Floating docking technique: a simple modification to improve the working space of the instruments during single-port robotic surgery

Single-port robotic extraperitoneal pediatric pyeloplasty using low anterior access: Description of technique and initial experience

INTRODUCTION

We aim to report our surgical technique, functional and radiological outcomes of single port (SP) extraperitoneal robotic pediatric pyeloplasty through a low anterior (3 cm) access using a da-Vinci single-port (SP) robotic surgical system in the pediatric population.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We present our initial series of 6 pediatric patients that underwent robotic SP extraperitoneal pyeloplasty between 2022 and 2023. Patient clinicopathologic variables and perioperative outcomes were collected prospectively.

RESULTS

All cases of SP extraperitoneal pyeloplasty were completed without any intraoperative complications or conversion to an open, laparoscopic, or multi-port robotic pyeloplasty. Total operative times including cystoscopy ranged from 178 min to 240 min. All patients tolerated the surgery with minimal postsurgical pain and no narcotic requirement. No intraoperative or immediate postoperative complications were recorded in the cohort. There were no readmissions after discharge at a median follow-up of 12 months (6-18 months) in our series.

CONCLUSIONS

Single port extraperitoneal pyeloplasty is a safe and feasible option for upper tract reconstruction in pediatric patients. All patients had complete resolution of symptoms and improvement of hydronephrosis on follow-up imaging.

Single-port Transvesical Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy: Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Surgical management of large prostatic adenomas can be performed via open, endoscopic, or robotic approaches. A low-profile single-port (SP) robot was built to work in confined areas (ie, the bladder) and regionalize surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the novel SP transvesical (TV) robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) and report clinical outcomes.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

SP TV RASP cases were performed in an academic hospital by two surgeons from 2019 to 2023. A total of 117 cases were performed, and data from patients with at least 12 mo of follow-up were analyzed. The inclusion criterion was severe obstructive urinary symptoms or catheter-dependent urinary retention due to large prostates with volume >80 ml.

SURGICAL PROCEDURE

The procedure consisted of two main steps through a single 3-cm suprapubic incision: first, enucleation of the adenoma, and second, a 360° bladder mucosal flap reconstruction. No drains or continuous bladder irrigation was used routinely.

MEASUREMENTS

Intraoperative parameters, pre- and postoperative uroflowmetry, and 1-yr clinical outcomes were assessed. We used descriptive statistics to analyze the data.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

All procedures were completed successfully without additional ports or conversions. The median console time and estimated blood loss were 107 min and 100 ml, respectively. Transfusion rate was 0%. Intraoperative complications included two suspected air emboli attributed to high insufflation pressures. There were no major postoperative complications. In total, 95.8% were discharged within the first 24 h, with a median length of stay and pain score of 5 h and 3/10, respectively. There was persistent improvement in the median International Prostate Symptom Score and flow rate after 1 yr. The median Sexual Score Inventory for Men score was 20 at 12 mo. Our study is limited by its retrospective nature and cohort size.

CONCLUSIONS

SP TV RASP is a feasible alternative for the management of severe benign prostatic hyperplasia that promotes fast recovery and demonstrates 1-yr improvement in urinary function.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Single-port transvesical robot-assisted simple prostatectomy is a minimally invasive alternative for the treatment of large benign prostatic growth. A single robotic arm goes through a small incision in the skin and bladder to extract the obstructive prostatic tissue. Afterward, reconstruction of the area is done to decrease bleeding and improve postoperative symptoms. We found that patients recover quickly and have excellent clinical results with a low risk of complications.

Low anterolateral incision for single-port extraperitoneal robot-assisted pyeloplasty: description of technique and initial experience

PURPOSE

This study aims to describe the surgical steps for the single-port low anterolateral extraperitoneal approach to pyeloplasty, report its feasibility, and share the initial outcomes of our experience.

METHODS

We analyzed all consecutive patients who underwent single-port low anterolateral extraperitoneal pyeloplasty due to ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). The surgical steps included a pure single-port approach through a 3.5 cm low anterolateral incision two fingerbreadths above the superior pubic ramus. The ureter was localized and followed cranially, a dismembered pyeloplasty was performed, and a running ureteropelvic anastomosis was completed. No drains were placed. The urinary catheter was removed upon discharge, and the ureteral stent after 3-5 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of eight cases (two adults and six children) were completed successfully, without complications or conversions. Median operative time, console time, and estimated blood loss were 208.5 min, 114.5 min, and 10.0 ml, respectively. All patients were discharged within 24 h, except for one that required urinary output observation due to retention. There were no major postoperative complications. The median pain score at discharge was 0/10. Only one patient was prescribed PRN opioids at discharge. The readmission rate was 0.0%. All patients were asymptomatic on their last follow-up with no definitive obstruction on imaging, and no requirement for additional procedures or stents.

CONCLUSION

Single-port low anterolateral extraperitoneal pyeloplasty is a feasible alternative for surgical treatment of UPJO in adult and pediatric patients with improved recovery outcomes.

Single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE

To provide a comprehensive update on the different techniques and outcomes of contemporary Single-Port (SP) Robotic Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) approaches.

METHODS

A literature review was performed to identify cohort studies that have utilized the purpose-built SP robotic platform (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, California) for RARP. All published approaches of SP-RARP were included in our review. Baseline clinical, perioperative, and postoperative oncological and functional outcomes were collected from the included studies.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies involving 1159 patients were identified. To date, five approaches of SP-RARP have been described, namely Transperitoneal, Extraperitoneal, Retzius-Sparing, Transperineal, and Transvesical. The surgical steps and clinical outcomes of the aforementioned approaches were discussed. While operating times were still faster in the Transperitoneal and Extraperitoneal cohorts, the novel and more regionalized Transvesical approach allowed for radical prostatectomy to be pursued in more patients with previous abdominal surgeries and contributed to significantly improved postoperative outcomes, including the earlier return of urinary continence and with most patients being discharged on the same day without any opioids.

CONCLUSION

Based on the existing literature, the introduction of SP-RARP not only enriched the repertoire of minimally-invasive surgical treatment options for prostate cancer but also provided the opportunity for urologists to develop new techniques that can improve perioperative outcomes and postoperative quality of life. Given the limited number of patients and heterogeneity in the patient selection and reporting of postoperative outcomes, further research remains necessary to better understand the different benefits and improve patient selection algorithms for the different techniques.

Implementation of single-port robotic urologic surgery: experience at a large academic center

The Single-Port (SP) robotic system is increasingly being implemented in the United States, allowing for several minimally invasive urologic procedures to be performed. The present study aims to describe our single-center experience since the adoption of the SP platform. We retrospectively collected and analyzed consecutive SP cases performed at a major teaching hospital in the Midwest (Rush University Medical Center) from December 2020 to December 2023. Demographic variables were collected. Surgical and pathological outcomes were analyzed in the overall cohort and for each type of procedure. The study timeframe was divided into two periods to assess the evolution of SP technical features over time. In total, 160 procedures were performed, with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) being the most common (49.4%). Overall, 54.4% of the procedures were extraperitoneal, with a significantly higher adoption of this approach in the second half of the study period (30% vs 74.3%, p < 0.001). A "plus one" assistant port was adopted in 38.1% of cases, with a shift towards a "pure" single-port surgery in the most recent procedures (21.1% vs 76.7%, p < 0.001). The median LOS was 33.5 h (30-48), with a rate of any grade and CD ≥ 3 postoperative complications of 9.4% and 2.5%, respectively, and a 30-day readmission rate of 1.9%. SP robotic surgery can be safely and effectively implemented for various urologic procedures. With increasing experience, the SP platform allows shifting away from transperitoneal procedures, potentially minimizing postoperative pain, and shortening hospital stay and postoperative recovery.

Single-Port Robotic Radical Prostatectomy Using Transvesical and Transperineal Access in Patients with a Hostile Abdomen

Introduction: Prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment is challenging in surgically complex patients. Radical prostatectomy can be performed without peritoneal entry using novel single-port (SP) transperineal (TP) and transvesical (TV) approaches. We sought to examine the outcomes of radical prostatectomy using novel TP and TV approaches in patients with extensive prior abdominal surgeries. Materials and Methods: From 2019 to 2023, 51 patients with extensive prior abdominal surgeries were identified who underwent TP (18) and SP TV (33) robotic radical prostatectomy. Indications included history of various surgeries with open laparotomy, including J-pouch reconstruction (22, 43%), active stoma (14, 27%), and open bowel resection (9, 18%). In all patients, 12/51 (24%) had a history of incisional hernia repair with mesh. A retrospective analysis was performed. Results: All cases were completed without open conversion, bowel injuries, or blood transfusions. Length of stay was 5.6 hours for TV and 22 hours for TP. No opioids were prescribed in 91% of TV vs 56% of TP. One intraoperative complication (ureteral injury) occurred in a patient undergoing the TP approach. Postoperative complications were noted in 14/51 (27%), including 10/18 (56%) TP vs 4/33 (12%) TV. High-grade complications (Clavien 3) occurred in three patients (6%, all TP). Pathologic staging showed pT3 in 26/51 (17 TV vs 9 TP), while the remainder were pT2. Biochemical recurrences were noted in four patients (8%, three TV and one TP). Immediate continence was noted in 30% of TV patients. Long-term continence after 12 months was 92% in TV and 67% in TP. Conclusions: In patients with extensive prior abdominal surgeries, radical prostatectomy is feasible using a TP or TV approach. No bowel injuries or open conversion were observed. The SP TV approach offers advantages of shorter hospital stay, shorter catheter duration, less opioid use, fewer complications, and improved continence recovery.

Surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: Thulium enucleation versus single-port transvesical robotic simple prostatectomy

Objective

The objective of this work is to compare our outcomes using thulium laser enucleation of prostate (ThuLEP) to the single-port robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (SP RASP) in the surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2017 through December 2021 of men who underwent SP RASP and ThuLEP performed by a single surgeon with an enucleation experience of >300 cases and extensive robotic experience. The primary outcome was changed in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were operative time, length of stay (LOS), change in post-void residuals (PVR), de novo stress- or urge-urinary incontinence (SUI, UUI), and rate of complications.

Results

One hundred two patients underwent surgery during the study period: 33 RASP and 69 ThuLEP. There was no difference in preoperative characteristics, including age and body mass index, between both groups. Changes in IPSS scores postoperatively were not significant between SP RASP versus ThuLEP (-17 vs. -14, p = 0.2956). SP RASP had a longer operative time (180 vs. 90 min, p < 0.0001). There was no difference in LOS (0 vs. 0 days, p = 0.2904). There was no difference in change in PVR (-96 vs. -91 mL, p = 0.8504). SP RASP patients had significantly less postoperative SUI than ThuLEP (0 vs. 13 patients, p = 0.0083), while there was no difference in UUI between both groups (4 vs. 2 patients, p = 0.0843). There was no difference in 30-day complication rate (21.2% vs. 21.7%, p = 0.9517), although there were three ThuLEP patients with Clavien-Dindo Class III or higher complication.

Conclusions

There was no difference in change in IPSS scores between the two groups. ThuLEP is associated with shorter postoperative catheter days and decreased operative times. Hospital LOS was equivalent. SP RASP demonstrates significantly improved continence rates. Though SP RASP is within the initial learning curve at our institution, early results demonstrate the role for this modality alongside ThuLEP in the treatment of large gland BPH.

Upper Urinary Tract Surgery Through Robotic Single-Port System Vs Multiport and Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Systems: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose: We aimed to make a general comparison between the safety and feasibility of a novel robotic platform, da Vinci^® single-port (SP) system with conventional robotic multiport (MP) and laparoendoscopic single-site systems (da Vinci Xi or Si) in three upper urinary tract procedures including robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), robot-assisted pyeloplasty (RAP), and robot-assisted adrenalectomy (RA). Materials and Methods: After systematical searching of the literature up to October 2022 in PubMed^®, Web of Science™, and the Cochrane Library and Scopus^® databases, we extracted and processed the data in eligible literature for operative time, warm ischemia time (WIT), morphine milligram equivalent (MME), postoperative complications, and positive surgical margins (PSMs). Results: A total of 752 patients who underwent robotic surgery for SP or MP from 11 articles were included in this meta-analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in operative time for either RAPN (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.30 to 0.03) or RA (SMD -0.51, 95% CI -1.08 to 0.06). However, for RAP, SP can save operation time (SMD -0.73, 95% CI -1.24 to -0.22). The introduction of SP did not increase complications to any degree, including total complication (risk ratio [RR] 0.89, 95% CI 0.52-1.53), minor complication (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.13-1.36), and major complication (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.34-2.09), nor the incidence of PSMs (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.54-1.99). It is worth noting that although the SP system increased WIT (SMD 0.44, 95% CI 0.26-0.62), it had the benefit of reducing intraoperative pain for RAPN with regard of MME (SMD -0.40, 95% CI -0.71 to -0.09). Conclusions: In terms of postoperative pain, SP robotic surgery is beneficial for RAPN but will make WIT prolonged. RAP is probably the most suitable upper urinary tract procedure for which SP is an option, which helps to shorten the surgery time and achieve a minimally invasive wound at the same time. Our study has been registered in PROSPERO (Registration No.: CRD42022350317).

A Propensity-Matched Comparison of the Perioperative Outcomes Between Single-Port and Multi-Port Robotic Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Report from the Single Port Advanced Research Consortium (SPARC)

Purpose: Single-port (SP) robotic surgery is a new technology and early in its adoption curve. The goal of this study is to compare the perioperative outcomes of SP to multi-port (MP) robotic technology for partial nephrectomy. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective cohort study of patients who have undergone robot-assisted partial nephrectomy using SP and MP technology. Baseline demographic, clinical, and tumor-specific characteristics and perioperative outcomes were compared using χ², t-test, and Mann-Whitney U test in the overall cohort and in a 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort, adjusting for baseline characteristics. Results: After propensity matching, 146 SP patients were matched with 146 MP patients. SP and MP groups had similar mean age (58 ± 12 years vs 59 ± 12 years; p = 0.606) and proportion of men (54.11% vs 52.05%; p = 0.725). The SP had a longer mean ischemia (18.29 ± 10.49 minutes vs 13.79 ± 6.29 minutes; p < 0.001). Estimated blood loss (EBL) and length of hospital stay (LOS), operative time, positive margin rate, and any complication rate were similar between the two groups. Conclusions: SP partial nephrectomy had a longer ischemia time, and a comparable LOS, EBL, operative time, positive margin rates, and complication rates to MP. These early data are encouraging. However, the role of SP requires further study and should evaluate safety and long-term data when compared with the standard MP technique.

Contemporary techniques of da Vinci SP radical prostatectomy: multicentric collaboration and expert opinion

Background

The da Vinci SP robot consists of an innovative single port trocar that houses a flexible camera and three biarticulated arms, which minimizes the number of incisions to assess the surgical site, allowing a less invasive procedure. However, due to its recent release in the market, the current literature reporting SP-RARP is still restricted to a few centers. In this scenario, after performing a literature search with all available techniques of SP-RARP, our objective is to report a multicentric opinion of referral centers on different techniques to approach SP-RARP.

Results

The SP literature is provided by only a few centers due to the limited number of this new console in the market. Five different approaches are available: transperitoneal, extraperitoneal, Retzius-Sparing, transperineal and transvesical. None of the current studies describe long-term functional or oncological outcomes. However, all approaches had satisfactory operative performance with minimum complication rates.

Conclusions

Several techniques of SP-RARP have been reported in the literature. We performed a multicentric collaboration describing and illustrating the most challenging steps of this surgery. We believe that the details provided in this article are useful teaching material for new centers willing to adopt the SP technology.

A Transition Towards A Faster Recovery in Single-Port Transvesical Simple Prostatectomy

Objectives To present the updated technique and evaluate the perioperative and postoperative outcomes of Single-port transvesical simple prostatectomy (SP TVSP) Patients and methods Forty-two consecutive patients with BPH indicated for surgery underwent SP TVSP in a single institution. Through direct suprapubic bladder access, the single-port (SP) robot was docked. Prostatic enucleation was performed using the prostatic capsule as a landmark. Then a complete vesicourethral mucosal advancement flap was accomplished. Demographics, perioperative and postoperative data were prospectively collected. Mean follow-up period was 12 months. Results All procedures were successfully performed with no conversion, additional port placement or intraoperative complication. The median prostatic volume was 170cc. 95% of the patients did not require opioids analgesia after discharge. Excluding planned admissions, 92% (21/23 patients) were discharged after a median (IQR) of 4.6 (4.1-5.7) hours after the surgery. The median Foley catheter duration for all cohort was 7 days, decreased to 3 days after technique adjustment for the last 19 consecutive patients. The median IPSS score decreased from 23 before the surgery to 2.5 after the surgery. All patients had a significant postoperative improvement in maximum flow rate with a 200% improvement over baseline (19 vs. 6.5 mL/sec). Conclusion In our initial series, SP TVSP allows for favorable perioperative and early postoperative outcomes including low complication same-day discharge, short Foley catheter stay, minimal opioids use and quick recovery.

The performance and optimum cutoff value for pelvic cavity index as a predictor of early continence after extraperitoneal single-port robotic radical prostatectomy: Role of pelvic anatomical characteristics

PURPOSE

To assess the value of pelvic cavity index (PCI), as an objective pelvimetry feature, to predict operative time, margin status and early urine continence after extraperitoneal single-port robotic radical prostatectomy (RP). We sought to define an optimal cutoff point for PCI in predicting postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

Data on 94 patients who underwent extraperitoneal single-port robotic RP and had preoperative cross-sectional imaging were enrolled. PCI was calculated as (Pelvic inlet diameter×Pelvic outlet diameter)/(Pelvic depth). The predictive value of PCI on operative time, surgical margin status and 3-month urinary continence recovery was assessed using regression models. To report the optimum cutoff value, on ROC analysis, we calculated the performance of PCI cutoff points ranging from 5.56 to 10.80 cm by every 0.01 increment.

RESULTS

No significant associations were noted between clinical characteristics (including PCI) and operative time. Similarly, other than pathological stage, no clinical variables (including PCI) were predictive of positive surgical margin. However, a higher PCI was associated with a significantly higher rates of continence 3-month after surgery (OR 2.44 (1.75 - 5.33); p= 0.01). On ROC- analysis, a PCI cutoff value=8.21 cm yielded the best accuracy (AUC= 0.733, %95 CI 0.615-0.851; p=0.001). No association was noted between variables and 6-month continence rate.

CONCLUSION

Using a single-port robotic system, operative time, positive surgical margin rate and long-term continence after prostatectomy would be independent of bony pelvis cavity. However, a higher PCI is associated with a higher rate of early continence after the surgery. PCI at a cutoff of 8.21 cm has the optimum performance to predict postoperative urine continence recovery. If validated, this information may be helpful regarding patient counseling before single-port robotic RP.

Robotic Single-Port Donor Nephrectomy with the da Vinci SP® Surgical System

Objectives

The da Vinci SP® Surgical System received U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for urological procedures in 2018. Here, we describe the first experience performing single-port robot-assisted donor nephrectomy (RADN) using the da Vinci SP® surgical system, present 90-day clinical outcomes, and discuss tips for operative success.

Methods

Seven consecutive patients underwent single-port RADN at a single institution between September 1, 2020 and March 31, 2021. Surgery was performed through a single, 60 mm Pfannenstiel incision with a 12 mm periumbilical assistant port for suction and vascular stapling. Donor characteristics, operative details, 90-day donor clinical outcomes, and recipient renal function were retrospectively evaluated.

Results

Four female and three male patients successfully underwent single-port RADN without conversion to standard multiport or open approach. Six cases were left-sided. Estimated blood loss for each procedure was ≤ 50 mL. Mean operative time, warm ischemia time, and extraction time were 218.3 minutes (standard deviation [SD]: 16.3 minutes), 5 minutes 4 seconds (SD: 56 seconds), and 3 minutes 37 seconds (SD: 38 seconds). Mean pre-operative creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate were 0.79 mg/dL and 107.3 mL/min/1.73m², respectively. At six week's follow up, they were 1.22 mg/dL and 66.1 mL/min/1.73m². Average pain score at 48 hours postoperatively was 1.7/10. There were no Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III complications within 90 days. All recipients experienced immediate and sustained return of renal function post-transplant.

Conclusion

Single-port RADN is a technically feasible and safe procedure with the da Vinci SP® system and can confer acceptable functional and cosmetic outcomes. Future studies are needed to define long-term outcomes and compare with previously established techniques for donor nephrectomy.

Robotic-assisted genitourinary reconstruction: current state and future directions

With the widespread dissemination of robotic surgical platforms, pathology previously deemed insurmountable or challenging has been treated with reliable and replicable outcomes. The advantages of precise articulation for dissection and suturing, tremor reduction, three-dimensional magnified visualization, and minimally invasive trocar sites have allowed for the management of such diverse disease as recurrent or refractory bladder neck stenoses, and radiation-induced ureteral strictures, with excellent perioperative and functional outcomes. Intraoperative adjuncts such as near-infrared imaging aid in identification and preservation of healthy tissue. More recent developments include robotics via the single port platform, gender-affirming surgery, and multidisciplinary approaches to complex pelvic reconstruction. Here, we review the recent literature comprising developments in robotic-assisted genitourinary reconstruction, with a view towards emerging technologies and future trends in techniques.

Single Port Donor Nephrectomy Via Modified Pfannenstiel Incision: Initial Preclinical Experience in A Cadaveric Model and Description of Technique

OBJECTIVE

To describe the surgical technique for the single port (SP) transperitoneal donor nephrectomy through a modified Pfannenstiel incision using the da Vinci SP surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) on a cadaver.

PATIENTS & METHODS

In a male cadaver, the SP surgical system was used to perform transperitoneal donor nephrectomy. A 3 cm modified Pfannenstiel incision was made. Through the incision GelPOINT mini (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA) was inserted. The floating docking technique was used. Through the gel port, the dedicated 25 mm multichannel port and a 12 mm assistant port were introduced. The surgical steps for donor nephrectomy were performed in the following order. 1) Mobilization of the colon, 2) Identification of psoas muscle, ureter, and the gonadal vein, 3) hilum dissection, 4) perirenal dissection, 5) stapling the renal artery and renal vein, 6) removal of the kidney through the enlarged incision.

RESULTS

Transperitoneal SP donor nephrectomy was completed without any complications or capsulotomy. Additional ports were not needed. The total operative time was 63 minutes and 54 seconds. A good-quality kidney was harvested. Renal artery length was 4 cm.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated the feasibility of single-port transperitoneal donor nephrectomy via modified Pfannenstiel incision, using the novel SP robotic platform. Further assessment is necessary in a clinical setting.

Predictive factors of postoperative complications and hospital readmission after implementation of the single-port robotic platform: A single-center and single-surgeon experience

OBJECTIVES

To measure the incidence, and identify potential risk factors of conversion, postoperative complication and readmission for patients treated with urological robotic single-port surgery.

METHODS

All consecutive urological surgery procedures carried out with the single-port robotic platform by the same surgeon in a single institution between September 2018 and March 2020 were included in this retrospective analysis. Demographic data, main perioperative outcomes and information related to the surgical technique were gathered and analyzed. A logistic regression model was used to assess predictive factors for any grade and high-grade (e.g. Clavien grade ≥3) postoperative complications, as well as predictive factors for readmission.

RESULTS

Analysis included 221 patients, of whom 194 (88%) underwent pelvic surgery and 27 (12.2%) underwent upper urinary tract surgery. Only one patient was converted to open surgery in the entire cohort. A total of 40 patients (18.1%) experienced postoperative complications, with grade ≥3 postoperative complications in 7.6% of the entire cohort. On multivariable analysis, the factors significantly associated with the risk of postoperative complication of any grade were diabetes (P < 0.001), perineal approach (P < 0.01) and postoperative pain management with opioids (P = 0.01). Only diabetes (P = 0.03) predicted a grade ≥3 complication. Overall, 17 patients (7.7%) were readmitted during the 3 months after surgery. A body mass index >30 kg/m² was the only identified predictor of readmission (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

A wide range of pelvic, extraperitoneal and upper-tract urological procedures can be carried out using the robotic single-port platform with a minimal conversion rate and low complication or readmission rate.

Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using Single-port Perineal Approach: Technique and Single-surgeon Matched-paired Comparative Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Radical perineal prostatectomy (RPP) has been revived with the advent of single-port (SP) robotic surgery. However, its interest and precise role need to be evaluated and better defined.

OBJECTIVE

To describe in detail the technique of SP-RPP and compare initial perioperative outcomes with those of multiport robot-assisted transperitoneal radical prostatectomy (MP-RARP).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

From October 2018 to June 2020, perioperative data of 26 consecutive patients who underwent SP-RPP for localized prostate cancer (PCa) in a single institution were prospectively entered into an institutional review board-approved database. Data of 86 consecutive patients treated from September 2017 to September 2018 with MP-RARP by the same surgeon, before the beginning of the SP experience, were used as comparators.

SURGICAL PROCEDURE

SP-RPP was performed using the SP robotic platform (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) according to the technique described in the supplementary video.

MEASUREMENTS

Demographics, and intra- and postoperative data were analyzed in a matched-paired design with a 1:1 ratio on the following factors: age at surgery, prostate-specific antigen level, preoperative Gleason score, and history of abdominal surgery.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

After matching, baseline characteristics were comparable except for the rate of prior laparotomy, which was higher in the SP-RPP group (52% vs 8%, p < 0.001). In the SP-RPP group, 84% of the patients had a high risk and an unfavorable intermediate risk of positive surgical margins (PSMs) versus 57% in the MP-RARP group (p = 0.03). While the rate of nonlimited PSMs (ie, >3 mm) was higher in the SP-RPP group (38.5% vs 7.7%, p < 0.01), the number of patients with biochemical recurrence at 1 yr was comparable between SP-RPP and MP-RARP (1 vs 3, p = 0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

SP-RPP is a complex procedure for patients with a complex surgical history and high-risk localized PCa with limited alternative therapeutic options.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Our study suggests that patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer and limited treatment options due to a complex abdominal surgical history (ie, frozen pelvis) may be suitable candidates for single-port radical perineal prostatectomy.