Prognostic impact of complete metastasectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the era of immuno-oncology-based combination therapies

The impact of metastasectomy on survival of patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell cancer in Finland: A nationwide study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Most of the studies on metastasectomy in renal cell cancer are based on metachronous, often oligometastatic disease. Prior data on the impact of metastasectomy in synchronous metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) is, however, very scarce. We aimed to investigate the role of complete and incomplete metastasectomy in a large, nationwide patient population.

METHODS

We analyzed nationwide data, including all synchronous mRCC cases in Finland diagnosed during a 6-year period identified from the Finnish Cancer Registry, and complemented with patient records from the treating hospitals. We only included the patients who underwent removal of the primary tumor by nephrectomy. We performed univariate and multivariable adjusted analysis to identify the effect of metastasectomy on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS

We included 483 patients with synchronous mRCC. Overall, 57 patients underwent complete and 96 incomplete metastasectomy, while 330 patients had no metastasectomy. The median OS was 17.9 and CSS 17.2 months for all patients. The median OS and the median CSS were 59.3 and 60.8 months for the complete, 21.9 and 25.1 for the incomplete, and 14.5 and 14.8 months for the no metastasectomy groups (p < 0.001 for differences). In both applied multivariable statistical models, the OS and CSS benefit from complete metastasectomy remained significant (hazard ratios (HRs) varied between 0.42 and 0.54, p < 0.001) compared with the no metastasectomy group. However, there was no improvement in survival estimates in the incomplete metastasectomy group compared with the no metastasectomy group (HRs varied between 1.04 and 1.10, p > 0.40).

CONCLUSIONS

Complete metastasectomy, when possible, can be considered as a treatment option for selected patients with synchronous mRCC who are fit for surgery. By contrast, we found no survival benefit from an incomplete metastasectomy suggesting that such procedures should not be performed for these patients.

Multidisciplinary systemic and local therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a narrative review

INTRODUCTION

Systemic and local therapies for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) are often challenging despite the evolution of multimodal cancer therapies in the last decade. In this review, we will focus on recent multidisciplinary approaches for patients with mRCC.

AREAS COVERED

Systemic therapies for patients with mRCC have been garnering attention particularly after the approval of immuno-oncology (IO) agents, including anti-programmed death 1/programmed death-ligand 1. IO combinations have significantly prolonged overall survival in patients with mRCC in the first-line setting. Regarding local therapies, cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) has become less common in the post-Cancer du Rein Metastatique Nephrectomie et Antiangiogéniques (CARMENA) trial era, even though CN may still benefit selected patients with mRCC. In addition, metastasis-directed local therapies, namely metastasectomy or stereotactic radiotherapy, particularly for oligo-metastatic lesions or brain metastases, may have a prognostic impact. Several ablative techniques are also evolving while maintaining high local control rates with acceptable safety.

EXPERT OPINION

Multimodal cancer therapies are essential for conquering complex cases of mRCC. Modern systemic therapies including IO-based combination therapy as well as local therapies including CN, metastasectomy, stereotactic radiotherapy, and ablative techniques appear to improve oncologic outcomes of patients with mRCC, although appropriate patient selection is indispensable.

The survival benefit of metastasectomy for metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to explore the benefit the metastasectomy for patients with metastatic non-clear cell carcinoma (non-ccRCC).

METHODS

This study enrolled 120 patients with confirmed metastatic non-ccRCC from the RCC database of our center from 2008 to 2021. Patients without metastasectomy were grouped as radical nephrectomy without metastasectomy patients. The clinical outcomes included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess potential factors that predict clinical benefits from metastasectomy.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients received radical nephrectomy alone, while the remaining 20 patients underwent both radical nephrectomy and metastasectomy. There was no significant difference in age between the two groups. Out of 100 patients who underwent radical nephrectomy, 60 were male, and out of 20 patients who had both radical nephrectomy and metastasectomy, 12 were male. Patients who underwent systemic therapy plus radical nephrectomy and metastasectomy had significantly better PFS (27.1 vs. 14.0, p = 0.032) and OS (67.3 vs. 24.0, p = 0.043) than those who underwent systemic therapy plus radical nephrectomy alone. Furthermore, for patients without liver metastasis (n = 54), systemic therapy plus radical nephrectomy and metastasectomy improved both PFS (p = 0.028) and OS (p = 0.043). Similarly, for patients with metachronous metastasis, systemic therapy plus radical nephrectomy and metastasectomy improved both PFS (p = 0.043) and OS (p = 0.032). None of the patients experienced serious perioperative complications (Clavien-Dindo Classification ≥ III grade).

CONCLUSION

Metastasectomy in patients with metastatic non-ccRCC may provide clinical benefits in terms of improved PFS and OS, especially in patients without liver metastasis and those with metachronous metastasis.

Surgical metastasectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the era of targeted and immune therapy: a narrative review

PURPOSE

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) still harbours a big propensity for future metastasis. Combinations of immune and targeted therapies are currently the cornerstone of management with a less clear role for surgical metastasectomy (SM).

METHODS

We performed a narrative review of literature searching for the available evidence on the yield of surgical metastasectomy in the era of targeted and immune therapies. The review consisted of a PubMed search of relevant articles using the Mesh terms:" renal cell carcinoma", "surgery», «resection", "metastasectomy", "molecular targeted therapies", "immune checkpoint inhibitors" alone or in combination.

RESULTS

In this review, we exposed the place of surgical metastasectomy within a multimodal treatment algorithm for mRCC Also, we detailed the patient selection criteria that yielded the best results when SM was performed. Finally, we discussed the feasibility and advantages of SM per organ site.

CONCLUSION

Our work was able to show that SM could be proposed as a consolidation treatment to excise residual lesions that were deemed unresectable prior to a combination of systemic therapies. Contrastingly, it can be proposed as an upfront treatment, leaving systemic therapies as an alternative in case of future relapse. However, patient selection regarding their performance status, metastatic sites, number of lesions and tumorous characteristics is of paramount importance.

Metastasectomy in renal cell carcinoma: where are we now?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Metastatic RCC has a variable natural history. Treatment choice depends on disease and patient factors, but most importantly disease burden and site of metastasis. This article highlights key variables to consider when contemplating metastasectomy for RCC and provide a narrative review on the evidence for metastasectomy in these patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Tumour subtype is associated with differing patterns of recurrence. Patients with single or few metastatic sites have better outcomes, and those with greater time interval from initial nephrectomy. Local recurrence is particularly amenable to minimally invasive surgical resection and is oncologically sound. Very well selected cases of liver or brain metastases may benefit from metastectomy, although lung and endocrine metastases have more favourable outcomes. Although site and burden of disease is important, the key determinate of outcome in metastasectomy depends mostly on the ability to achieve a complete resection. Adjuvant treatment is not currently advocated.

SUMMARY

Metastasectomy should be generally reserved for cases where complete resection is achievable, unless the goal of treatment is to palliate symptoms. This field warrants ongoing research, particularly as systemic therapy and minimally invasive surgical techniques evolve. Elucidating tumour biology to inform patient selection will be important in future research.