The intraureteral placement of the stent's distal end decreases stent-related urinary symptoms: a prospective randomized clinical trial

Is Stent on a String the New Gold Standard for Postureteroscopy Ureteral Drainage? Evidence from a Systematic Review

Introduction: Ureteral stents are widely used throughout urologic surgery, most commonly following ureteroscope (URS) procedures. This systematic review aims to assess the current evidence concerning stent on string (SOS) placed after URS and compare it with stents without strings (SWOSs). Methods: A systematic review was conducted on several databases using the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) methodology for studies in English language, for patients of all age groups, who had an SOS after URS for stone disease. Results: Of 1210 records identified, a total of 22 studies (20 adult and 2 pediatric studies) were included, with a total of 8382 patients. Of these, 3427 (40.9%) had SOSs inserted and 434 (11%) were in the pediatric age group. Our results show that SOS provides several advantages, and compared with SWOS, they were in situ for less time, with no difference in complications such as urinary tract infection or urinary symptoms. Furthermore, significant cost savings, less pain on removal, and high rates of safe home removal were reported in SOS, with >90% patients reporting that they would be happy to remove their SOSs at home. However, a small risk of stent dislodgment must be considered when making decisions regarding SOS placement after URS. Conclusion: SOS provides an excellent option after URS, especially in those patients with no intraoperative complication, and their placement is done as a routine insertion based on surgeon preference. These stents reduce dwell time, pain, cost, risks, and suffering involved from prolonged stenting, and majority of patients are happy to remove it themselves at home. Although their use seems to be still restricted in the current endourology practices, they are likely to become the new gold standard for routine URS in future, with more shared decision making and patient-reported outcome measures coming into the mainstream.

Complete Intraureteral Stents Decrease Urinary Symptoms Compared with Conventional Ureteral Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Up to 80% of stent patients report urinary discomfort, negatively impacting their daily activities and quality of life. Conventional Double-J ureteral stents (DJSs) can cause adverse kidney and bladder-related symptoms. Complete intraureteral stents (CISs) may reduce bothersome bladder symptoms by reducing foreign material in the bladder. We sought to aggregate and analyze ureteral stent symptom questionnaire (USSQ) data from the available randomized controlled trials comparing CISs with conventional ureteral stents. Methods: In February 2023, a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant systematic review was performed to identify studies that evaluated the use of CISs and reported outcomes using the USSQ score. Two authors (D.E.H.-G. and G.S.) independently extracted and analyzed data using Review Manager 5.41. Heterogeneity was assessed using Higgins I2%, with values >50% considered heterogeneous and analyzed with a random effects model; otherwise, a fixed effects model was used. The results are presented as the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We set our significance level at p = 0.05. Results: Six randomized controlled clinical trials compared CISs with DJSs, but only five trials reported the USSQ score. Among these patients, 235 had CISs, whereas the remaining 259 had DJSs or loop-tail stents and served as controls for 494 patients. Urinary symptoms scores were lower in the CIS group (MD -5.19, 95% CI: [-5.89 to -4.50], p < 0.0001). Pain scores were also lower in the CIS group (MD -1.90 [-2.63 to -1.16] p < 0.00001). General health and work performance domains were similar between the groups. A 2.5% stent failure or migration rate requiring endoscopic intervention was reported in the CIS group compared with 0.3% in the DJS group (odds ratio 4.01 [0.96-16.76] p = 0.06). Conclusions: CISs significantly decrease urinary symptoms and pain associated with conventional indwelling ureteral stents. However, further trials are needed to determine the optimal patient selection for this type of stent.

Comparation of intraureteral stent and conventional stent at different stages: a systematic review with meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Stent related symptom (SRS) is the most common adverse effect of ureteral stenting. In recent years, many efforts have been made to develope modified ureteral stents to ameliorate SRS. It has been reported that intraureteral stents have the potential to improve the tail end adverse effect of the bladder and alleviate SRS. However, there still lack of evidence for the efficacy and the safety of clinically applying intraureteral stents. The aim of this work is to investigate the efficacy and safety of intraureteral stents.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review was performed by using the PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library. The studies published before February 2023 were included. The study selection was following the guideline from Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). The searching strategy was: "Pigtail suture stent" OR "Intra-ureteric stent" OR "Suture Stent" OR "Intraureteral stent" AND "Ureteroscopy" OR "Urinary calculi" OR "Stent-related symptoms" OR "Lower urinary tract symptoms". The data from randomized clinical trials which meet the selection criteria were extracted. Revman 5.4 was employed to proceed the meta-analysis.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

A total of six randomized clinical trials of intraureteral stents were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. According to the different investigation time, the results could be divided into four stages: early-stage, middle-stage, late-stage, and long-term evaluation. Urinary symptoms, pain score, and general health were significantly improved in intraureteral stents group at middle stage. For late-stage, intraureteral stent achieved better outcomes in urinary symptoms index, VAS score, quality of life, general health, and pain score. However, for early-stage and long-term evaluation, there was no significant difference between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis reveal that regardless of the stage of treatment, the efficacy and safety of intraureteral stent are no worse than that of conventional stent. During 7-14 days postoperation, which is the most commonly time for clinically using ureteral stent, most of the outcomes of intraureteral stent are better than those of conventional stent. Hence, it is confirmed that intraureteral stent is worth for more clinical study and application.

Modified endoluminal ureteral stenting for the management of proximal ureteral obstruction in two cats

Case series summary

Two cases of placement of modified endoluminal ureteral stents are described, for revision of a subcutaneous ureteral bypass (SUB) and for primary treatment of obstructive ureterolithiasis. Modified endoluminal stents were inserted through the ureterotomy, anchored in the renal pelvis with a single pigtail and shortened to a length sufficient to span the proximal ureter and ureterotomy site.

Relevance and novel information

The advantages of this approach as a surgical option for feline obstructive ureterolithiasis are demonstrated, including the avoidance of disruption, or bypass, of the ureterovesicular junction, minimisation of implanted foreign material and avoidance of intravesicular stent mass, maintenance of the physiological route of urine flow, including preservation of active distal ureteral function, and limitation of the potential complications of ureterotomy. The clinical efficacy of this adaptation of the previously published endoluminal stenting technique is demonstrated with its applicability de novo and in the revision of other stenting procedures.

Complete intraureteral stent placement reduces stent-related symptoms: Systemic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The distal coil of a double-J ureteral stent is considered the major cause of stent-related symptoms. We noticed that some recent studies investigated whether complete intraureteral stent placement (CIU-SP) reduced these symptoms. The current systemic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and the effectiveness of CIU-SP, as compared to conventional stent placement (C-SP).

METHODS

We retrieved relevant trials published before December 2021 from three databases, including PubMED, Embase, and Web of Science. The following medical subject heading were used ((complete intraureteral stent) OR (suture stent)) AND (symptom OR pain) AND (randomized OR randomised). The above search was limited to English language publication.

RESULTS

We identified six prospective randomized trials, all of which investigated a short-term (1-2 weeks) stent placement following uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy. The meta-analysis revealed that CIU-SP significantly reduced stent-related symptoms: CIU-SP had lower USSQ (Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire) Urinary Symptom Index score (MD -5.13; 95%CI [-5.82,-4.44]; P < 0.00001), lower USSQ Pain Index score (MD -4.21; 95%CI [-5.25,-3.17]; P < 0.00001), and lower VAS pain scale (MD -1.93; 95%CI [-2.17,-1.69]; p < 0.00001). Besides, patients with CIU-SP were less likely to have pain (RR 0.78; 95%CI [0.67,0.91]; p = 0.001). There was no significant difference regarding the USSQ General Health and Work Performance. Both CIU-SP and C-SP had similarly few complications of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥2.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis reveals that CIU-SP significantly decreases stent-related urinary symptoms and pain. Based on the current evidence, CIU-SP is ready to be applied in clinical practice, at least in those requiring short-term stent placement following uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy.