1
|
Rajwa P, Quhal F, Tsaur I. Current Management and Future Treatment Strategies for Patients with Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. World J Urol 2023; 41:2005-2006. [PMID: 37524851 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04542-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/02/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, 3 Maja Street 13-15, 41-800, Zabrze, Poland.
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Igor Tsaur
- Department and Outpatient Clinic for Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yanagisawa T, Hata K, Narita S, Hatakeyama S, Mori K, Yata Y, Sano T, Otsuka T, Hara S, Miyajima K, Enei Y, Fukuokaya W, Nakazono M, Matsukawa A, Miki J, Habuchi T, Ohyama C, Shariat SF, Kimura T. Docetaxel versus abiraterone for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer with focus on efficacy of sequential therapy. Prostate 2023; 83:563-571. [PMID: 36661102 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 12/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to assess the oncologic efficacy of combining docetaxel (DOC) versus abiraterone (ABI) with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with high-risk metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), with a focus on the efficacy of sequential therapy, in a real-world clinical practice setting. METHODS The records of 336 patients who harbored de novo high-risk mHSPC, based on the LATITUDE criteria, and had received ADT with either DOC (n = 109) or ABI (n = 227) were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival (PFS), including time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), time to 2nd-line progression (PFS2), and 2nd- and 3rd-line PFS, were compared. We used one-to-two propensity score matching to minimize the confounders. The differential efficacy of 2nd-line therapy based on agents in each arm was evaluated using the unmatched cohort as an additional interest. RESULTS After propensity score matching, 86 patients treated with DOC + ADT and 172 with ABI + ADT were available for analyses. The 3-year OS and CSS for DOC versus ABI were 76.2% versus 75.1% (p = 0.8) and 78.2% versus 78.6% (p = 1), respectively. There was no difference in the median PFS2 (49 vs. 43 months, p = 0.39), while the median time to CRPC in patients treated with ABI was significantly longer compared to those treated with DOC (42 vs. 22 months; p = 0.006). The median 2nd-line PFS (14 vs. 4 months, p < 0.001) and 3rd-line PFS (4 vs. 2 months, p = 0.012) were significantly better in the DOC group than in the ABI group. Among the unmatched cohort, after ABI for mHSPC, the median 2nd-line PFS did not differ between the patients treated with DOC and those treated with enzalutamide as 2nd-line therapy (both 3 months, p = 0.8). CONCLUSIONS ADT with DOC or ABI has comparable oncologic outcomes in terms of OS, CSS, and PFS2 in patients with de novo high-risk mHSPC. Compared to DOC, ABI resulted in longer time to CRPC but worse 2nd and 3rd-line PFS. Further studies are needed to clarify the optimal sequence of therapy in the upfront intensive treatment era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Kenichi Hata
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Urology, Atsugi City Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Shintaro Narita
- Department of Urology, Akita University School of Medicine, Akita, Japan
| | - Shingo Hatakeyama
- Department of Urology, Division of Advanced Blood Purification Therapy, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Aomori, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuji Yata
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takayuki Sano
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Otsuka
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shuhei Hara
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Miyajima
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuki Enei
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Wataru Fukuokaya
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Minoru Nakazono
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Miki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomonori Habuchi
- Department of Urology, Akita University School of Medicine, Akita, Japan
| | - Chikara Ohyama
- Department of Urology, Division of Advanced Blood Purification Therapy, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Aomori, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Miura Y, Hatakeyama S, Narita S, Kimura T, Hata K, Yanagisawa T, Tanaka T, Ishi N, Kawamura S, Hoshi S, Ishidoya S, Mitsuzuka K, Ito A, Tsuchiya N, Egawa S, Habuchi T, Ohyama C. Effect of upfront intensive therapy on oncological outcomes in older patients with high tumor burden metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: A multicenter retrospective study. Prostate 2022; 82:1304-1312. [PMID: 35747992 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effect of upfront intensive therapy on the prognosis of older patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) remains unclear. Thus, we assessed the impact of older age (≥75 years) on oncological outcomes in mCSPC patients with a high tumor burden. METHODS This multicenter retrospective study included 252 patients aged ≥75 years treated with either upfront or conventional therapy between 2014 and 2021. We compared castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)-free survival (FS) and overall survival (OS) between patients with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus upfront intensive therapy (docetaxel [DTX] or abiraterone acetate [ABI] plus prednisolone) and conventional therapy (ADT monotherapy or ADT combined with bicalutamide). We evaluated the effect of upfront intensive therapy on prognosis by multivariable Cox regression analysis. RESULTS The 231 patients enrolled in our study were classified in the conventional group (n = 148) or the upfront group (n = 104; DTX = 27 and ABI = 77). The upfront group had significantly prolonged CRPC-FS and OS compared with the conventional group, and this was also the case in the background-adjusted multivariable Cox regression analysis. CONCLUSION Patients aged ≥75 years who received upfront intensive therapy had significantly longer CRPC-FS and OS compared with similar age patients treated with conventional therapy in real-world practice. The oncological benefit may not diminish in this older population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Miura
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Shingo Hatakeyama
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Shintaro Narita
- Department of Urology, Akita University School of Medicine, Akita, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenichi Hata
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Urology, Atsugi City Hospital, Atsugi, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshikazu Tanaka
- Department of Urology, Aomori Prefectural Central Hospital, Aomori, Japan
| | - Noritaka Ishi
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | | | - Senji Hoshi
- Department of Urology, Yamagata Prefectural Central Hospital, Yamagata, Japan
| | | | - Koji Mitsuzuka
- Department of Urology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Akihiro Ito
- Department of Urology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Norihiko Tsuchiya
- Department of Urology, Yamagata University School of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Shin Egawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomonori Habuchi
- Department of Urology, Akita University School of Medicine, Akita, Japan
| | - Chikara Ohyama
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|