed. Baseline and continuous ureteroscopic IRP was recorded, alongside relevant operative variables. A 30-day follow-up was completed. Descriptive statistics were applied to IRP traces, with mean (sd) and maximum values and variance reported. Relationships between IRP and technical variables, and IRP and clinical outcome were interrogated using the chi-square test and independent samples t-test.

RESULTS

A total of 430 pressure traces were analysed from 120 patient episodes. The mean (sd) baseline IRP was 16.45 (5.99) mmHg and the intraoperative IRP varied by technique. The mean (sd) IRP during semi-rigid URS with gravity irrigation was 34.93 (11.66) mmHg. FURS resulted in variable IRP values: from a mean (sd) of 26.78 (5.84) mmHg (gravity irrigation; 12/14-F ureteric access sheath [UAS]) to 87.27 (66.85) mmHg (200 mmHg pressurised-bag irrigation; 11/13-F UAS). The highest single pressure peak was 334.2 mmHg, during retrograde pyelography. Six patients (5%) developed postoperative urosepsis; these patients had significantly higher IRPs during FURS (mean [sd] 81.7 [49.52] mmHg) than controls (38.53 [22.6] mmHg; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A dynamic IRP profile is observed during human in vivo URS, with IRP frequently exceeding expected thresholds. A relationship appears to exist between elevated IRP and postoperative urosepsis.

Perceptions and Practice Patterns of Urologists Relating to Intrarenal Pressure During Ureteroscopy: Findings from a Global Cross-Sectional Analysis

Objectives: To explore beliefs and practice patterns of urologists regarding intrarenal pressure (IRP) during ureteroscopy (URS). Methods: A customized questionnaire was designed in a 4-step iterative process incorporating a systematic review of the literature and critical analysis of topics/questions by six endourologists. The 19-item questionnaire interrogated perceptions, practice patterns, and key areas of uncertainty regarding ureteroscopic IRP, and was disseminated via urologic societies, networks, and social media to the international urologic community. Consultants/attendings and trainees currently practicing urology were eligible to respond. Quantitative responses were compiled and analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square test, with subgroup analysis by procedure volume. Results: Responses were received from 522 urologists, practicing in six continents. The individual question response rate was >97%. Most (83.9%, 437/515) respondents were practicing at a consultant/attending level. An endourology fellowship incorporating stone management had been completed by 59.2% (307/519). The vast majority of respondents (85.4%, 446/520) scored the perceived clinical significance of IRP during URS ≥7/10 on a Likert scale. Concern was uniformly reported, with no difference between respondents with and without a high annual case volume (p = 0.16). Potential adverse outcomes respondents associated with elevated ureteroscopic IRP were urosepsis (96.2%, 501/520), collecting system rupture (80.8%, 421/520), postoperative pain (67%, 349/520), bleeding (63.72%, 332/520), and long-term renal damage (26.1%, 136/520). Almost all participants (96.2%, 501/520) used measures aiming to reduce IRP during URS. Regarding the perceived maximum acceptable threshold for mean IRP during URS, 30 mm Hg (40 cm H2O) was most frequently selected [23.2% (119/463)], with most participants (78.2%, 341/463) choosing a value ≤40 mm Hg. Conclusions: This is the first large-scale analysis of urologists' perceptions of ureteroscopic IRP. It identifies high levels of concern among the global urologic community, with almost unanimous agreement that elevated IRP is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Equipoise remains regarding appropriate IRP limits intraoperatively and the most appropriate technical strategies to ensure adherence to these.

Intrarenal Pressure Measured Using a Novel Flexible Ureteroscope with Pressure Sensing Capabilities: A Study of the Effects of Ureteral Access Sheath, Irrigation, and Working Channel Accessories

Introduction: Intrarenal pressure is emerging as an important monitoring parameter during flexible ureteroscopy (fURS). We measure how intraoperative conditions affect intrarenal pressure using a novel pressure sensing ureteroscope. Methods: The LithoVue Elite (LVE) single-use digital flexible ureteroscope (Boston Scientific) is the first commercial ureteroscope that senses pressure at its tip. LVE was used in a porcine model to measure intrarenal pressure with and without a ureteral access sheath (UAS) with various sizes and placement locations, irrigation methods, and working channel accessories. LVE pressure accuracy was measured in a bench model. This abstract shows the least-square means from multiway analysis of variances used for analysis. Results: Intrarenal pressures were the highest without a UAS (64 mm Hg), followed by the 11/13 UAS (51 mm Hg) and the 12/14 and 13/15, which were not statistically different (39-40 mm Hg). The pressures were highest with UASs placed at the ureteropelvic junction (61 mm Hg), and lowest if placed in the renal pelvis (24 mm Hg). Irrigation methods showed the highest pressures with syringe (57 mm Hg), while irrigation bags (pressurized at 150-300 mm Hg) produced 43 to 46 mm Hg and 25 mm Hg when applied with 80 cm of gravity. Placing a 200 μm laser fiber reduced pressures from 44 to 41 mm Hg. Finally, the bench model showed that LVE was 96% accurate up to 300 mm Hg. Conclusion: Intrarenal pressure significantly varied based on UAS sizes, placement, and irrigation methods. Accordingly, fURS with LVE is poised to be an invaluable tool for clinical decision-making and future studies of intrarenal pressure.

Change in renal blood flow in response to intrarenal pressure alterations induced by ureteroscopy in an in-vivo porcine model

INTRODUCTION

High irrigation rates are commonly used during ureteroscopy and can increase intrarenal pressure (IRP) substantially. Concerns have been raised that elevated IRP may diminish renal blood flow (RBF) and perfusion of the kidney. Our objective was to investigate the real-time changes in RBF while increasing IRP during Ureteroscopy (URS) in an in-vivo porcine model.

METHODS

Four renal units in two porcine subjects were used in this study, three experimental units and one control. For the experimental units, RBF was measured by placing an ultrasonic flow cuff around the renal artery, while performing ureteroscopy in the same kidney using a prototype ureteroscope with a pressure sensor at its tip. Irrigation was cycled between two rates to achieve targeted IRPs of 30 mmHg and 100 mmHg. A control data set was obtained by placing the ultrasonic flow cuff on the contralateral renal artery while performing ipsilateral URS.

RESULTS

At high IRP, RBF was reduced in all three experimental trials by 10-20% but not in the control trial. The percentage change in RBF due to alteration in IRP was internally consistent in each porcine renal unit and independent of slower systemic variation in RBF encountered in both the experimental and control units.

CONCLUSION

RBF decreased 10-20% when IRP was increased from 30 to 100 mmHg during ureteroscopy in an in-vivo porcine model. While this reduction in RBF is unlikely to have an appreciable effect on tissue oxygenation, it may impact heat-sink capacity in vulnerable regions of the kidney.

Effect of outflow resistance on intrarenal pressure at different irrigation rates during ureteroscopy: in vivo evaluation

To maintain visualization and control temperature elevation during ureteroscopy, higher irrigation rates are necessary, but this can increase intrarenal pressure (IRP) and lead to adverse effects like sepsis. The IRP is also dependent on outflow resistance but this has not been quantitatively evaluated in a biological system. In this study, we sought to characterize the IRP as a function of irrigation rate in an in vivo porcine model at different outflow resistances. Ureteroscopy was performed in a porcine model with a 9.5 Fr prototype ureteroscope containing a pressure sensor. A modified ureteral access sheath (UAS) (11/13 Fr, 36 cm) was configured to adjust outflow resistance. IRP-irrigation rate curves were generated at four different outlet resistances representing different outflow scenarios. At lower irrigation rates, the pressure change in response to increased irrigation was gradual and non-linear, likely reflecting a "compliant" phase of the renal collecting system. Once IRP reached the range of 35-50 cm H2O, the pressure increased in a linear fashion with irrigation rate, suggesting that the distensibility of the collecting system had become saturated. The relationship between IRP and irrigation rate becomes linear during in vivo porcine studies once the initial compliance of the system is saturated. IRP is more sensitive to changes in irrigation rate in systems with higher outflow resistance. The modified UAS is a novel research tool which allows variance of outflow resistance to mimic different clinical scenarios. Knowledge of outflow resistance may simplify the decision to use an UAS.

Retrograde intra renal surgery and safety: pressure and temperature. A systematic review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Retrograde intra renal surgery (RIRS) with laser lithotripsy represents the gold-standard to treat renal stones up to 20 mm. Controlling intraoperative parameters such as intrarenal pressure (IRP) and temperature (IRT) is mandatory to avoid complications. This article reviews advances in IRP and IRT over the last 2 years.

RECENT FINDINGS

We conducted a PubMed/Embase search and reviewed publications that include temperature and pressure during RIRS. Thirty-four articles have been published which met the inclusion criteria. Regarding IRP, a consensus has emerged to control IRP during RIRS, in order to avoid (barotraumatic and septic) complications. Several monitoring devices are under evaluation but none of them are clinically approved for RIRS. Ureteral access sheath, low irrigation pressure and occupied working channel help to maintain a low IRP. Robotic systems and suction devices would improve IRP intraoperative management and monitoring. IRT determinants are the irrigation flow and laser settings. Low power settings(<20 W) with minimal irrigation flow (5-10 ml/min) are sufficient to maintain low IRT and allows continuous laser activation.

SUMMARY

Recent evidence suggests that IRP and IRT are closely related. IRP depends on inflow and outflow rates. Continuous monitoring would help to avoid surgical and infectious complications. IRT depends on the laser settings and the irrigation flow.

A Prospective Study of Renal Blood Flow during Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery

(I) Introduction: The use of Doppler ultrasound allows us to indirectly assess the effect of increased intrarenal pressure on renal blood flow during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). On the basis of vascular flow spectra from selected blood vessels in the kidney, it is possible to determine Doppler parameters that reflect the renal perfusion status, which indirectly shows the degree of vasoconstriction and reflects the resistance of kidney tissue. (II) Materials and methods: A total of 56 patients were included in the study. The study assessed the changes of three Doppler parameters of intrarenal blood flow: resistive index-RI, pulsatility index-PI, and acceleration time-AT in the ipsilateral and contralateral kidneys during RIRS. The effects of mean stone volume, energy used, and pre-stenting were examined as predictors and calculated at two time intervals. (III) Results: The mean value of RI and PI was significantly higher in the ipsilateral kidney than in the contralateral kidney just after RIRS. The mean value of the acceleration time was not significantly different before and after RIRS. The values of all three parameters 24 h after the procedure were comparable to their values immediately after the RIRS. The size of the stone exposed to laser lithotripsy, the value of the energy used, and pre-stenting are not factors that significantly influence Doppler parameters during RIRS. (IV) Conclusions: The significant increase in RI and PI after RIRS in the ipsilateral kidney suggests a vasoconstriction of the interlobar arteries generated by increased intrarenal pressure during the procedure.

Upper urinary tract pressures in endourology: a systematic review of range, variables and implications

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the literature to ascertain the upper tract pressures generated during endourology, the relevant influencing variables and clinical implications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of the MEDLINE, Scopus and Cochrane databases was performed by two authors independently (S.C., N.D.). Studies reporting ureteric or intrarenal pressures (IRP) during semi-rigid ureteroscopy (URS)/flexible ureterorenoscopy (fURS)/percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)/miniaturized PCNL (mPCNL) in the period 1950-2021 were identified. Both in vitro and in vivo studies were considered for inclusion. Findings were independently screened for eligibility based on content, with disagreements resolved by author consensus. Data were assessed for bias and compiled based on predefined variables.

RESULTS

Fifty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Mean IRP appeared to frequently exceed a previously proposed threshold of 40 cmH₂ O. Semi-rigid URS with low-pressure irrigation (gravity <1 m) resulted in a wide mean IRP range (lowest reported 6.9 cmH₂ O, highest mean 149.5 ± 6.2 cmH₂ O; animal models). The lowest mean observed with fURS without a ureteric access sheath (UAS) was 47.6 ± 4.1 cmH₂ O, with the maximum peak IRP being 557.4 cmH₂ O (in vivo human data). UAS placement significantly reduced IRP during fURS, but did not guarantee pressure control with hand-operated pump/syringe irrigation. Miniaturization of PCNL sheaths was associated with increased IRP; however, a wide mean human IRP range has been recorded with both mPCNL (lowest -6.8 ± 2.2 cmH₂ O [suction sheath]; highest 41.2 ± 5.3 cmH₂ O) and standard PCNL (lowest 6.5 cmH₂ O; highest 41.2 cmH₂ O). Use of continuous suction in mPCNL results in greater control of mean IRP, although short pressure peaks >40 cmH₂ O are not entirely prevented. Definitive conclusions are limited by heterogeneity in study design and results. Postoperative pain and pyrexia may be correlated with increased IRP, however, few in vivo studies correlate clinical outcome with measured IRP.

CONCLUSIONS

Intrarenal pressure generated during upper tract endoscopy often exceeds 40 cmH₂ O. IRP is multifactorial in origin, with contributory variables discussed. Larger prospective human in vivo studies are required to further our understanding of IRP thresholds and clinical sequelae.

Quantification of outflow resistance for ureteral drainage devices used during ureteroscopy

PURPOSE

Since renal pelvis pressure is directly related to irrigation flowrate and outflow resistance, knowledge of outflow resistance associated with commonly used drainage devices could help guide the selection of the type and size of ureteral access sheath or catheter for individual ureteroscopic cases. This study aims to quantitatively measure outflow resistance for different drainage devices utilized during ureteroscopy.

METHODS

With measured irrigation flowrate and renal pelvis pressure, outflow resistance was calculated using a hydrodynamic formula. After placement of a drainage device into a silicone kidney-ureter model, a disposable ureteroscope with a 9.5-Fr outer diameter was inserted with its tip positioned at the renal pelvis. Irrigation was delivered through the ureteroscope from varying heights above the renal pelvis. Renal pelvis pressure was measured directly from the port of the kidney model using a pressure sensor (Opsens, Canada). Outflow resistance was determined by plotting flowrate versus renal pelvis pressure. All trials were performed in triplicate for each drainage device inserted.

RESULTS

Flowrate was linearly dependent on renal pelvis pressure for all drainage devices tested. Outflow resistance values were 0.2, 1.1, 1.4, 3.9, and 6.5 cmH₂O/[ml/min] for UAS 13/15 Fr, UAS 11/13 Fr, UAC 6 Fr, UAC 4.8 Fr, and UAC 4.0 Fr, respectively, across the range of commonly used irrigation flowrates.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, outflow resistance of different ureteral drainage devices was quantitatively measured. This knowledge can be useful when selecting which type and size of drainage device to insert to maintain safe renal pelvis pressure during ureteroscopy.

Determinants of outflow rate through the ureteral access sheath during flexible ureteroscopy: an experimental in vivo study in an anesthetized porcine model

To evaluate the effect of different ureteroscope positions, saline pumping frequency, laser fiber diameter and ureteral access sheath (UAS) on outflow rate during flexible ureteroscopy (fURS). This study was performed in an anesthetized porcine model. The fURS setup included a manual pumping system, a 9.5 Fr single used-digital flexible ureteroscope and a ureteral access sheath (UAS). Outflow was collected and measured from the UAS during 1 min in all experimental settings. The evaluated variables were the position of the ureteroscope, the pumping frequency (2 s, 3 s or 5 s), the diameter of the used UAS (12/14 Fr or 14/16 Fr) and laser fiber (200 μm or a 272 μm). Ureteroscope position in the lower calyx was associated with significantly lower outflow rate (p < 0.05). The use of the 14/16 Fr UAS resulted in improved flow in the renal pelvis and upper calyx (p < 0.05) but not in the lower calyx. The use of a 200 μm laser fiber only improved flow in the upper calyx and when a 14/16 Fr UAS was being used. Pumping frequency did not show a significant correlation with outflow rate. The ureteroscope positioning and UAS size were important determinants of outflow rate through the UAS during fURS, while laser fiber diameter had a limited effect. In the lower calyx the outflow was minimal and was not improved by using a larger UAS.

Ureteral Access Sheaths and Its Use in the Future: A Comprehensive Update Based on a Literature Review

Ureteral access sheaths (UASs) are part of urologist’s armamentarium when performing retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Recently, the world of RIRS has changed dramatically with the development of three game-changers: thulium fiber laser (TFL), smaller size single use digital flexible ureterosopes and intraoperative intrarenal pressure (IRP) measurement devices. We aimed to clarify the impact of UASs on IRP, complications and SFRs and put its indications in perspective of these three major technological improvements. A systematic review of the literature using the Medline, Scopus and Web of Science databases was performed by two authors and relevant studies were selected according to PRISMA guidelines. Recent studies showed that using a UAS lowers IRP and intrarenal temperature by increasing irrigation outflow during RIRS. Data on the impact of a UAS on SFRs, postoperative pain, risk of infectious complications, risk of ureteral strictures and risk of bladder recurrence of urothelial carcinoma after diagnostic RIRS were inconclusive. Prestenting for at least one week resulted in ureteral enlargement, while the influence of pre-operative administration of alpha-blockers was unclear. Since TFL, smaller single use digital ureteroscopes and devices with integrated pressure-measuring and aspiration technology seemed to increase SFRs and decrease pressure and temperature related complications, indications on the use of a UAS may decrease in the near future.

Determination of Irrigation Flowrate During Flexible Ureteroscopy: Methods for Calculation Using Renal Pelvis Pressure

BACKGROUND

Proper control of irrigation flowrate during ureteroscopy is important to manage thermal and pressure risks. This task is challenging because flowrate is not directly measured by commercially available ureteroscopic or fluid management systems. However, flowrate can be calculated using a hydrodynamic relationship based on measurable values during ureteroscopy. Objectives of this in vitro study were to 1) calculate inflow resistance for different working channel conditions and then using these values 2) calculate irrigation flowrate and determine its accuracy across a range of renal pelvis pressures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 16 Liter container was filled with deionized water and connected by irrigation tubing to a 9.6Fr single-use ureteroscope. Inflow resistance was determined by plotting flowrate (mass of fluid collected from ureteroscope tip in 60 seconds) versus irrigation pressure (range 0-200 cmH2O). Next, the tip of the ureteroscope was inserted into the renal pelvis of a silicone kidney-ureter model and renal pelvis pressure was measured. In conjunction with the previously determined inflow resistance and known irrigation pressure values, flowrate was calculated and compared to experimentally measured values. All trials were performed in triplicate for working channel conditions: empty, 200µm laser fiber, 365µm laser fiber, and 1.9Fr stone basket.

RESULTS

Flowrate was linearly dependent on irrigation pressure for each working channel condition. Inflow resistance was determined to be 5.0 cmH2O/(ml/min) with the 200µm laser fiber in the working channel and calculated flowrates were within 1 ml/min of measured flowrates. Similar results were seen with a 365µm laser fiber, and 1.9Fr basket.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilizing renal pelvis pressure measurements, flowrate was accurately calculated across a range of working channel conditions and irrigation pressures. Incorporation of this methodology into future ureteroscopic systems that measure intrarenal pressure, could provide a real-time readout of flowrate for the urologist and thereby enhance safety and efficiency of laser lithotripsy.

The Impact of One Week of Pre-stenting on Porcine Ureteral Luminal Circumference

OBJECTIVES

Larger ureteral access sheaths (UAS) have the potential to improve ureteroscopic stone removal outcomes, but are often avoided by surgeons due to concerns of ureteral injury. Using our novel UAS force sensor and previously defined force thresholds for ureteral injury, we sought to evaluate the impact of one week of stenting on the maximum safe dilation of ureteral luminal circumference.

METHODS

Twelve juvenile female Yorkshire pigs (24 ureters) were evaluated. The inner (i.e. luminal) circumference of each ureter was determined using Cook urethral dilators ranging from 8-24Fr in 2Fr increments, 37cm in length. Each dilator was sequentially passed while applying the UAS force sensor to measure insertion force before and after one week of stent placement. Each ureter was randomized to receive either a 4.7Fr or 7.0Fr stent (20cm). Maximum ureteral luminal circumference was defined as successful passage of the dilator to the ureteropelvic junction with <6 newtons (N) of force (the force threshold previously defined by porcine and clinical studies to avoid ureteral damage). Following passage of the largest dilator at 6N, flexible ureteroscopy was performed and a post-ureteroscopic lesion score (PULS) was recorded.

RESULTS

After one week of stent placement, the median ureteral luminal circumference increased to 15Fr representing a mean increase of 3.8Fr + 2.8 (p<0.001). Twenty-one (88%) of the pre-stented ureters had an increase in luminal circumference, with 12 ureters (50%) dilated to >16Fr (p=0.032), six ureters (25%) dilated to >18Fr, and in two cases a maximum size of 24Fr was recorded. The PULS grade was < 2 in all cases, indicating no high grade ureteral injuries. Laterality and stent size did not impact ureteral luminal circumference after pre-stenting (p=0.232 and p=0.337, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

One week of ureteral stenting resulted in nearly a 4Fr increase in the luminal circumference of porcine ureters.

The Life and Death of Percutaneous Stone Removal: "Looking Back-Looking Forward"

Although percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is less morbid than open surgery, it still carries risks of significant complications as well as injury to the renal parenchyma. Flexible ureteroscopic stone removal, although causes no appreciable damage to the renal parenchyma, has limitations, most notably, a lower stone-free rate than PCNL. Advances in our knowledge regarding ureteral physiology combined with technical developments applied to ureteral access sheath deployment and size may well propel retrograde intrarenal surgery to the forefront of kidney stone removal, regardless of stone size or location.

Role of Intrarenal Pressure in Modern Day Endourology (Mini-PCNL and Flexible URS): a Systematic Review of Literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the latest evidence about intrarenal pressures (IRPs) generated during flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) and mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) and present tools and techniques to maintain decreased values.

RECENT FINDING

fURS and PCNL constitute the primary means of stone treatment. New flexible ureterorenoscopes with small diameter and miniaturized PCNL instruments achieve optimal stone-free rates (SFRs) while decreasing invasiveness and morbidity. Nevertheless, endourologists must remain cognizant regarding the dangers of increased IRPs to avoid complications. Current research presents essential information for urologists regarding this topic. During fURS, using a ureteral access sheath (UAS), we avoid extremely high IRPs with all irrigation types. During mPCNL, pressure remains low, mainly using the purging effect or a vacuum-assisted sheath. Devices of intraoperative IRP measurement and intelligent pressure control have proven their feasibility, accuracy and efficacy. These will have an increasing role to play in the future management of stone disease.