Systematic review of the endoscopic enucleation of the prostate learning curve

The early learning curve of the bipolar enucleation of the prostate: a multicenter cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the early learning curve of BipolEP (Bipolar Enucleation of the Prostate).

SUBJECTS/PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, multicenter analysis of surgical and functional outcomes of patients treated with BipolEp for BPO (benign prostatic obstruction). We evaluated the first 20 cases of BipolEp performed by four different surgeons in three different countries. The following baseline parameters were obtained: age, IPSS, indwelling catheter, transrectal measured prostate volume, post void residual volume (PVR) and uroflowmetry. The learning curve was analysed based on perioperative parameters and the influence of perioperative parameters was correlated with the sequence of BipolEp cases.

RESULTS

84 BipolEp operations performed by 4 different surgeons in their early learning curve were studied. Mean prostate volume was 75 ml, 39% of cases had an indwelling catheter and the average operating time was 101 min. Three out of four surgeons performed at least 50% of successful operations according to Trifecta (complete enucleation and morcellation < 90 min., no conversion to TUR-P). Conversion rate to TURP was 11.9% in total which however was driven by a single surgeon with an almost 50% conversion rate. Mean enucleated prostate was 33.3 gr (18-54.5). Intraoperative complications and reported stress incontinence ranged from 0 to 38.1%. At six-weeks review, the IPPS improved by 12.5 (8-16) points and Qmax by 208% (109.8-266.7). Uroflowmetry outcomes correlated with the sequence of cases with a linear improvement during 20 consecutive cases (p = 0.018) in all centres. Major complications (Clavien Dindo ≥ 3) were rare (4.8%) and comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Surgeons starting to learn BipolEp can expect to be able to achieve a linear improvement in Uroflow at the six-week postoperative evaluation after 20 consecutive cases. BipolEp can be successfully performed during the early learning curve with an acceptable rate of conversion to standard TUR-P.

Evaluation of new treatments for benign prostatic obstruction: ICI-RS 2023

AIMS

To address how invasive therapies for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) have been evaluated, what their effect is on BPO, if they can prevent progression to BPO and how new therapies need to be evaluated before implementation into clinical practice.

METHODS

The think tank conducted a literature review and looked at the previous and current American Urological Association, European Association of Urology and the International Consultation on Urological Diseases guidelines to see what procedures have been used to treat BPO. They then assessed whether trials have been conducted before implementation of the procedures and whether they have been compared to a "gold" standard treatment. The use of urodynamics has also been addressed in the think tank in relation the clinical trials as well as terminology.

RESULTS

Guidelines vary in the use of terminology when it comes to BPO with some continuing to use the term benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). There are several procedures for example, TUNA, which have become obsolete although continues to be mentioned in the guidelines until recently. Majority of procedures have been introduced without comparing to "gold" standard treatment and without any long-term data. There continues to be many unknowns with regard to the success of some of the BPO procedures and why some of the adverse events develop.

CONCLUSION

There needs to be more robust long-term clinical trials conducted of new BPO therapies, with men who have both lower urinary tract symptoms and urinary retention, before introduction into clinical practice.

Evaluation of learning curves for contact laser vaporization of the prostate using the 980 nm diode laser for benign prostatic hyperplasia

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the background of patients who underwent contact laser vaporization of the prostate (CVP) surgery and the learning curve of the operators.

METHODS

A total of 207 patients who underwent CVP surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia between August 2018 and March 2023 were included in this study. Patient background, perioperative results, pre- and postoperative urinary flow tests, and complications were collected retrospectively.

RESULTS

We enrolled 12 doctors who were divided into expert (five doctors) and novice (seven doctors) groups based on the number of TURP experiences before CVP. The median patient age was 73 years (51-92 years) and prostate volume was 56 cc (15-190 cc) with no difference between the expert and novice groups. Complications included urinary retention (eight cases), hematuria (four), urinary tract infection (four), intraoperative perforation (two), and postoperative stricture (one). Both cases of intraoperative perforation occurred in the novice group. The expert group had a significantly shorter operative time (38 vs. 66 min) and a higher operative efficacy of prostate volume divided by operative time (1.43 vs. 0.88 cc/min). Postoperatively, IPSS, quality of life scores, and postvoid residual urine volume decreased, and maximal flow rate increased; however, there was no significant difference between the groups. The expert group showed stable operative time and operative efficacy after about five to eight cases, while the novice group showed stable after about 15 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that CVP was safely performed at our hospital, and operators with limited experience in TURP can achieve stable perioperative results.

Evaluation of the learning curve for Thulium fiber laser enucleation of prostate (ThuFLEP): retrospective study of a single-surgeon experience in real-world settings

PURPOSE

To assess the learning curve of Thulium Fiber Laser Enucleation of prostate (ThuFLEP) of a single surgeon inexperienced in laser endoscopic enucleation of prostate (EEP).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all patients with benign prostate hyperplasia undergoing ThuFLEP at our center between January 2022 and August 2023 by one surgeon. Inclusion criteria were International Prostate Symptom Score > 7, prostate volume < 200 g, and maximal urinary flow rate < 15 mL/s. The surgeon was inexperienced in laser EEP and trained by watching educational videos of ThuFLEP before starting to perform the procedure under mentoring during the first 4 cases. Procedural data (enucleation and morcellation efficiency, complications) and functional results up to 3 months were evaluated. Patients were divided into 4 cohorts of 20 consecutive cases to evaluate outcomes evolution throughout time.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 69.9 years (SD 7.8) and mean prostate volume was 89.9 g (SD 25.8). Preoperative functional parameters were comparable between the groups. Mean enucleation efficiency (EE) ratio and morcellation efficiency (ME) ratio reached respectively 0.78 g/min (SD 0.55) and 2.49 g/min (SD 1.03) and both variables significantly increased from group 1 to group 3 (p < 0,001). Perioperative complications remained low throughout the caseload with similar significant 3-month functional improvements between all groups.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to evaluate ThuFLEP learning curve for a single surgeon inexperienced in laser EEP with limited mentoring. Under these real-world conditions, nearly 60 cases were needed to complete the learning curve with a complications rate remaining low throughout the training process.

The long-term learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in the en-bloc technique: a single surgeon series of 500 consecutive cases

PURPOSE

To evaluate perioperative parameters, clinical outcomes, and the learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) of a single surgeon in 500 consecutive cases.

METHODS

Demographic parameters, outcomes, and adverse events were evaluated. The learning curve for HoLEP in en-bloc technique of the first 500 consecutive patients was analyzed in clusters of 100 (clusters 1-5) using the Wilcoxen rank test, Chi² test and Kruskal Wallis test.

RESULTS

Enucleation weight was similar in the clusters 1,2,3, and 5 (62 g, 63 g, 61 g, 61 g), in cluster 4 it was slightly higher at 73 g. There was a significant reduction in operating time from 67 min (cluster 1) to 57 min (cluster 2), 46 min (cluster 3), 53 min (cluster 4), and 43 min (cluster 5), p < 0.001. Enucleation efficiency (g/min) showed a steady increase (1.72, 2.24, 2.79, 2.92 vs. 2.99, p < 0.001). Laser energy efficiency also improved (2.17 vs. 2.12 vs. 1.71 vs. 1.65 vs. 1.55; p < 0.001). There was no measurable learning curve regarding the length of hospital stay (mean 2.5 days), catheterization time (1.9 days), hemoglobin drop (approx. 1 g/dl) or complications (p > 0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

HoLEP using the en-bloc technique is a safe and highly effective method. Over time, a slight but steady learning curve and improvement in operation time, enucleation efficiency and laser energy efficiency were shown even for an experienced surgeon - after 500 cases, still no plateau was reached. There was no measurable learning curve regarding blood loss, complications, length of hospital stay, and catheterization time.

Perioperative Outcomes and Complication Rates in Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Patients After Prior Prostate Biopsy-Does It Really Make a Difference? A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

Introduction: Before holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), many patients have undergone short-term prostate biopsy (PB) to rule out the presence of prostate cancer. The aim of this study is to determine whether a short-term PB before HoLEP has an impact on the perioperative outcomes or complications of HoLEP. Methods: In total, 734 consecutive patients treated with HoLEP at a tertiary care university hospital between January 2021 and July 2023 were retrospectively enrolled. Patients who had PB within 6 months before HoLEP were matched to patients who underwent PB more than 6 months or had no PB before HoLEP using propensity score matching (PSM) based on age, prostate volume (PV), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), preoperative urinary tract infection (UTI), and surgeon. Perioperative parameters, such as operation time (OT), enucleation efficiency (EF), as well as complications according to the Satava classification, the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC), and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) were evaluated. Results: In total, 206 patients were matched. Age, PV, PSA, as well as the presence of a preoperative UTI and surgeons did not differ significantly between both groups after PSM. There were no significant differences in mean OT (75 vs. 81 minutes, p = 0.28) and EF (2.13 vs. 2.13 g/min, p = 0.99). No differences were noted regarding intraoperative (16 vs. 25, p = 0.16) or postoperative complications graded by CDC (p = 0.53) and CCI (p = 0.92). Conclusion: PB within 6 months preoperatively before HoLEP showed no effect on perioperative outcomes or intra- and postoperative complications.

MOSES™ Technology vs Non-Moses Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: A Randomized Controlled Trial From a High-Volume Center

OBJECTIVE

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) management has evolved from transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) to holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). Recent innovation introduces Moses™ technology in holmium lasers, with the Lumenis Pulse™ system.

METHODS

To compare Moses-augmented HoLEP (MoLEP) to non-Moses HoLEP in terms of enucleation efficiency, hemostasis, and applicability in day surgery settings. A single-blind, prospective, parallel randomized controlled trial was conducted in Shanghai, China, from March to December 2022. Ethical approval (SK2020-038) was obtained, and 100 consenting men over 50 with BPH indications were randomized (1:1) into MoLEP and HoLEP groups. Surgical procedures were standardized, and outcomes were assessed by blinded analysts.

RESULTS

Data from 80 participants (38 MoLEP, 42 HoLEP) were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were comparable. MoLEP demonstrated superior enucleation efficiency (3.5±0.8 g/min) and shorter enucleation time (22.5±7.6 minutes) compared to HoLEP, although not statistically significant. MoLEP achieved hemostasis in less time (6.6±4.2 minutes) than HoLEP (11.2±5.1 minutes). Postoperative care demands varied, with MoLEP requiring less bladder irrigation. MoLEP exhibited a shorter average catheterization time (1.3±0.1 days) and reduced hospitalization compared to HoLEP. Both groups showed significant postoperative improvements in functional outcomes.

CONCLUSION

While statistical significance was not achieved in certain outcome measures, MoLEP exhibited potential advantages in postoperative care demands, shorter catheterization time, and reduced hospitalization, suggesting its feasibility and safety in day surgery settings. Postoperative functional outcomes improved significantly in both groups.

The learning curve for transurethral enucleation with bipolar energy for benign prostate hyperplasia: a single-surgeon experience of 494 patients

This study was performed to investigate the learning curve of transurethral enucleation with bipolar energy (TUEB) for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The study involved 494 consecutive patients who underwent TUEB for benign prostatic hyperplasia from August 2018 to March 2022 by one surgeon (SJJ, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea). The patients were followed up at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. To evaluate the learning curve of TUEB, perioperative parameters including the enucleation ratio (enucleated tissue weight/transitional zone volume), TUEB efficiency (enucleated tissue weight/operation time), and enucleation efficiency (enucleated tissue weight/enucleation time) were analyzed. Functional outcomes and postoperative complications were also assessed, including the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), IPSS quality-of-life (QoL) score, and uroflowmetry outcomes. The patients' median age was 72 (interquartile range [IQR]: 66-78) years, and the estimated prostate volume and transitional zone volume were 63.0 (IQR: 46.0-90.6) ml and 37.1 (IQR: 24.0-60.0) ml, respectively. The enucleation ratio, TUEB efficiency, and enucleation efficiency were 0.60 (IQR: 0.46-0.54) g ml -1 , 0.33 (IQR: 0.22-0.46) g min -1 , and 0.50 (IQR: 0.35-0.72) g min -1 , respectively, plateauing after 70 cases. The functional outcomes, including total IPSS, IPSS QoL score, and uroflowmetry outcomes, significantly improved at 6 months after TUEB (all P < 0.05), but without significant differences over the learning curve. Sixty-five (13.2%) patients developed complications after TUEB, 21.5% of whom experienced major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3). The rate of major complications declined as the number of TUEB cases increased ( P = 0.013). Our results suggest that the efficiency of TUEB stabilized within 70 procedures.

The prospective evaluation of learning curve of bipolar anatomic endoscopic prostate enucleation (AEEP) with Herrmann's vapoenucleation probe

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate the learning curve of Bipolar Endoscopic Prostate Enucleation (BIPOLEP) in benign prostate enlargement without a mentorship.

METHODS

The prospective data of 55 patients underwent BIPOLEP surgery by a single surgeon during 3 years were evaluated. The demographic, peri-operative and follow-up data were recorded. Trifecta was defined as a combination of complete enucleation and morcellation within < 90 min and without any conversion to standard TURP. Pentafecta was defined as a combination of Trifecta without postoperative complications or stress urinary incontinence at 3 months. The learning curve was considered to have been overcome when the surgeon obtained Trifecta/Pentafecta in four consecutive patients.

RESULTS

The mean age of the study group was 67.9 ± 6.8 years with mean prostate volume of 102.3 ± 56.4 ml. The mean operation time and enucleation time were 103.5 ± 41.1 and 65.78 ± 22.6 min, respectively. Trifecta and Pentafecta were achieved in 23rd (from 19th to 23rd) and 34th (from 30 to 34th) patients, respectively. Among the seven consecutive patients between Trifecta and Pentafecta, prostate capsule perforation was occurred during the surgery in four patients (26th, 27th and 29th patients). The mean follow-up duration was 16.7 ± 6.4 (3-24 months, range) months. Urethral stricture was observed in four (7. 2%) patients while bladder neck contracture was observed 1 (1.8%) patient. After the 3rd month, no patient reported stress incontinence.

CONCLUSION

Bipolar endoscopic enucleation of prostate is a safe surgical method and has similar and/or short learning curve compared to HOLEP even without a mentorship program.

Single-port robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: techniques and outcomes

PURPOSE

To describe the surgical techniques and to analyse the outcomes of single-port robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (SP RASP) procedure for the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODS

Three databases (PubMed®, Web of Science™, and Scopus®) were queried to identify studies reporting on the technical aspects and outcomes of SP RASP. Different combinations of keywords were used, according to a free-text protocol, to identify retrospective and prospective studies, both comparative and non-comparative, systematic reviews (SR) and meta-analysis (MA) describing surgical techniques for SP RASP and the associated surgical and functional outcomes.

RESULTS

The transvesical approach represents the most common approach for SP RASP. A decrease in terms of estimated blood loss was observed when SP RASP was compared to open simple prostatectomy (OSP) and multi-port (MP) RASP. Furthermore, this technique allowed for a shorter length of hospital stay (LoS) and a lower post-operative complication rate, compared to OSP. Post-operative subjective and objective functional outcomes are satisfying and comparable to OSP and MP RASP.

CONCLUSION

SP RASP represents a safe and feasible approach for the surgical management of BPH. It provides comparable surgical and functional outcomes to MP RASP, enabling for minimal invasiveness, enhanced recovery, and potential for improving patient care.

Comparison of EEP and TURP long-term outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare long-term reoperation rate and functional outcomes between EEP (endoscopic enucleation of the prostate) and TURP (transurethral resection of the prostate).

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic literature review of Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted with primary outcome assessed being reoperation rate and secondary outcomes after a long term (> 3 years) being functional outcomes or related values (prostate volume, PSA level, etc.).

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Five studies were found with long-term follow-up 4-7 years. EEP reoperation rate ranged from 0 to 1.27%, while from 1.7 to 17.6% for TURP. Meta-analysis showed significantly lower OR for EEP, 0.27 (95% CI 0.24-0.31), with notable homogeneity of the results, I2 = 0%. Long-term Qmax and IPSS were significantly better for EEP. Qmax pooled mean difference was 1.79 (95% CI 1.72-1.86) ml/s with a high concordance among the studies, I2 = 0%. IPSS mean difference -1.24 (95% CI - 1.28 to - 1.2) points, I2 = 57% but QoL did not differ, with mean difference being 0.01 (95% CI - 0.02 to 0.04), I2 = 0%. IIEF-5 score was also significantly better for EEP, mean difference 1.08 (95% CI 1.03-1.13), but heterogeneity was high, I2 = 70%. PSA level and prostate volume were only reported in one study and favored EEP slightly yet statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

EEP had a significantly lower reoperation rate and better functional outcomes (Qmax and IPSS) at long term compared with TURP. It may also be beneficial in terms of IIEF-5, PVR, and PSA level.

Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate vs Transvesical Single-port Robotic Simple Prostatectomy for Large Prostatic Glands

OBJECTIVE

To compare the perioperative outcomes of transvesical single-port robotic simple prostatectomy (SP-RASP) and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of patients undergoing SP-RASP and HoLEP from 2019 to 2022 with preoperative prostatic volume (PPV) >80 cm3. Percent of prostate adenoma removed (%PAR) was estimated by specimen weight normalized by PPV. Univariate analysis was performed using chi-square, Fisher exact, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. A subgroup analysis with 1:1 matching for PPV was also performed.

RESULTS

A total of 50 SP-RASP and 90 HoLEP cases were analyzed. The median (interquartile range) PPV was 169 (128-244)cm3 for SP-RASP and 129 (100-150)cm3 for HoLEP, (P < .01). The median (interquartile range) %PAR was 57(44-68) for SP-RASP vs 51(42-62) for HoLEP (P = .10). Overall, 11(12%) HoLEP and 5(10%) SP-RASP patients experienced complications (P = .51). Same-day discharge occurred in 24(48%) SP-RASP vs 7(8%) HoLEP patients (P < .01). Median foley catheter duration was longer in SP-RASP (6 vs 1 day, P < .01) and trial of void was successful at first attempt in >94% (P = .68). Transient de novo incontinence was reported in 24(28%) HoLEP vs 2(5%) SP-RASP (P < .01). No differences in voiding parameters were observed at latest follow up. Subgroup postmatched analysis revealed analogous findings.

CONCLUSION

SP-RASP and HoLEP have similar favorable perioperative outcomes for management of large prostatic adenomas. SP-RASP may be considered in patients unwilling to accept the risk of transient incontinence and in those with unfavorable urethral access, large bladder stone burden, or diverticula.

The Efficacy and Safety of 'Inverted Omega En-bloc' Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Size-Independent Technique for the Surgical Treatment of LUTS

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety, efficiency, and size-dependency of the 'Inverted omega En-bloc (Ʊ)' holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) with lower urinary tract symptoms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 716 consecutive patients who underwent HoLEP under the care of a single surgeon from 2014-2021. These patients were treated using the 'Inverted omega En-bloc' HoLEP technique for BPH. The patients were divided into 3 groups: Group 1 (<40 mL, n=328), Group 2 (40-60 mL, n=221), and Group 3 (≤60 mL, n=167). Perioperative parameters, safety, and functional outcomes were assessed and analyzed.

RESULTS

The perioperative parameters, like enucleation time (45.8±26.9 min), morcellation time (13.2±47.5 min), and catheterization duration (1.6±1.2 d) significantly differed to favor smaller prostate sizes (p<0.01). Significant improvements in the IPSS (total, voiding, storage, and quality of life), post-void residual urine, and maximum flow rate were observed 3 months post-HoLEP and continued during the 1-year follow-up period in all groups (p<0.01). The postoperative complications included urethral stricture in 11 patients (1.5%), bladder neck contracture in 12 (1.7%), urinary incontinence in 14 (2.0%), and bladder injuries in 4 (0.6%). Bladder neck contractures occurred only in Group 1. The postoperative surgical management for complications included urethral sounding (n=9, 1.3%), endoscopic internal urethrotomy (n=2, 0.3%), and re-HoLEP for bladder neck contractures in (n=12, 1.7%). The rate of re-HoLEP for regrowing adenomas was 15 (2.1%). Postoperative medications exceeding 6 months were α-blocker (n=22, 3.1%), cholinergics (n=16, 2.2%), anticholinergics (n=58, 8.1%), antidiuretics (n=18, 2.5%), and daily PDE5 inhibitor (n=38, 5.3%). Thirty-four patients (4.7%) had postoperative incidental prostate cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The inverted omega En-bloc HoLEP technique is safe and effective for the treatment of BPH. Moreover, 'Inverted omega En-bloc' HoLEP is a size-independent and effective method for all prostate sizes.

A Delphi consensus to standardize the technique of anatomical endoscopic enucleation of prostate: a study by ESUT endoscopic enucleation of prostate study group

PURPOSE

Our objective was to establish a standardized technique for Anatomical Endoscopic Enucleation of Prostate (AEEP) utilizing a consensus statement to provide robust recommendations for urologists who are new to this procedure.

METHODS

The participants were electronically sent a questionnaire in three consecutive rounds. In the second and third rounds, the anonymous aggregate results of the previous round were presented. Experts' feedback and comments were then incorporated to refine existing questions or to explore more controversial topics in greater depth.

RESULTS

Forty-one urologists participated in the first round. In the second round, all Round 1 participants received a 22-question survey, resulting in a consensus on 21 items. In the third round, 76% (19/25) of the second-round respondents also participated, reaching a consensus on 22 additional items. The panelists consensually agreed on detaching the urethral sphincter at the beginning of the enucleation and not at the end of the enucleation. To prevent incontinence, it was recommended that the apical mucosa be preserved through various approaches between 11 and 1 o'clock while gently disrupting the lateral lobes in their apical part, avoiding an excess energy delivery approximation to the apical mucosa.

CONCLUSION

To optimize laser AEEP procedures, urologists must follow expert guidelines on equipment and surgical technique, including early apical release, using the 3-lobe technique for enucleation, preserving apical mucosa with appropriate approaches, gently disrupting lateral lobes at their apical regions, and avoiding excessive energy delivery near the apical mucosa. Following these recommendations can lead to improved outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Predictive factors affecting morcellation efficiency in holmium laser enucleation of the prostate

PURPOSE

To determine the factors affecting morcellation efficiency in holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent HoLEP surgery by a single surgeon between 2018 and 2022 were included in the study. Our primary outcome of interest in this study was morcellation efficiency. The effect of preoperative and perioperative variables on morcellation efficiency was evaluated with linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 410 patients were included in the study. The mean morcellation efficiency was 6.95±1.70 g/min. Univariable and multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to identify factors affecting morcellation efficiency. Presence of the "beach ball" effect (small, round prostatic tissue fragments that are fibrotic and difficult to morcellate), the learning curve, resectoscope sheath type, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density, morcellated tissue weight, and the presence of prostate calcification were found to be independent predictive factors (β=-1.107, 95% CI: -1.59 to -0.55, p<0.001; β=-0.514, 95% CI: -0.85 to -0.17, p=0.003; β=-0.394, 95% CI: -0.65 to -0.13, p=0.003; β=-0.302, 95% CI: -0.59 to -0.09, p=0.043; β=0.062, 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.06, p<0.001; β=-0.329, 95% CI: -0.55 to -0.10, p=0.004; respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This study reports that presence of the beach ball effect, the learning curve, small resectoscope sheath, PSA density, and presence of prostate calcification negatively affect morcellation efficiency. On the contrary, morcellated tissue weight has a linear relationship with morcellation efficiency.

Adequate Mentorship Program for Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) Leads to Satisfactory Short-Term Outcomes in the Early Learning Curve of Young Urologists: First-Year Outcomes of a Newly Established Mentorship Training in Mexico

Introduction Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is one of the most common causes of lower urinary tract symptoms in men. Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) has been recommended by international guidelines as an alternative to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). HoLEP's learning curve and the lack of adequate mentorship remains an obstacle for the worldwide adoption of this technique. Objective To report the first-year learning curve of a newly established mentorship program in young urologists without any previous HoLEP experience. Methods We report a cohort of patients with BPH, with prostate size ≥70 grams, treated with HoLEP, analyzed for perioperative data and complications, and short-term postoperative complications and functional outcomes, at three and six months after surgery. Results A total of 47 patients were managed with HoLEP. Mean total operative time was 149.8 ± 42.9 minutes. We experienced five (10.6%) intraoperative complications, including one intravesical resection of the prostate with bipolar energy, three conversions to TURP and one conversion to open prostatectomy. We experienced four postoperative complications, all of them Clavien-Dindo ≤2. Median International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) decrease at six months was -17 points from baseline. Mean post-void residual volume and prostate-specific antigen significantly decreased by the third postoperative month. Multiple linear regression showed that prostate size is directly related to increased surgical time during the early learning curve. Discussion Our experience adequately reflects the importance of HoLEP mentorship in young urologists seeking training in this technique. Both surgeons had perioperative and postoperative outcomes deemed satisfactory based on previously published learning curves. Conclusions HoLEP is a technically difficult procedure, however, adequate mentorship leads to satisfying short-term outcomes since the early stages of the learning curve in young urologists with no previous training on this technique.

Residency Surgical BPH Training Paradigms from MIST to HOLEP

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common medical condition of older men that often requires medical or surgical therapy. Surgical options for BPH have grown exponentially over the last two decades. The numerous options and/or lack of access to them can make it challenging for new trainees to gain proficiency. We examine the literature for available BPH surgical simulators, learning curves, and training pathways.

RECENT FINDINGS

Each BPH surgical therapy has a learning curve which must be overcome. There is an abundance of TURP simulators which have shown face, content, and construct validity in the literature. Similarly, laser therapies have validated simulators. Newer technologies do have available simulators, but they have not been validated. There are strategies to improve learning and outcomes, such as having a structured training program. Simulators are available for BPH surgical procedures and some have been implemented in urology residencies. It is likely that such simulation may make urologists more facile on their learning curves for newer technologies. Further studies are needed. Future directions may include integration of simulator technology into training pathways that include surgical observation and proctorship.

An Outcomes Comparison Between Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate, Open Simple Prostatectomy, and Robotic Simple Prostatectomy for Large Gland Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy

OBJECTIVE

To compare perioperative outcomes between Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), open simple prostatectomy (OSP), and robotic simple prostatectomy (RSP) for large prostates (> 80 cc).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of 340 patients who underwent HoLEP (n = 209), OSP (n = 66), or RSP (n = 65) at a large academic medical center between January 2013 - September 2021 was performed. Length of stay (LOS), operative time, catheter duration, estimated blood loss (EBL), blood transfusion, and 30-day ED visits and readmissions were compared between the three groups. Univariate analyses consisted of ANOVA with Tukey's corrections and Chi-square tests. Linear and multivariate logistic regression was also performed. All tests were two-sided and a p-value <0.05 was pre-determined to be statistically significant. Analyses were performed with SAS v9.4.

RESULTS

HoLEP was found to have the shortest: operative time (1.4 vs 2.7 vs 3.8h), LOS (0.65 vs 4.2 vs 2.6d), and catheter duration (0.38 vs 9.9 vs 11.2d) compared to OSP and RSP, respectively (all P <.0001). HoLEP also had the lowest EBL (66 vs 795 vs 326 mL, P <.0001). HoLEP and RSP had a lower risk of blood transfusion compared to OSP (P <.0001). These associations remained significant on multivariable analyses.

CONCLUSION

HoLEP is a minimally invasive treatment option for large prostates that was found to have shorter operative time, LOS, and catheter duration as well as lower EBL compared to OSP and RSP.

Safety profile of treatment with greenlight versus Thulium Laser for benign prostatic hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE

The major strengths of surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with laser are reduced morbidity compared to endoscopic resection. No studies analysed the different risk of intra/peri-operative events between patients undergoing Thulium and GreenLight procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 100 consecutive cases undergoing GreenLight vaporization and Thulium procedures performed during the learning curve of two expert endoscopic surgeons. Pre-operative data, intra and post-operative events at 90 days were analysed.

RESULTS

Patients on antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy were pre-dominant in the Green group (p < 0.0001). Rates of blood transfusion (p < 0.0038), use of resectoscope (p < 0.0086), and transient stress urinary incontinence were statistically higher in the Thulium group. On the contrary conversions to TURP (p < 0.023) were more frequent in GreenLight patients. Readmissions were more frequently necessary in GreenLight group (24%) vs. Thulium group (26.6%). The overall complication rate in GreenLight and Thulium groups were 31% and 53% respectively; Clavien 3b complications were 13% in Thulium patients versus 1% in GreenLight patients.

CONCLUSIONS

GreenLight and Thulium treatments show similar safety profiles. Randomized controlled trial are needed to better clarify the rate of major complications in Thulium group, and the incidence of post-operative storage symptoms in these patients' populations.

Learning curve and functional outcomes after laser enucleation of the prostate for benign prostate hyperplasia according to surgeon's caseload

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of surgical caseload on safety, efficacy, and functional outcomes of laser enucleation of the prostate (LEP) applying a structured mentoring program.

METHODS

Patient characteristics, perioperative data, and functional outcomes were analyzed descriptively. Linear and logistic regression models analyzed the effect of caseload on complications, functional outcomes and operative speed. Within the structured mentoring program a senior surgeon was present for the first 24 procedures completely, for partial steps in procedures 25-49, and as needed thereafter.

RESULTS

A total of 677 patients from our prospective institutional database (2017-2022) were included for analysis. Of these, 84 (12%), 75 (11%), 82 (12%), 106 (16%), and 330 patients (49%) were operated by surgeons at (A) < 25, (B) 25-49, (C) 50-99, (D) 100-199, and (E) ≥ 200 procedures. Preoperative characteristics were balanced (all p > 0.05) except for prostate volume, which increased with caseload. There was no significant difference in change of IPSS, Quality of life, ICIQ, pad usage, peak urine flow, residual urine, and major complications (Group A: 8.3 to E: 7.6%, p = 0.2) depending on the caseload. Caseload was not associated (Odds ratio: 0.7-1.4, p > 0.2) with major complications in the multivariable logistic regression model. Only operating time was significantly shorter with increasing caseload in the multivariable analysis (111-55 min, beta 23.9-62.9, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

With a structured mentoring program, the safety and efficacy of LEP can be ensured even during the learning curve with very good outcome quality. Only the operating time decreases significantly with increasing experience of the surgeon.

Improving Prostatic Preoperative Volume Estimation and Planning before Laser Enucleation

We aimed to validate a formula for improving the estimation of prostatic volume by abdominal ultrasound (AUS) prior to transurethral laser enucleation. A total of 293 patients treated for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) by laser enucleation from 2019−2022 were included. The preoperative AUS volume was adjusted by the formula 1.082 × Age + 0.523 × AUS − 53.845, which was based on specimens retrieved by suprapubic prostatectomy. The results were compared to the weight of the tissue removed by laser enucleation as determined by the intraclass correlation coefficient test (ICC). The potential impact of preoperative planning on operating time was calculated. The ICC between the adjusted volumes and the enucleated tissue weights was 0.86 (p < 0.001). The adjusted volume was more accurate than the AUS volume (weight-to-volume ratio of 0.84 vs. 0.7, p < 0.001) and even more precise for prostates weighing >80 g. The median operating time was 90 min. The adjusted volume estimation resulted in an overall shorter expected preoperative operating time by a median of 21 min (24%) and by a median of 40 min in prostates weighing >80 g. The adjustment formula accurately predicts prostate volume before laser enucleation procedures and may significantly improve preoperative planning, the matching of a surgeon’s level of expertise, and the management of patients’ expectations.

Does the 5-item Frailty Index predict surgical complications of endoscopic surgical management for benign prostatic obstruction? An analysis of the ACS-NSQIP

PURPOSE

To assess whether the 5-item Frailty Index (5i-FI) predicts surgical complications of endoscopic surgery for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) and examine the rates of these complications across BPO surgical modalities adjusting for patient frailty.

METHODS

The ACS-NSQIP registry was queried for patients who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP), and laser enucleation of the prostate (LEP) between 2009 and 2019. Patients' frailties were estimated using the 5i-FI. We assessed the association between 5i-FI and the following endpoints: all complications, major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3), length of stay (LOS) ≥ 2 days, and 30-day postoperative readmission. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to account for selection bias in treatment allocation. IPTW-adjusted rates for 30-day complications were compared between surgical modalities.

RESULTS

The cohort included 38,399 (62.6%) TURP, 19,121 (31.2%) PVP, and 3797 (6.2%) LEP. Men with 5i-FI score ≥ 2 were more likely to receive TURP (22.7%) and PVP (22.5%) than LEP (18.8%). 5i-FI ≥ 2 was associated with higher odds of all complications (OR 1.50), major complications (OR 1.63), LOS ≥ 2 (OR 1.31), and readmission (OR 1.65). After IPTW, LEP had the lowest rates for all complications (6.29%; 95%CI 5.48-7.20), major complications (2.30%; 95%CI 1.83-2.89), and readmission (3.80%; 95%CI 3.18-4.53).

CONCLUSION

The 5i-FI score is an independent predictor of 30-day postoperative surgical complications after endoscopic BPO surgery. After IPTW, LEP and PVP were associated with lower rates of complications than TURP. However, frail patients were less likely to undergo PVP and LEP. Preoperative frailty assessment could improve risk stratification before BPO surgery.

Switching lasers: learning curve of HoLEP in surgeons experienced in ThuLEP

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate perioperative parameters, clinical outcomes, and the learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in surgeons with experience in thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The learning curves for HoLEP of the first 50 consecutive patients of two surgeons experienced in ThuLEP were analyzed. In addition, demographic parameters, clini¬cal outcomes and adverse events were evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean operation time was 70.9 + 29.7 min (SD) (Surgeon 1) and 74.4 + 35.4 min (Surgeon 2), the mean enucleation efficiency was 1.5 + 0.6 g/min (Surgeon 1) and 1.5 + 0.7 g/min (Surgeon 2). The hemoglobin loss was 0.9 + 0.8 g/dl and 0.8 + 0.8 g/dl. For both surgeons, there was a significant learning curve in enucleation efficiency within the first 50 cases (Surgeon 1: p = .034, Surgeon 2: p = .006, both: p = .0003, Spearman's ρ = .351). Both surgeons started with an enucleation efficiency of around 1g/min in their first 10 cases. No significant correlation between hemoglobin loss and experience could be found (p = .823, ρ = .025). While there was no significant learning curve for morcellation efficiency (p = .785, ρ = .028), a significant progress was found for one of the two surgeons regarding laser energy efficiency (p = .014). The overall incidence of all grade treatment-related adverse events was very low at 10.0%, and extremely low for significant complications with Clavien-Dindo Grade > II at 1%.

CONCLUSIONS

In our analysis, switching to HoLEP is uncomplicated and safe for experienced ThuLEP surgeons. The enucleation efficiency was high from the beginning, but a learning curve was present for both surgeons. No learning curve was noticeable in hemoglobin loss and the incidence of complications, both of which were very low throughout the study.

Analysis of Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate Fixed Operating Room Times

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate factors influencing fixed operating room time during holmium laser enucleation of the prostate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective observational study was performed for all holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) cases performed by a single surgeon over a 24-month period. Operating room (OR) time was divided into fixed and variable time. The variable time was defined as cut-to-close time. Fixed time included in room time to anesthesia release time (IRAT), anesthesia release time to cut time (ARCT), and close time to wheels out (CTWO). The effects of time of day and anesthesia personnel (AP) changes on fixed operating room time were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 406 HoLEPs were analyzed. There was no statistically significant difference in nonprocedural OR times between morning and afternoon surgeries (IRAT, P=0.38, ARCT P=0.10, CTWO P=0.77). Median nonprocedural OR times accounted for 27% (IQR: 22%-31%) of the total procedure time in the AM group and 29% (IQR: 24%-33%) in the PM group (P=0.005). Of the HoLEPs,78.1% (178/228) experienced one or more AP changes during the procedure. The median fixed OR time was not significantly different between procedures with 1 AP and procedures with ≥2 APs (IRAT, P=0.53; ARCT, P=0.71; CTWO, P=0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

Fixed operating room time makes up a significant portion of HoLEP procedures and should be considered when evaluating OR efficiency. The time of day and number of anesthesia personnel involved did not affect the fixed OR times.

Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate Is Better than Robot-assisted Simple Prostatectomy

In 2022, endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) is the treatment of choice for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) for glands >80 ml and is a valid alternative for patients with bleeding disorders. Unlike robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, EEP has no additional access-related trauma and can be performed using the same instruments as for bipolar enucleoresection. With favorable costs, EEP can serve as a global solution for BPO treatment.

Is the Peripheral Zone Thickness an Indicator of a Learning Curve in Bipolar Transurethral Plasma Enucleation of the Prostate?—A Single Center Cohort Study

Background

We conducted this cohort study to assess the differences in the learning curve of bipolar transurethral plasma enucleation of the prostate (B-TUEP) associated with prostatic peripheral zone thickness (PZT) under MRI quantitative measurements.

Methods

For the study, 60 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were involved. PZT are defined as “Thin” (<7 mm), “Thick” (>10 mm), and “Medium” (in between), with 20 patients in each group. Learning stages were defined as Group 1 (No. 1–20), Group 2 (No. 21–40), and Group 3 (No. 41–60). We measured parameters of the prostate, such as PZT and transitional zone thickness (TZT), with MRI. A learner with no experience in enucleation performed the operations. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the differences. Pearson correlation analysis and multiple linear regression analysis evaluated the relationship between characteristics of patients. P < 0.05 was deemed statistically significant.

Results

One-Way ANOVA revealed different enucleation efficiency (0.811 ± 0.18 vs. 0.748 ± 0.14 vs. 0.634 ± 0.16), prostate volume (58.9 ± 15.33 vs. 57.3 ± 15.58 vs. 46.6 ± 14.10), and thickness of transition zone (44.45 ± 7.60 vs. 42.45 ± 6.08 vs. 34.78 ± 6.04) among Thin, Medium, and Thick groups. The enucleation efficiency is different between groups divided by learning stages (Group 1 vs. Group 3, 0.658 vs. 0.783; Group 2 vs. Group 3, 0.751 vs. 0.783). Pearson correlation analysis reveals that PZT was negatively correlated with prostate volume (r = −0.427), resection weight (r = −0.35), enucleation efficiency (r = −0.445), and TZT (r = −0.533), and was positively correlated with Q-max (r = 0.301) and bladder outlet obstruction index (BOOI) (r = 0.388). The regression coefficients of PZT, TZT, prostate volume, and Q-max were −0.012, 0.008, 0.007, and 0.013, respectively (all P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Lower PZT is independent of higher enucleation efficiency, larger adenoma, and higher TZT. PZT may be an important factor on the learning curve of B-TUEP. Higher TZT, prostate volume. and Q-max may also relate to higher enucleation efficiency. For B-TUEP learners, it seems easier to perform the operation when the PZT is low, though more care should be taken with the capsule perforation. Further, the capsule plane should be maintained more attentively if the PZT is high.

A Novel Modified Two-Lobe Holmium Prostate Enucleation Technique: Demirtaş-Erciyes Enucleation Prostatectomy

Objective

Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate has evolved and became popular for the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) during the last decade. Different surgical techniques have been described so far. We hereby described a new modified two-lobe technique for urologists who are inexperienced in endoscopic enucleation. We aimed here to present the data on a learning curve of this stepwise technique named Demirtaş-Erciyes Enucleation Prostatectomy (DEEP): reverse S-J incision technique and its postoperative outcomes.

Material and methods

The study included 102 patients who underwent holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) with the DEEP technique between October 2020 and December 2021. Demographic, preoperative, and postoperative variables were recorded. The operation was performed with a 150 W holmium laser system (Quanta System, Varese, Italy) with cutting and coagulation settings of 2J × 50 Hz with virtual basket mode and 2J × 12 Hz in bubble blast mode, respectively. Bladder irrigation was done for one day, and then, on the next day, the urethral catheter was removed. Postoperatively, uroflowmetry studies, continence status, and ejaculation status were recorded during follow-up. The data of all patients were divided into two groups (first 51 and final 51 patients). All variables were analyzed between two groups.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 68.48±8.74 years. The median Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score was 3. The median International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) values ​​were 26 (10-35) and 10 (0-25), respectively. Of the patients, 60.8% had Foley catheters due to urinary retention. The median anesthesia time, laser time, enucleation time, morcellation time, and enucleated tissue amount were 102.5 minutes, 17 minutes, 25 minutes, 20 minutes, and 50 g, respectively. Enucleation was performed in two stages in five patients due to bigger prostate volume or incomplete morcellation. The median catheter removal time was 48 hours. In six patients, the postoperative catheterization time was prolonged due to hematuria. The median increase in Qmax was 19.35 mL/second. The overall complication rate was 5.9%, which were all Clavien grade II. Enucleation time, laser time, and anesthesia time were significantly lower in the last 51 patients.

Conclusion

DEEP enucleation technique seems to provide effective and safe postoperative results for beginners in prostate enucleation.

Holmium laser enucleation versus bipolar transurethral enucleation for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia, which one is better?

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the overall efficacy and safety between holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and bipolar transurethral enucleation of the prostate (B-TUEP) for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHOD

We systematically searched electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) to identify eligible comparative studies as of July 2021. The parameters including perioperative results, complications, and functional outcomes were evaluated. RevMan version 5.4 was used for the analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies involving 1725 patients were included. HoLEP had lower operative time (p = .03), shorter catheterization time (p = .007), lower bladder irrigation time (p = .01), and higher enucleation weight (p = .01) compared with B-TUEP. However, there were no significant differences between the techniques regarding the length of stay (LOS), hemoglobin drop, transfusion rates, and complications. Furthermore, no significant differences were also observed in postoperative functional outcomes at 1, 3, 6, 12, or 24 months.

CONCLUSIONS

HoLEP has more advantages in perioperative parameters compared with B-TUEP, but no significant differences are found regarding functional outcomes and complications. Large-scale studies with long-term follow-up are required to compare the outcomes of these two techniques.

A prospective comparative study of mini-PCNL using Trilogy™ or thulium fibre laser with suction

INTRODUCTION

There has been recent introduction of novel lithotripters and high-power lasers for stone disintegration. With miniaturization of PCNL, there is need of effective disintegration and faster stone-clearance. This study aimed to evaluate efficiency of Trilogy™ and Thulium fibre laser (TFL) in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL).

METHODS

This is prospective study comparing efficiency and outcomes of Trilogy™ and TFL in mini-PCNL between January 2019 and February 2020. Primary objective was to compare stone fragmentation rates, with secondary objectives beings stone-free rates and complications.

RESULTS

There were 60 mini-PCNL with suction using either Trilogy™ or TFL energy source. Mean stone size and density were 27.60 ± 10.17 mm, 22.04 ± 9.69 mm (p = 0.05) and 1172.9 ± 313.5HU, 1308.9 ± 333.9HU (p = 0.10) for Trilogy™ and TFL, respectively. Using 3D doctor imaging software from CT images, mean stone volumes were 3718.9 ± 3038.7mm³ for Trilogy™ and 3425.9 ± 3096.1mm³ for TFL(p = 0.77). Using probe-activation time or lasing time, stone-fragmentation rate was 5.98 ± 4.25mm³/sec for Trilogy™ and 3.95 ± 1.00mm³/sec for TFL(p = 0.015). Treatment time (puncture to complete clearance) was 32.48 ± 15.39 min for Trilogy™ and 28.63 ± 18.56 min for TFL(p = 0.38). Haemoglobin drop was 1.19 ± 0.76gm/dl for Trilogy™ and 0.99 ± 0.74gm/dl for TFL (p = 0.30). Trilogy™ arm had 96.6% complete clearance and TFL had 76.6% in TFL at 48 h. One patient in Trilogy™ arm required auxiliary RIRS for residual stone. Both arms had complete stone clearance at 1 month follow-up. Trilogy™ arm had 3 Clavien-Dindo grade-II complications while TFL had 2 Clavien-Dindo grade-II complications (UTI requiring antibiotics). There was no blood transfusion in either of arm.

CONCLUSION

Trilogy™ had significantly better stone fragmentation rate than TFL in managing renal stones. However, stone-free rates and complications were comparable for Trilogy™ and TFL.

T-L technique for HoLEP: perioperative outcomes of a large single-centre series

Introduction

The aim of this article was to describe, step-by-step, an original technique (T-L technique) in a single centre series of patients who underwent holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia and analyze perioperative outcomes.

Material and methods

We retrospectively analyzed data of 567 patients who underwent HoLEP. The T-L technique consists of a series of incisions used as landmarks, performed at the beginning of the procedure before enucleation. Two T-shape incisions are performed at the level of bladder neck (at the 5-7 and 12 o’clock positions); two L-shape incisions are performed at the level of verumontanum, bilaterally, to mark the apex and to limit the sphincter. Another T-shape incision is performed on the bladder neck at the 12 o’clock position posterior to the level of verumontanum.

Results

The median operative time (OT) was 80 minutes (IQR 64–105); 50 minutes (IQR 35–70) and 15 minutes (IQR 10–20) for enucleation and the morcellation phase, respectively. Conversion to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) was necessary in 3/567 (0.6%) patients. Intraoperative complications occurred in 3.4% of cases, capsule perforation occurred in 12/567 (2%) of cases, while bladder perforation during morcellation occurred in 8/567 (1.4%) of cases. Postoperative complications were observed in 20/567 (3.5%) of patients. Specifically, grade 1–2 occurred in 19/567 (3.3%) and grade 3 was recorded in 1/567 (0.2%).

Conclusions

The T-L technique for HoLEP is safe and reproducible with a low rate of perioperative complications. The positioning of some landmarks before enucleation allows for the better orientation during enucleation and could be very useful in case of large prostates.

Proctored Step by Step Training Program for GreenLight Laser Anatomic Photovaporization of the Prostate: A Single Surgeon's Experience

Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of a proctored step-by-step training program for GreenLight laser anatomic photovaporization (aPVP) of the prostate. Methods: Data from patients undergoing aPVP between January 2019 and December 2020 operated by a single surgeon following a dedicated step-by-step proctored program were prospectively collected. The procedure was divided into five modular steps of increasing complexity. Preoperative patients' data as well as total operative time, energy delivered on the prostate and postoperative data, were recorded. Then, we assessed how the overall amount of energy delivered and the operative times varied during the training program. Surgical steps were analyzed by cumulative summation. Univariable and multivariable regression models were built to assess the predictors of the amount of energy delivered on the prostate. Results: Sixty consecutive patients were included in the analysis. Median prostate volume was 56.5 mL. The training program was succesfully completed with no intraoperative or meaningful post-operative complications. The energy delivered reached the plateau after the 40th case. At multivariable analysis, increasing surgeon experience was associated with lower amounts of energy delivered as well as lower operative times. Conclusions: A step-by-step aPVP training program can be safely performed by surgeons with prior endoscopic experience if mentored by a skilled proctor. Considering the energy delivered as an efficacy surrogate metrics (given its potential impact on persistent postoperative LUTS), 40 cases are needed to reach a plateau for aPVP proficiency. Further studies are needed to assess the safety of our step-by-step training modular program in other clinical contexts.

Prostatic Artery Embolization: An Alternative Treatment for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Purpose Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative for patients with prostates >80 mL and has demonstrated lower morbidity rates. We sought to evaluate PAE at a single tertiary medical center. Methods A retrospective review of all patients who underwent PAE was completed. Demographic, clinicopathologic, procedure, and outcome data were collected to include international prostatic symptom score (IPSS) and quality of life (QoL) assessments. Results The pre-PAE mean prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 8.4 ng/mL, mean prostate volume was 146.9 mL (9% >200 mL), and mean postvoid residual (PVR) was 208.2 mL (21.9% 200–300 mL). IPSS mean was 19.8 and QoL was “mostly dissatisfied.” Following PAE, mean PSA was reduced by 3.2 ng/mL (38.1%, p = 0.3014), the mean prostate volume reduction was 59.2 mL (40.3%, n = 19, p < 0.0001), and the average PVR reduction was 150.3 mL (72.2%, n = 27, p = 0.0002). Average IPSS score was also lower (11.9; 60.1%, n = 25, p < 0.0001) and QoL was reduced to “mostly satisfied” (p < 0.0001). Technical success was 100% with 24% minor morbidities. Conclusion PAE is a successful treatment for patients with BPH resulting in large prostates that are not good candidates for simple prostatectomy, providing optimal care with less operative and postoperative complications.

Reasons to go for thulium-based anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate

PURPOSE

To summarize the current evidence and the reasons to go for thulium-based anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (AEEP).

METHODS

This review discusses the available literature on thulium-based AEEP.

RESULTS

Thulium lasers operate at a wavelength between 1940 and 2013 nm. This wavelength, which has a low penetration depth in water, allows to perform smooth cuts in the prostatic tissue and allows urologists to perform various procedures: resection, vaporization, enucleation, or vapoenucleation of the prostate. Depending on the type of thulium laser, it can be used either in a continuous, or pulsed mode.

CONCLUSION

In recent years, an increasing amount of evidence has described the thulium laser as a minimally invasive and size-independent treatment option for benign prostatic enlargement with excellent long-term results.

Aquablation versus holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in medium-to-large-sized prostates (ATHLETE): protocol of a prospective randomised trial

INTRODUCTION

A novel method for the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) called Aquablation has become commercially available. Previous studies have been able to show similar functional results when compared with transurethral resection of the prostate and a high efficacy has been demonstrated when this approach is applied to patients with a prostate size of 80-150 cm³.Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is a well-established procedure in the surgical treatment of BPH in prostate glands larger than 30 mL and a first-line therapy in glands over 80 mL. To date, no data are available whether Aquablation is non-inferior compared with HoLEP in the treatment of patients with medium-to-large-sized prostates regarding safety and efficacy.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority clinical trial conducted at a Swiss centre of tertiary care. The primary outcome is assessment of non-inferiority of Aquablation compared with HoLEP in reducing lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic obstruction measured by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Randomisation will be performed using secuTrial, stratifying on age (<70 years, 70+ years) and prostate volume (<100 mL, 100+ mL). Both interventions are performed in an inpatient setting and regular follow-up controls starting 8 weeks after intervention and continuing up to 5 years will be performed. The primary outcome (change in IPSS from baseline to 6 months) will be tested for non-inferiority with a one-sided t-test. Secondary outcomes, such as efficacy parameters, several patient-reported outcome measures, and periprocedural and safety parameters will be described by calculating means or relative frequencies for each treatment group and testing differences with two-sided standard superiority tests.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by the local ethics committee (EKOS 2020-02353). Results of the primary endpoint and each of the secondary endpoints will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04560907).

Morcellation After Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate: Efficiency and Safety of Currently Available Devices

CONTEXT

Although several studies have compared different morcellators and enucleation techniques for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), there is sparse literature on morcellation, so further experimental and clinical research is required for its optimization.

OBJECTIVE

To critically appraise the contemporary literature on prostate morcellation and to evaluate the safety and efficiency of currently available morcellators for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) in the context of BPH.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A comprehensive review of the English and French literature relevant to prostate morcellation was performed using the PubMed-MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Wiley Online Library database from 1998 to 2020 using PICOS (patient population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and study design) criteria.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We retrieved 26 studies involving 5652 patients treated with a morcellator that were eligible for data extraction and analysis. The mean patient age was 67.4 (range 61.4-72.8) yr. The weighted mean efficiency of Piranha, VersaCut, and DrillCut morcellators was 5.29, 3.95, and 5.3 g/min, respectively. Several approaches, such as en bloc, two-lobe, inverse, and improved techniques, may increase morcellation efficiency and safety. The lowest weighted mean rate of bladder wall injury was 1.24% for Piranha, followed by 1.98% for DrillCut, and 5.23% for VersaCut, while the VersaCut morcellator had the lowest weighted mean rate of device malfunction at 0.74%, compared to 2.07% for Piranha and 7.86% for DrillCut.

CONCLUSIONS

All three morcellators are efficient and safe for prostatic morcellation after EEP. Further development of devices and techniques may improve the efficiency and safety profile of morcellation. To increase safety, surgeon expertise, technical equipment, and patient characteristics should be considered. Therefore, interdisciplinary exchange of knowledge and further technological innovations are strongly encouraged.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We reviewed the safety and efficacy of devices called morcellators. These devices cut tissue into small pieces that are easier to remove from the body, and are used during laser surgery for benign enlargement of the prostate. Three morcellators are currently available on the market and are comparable in safety and efficacy.

Temperature profiles of calyceal irrigation fluids during flexible ureteroscopic Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy

PURPOSE

To evaluate calyceal irrigation fluid temperature changes during flexible ureteroscopic Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy.

METHODS

Between May 2019 and January 2020, patients with kidney stones undergoing flexible ureteroscopic Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy were enrolled. A K-type thermocouple was applied for intraoperative temperature measurement. Laser was activated at different power (1 J/20 Hz and 0.5 J/20 Hz) and irrigation (0 ml/min, 15 ml/min and 30 ml/min) settings, temperature-time curve was drawn and time needed to reach 43 °C without irrigation was documented.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were enrolled in our study. The temperature-time curve revealed a quick temperature increase followed by a plateau. With 15 ml/min or 30 ml/min irrigation, 43 °C was not reached after 60 s laser activation at both 1 J/20 Hz and 0.5 J/20 Hz. At the power setting of 1 J/20 Hz and irrigation flow rate of 15 ml/min, the temperature rise was significantly higher than other groups. Without irrigation, the time needed to reach 43 °C at 1 J/20 Hz was significantly shorter than that at 0.5 J/20 Hz (8.84 ± 1.41 s vs. 13.71 ± 1.53 s).

CONCLUSION

Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy can induce significant temperature rise in calyceal fluid. With sufficient irrigation, temperatures can be limited so that a toxic thermal dose is not reached, when irrigation is closed, the temperature increased sharply and reached 43 °C in a few seconds.

A clinical experience of thulium fibre laser in miniperc to dust with suction: a new horizon

PURPOSE

To report safety and efficacy of mini-PCNL with suction attached to sheath combined with high-power Thulium Fibre laser (TFL). The secondary aim was to evaluate optimal laser settings for maximum stone dusting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prospective, single arm study was conducted from June 2019-December 2019 using miniPCNL with suction and TFL in 54 patients with renal stones < 3 cm. Stone fragments for each laser setting were independently retrieved and segregated according to size(< 1 mm,1-3 mm, > 3 mm) and weighed. Xray/CT scan imaging was performed in all patients within 48 h and 30 days to assess stone clearance. Optimal laser settings were evaluated for maximum dusting.

RESULTS

Mean stone size was 18.32 ± 6.37 mm, volume was 2337.75 ± 1996.84mm³ and stone density was 1300.55 ± 435.32 HU. Total operative time was 39.85 ± 20.52 min, laser time was 10.08 ± 7.41 min and stone fragmentation rate was 5.02 ± 3.93 mm³/s. The procedure was completely tubeless in 37.04%, nephrostomy tube in 37.04% and DJ stent placed in 25.92%. Postoperatively, three patients had urinary infection (Clavien 2). Complete stone clearance at 48 h was achieved in 35 (64.8%) cases. 19 patients (35.2%) who had residual fragments at 48 h, had 100% clearance at one month on CT/Xray KUB.

CONCLUSIONS

MiniPCNL using a nephrostomy sheath with suction along with high power Thulium Fibre Laser is safe and effective modality for lithotripsy. An initial laser setting of 0.2 J and 125-200 Hz was optimal for maximum dusting and simultaneous aspiration. Randomized comparative studies with other energy sources are being considered.