Reasons to overthrow TURP: bring on Aquablation

[Benign prostatic hyperplasia]

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a histopathologic definition associated with enlargement of the prostate gland that causes obstruction of the lower urinary tract and manifests clinically with characteristic symptoms that are what bring patients for consultation. Urinary tract symptoms are common, especially in an increasingly aging population. Diagnosis and the decision on when and how to treat depend on the patient's quality of life and objective clinical parameters. An individualized, risk-based approach is necessary to guide conservative, pharmacologic, or surgical treatment.

Ablative minimally invasive surgical therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia: A review of Aquablation, Rezum, and transperineal laser prostate ablation

INTRODUCTION

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is one of the most common diseases affecting men and can present with bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Historically, transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has been considered the gold standard in the treatment of LUTS due to BPH. However, TURP and other traditional options for the surgical management of LUTS secondary to BPH are associated with high rates of sexual dysfunction. In the past decade, several novel technologies, including Aquablation therapy, convective water vapor therapy (Rezum), and transperineal prostate laser ablation (TPLA), have demonstrated promising evidence to be safe and effective while preserving sexual function.

METHODS

In this review, we discuss three ablative minimally invasive surgeries: Aquablation, Rezum, and TPLA. We review their techniques, safety, as well as perioperative and functional outcomes. We go into further detail regarding sexual function after these ablative minimally invasive surgical therapies.

RESULTS

Aquablation is a surgeon-guided, robot-executed, heat-free ablative waterjet procedure with sustained functional outcomes at 5 years while having no effect on sexual activity. Rezum is an innovative office-based, minimally invasive surgical option for BPH that delivers convective water vapor energy into prostate adenoma to ablate obstructing tissue. Rezum leads to significant improvements in Qmax, IPSS while preserving sexual function. TPLA is another office-based technology which uses a diode laser source to produce thermoablation. It leads to improvement in Qmax, IPSS, and QoL while preserving ejaculatory function.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, ablative minimally invasive surgical therapies have demonstrated excellent safety and efficacy profiles while preserving sexual function. These modalities should be discussed with patients to ensure informed and shared decision-making. Ablative minimally invasive surgical therapies may be particularly interesting to patients who value the preservation of their sexual function.

Aquablation in Patients on Antithrombotics: Assessment of Safety, Postoperative Bleeding Rates and Clinical Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the impact of perioperative antithrombotic use on the bleeding outcomes following Aquablation.

METHODS

One hundred sixteen men with who underwent Aquablation as part of the WATER prospective trial (NCT02505919) were assigned to 2 groups based on perioperative antithrombotic status. Antithrombotic cessation and restart timing were based on the surgeon's discretion. Methods of achieving intraoperative hemostasis consisted of no-cautery balloon tamponade or cautery. Primary endpoints included immediate postoperative hematuria rates and changes in hemoglobin. Secondary endpoints included 90-day bleeding complications and nonbleeding postoperative adverse events.

RESULTS

Forty-one men took antithrombotic medications in the perioperative period while 75 men had no antithrombotic medication. Preoperative hemoglobin levels were comparable between both groups. Postoperative hemoglobin change from baseline (drop of 1.8 ± 1.5 g/dL among the antithrombotic group vs 1.8 ± 1.7 g/dL among the antithrombotic-naïve group) did not differ between both groups (P = .896). In total, 4 (9.8%) men in the antithrombotic group and 4 (5.3%) patients in the antithrombotic-naïve group experienced a Clavien-Dindo grade 1 complication (P = .451) in the 3-month postoperative period. Eight (19.5%) patients in the antithrombotic group and 11 (14.7%) patients in the antithrombotic-naïve group experienced a Clavien-Dindo grade 2 complication (P = .601), none of which is associated with bleeding in both groups. No men in either group demonstrated de novo erectile dysfunction. One patient (2.4%) in the antithrombotic group and none in the antithrombotic-naïve group required blood products (P = .353).

CONCLUSION

Aquablation demonstrates comparable postoperative bleeding outcomes and other adverse effects for men with benign prostatic hypertrophy who are on antithrombotic therapy.

Functional and surgical outcomes of Aquablation in elderly men

PURPOSE

As benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is an age-related process, growing interest in surgical management for elderly men has emerged. Recently, Aquablation was approved for treatment of BPH associated lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and utilizes robotic ultrasound guided surgeon-controlled waterjet ablation. We assessed the differences in functional and surgical outcomes between elderly and young men undergoing Aquablation for BPH/LUTS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively assessed prospectively collected data from the WATER I (NCT02505919) and WATER II (NCT03123250) clinical trials reporting safety and efficacy of Aquablation in the treatment of LUTS/BPH in men 45-80 years with a prostate between 30 and 80 cc, and 80 cc and 150 cc, respectively. Men ≥ 65 years were defined as elderly and men < 65 years as young.

RESULTS

Of 217 patients included, 83 (38.2%) were young and 134 (61.8%) were elderly. Mean age (SD) was 59.3 (± 3.4) years and 71.2 (± 4.2) years for young and elderly men, respectively. At 3 years of follow-up compared to baseline, elderly men showed similar reductions in total IPSS (7.68 points vs 7.12 points, p > 0.05) and similar increases in Qmax (20.6 mL/s vs 19.3 mL/s, p > 0.05) compared to young men. The ejaculatory dysfunction rate was similar for both cohorts (12.0% vs 9.7%, p > 0.05). Elderly men experienced similar annual retreatment rates compared to young men (1.5% vs 0.8% p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly men undergoing Aquablation have similar functional and surgical outcomes as young men. Elderly patient BPH surgical counseling should, therefore, consider Aquablation as a treatment option for LUTS/BPH.

Learning curve in aquablation: an international multicenter study

OBJECTIVES

To describe and analyze the learning curve (LC) of aquablation for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction and determine the number of cases needed to achieve acceptable surgical safety, efficiency, and efficacy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained aquablation databases from France, Lebanon, and Spain was conducted. The combined LC of three surgeons was defined by trifecta and pentafecta outcomes. Trifecta reflected efficiency and safety: operative time < 60 min, hemoglobin reduction ≤ 2 mg/dL, and no 90 day Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 2 complications. Pentafecta reflected effectiveness: percent reduction in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and ejaculation preservation. The combined LC was plotted using a moving average with polynomial fitting.

RESULTS

The cohort included 175 consecutive patients. Median (IQR) prostate volume was 70 (50-91) cc, and baseline IPSS was 23 (18-27). The achievement of trifecta exceeded 50% after 4 cases, and 70% after 50 cases. Pentafecta achievement exceeded 50% after 38 cases. Logistic regression showed significant improvement in hemoglobin reduction and ejaculation preservation. Grade ≥ 2 complication was not affected by experience, and neither was 3 month %IPSS reduction as 94% of patients showed ≥ 50% symptoms' improvement.

CONCLUSION

Aquablation is associated with a quick learning curve for the defined trifecta and pentafecta outcomes. It provided effective LUTS relief and low complication rates independent of surgeon experience. Hemoglobin drop and ejaculatory function preservation were the two factors influenced by the surgeons' LC. Training to reduce operative time, standardization of hemostasis techniques, and early assistance to improve veru-protection zone planning are keys to quicker learning.

Aquablation versus holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in medium-to-large-sized prostates (ATHLETE): protocol of a prospective randomised trial

INTRODUCTION

A novel method for the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) called Aquablation has become commercially available. Previous studies have been able to show similar functional results when compared with transurethral resection of the prostate and a high efficacy has been demonstrated when this approach is applied to patients with a prostate size of 80-150 cm³.Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is a well-established procedure in the surgical treatment of BPH in prostate glands larger than 30 mL and a first-line therapy in glands over 80 mL. To date, no data are available whether Aquablation is non-inferior compared with HoLEP in the treatment of patients with medium-to-large-sized prostates regarding safety and efficacy.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority clinical trial conducted at a Swiss centre of tertiary care. The primary outcome is assessment of non-inferiority of Aquablation compared with HoLEP in reducing lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic obstruction measured by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Randomisation will be performed using secuTrial, stratifying on age (<70 years, 70+ years) and prostate volume (<100 mL, 100+ mL). Both interventions are performed in an inpatient setting and regular follow-up controls starting 8 weeks after intervention and continuing up to 5 years will be performed. The primary outcome (change in IPSS from baseline to 6 months) will be tested for non-inferiority with a one-sided t-test. Secondary outcomes, such as efficacy parameters, several patient-reported outcome measures, and periprocedural and safety parameters will be described by calculating means or relative frequencies for each treatment group and testing differences with two-sided standard superiority tests.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by the local ethics committee (EKOS 2020-02353). Results of the primary endpoint and each of the secondary endpoints will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04560907).

Ejaculation-sparing versus non-ejaculation-sparing anatomic GreenLight laser enucleo-vaporization of the prostate: first comparative study

PURPOSE

To present the step-by-step description of an ejaculation-sparing anatomic photo-selective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) technique. To report the results of a series of ejaculation-sparing versus non-ejaculation-sparing anatomic PVPs.

METHODS

Sexually active, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients undergoing an anatomic PVP between 11/2018 and 2/2020 were included. Patients were divided into group A (ejaculation-sparing surgery) and group B (control group). Baseline, peri-operative and 6-months follow-up data were evaluated. Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and sexual function were assessed through internationally validated questionnaires. Groups were matched by an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis. Logistic univariable regression analysis was performed to detect predictors of antegrade ejaculation preservation.

RESULTS

Overall, 76 patients were included, among which 15 in group A and 61 in group B. Median (inter-quartile range, IQR) age was 72 (66.5-77) years, median (IQR) prostate volume 63.5 (54.5-98.5) cc. No differences about peri-operative outcomes were detected, included high-grade complications. At 6-months follow-up, no differences in urinary or erectile function were detected between groups, while ejaculation-sparing patients showed better Male Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ) scores [7 (1-13) vs. 1 (1-1), p < 0.001] and higher rates of antegrade ejaculation (60% vs. 13.1%, p < 0.001). The ejaculation-sparing technique was identified as a predictor of post-operative antegrade ejaculation (OR 19.3, CI 95% 7.2-51.2, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The ejaculation-sparing anatomic PVP showed superiority over the control group in post-operative ejaculatory function scores and antegrade ejaculation rates. Besides, preliminary results suggested similar effectiveness in LUTS relief at a short-term follow-up.