Insufficient utilization of care in male incontinence surgery: health care reality in Germany from 2006 to 2020 and a systematic review of the international literature

[Structural health care reality in the surgical treatment of male stress incontinence in Germany]

BACKGROUND

Stress urinary incontinence in men is predominantly iatrogenic after radical prostatectomy or transurethral interventions. Current studies show that there is a deficit in the availability of surgical therapy not only in Germany. The aim of this study is to investigate in more detail the structural health care situation of surgical treatment of male stress incontinence in Germany.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The evaluation of the surgical therapy of male stress incontinence in Germany is based on the OPS (Operationen- und Prozedurenschlüssel-German procedural classification) codes from hospital quality reports from 2011-2019.

RESULTS

From 2012-2019, the number of male incontinence surgeries declined from 2191 to 1445. The number of departments performing incontinence surgeries decreased from 275 to 244. In the multivariate analysis, a high number (≥ 50) of radical prostatectomies/year (RPE/year) is an independent predictor of a high-volume centre (≥ 10 procedures/year; odds ratio [OR] 6.4 [2.3-17.6]; p < 0.001). The most significant decrease was in sling surgery (from 1091 to 410; p < 0.001). Here, the number of cases decreased especially in departments that implanted a high number of slings (≥ 10 slings/year; -69%; -62.4 ± 15.5 surgeries/year; p = 0.007). In addition, the number of departments implanting slings decreased over the investigated time period (from 34 to 10; p < 0.001). This particularly affected departments that also had a low number of RPE/year (from 9 to 0; -100%).

CONCLUSION

The situation of surgical treatment of male stress urinary incontinence in Germany shows a clear decline in sling implantation, especially in small departments. On the one hand, this reflects the increasingly differentiated indications for sling implantation. On the other hand, it raises the suspicion that a gap in care has developed, as the decline was not compensated for by other surgical therapies.

[Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: risk factors and utilisation of care]

Stress urinary incontinence is a relevant risk of radical prostatectomy (RP), which significantly affects patients' quality of life. The risk of developing stress urinary incontinence depends on pre-, intra- and postoperative factors. In particular, intraoperative factors regarding different surgical techniques are often focused on in order to improve continence rates. If stress urinary incontinence develops after RPE, patients affected should be treated adequately. In this respect, there are indications of healthcare insufficiencies in Germany. On the one hand, these include deficits in the use of incontinence materials. On the other hand, surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence after RPE is insufficient.