[The reproducibility of multifocal ERG recordings]

Comparison of DTL and gold cup skin electrodes for recordings of the multifocal electroretinogram

OBJECTIVE

To compare mfERG recordings with the Dawson-Trick-Litzkow (DTL) and gold cup skin electrode in healthy young and old adults and to test the sensitivity of both electrodes to age-related changes in the responses.

METHODS

Twenty participants aged 20-27 years ("young") and 20 participants aged 60-75 ("old") with a visual acuity of ≤ 0 logMAR were included. The mfERG responses were recorded simultaneously using DTL and skin electrodes. P1 amplitudes, peak times and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) were compared between both electrodes and across age groups, and correlation analyses were performed. The electrode's performance in discriminating between age groups was assessed via area under curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics.

RESULTS

Both electrodes reflected the typical waveform of mfERG recordings. For the skin electrode, however, P1 amplitudes were significantly reduced (p < 0.001; reduction by over 70%), P1 peak times were significantly shorter (p < 0.001; by approx. 1.5 ms), and SNRs were reduced [(p < 0.001; logSNR ± SEM DTL young (old) vs gold cup: 0.79 ± 0.13 (0.71 ± 0.15) vs 0.37 ± 0.15 (0.34 ± 0.13)]. All mfERG components showed strong significant correlations (R² ≥ 0.253, p < 0.001) between both electrodes for all eccentricities. Both electrodes allowed for the identification of age-related P1 changes, i.e., P1-amplitude reduction and peak-time delay in the older group. There was a trend to higher AUC for the DTL electrode to delineate these differences between age groups, which, however, failed to reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Both electrode types enable successful mfERG recordings. However, in compliant patients, the use of the DTL electrode appears preferable due to the larger amplitudes, higher signal-to-noise ratio and its better reflection of physiological changes, i.e., age effects. Nevertheless, skin electrodes appear a viable alternative for mfERG recordings in patients in whom the use of corneal electrodes is precluded, e.g., children and disabled patients.

Removing mains interference from the mfERG by applying a post-processing digital notch filter: for the good or the bad?

Purpose

Ideally, the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) is recorded without noticeable intrusion of mains interference. However, sometimes contamination is difficult to avoid. A post-processing digital notch filter can help to recover the retinal response even in severe cases of mains interference. While a digital filter can be designed to have little to no impact on peak times, filtering out mains interference also removes the retinal signal content of the same frequency, which may result in a change of amplitude. The present study addressed this issue in the standard first order kernel mfERG.

Methods

In 24 recordings from routine exams with no perceivable mains interference, the effects of 50-Hz and 60-Hz non-causal digital notch filters on amplitude and peak time were assessed. Furthermore, the effect of filtering on contaminated traces was demonstrated and simulated mains interference was used to provide an example of nonlinear superposition of retinal signal and mains interference.

Results

mfERG amplitudes were reduced by 0%–15% (median 6%) with the 50-Hz filter and remained virtually unaffected with the 60-Hz filter. Simulations illustrate that spurious high-frequency components can occur in the filtered signal if a strongly contaminated signal is clipped due to a limited input range of the analog-to-digital converter.

Conclusion

The application of a 50-Hz digital notch filter to mfERG traces causes a mild amplitude reduction which will not normally affect the clinical interpretation of the data. The situation is even more favorable with a 60-Hz digital notch filter. Caution is necessary if the assumption of linear additivity of retinal signal and mains interference is violated.

The effect of nutritional supplementation on the multifocal electroretinogram in healthy eyes

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated an increase in macular pigment optical density (MPOD) with lutein (L)-based supplementation in healthy eyes. However, not all studies have assessed whether this increase in MPOD is associated with changes to other measures of retinal function such as the multifocal ERG (mfERG). Some studies also fail to report dietary levels of L and zeaxanthin (Z). Because of the associations between increased levels of L and Z, and reduced risk of AMD, this study was designed to assess the effects of L-based supplementation on mfERG amplitudes and latencies in healthy eyes.

METHODS

Multifocal ERG amplitudes, visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, MPOD and dietary levels of L and Z were assessed in this longitudinal, randomized clinical trial. Fifty-two healthy eyes from 52 participants were randomly allocated to receive a L-based supplement (treated group), or no supplement (non-treated group).

RESULTS

There were 25 subjects aged 18-77 (mean age ± SD; 48 ± 17) in the treated group and 27 subjects aged 21-69 (mean age ± SD; 43 ± 16) in the non-treated group. All participants attended for three visits: visit one at baseline, visit two at 20 weeks and visit three at 40 weeks. A statistically significant increase in MPOD (F = 17.0, p ≤ 0.001) and shortening of mfERG ring 2 P1 latency (F = 3.69, p = 0.04) was seen in the treated group.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the results were not clinically significant, the reported trend for improvement in MPOD and mfERG outcomes warrants further investigation.

Test-retest reliability and inter-ocular symmetry of multi-focal electroretinography in Stargardt disease

PURPOSE

To evaluate test-retest reliability and inter-ocular symmetry of multi-focal electroretinography recordings in Stargardt disease and in patients without retinal pathology.

METHODS

Multi-focal electroretinography were recorded with continuous fundus monitoring using the VERIS multifocal recording system using an array of 103 hexagons spanning 50 degrees of central retina. Recordings were made sequentially from one eye (test-retest) followed by recordings from the fellow eye. A departure score, expressed as a percentage difference from the first recording (or from the fellow eye), was calculated for each comparison and parameter.

RESULTS

Multi-focal electroretinography response topographies were similar within and between eyes for a particular individual and parameter. However, local response variability within and between eyes was significantly higher in Stargardt disease than in patients without retinal pathology for both amplitude and timing parameters. Amplitude variability in Stargardt disease decreased with more peripheral targets and with larger stimuli but never to the levels achieved with normal observers.

CONCLUSIONS

Both test-retest reliability and inter-ocular symmetry of multi-focal electroretinography responses were significantly lower in Stargardt disease compared to normal eyes, a finding attributable primarily to unsteady fixation. The greater variability between eyes in Stargardt disease may also reflect pathological differences in the topography of retinal function. This inherent variability must be taken into consideration if the multi-focal electroretinography is to be sufficiently sensitive to reliably detect small differences in retinal function.

Cone-mediated multifocal electroretinogram in early age-related maculopathy and its relationships with subjective macular function tests

PURPOSE

To investigate the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) and subjective function in early age-related maculopathy (ARM).

METHODS

Seventeen subjects with early ARM with visual acuity (VA) of 6/12 or better and 20 age-matched control subjects were examined. We assessed mfERGs, high and low contrast distance VA, near VA, low luminance VA, contrast sensitivity, saturated and desaturated Panel D-15 and visual fields (mean sensitivity). The mfERG responses were analysed by comparing central-overall (method 1) and superior-inferior (method 2) ratios.

RESULTS

The mfERG did not discriminate between the groups whereas colour vision (tritan deficiency), contrast sensitivity, and high contrast and low contrast VA showed significantly reduced responses for the early ARM group compared with the control group (p < or = 0.01). The mfERG first-order kernel responses correlated significantly with the desaturated D-15 in both methods (r = -0.5, p < or = 0.05). Fundus grading was not correlated with the mfERG measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the mfERG correlated significantly with the desaturated D-15 in early ARM, suggesting it operates at a sensitive level, it failed to discriminate between the control and ARM groups. In our sample, the subjective function measures were more sensitive than the mfERG measures.

Reproducibility of the mfERG between instruments

PURPOSE

First, to examine both the reproducibility of the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) recorded on different versions of the same instrument, and the repeatability of the mfERG recorded on a single instrument using two different amplifiers. Second, to demonstrate a means by which multicenter and longitudinal studies that use more than one recording instrument can compare and combine data effectively.

METHODS

Three different amplifiers and two mfERG setups, one using VERIS 4.3 software (mfERG1) and another using VERIS Pro 5.2 software (mfERG2), were evaluated. A total of 73 subjects with normal vision were tested in three groups. Group 1 (n = 42) was recorded using two amplifiers in parallel on mfERG1. Group 2 (n = 52) was recorded on mfERG2 using a single amplifier. Group 3 was a subgroup of 21 subjects from groups 1 and 2 that were tested sequentially on both instruments. A fourth group of 26 subjects with diabetes were also recorded using the two parallel amplifiers on mfERG1. P1 implicit times and N1-P1 amplitudes of the 103 local first order mfERGs were measured, and the differences between the instruments and amplifiers were evaluated as raw scores and Z-scores based on normative data. Measurements of individual responses and measurements averaged over the 103 responses were analyzed.

RESULTS

Simultaneous recordings made on mfERG1 with the two different amplifiers showed differences in implicit times but similar amplitudes. There was a mean implicit time difference of 2.5 ms between the amplifiers but conversion to Z-scores improved their agreement. Recordings made on different days with the two instruments produced similar but more variable results, with amplitudes differing between them more than implicit times. For local response implicit times, the 95% confidence interval of the difference between instruments was approximately +/-1 Z-score (+/-0.9 ms) in either direction. For local response amplitude, it was approximately +/-1.6 Z-scores (+/-0.3 microV).

CONCLUSIONS

Different amplifiers can yield quite different mfERG P1 implicit times, even with identical band-pass settings. However, the reproducibility of mfERG Z-scores across recording instrumentation is relatively high. Comparison of data across systems and laboratories, necessary for multicenter or longitudinal investigations, is facilitated if raw data are converted into Z-scores based on normative data.

[Multifocal ERG using ERG-jet and Gold Foil electrodes in normal subjects: comparison and reproducibility]

PURPOSE

To compare multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) amplitudes with the Gold Foil electrode and ERG-jet electrode. To study mfERG amplitude changes between two successive records (intraindividual reproducibility).

METHODS

The right eye of 27 normal subjects was examined. Two mfERG recordings using the 61-hexagon strategy (Vision Monitor, Métrovision, France) were made with both ERG-jet and Gold Foil electrodes. N1 and P1 wave amplitudes were analyzed in the central response and in four concentric rings. Bland and Altman analysis was used for the reproducibility study.

RESULTS

MfERG amplitudes were significantly lower with the Gold Foil electrode, which averaged 72+/-10% of ERG-jet amplitudes. For N1 and P1 waves, the percentage change for the intraindividual reproducibility study was 9.1% and 6.7%, respectively, with the ERG-jet electrode and 18.2% and 13.5%, respectively, with the Gold Foil electrode.

CONCLUSION

MfERG amplitudes were larger and more reproducible with an ERG-jet electrode than with a Gold Foil electrode. The limits of agreement of each ring can be used in clinical practice to determine whether the variation between two mfERG recordings over time is normal, which could reflect a retinal disorder.

Intra-sessional and inter-sessional variability of multifocal electroretinogram

The aim of this study was to investigate the intra-sessional and inter-sessional variability of the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG). Right eyes of 20 healthy adult subjects with uncorrected visual acuity of 1.0 were studied. mfERG recordings were obtained in two sessions by using jet corneal electrodes. The responses were averaged over five retinal regions, the central hexagon (CH: 0.0-2.3 degrees ) and four concentric rings [ring 1 (R1: 2.3-7.4 degrees ), ring 2 (R2: 7.4-12.0 degrees ), ring 3 (R3: 12.0-19.4 degrees ), and ring 4 (R4: 19.4-30.0 degrees )]. In the first session, recordings were repeated while the electrodes stayed in place (the first and the second recordings). Second sessions (third recordings) were performed 1 week later. Individual coefficient of variation (CV; standard deviation/mean) for P1 and N1 amplitudes and implicit times were calculated for the first to second and first to third recordings to assess intra-sessional and inter-sessional variability, respectively, and were evaluated by Wilcoxon-paired samples test. Regarding implicit time and amplitude of mfERG recordings, there was no significant difference between the first to second and first to third recordings (P > 0.05, Bonferroni-corrected Wilcoxon test). CV values significantly decreased with eccentricity in both intra-sessional and inter-sessional comparisons (P < 0.05, Wilcoxon test). However, partial ring averaging showed no significant difference (P > 0.05) between CV values for single hexagons in each ring. Intra-sessional CV values were significantly lower than corresponding inter-sessional values (P < 0.05, Wilcoxon test). Our results support the importance of electrode replacement on variability. The increased number of hexagons that are averaged is the main factor that explains the lower variability in the more peripheral rings.

The clinical applications of multifocal electroretinography: a systematic review

Multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) is an investigation that can simultaneously measure multiple electroretinographic responses at different retinal locations by cross-correlation techniques. mfERG therefore allows topographic mapping of retinal function in the central 40-50 degrees of the retina. The strength of mfERG lies in its ability to provide objective assessment of the central retinal function at different retinal areas within a short duration of time. Since the introduction of mfERG in 1992, mfERG has been applied in a large variety of clinical settings. This article reviews the clinical applications of mfERG based on the currently available evidence. mfERG has been found to be useful in the assessment of localized retinal dysfunction caused by various acquired or hereditary retinal disorders. The use of mfERG also enabled clinicians to objectively monitor the treatment outcomes as the changes in visual functions might not be reflected by subjective methods of assessment. By changing the stimulus, recording, and analysis parameters, investigation of specific retinal electrophysiological components can be performed topographically. Further developments and consolidations of these parameters will likely broaden the use of mfERG in the clinical setting.