Real-world data and treatment patterns of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia in Germany: an observational study using health insurance claims data

[Surgical treatment options of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic obstruction : The German S2e guideline 2023-part 3]

BACKGROUND

Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) are one of the most common diagnoses in clinical practice. Bothersome LUTS impact considerably quality of life of men and may cause severe complications without treatment. According to the diagnostic assessment every patient should be treated with an adequate therapy. Management comprises a conservative approach, medication, novel minimally invasive options, and surgical procedures with the aim to remove the obstructing adenoma. The German guideline panel has updated the German guidelines on diagnostic evaluation and management of LUTS due to BPO.

OBJECTIVES

Evidence-based recommendations of surgical treatment options of LUTS due to BPO are evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chapters 11.1.1 and 11.2 of the updated German S2e guideline on the management of LUTS due to BPO are summarized as a review article.

RESULTS

A treatment algorithm based on current evidence has been proposed. It is considered to provide guidance for the selection of the best procedure according to the needs of the patient. Anatomic features of the prostate, the patients' morbidity, and the preservation of ejaculatory function are taken into account for the choice of the best procedures. These surgical options can be divided into techniques with direct, delayed or no removal of the adenoma, procedures with suprapubic access, and embolizing approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

The updated German S2e guideline on the management of LUTS due to BPO provides evidence-based recommendations for the selection of the best procedure according to the needs of the individual patient.

Clinical efficacy and complications of transurethral resection of the prostate versus plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate

BACKGROUND

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common disease in elderly males, and many kinds of minimally invasive procedures can be used for the treatment of BPH. However, various procedures have caused some controversies regarding clinical outcomes, so more studies are needed to validate these controversial topics.

AIMS

This study aimed to explore differences of clinical efficacy, surgical features, and complications between transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP) for BPH.

METHODS

A total of eligible 850 cases of BPH underwent TURP (the TURP group, 320 cases) or PKEP (the PKEP group, 530 cases) in the urology department of our hospital from March 2015 to 2018 were involved in this study. Then, the baseline data, surgical characteristics, IPSS, QoL, PVR, Q_max, IIEF-5, and documented complications were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The operative time, intraoperative irrigation volume, postoperative hemoglobin, decrease in hemoglobin, postoperative irrigation time and volume, catheterization time, and hospital stay of the PKEP group were significantly less than those of the TURP group (all P < 0.05). At 3 months, 1, 2, and 3 years after operation, no significant differences were observed in IPSS, QoL, PVR, but the results of Q_max and IIEF-5 in the PKEP group were significantly higher than those parameters in the TURP group (all P < 0.05). The incidences of massive blood loss, postoperative secondary bleeding, blood transfusion, capsular perforation, urinary tract irritation, bladder spasm, clot retention, urinary tract infection, transient incontinence, erectile dysfunction, and the incidences of II, III grade of Clavien-Dindo classification in the PKEP group were significantly lower than those of the TURP group (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The clinical efficacy of PKEP is compared favorably with TURP during midterm follow-up. Given the merits such as less blood loss and hospital stay, lower complications, PKEP should be given a priority for BPH.

[Learning from coding data-surgical treatment of benign prostatic syndrome : Big data for BPS]

Benign prostatic syndrome (BPS) is one of the most common urological diseases. Currently, there are numerous surgical methods to treat BPS. The digitalisation of medicine enables new study approaches in healthcare research using digital data from individual treatment pathways. In the present work, BPS-specific longitudinal trend analyses were performed. Treatment-related figures, both with regard to the therapy methods and predefined patient cohorts, could be examined after validating the datasets. This meant that information on relevant characteristics of surgical BPS treatment could be read and calculations made that reflect the overall impact of these processes. In the future, it is expected that increasingly comprehensive, higher-quality digital datasets on different clinical pictures will be available for analytical purposes. Intensification of research projects in this field is desirable. The results thus obtained enable further optimisation steps of certain treatment actions and provide important key figures for the strategy development of a medical facility.