Photoselective sharp enucleation of the prostate with a front-firing 532-nm laser: an innovative surgical technique for benign prostatic hyperplasia-a single-center study of 475 cases

Photoselective sharp enucleation of the prostate with a front-firing 532-nm laser versus photoselective vaporization of the prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomised controlled trial with 1-year followup results

BACKGROUND

We designed a new surgical procedure to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH). In order to verify its effectiveness and safety, we constructed this randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of our innovative enucleation technique- photoselective sharp enucleation of the prostate (PSEP), with a front-firing 532-nm laser and the traditional technique-photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) in the treatment of BPH.

METHODS

A total of 154 consecutive patients diagnosed with bladder outlet obstruction secondary to BPH in our center from June 2018 to April 2019 were randomly divided into the PSEP group (n = 77) and the PVP group (n = 77) and were treated surgically with either PSEP or PVP. All patients were assessed preoperatively and followed up at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The international prostate symptom score,quality-of-life score, postvoid residual urine volume, maximum urine flow rate, prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen, and adverse events were compared.

RESULTS

The lower urinary tract symptoms in both groups were significantly improved compared with the baseline at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The PSEP and PVP groups had an equivalent International Prostate Symptom Score, quality-of-life score, postvoid residual urine volume, maximum urine flow rate, prostate-specific antigen at each follow-up (P > 0.05). The median operative time in the PSEP group was significantly shorter than that in the PVP group (35 min vs. 47 min, P < 0.001). At 6 and 12 months after surgery, the median PV in the PSEP group was smaller than that in the PVP group (P < 0.05). Complication rates were comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Both PSEP and PVP can achieve good efficacy and safety in the treatment of BPH. PSEP can remove more tissue than PVP and is associated with higher efficiency. In addition, PSEP eliminates the problem of lack of tissue samples associated with PVP.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, identifie:ChiCTR1800015867, date:25/04/2018.

Incidence and risk factors for postoperative urinary incontinence after various prostate enucleation procedures: systemic review and meta-analysis of PubMed literature from 2000 to 2021

PURPOSE

To evaluate the risk of urinary incontinence (UI) after various prostate enucleation procedures (PEP).

METHODS

PubMed was searched from January 2000 to July 2021 for studies investigating UI after PEP. The articles were divided into 5 subgroups: holmium, thulium, greenlight laser, electrocautery, and simple prostatectomy. Meta-analysis was performed to examine rate of stress (SUI), urge (UUI) or unspecified UI at short (< 3 months), intermediate (3-6 months), and long-term (> 6 months). The impact of age, prostate size, surgery time, laser time, postoperative nadir PSA level and technical modifications on UI was analyzed.

RESULTS

Most (69.4%) of 49 articles included employed holmium laser. There was no significant difference in incidence of short-, intermediate-, and long-term UI, SUI and UUI between five sub-groups and within different technical modifications. Although not statistically significant, the incidence of UI was higher (15%) at short-term with green-light and simple prostatectomy (95% CI 9-23 and 1-84), and higher (4%) at intermediate-term with holmium laser (95% CI 2-8). SUI was more prevalent at short-term with holmium laser (4%; 95% CI 2-5%), and at intermediate term with simple prostatectomy (3%; 95% CI 1-14). UUI was higher in the thulium group (10%, 95% CI 7-16). Increased age, surgery time, laser time and prostate size up to 80 cc were associated with higher UI. There was no correlation between postoperative PSA and UI.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no significant difference in incidence of UI, SUI and UUI after various PEP. Patients age, prostate size, surgery and laser time are linearly associated with UI.