Upper tract urothelial carcinoma in Germany: epidemiological data and surgical treatment trends in a total population analysis from 2006 to 2019

Refined step-by-step narrative review of robotic radical nephroureterectomy in the management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma

Background and Objective

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a challenging clinical entity to diagnose and manage. Recent advances in robotic technology have permitted optimization of surgical technique in robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision (RNU/BCE), regional lymphadenectomy, and intra or perioperative instillation of intravesical chemotherapy. This has optimized the management of bulky upper tract disease and high-grade disease not amenable to segmental ureterectomy or nephron-sparing surgery. The purpose of this article is to highlight and review the surgical technique if RNU/BCE and regional lymphadenectomy utilized in our high-volume clinical practice.

Methods

A review of our surgical approach was summarized for this narrative article. This technique has been refined over a course of more than 150 cases and 12 years of local experience with the procedure, as well as through multiple da Vinci® robotic surgical systems over the years.

Key Content and Findings

RNU/BCE, regional template-based lymphadenectomy, and intra or perioperative instillation of intravesical chemotherapy is technically feasible and the procedure has been optimized via multiple iterations with a decade of local experience. The appropriate steps are outlined in this review.

Conclusions

RNU/BCE, regional template-based lymphadenectomy, and intra or perioperative instillation of intravesical chemotherapy provides a refined, standardized, efficient approach for management of UTUC in appropriately selected patients. This surgical technique has also been undertaken in elderly patients including those with advanced age (>80 years old) with significant medical co-morbidities due to imperative, symptomatic indications. Further, this approach may be facilely adapted by urologists familiar with all forms of robotic renal surgery.

Prognostic Impact of the Modified 5-Item Frailty Index After Radical Nephroureterectomy in Patients With Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

The modified 5-item frailty index can be used to evaluate frailty using 5 routinely encountered clinical variables. This study aimed to assess the impact of the modified 5-item frailty index in patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this multicenter retrospective study, we calculated the modified 5-item frailty index scores of patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma between 2010 and 2022. Patients were categorized into the high (≥2) and low (≤1) modified 5-item frailty index score groups. To assess the prognostic influence of the preoperative modified 5-item frailty index, we conducted Cox proportional regression analyses concerning progression-free, overall, and cancer-specific survival.

RESULTS

Of 434 patients, 82, and 352 were classified into the high and low modified 5-item frailty index score groups, respectively. The high modified 5-item frailty index score group had significantly higher rates of severe surgical complications (P = .038) and ≥30 days of hospitalization (P = .049) and significantly worse progression-free (P = .012) and overall survival (P = .002) than the low modified 5-item frailty index score group. The multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that a high modified 5-item frailty index score was independently associated with poor progression-free (P = .044), overall (P = .017), and cancer-specific survival (P = .005).

CONCLUSION

The modified 5-item frailty index emerged as a significant predictive indicator of severe surgical complications and postoperative survival outcomes in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy.

The efficacy and safety of tislelizumab combined with gemcitabine plus cisplatin in the treatment of postoperative patients with muscle-invasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma

BACKGROUND

A combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and chemotherapy has demonstrated excellent clinical efficacy and safety in treating a variety of cancers, including urothelial carcinoma (UC). However, its efficacy and safety in patients with muscle-invasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who are undergoing radical surgery remain uncertain. The purpose of this retrospective study was to examine the effectiveness and safety of tislelizumab combined with gemcitabine plus cisplatin (TGC) as a first-line postoperative adjuvant treatment in this population.

METHODS

This single-center, real-world study retrospectively analyzed the data from 71 patients with muscle-invasive UTUC who had radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University between November 1, 2020, and November 1, 2023. Among the 71 patients, 30 received adjuvant therapy of TGC within 90 days after RNU and 41 underwent surveillance. No patients receive preoperative neoadjuvant therapy. The TGC therapy group received adjuvant therapy every 3 weeks postoperatively until the first recurrence, first metastasis, or death due to any reason, whichever occurred first. The patients were followed up telephonically and through outpatient visits to record and evaluate their disease-free survival (DFS) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).

RESULTS

This study assessed the DFS of 41 and 30 patients in the surveillance group and TGC therapy group, respectively. The median DFS of the surveillance group was 16.5 [95% confidence interval (CI), 14.7-18.3] months, while the median DFS of the TGC group has not yet reached [hazard ratio (HR) 0.367 (95% CI, 0.169-0.796); p = 0.008], with 21 patients still undergoing follow-up. Compared with the surveillance group, the TGC therapy group had dramatically improved DFS after RNU and reduced risk by 63.3%. Of the 30 patients receiving combination therapy, 28 experienced TRAEs; all TRAEs were consistent with the frequently reported events in the chemotherapy-alone regimens, and there were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that TGC therapy exhibits excellent clinical efficacy in patients undergoing radical surgery, significantly improving DFS and displaying great safety.

Preoperative systemic immune-inflammation index as a prognostic indicator for patients with urothelial carcinoma

Background

The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) is a cost-efficient indicator for carcinoma prognosis. However, its utility in urothelial carcinoma (UC) prognosis is disputed. This meta-analysis aims to assess SII's prognostic value in UC.

Methods

A thorough search of databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus, was conducted to find studies until January 11, 2023. Eligibility criteria were applied to select studies. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted from selected studies and compiled in a meta-analysis to gauge SII's association with survival outcomes such as overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

This analysis includes 19 studies with 12505 UC patients. It was found that high SII significantly correlated with worse OS in UC patients (HR 1.430, 95% CI 1.237-1.653, P<0.001). High SII values also linked with poorer CSS (HR 1.913, 95% CI 1.473-2.485, P<0.001), RFS (HR 1.240, 95% CI 1.097-1.403, P=0.001), and PFS (HR 1.844, 95% CI 1.488-2.284, P<0.001) compared to low SII values. Subgroup analysis revealed SII's consistent prognostic value in UC across races, carcinoma types, sample sizes, and SII cut-off values, suggesting its potential as a prognostic indicator in UC patients.

Conclusion

Current evidence suggests SII as a promising, cost-efficient predictor in UC patients. This meta-analysis indicates SII's potential as a valuable prognostic tool in UC patients.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=307643, identifier CRD42022307643.

[National Registries for Urothelial Cancer (UroNAT) and Prostate Cancer (ProNAT) by d-uo]

The German Society of Uro-Oncologists ("Deutsche Uro-Onkologen e.V.", d-uo) provides a national registry for urothelial cancer (UroNat) and a national registry for prostate cancer (ProNAT). These registries aim to evaluate the standard of care for urothelial cancer of the bladder and the upper urinary tract as well as prostate cancer by office-based urologists, oncologists and outpatient hospital departments in Germany. This includes, but is not limited to, adherence to guidelines during the treatment of patients with urothelial cancer and prostate cancer. The registries aim to capture and analyse scientifically how patients with these two most frequent urological tumours are treated and how quality assurance is implemented to improve the quality of their outpatient treatment in Germany. Both registries may share basic patient data supplied by the non-interventional, prospective, multicentre VERSUS registry by d-uo, which has been ongoing since 2018 and today includes more than 15,000 patients with different urological malignancies. In the UroNAT and ProNAT registries, additional items and parameters are included to allow for more detailed analyses of outcomes of outpatient treatments in Germany, which have so far been unavailable from the German Cancer Registry. By documenting the current treatment landscape of urothelial and prostate cancer in the outpatient setting, the registries intend to identify potential improvements of patient care and to initiate their implementation into clinical practice. These non-interventional prospective registries only document daily routine diagnostics, clinical courses and procedures.