1
|
Margue G, Ingels A, Bensalah K, Doumerc N, Vaessen C, Roupret M, Audenet F, Mejean A, Bruyere F, Olivier J, Baumert H, Michel C, Paparel P, Parier B, Sebe P, Long JA, Lang H, Lebret T, Patard JJ, Bernhard JC. Late complications and 5 years outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy in France: prospective assessment in the French Kidney Cancer Research Network (UroCCR 10). World J Urol 2023; 41:2281-2288. [PMID: 37407720 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04491-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe the practice of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in France and prospectively assess the late complications and long-term outcomes. METHODS Prospective, multicenter (n = 16), observational study including all patients diagnosed with a renal tumor who underwent RAPN. Preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative, and follow-up data were collected and stored in the French research network for kidney cancer database (UroCCR). Patients were included over a period of 12 months, then followed for 5 years. RESULTS In total, 466 patients were included, representing 472 RAPN. The mean tumor size was 3.4 ± 1.7 cm, most of moderate complexity (median PADUA and RENAL scores of 8 [7-10] and 7 [5-9]). Indication for nephron-sparing surgery was relative in 7.1% of cases and imperative in 11.8%. Intraoperative complications occurred in 6.8% of patients and 4.2% of RAPN had to be converted to open surgery. Severe postoperative complications were experienced in 2.3% of patients and late complications in 48 patients (10.3%), mostly within the first 3 months and mainly comprising vascular, infectious, or parietal complications. At 5 years, 29 patients (6.2%) had chronic kidney disease upstaging, 21 (4.5%) were diagnosed with local recurrence, eight (1.7%) with contralateral recurrence, 25 (5.4%) with metastatic progression, and 10 (2.1%) died of the disease. CONCLUSION Our results reflect the contemporary practice of French expert centers and is, to our knowledge, the first to provide prospective data on late complications associated with RAPN. We have shown that RAPN provides good functional and oncologic outcomes while limiting short- and long-term morbidity. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03292549.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaëlle Margue
- Service d'urologie, Urology Department, Bordeaux University Hospital, CHU de Bordeaux, Place Amelie Raba Leon, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
| | - Alexandre Ingels
- Urology Department, Henri Mondor University Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Karim Bensalah
- Urology Department, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Nicolas Doumerc
- Urology Department, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Morgan Roupret
- Urology Department, Pitié-Saplétrière Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
| | - François Audenet
- Urology Department, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Arnaud Mejean
- Urology Department, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Franck Bruyere
- Urology Department, Tours University Hospital, Tours, France
| | | | - Hervé Baumert
- Urology Department, Saint Joseph Hospital, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Bastien Parier
- Urology Department, Bicêtre University Hospital, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Philippe Sebe
- Urology Department, Hospital Group Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon, Paris, France
| | | | - Hervé Lang
- Urology Department, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Thierry Lebret
- Urology Department, Foch Hospital, Paris Saclay University, Suresnes, France
| | | | - Jean-Christophe Bernhard
- Service d'urologie, Urology Department, Bordeaux University Hospital, CHU de Bordeaux, Place Amelie Raba Leon, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Comparison of open and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy approaches using multicentric data (UroCCR-47 study). Sci Rep 2022; 12:18981. [PMID: 36347900 PMCID: PMC9643517 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22912-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
We compared the outcomes of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN) using contemporary data to respond to unmet clinical needs. Data from patients included in the registry who underwent partial nephrectomy between January 01, 2014 and June 30, 2017 within 20 centres of the French Network for Research on Kidney Cancer UroCCR were collected (NCT03293563). Statistical methods included adjusted multivariable analyses. Rates of peri- and post-operative transfusion, and of surgical revision, were lower in the RPN (n = 1434) than the OPN (n = 571) group (2.9% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.0012; 3.8% vs. 11.5%, p < 0.0001; 2.4% vs. 6.7%, p < 0.0001, respectively). In multivariable analyses, RPN was independently associated with fewer early post-operative complications than OPN (overall: odds-ratio [95% confidence interval, CI] = 0.48 [0.35-0.66]; severe: 0.29 [0.16-0.54], p < 0.0001 for both) and shorter hospital stays (34% [30%; 37%], p < 0.0001). RPN was also a significantly associated with a decresedrisk of post-operative acute renal failure, and new-onset chronic kidney disease at 3 and 12 months post-surgery. There were no between-group differences in oncological outcomes. In comparison with OPN, RPN was associated with improved peri- and post-operative morbidity, better functional outcomes, and shorter hospital stays. Our results support the use of RPN, even for large and complex tumours.
Collapse
|
3
|
Margue G, Callede E, Ricard S, Picard F, Dubernet C, Robert G, Bladou F, Bernhard JC. [Digital transformation of perioperative nurse-coordinated protocols in renal surgery for enhanced recovery and outpatient surgery using UroConnect® application]. Prog Urol 2022; 32:888-892. [PMID: 36055902 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
Robot Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (RAPN) is a standard of care for localized renal tumors. It allows a good carcinological control while limiting complications. Despite numerous benefits, the economic sustainability of robotic assistance remains a challenge in the French health care system. The introduction in our institution of two perioperative nurse-coordinated protocols for patients undergoing RAPN (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: NP-RAAC in 2015 and Outpatient: Ambu-Rein in 2016) is associated with a shortening of the average length of hospital stay, thus reducing the cost of robotic assisted procedures. With the aim of improving efficiency of nursing support within these protocols, we have introduced digitalized nursing coordination by developing a urological perioperative application: UroConnect®. This device is offered to patients by the coordinating nurses during a preoperative visit. It provides information on the pathology and its surgical management. Self-completed questionnaires sent at key moments collect data from the first month after surgery and detect patients presenting difficulties or complications, allowing the nurses to respond with appropriate care. The application allows a secure discharge, a personalised follow-up and an increase in the patient's autonomy and compliance with care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Margue
- Service de chirurgie urologique et transplantation rénale, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
| | - E Callede
- Service de chirurgie urologique et transplantation rénale, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France; Réseau français de recherche sur le cancer du rein UroCCR, Bordeaux, France
| | - S Ricard
- Service de chirurgie urologique et transplantation rénale, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France; Réseau français de recherche sur le cancer du rein UroCCR, Bordeaux, France
| | - F Picard
- Service de chirurgie urologique et transplantation rénale, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - C Dubernet
- Service de chirurgie urologique et transplantation rénale, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - G Robert
- Service de chirurgie urologique et transplantation rénale, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - F Bladou
- Service de chirurgie urologique et transplantation rénale, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - J C Bernhard
- Service de chirurgie urologique et transplantation rénale, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France; Réseau français de recherche sur le cancer du rein UroCCR, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|