First-line salvage treatment options for germ cell tumor patients failing stage-adapted primary treatment : A comprehensive review compiled by the German Testicular Cancer Study Group

[Conventional versus high-dose salvage chemotherapy for relapsed testicular germ cell tumours]

Since the introduction of cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy, patients with metastatic germ cell tumours achieve very high cure rates of >80%. Nevertheless, about 30% of patients relapse despite guideline-endorsed first-line treatment. Of these, again about 50% of patients can still achieve cure with platinum-based salvage chemotherapy and eventually post-chemotherapy residual mass resection.Salvage chemotherapy generally involves platinum-based combination chemotherapy, either as conventional dose cisplatin-based combinations again or as high-dose chemotherapy with subsequent autologous stem cell transplantation.To date, high level evidence from randomised trials supporting the use of salvage high-dose chemotherapy for all patients relapsing after first-line treatment remains lacking, but a large international retrospective registry study had shown a 15% overall survival benefit for patients undergoing salvage high-dose chemotherapy.In this article, we summarise the available literature on the different salvage treatment approaches and discuss these in the light of current treatment guideline recommendations for the management of testicular cancer.

[Follow-up of testicular germ cell tumors-historical aspects and current recommendations]

Systematic follow-up examinations of patients cured of testicular cancer first gained attention by caregivers in the 1980s only after the management of the disease had significantly been improved by the introduction of cisplatin-based chemotherapy and almost synchronously, by the implementation of computerized tomography (CT) and serum tumor markers. Follow-up involves three aims: early diagnosis of recurrence, detection of treatment-related toxicity, and detection of secondary diseases. As the clinical presentation of testicular cancer is very heterogeneous, there is no uniform follow-up for the disease. Instead, risk-adapted follow-up schedules are required. Since the release of the German AWMF S3 guideline for the management of testicular cancer in 2019, high level evidence has accumulated for the noninferiority of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to CT with regard to abdominal imaging. Therefore, it is appropriate to modify the recommendations for follow-up given in the 2019 issue of the S3 guidelines. The modifications recommended herein relate to three issues: (1) Only three risk groups (instead of formerly four) are identified, i.e., seminoma (all stages); nonseminoma clinical stage 1b (i.e., pT2, with lymphovascular invasion) on surveillance; nonseminoma all other stages. All patients cured from poor risk disease or from relapses require individual follow-up schedules not included in the recommendations tabulated herein. (2) CT and abdominal sonography are replaced by MRI. (3) Chest X‑ray imaging during follow-up of seminoma patients is no longer recommended.