Photodynamische Therapie mit Verteporfin beim Aderhautmelanom

LONG TERM RESULTS OF PHOTODYNAMİC THERAPY IN INTRAOCULAR TUMORS

PURPOSE

To report long term results of photodynamic therapy (PDT) as treatment for intraocular tumors METHODS: Retrospective interventional case series of 15 patients. All patients treated with standard-fluence PDT (83 seconds; 50 J/cm2) using verteporfin.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Tumor diameter, tumor thickness, subretinal fluid resolution, best-corrected visual acuity,intraocular pressure and PDT complications.

RESULTS

10 patients (66.7% of total patients) were diagnosed with choroidal hemangioma, 3 patients (20% of total patients) were diagnosed with choroidal melanoma, and 2 patients (13,3% of total patients) were diagnosed with choroidal osteoma.. Mean follow-up time was 33±18 months. The mean visual acuity was determined as 1.29±0.98 logMAR in the examinations just before the PDT application. At the end of the follow-up period, the mean visual acuity was calculated as 1.41±1.07 logMAR. While VA increased in 3 (20%) patients and decreased in 5 (33.3%) patients; It was determined that VA value did not change after treatment in 7 (46.7%) patients. The mean lesion diameter before PDT was 6573 ±2115 µm (range; 1500-10000µm). The mean tumor thickness before PDT was 3624 ±1404 µm (range; 600-6000µm). The mean lesion diameter after treatment was 6026±2521 µm (range; 0-9000µm), and the mean tumor thickness after treatment was 2280 ±1740 µm (range; 0-6000 µm).After the PDT, tumor size decreased in 8 (53.3%) patients, increased in 3 (20%) patients, and no change in tumor size was observed in 4 (26.7%) patients. Mean IOP values ​​of all patients were 14.06±3.17 mmHg before treatment; after treatment, it was measured as 13.46±1.70 mmHg. After the treatment, geographic atrophy developed in 1 (6.7%) patient, cystoid macular edema developed in 1 (6.7%) patient, Retinal Pigment Epithelium (RPE) and choroidal atrophy developed in 1 (6.7%) patient.

CONCLUSION

There are not enough cases of each to clearly distinguish between these 3 types of ocular cancers however PDT may be a good option in the treatment of intraocular tumors with the chance of selective treatment and successful responses in selected cases.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) as adjuvant treatment to brachytherapy for amelanotic choroidal melanoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) as adjuvant treatment, after brachytherapy, in posterior amelanotic choroidal melanomas.

METHODS

Six patients with posterior amelanotic choroidal melanoma underwent brachytherapy treatment. Tumour response was assessed by fundus examination, fundus photography and A-B scan ultrasonography. The residual tumours were treated with adjuvant PDT performed with infusion of verteporfin intravenously at 6 mg/m2 body surface area. Five minutes after infusion, a 689 nm laser was applied with a light dose of 100 J/cm2 over an interval of 166 s.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up after brachytherapy of 17.5 months (IQR 16.2-22.5, range 5-42 months), tumours showed a partial reduction of tumour thickness (22.5% as compared to baseline value) and persistent low internal reflectivity at A-B scan ultrasonography. Supplementary photodynamic treatment resulted in complete resolution of the lesion with marked decrease of elevation . Mean decrease in thickness after PDT was 49.9% with respect to previous brachytherapy treatment 22.5% (p = 0.007). The results was achieved within a median period of 4 months (range 2-4 months) after PDT, and there has been no recurrence after a median follow-up of 84.7 months ± 18.7 (range 59 to 107 months).

CONCLUSION

Combined treatment of brachytherapy and adjuvant PDT in amelanotic uveal melanoma seems to be favourable with regard to complete and rapid tumour regression.

Long term outcome of adjuvant photodynamic therapy after cyberknife radiotherapy for choroidal melanoma

PURPOSE

To report the outcome of photodynamic therapy (PDT) for choroidal melanoma as adjuvant treatment with CyberKnife radiotherapy.

DESIGN

Retrospective interventional case series.

METHODS

Standard-fluence PDT using verteporfin.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Regression of tumor; resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF); change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and complications of PDT.

RESULTS

The study included 16 choroidal melanomas (3 pigmented, 4 lightly pigmented, 9 amelanotic) treated with adjuvant PDT after CyberKnife radiotherapy. The mean follow up time was 45.5 months after the initial PDT. 13 patients improved completely with PDT sessions and growth was seen in 3 patients. There was seen completely resolution in SRF in 10 eyes, partial resolution in 3 eyes, and stable in 3 eyes. The mean thickness of tumors was 3.9 mm before PDT and 2.3 mm after PDT. Retina pigment epithelium atrophy in 3 patients and subretinal hemorrhage in 1 patient were seen as complication of PDT. Three patients underwent enucleation for recurrence in the tumor. There was not a higher rate of change in BCVA after PDT (37.5% stable; 25% increase; 37.5% decrease. Poor final visual acuity associated with worse initial visual acuity, proximity of the tumor to the foveola and optic disc, and radiation complications.

CONCLUSIONS

PDT seems to offer a good option for posterior pole choroidal melanoma as adjuvant therapy in suitable cases. Future prospective studies with larger number of patients and with longer follow-up are needed to further investigation.

Long-term Outcomes of Small Pigmented Choroidal Melanoma Treated with Primary Photodynamic Therapy

PURPOSE

To report the long-term outcomes of patients with small, pigmented, posteriorly located choroidal melanoma undergoing primary treatment using photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin at the London Ocular Oncology Service.

DESIGN

Retrospective, interventional, consecutive case series.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients undergoing primary treatment using PDT with verteporfin from April 2014 to December 2015 and followed until December 2019.

METHODS

This is a long-term follow-up study of the same cohort of patients previously reported by our group in 2017 and 2018.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Local tumor control, visual outcomes, and metastasis-free survival.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were included with a mean (± standard deviation) age and tumor thickness of 62 ± 14 years and 1.3 ± 0.5 mm, respectively. Tumors were posteriorly located (mean distance to optic nerve and fovea = 2.0 ± 2.2 mm and 1.6 ± 1.5 mm, respectively), and the majority were fully pigmented (73%). Overall, patients were followed for a median (interquartile range [IQR], range) of 49.5 (15.3, 7.0-66.0) months from first PDT to last follow-up. Over the course of this study, 14 of 26 (54%) have developed a local recurrence at a median of 20.0 months (20.5, 4.7-60.9 months). The most common pattern of recurrence was an isolated increase in basal dimensions (9/14; 64%). Median (IQR) final logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity of the whole cohort was 0.2 (0.5). The only statistically significant difference in baseline and outcome characteristics between treatment failures and nonfailures was the distance to the fovea (median [IQR], 0.5 [1.3] vs. 2.5 [2.8]; P = 0.002) and final logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity (median [IQR], 0.50 [0.80] vs. 0.00 [0.14]; P = 0.002), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although treatment of small pigmented posterior choroidal melanoma with PDT effectively preserves visual acuity, 5-year treatment-success calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis was only 38.4%. Recurrences after PDT tend to occur along the tumor edges, often with minimal increase in thickness. Given the substantial risk of treatment failure, primary PDT with vertepofrin is recommended in exceptional cases of choroidal melanoma, for which other treatments with greater tumor control are not a feasible option.

PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY AS PRIMARY TREATMENT FOR SMALL CHOROIDAL MELANOMA

PURPOSE

To report outcomes of photodynamic therapy (PDT) as primary treatment for small amelanotic choroidal melanoma.

METHODS

Retrospective interventional case series of 12 patients with small choroidal melanoma treated with standard-fluence PDT (83 seconds; 50 J/cm) using verteporfin.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Tumor regression, subretinal fluid resolution, best-corrected visual acuity, and PDT complications.

RESULTS

There were 12 eyes with melanoma, demonstrating amelanotic (10 [83%]) or lightly pigmented (n = 2, 17%) appearance. The mean tumor thickness was 2.7 mm (median, 2.8; range 1.8-3.7 mm). After PDT, mean follow-up was 56 months (median, 53; range, 14-91). Outcomes revealed complete tumor regression after 1 session (n = 3, 25%), 2 sessions (n = 3, 25%), and 3 sessions (n = 2, 17%) of PDT, reduced to mean thickness of 2.1 mm (median, 2.0; range 1.2-3.4 mm). Tumors that failed to regress (n = 4, 33%) were further controlled with transpupillary thermotherapy (n = 1) or plaque brachytherapy (n = 3). Subretinal fluid, present in six eyes, demonstrated resolution (n = 5) or progression (n = 1), and one tumor developed new subretinal fluid after PDT (n = 1). Visual outcome was stable (n = 11 eyes) or improved (n = 1). Photodynamic therapy complications included local retina pigment epithelium atrophy at the site of treatment in 3 (25%) eyes, with no effect on macular or optic nerve function.

CONCLUSION

Primary PDT resulted in complete tumor regression of small amelanotic choroidal melanoma in 67% at mean 5 years, with no major effect on visual acuity.

BRACHYTHERAPY ALONE OR WITH NEOADJUVANT PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY FOR AMELANOTIC CHOROIDAL MELANOMA: Functional Outcomes and Local Tumor Control

PURPOSE

To compare visual outcomes and local tumor control between two groups of patients with amelanotic choroidal melanoma treated with brachytherapy alone, or neoadjuvant photodynamic therapy before brachytherapy.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with amelanotic choroidal melanoma were recruited for the study and divided into two groups: brachytherapy alone (Group A) and photodynamic therapy preceding brachytherapy (Group B). Patients of both groups were selected to be comparable.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients with amelanotic choroidal melanoma were enrolled in the study. Within Group B, 1 month after photodynamic therapy, ultrasonography showed reduction of tumor height in 11 patients (73.4%). The mean doses of irradiation to macula and optic nerve, at baseline were 74.37 and 52.07 Gy, whereas after photodynamic therapy there was a decrease of 17.26% (P = 0.008) and 21.22% (P = 0.025), respectively. In terms of visual acuity, a mean decrease of 14 ETDRS letters and 5 ETDRS letters was observed at 24 months follow-up, in Groups A and B, respectively (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Photodynamic therapy as neoadjuvant therapy before brachytherapy reduces tumor thickness in 73.4% of cases. As a result, a decrease of radiation toxic effects on visual function could be obtained, without compromising disease control.

Treatment of posterior uveal melanoma with multi-dose photodynamic therapy

AIMS

To report on the use of multi-dose photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the treatment of posterior uveal melanoma.

METHODS

Prospective case series. 18 patients with posterior uveal melanoma were treated with a minimum of three sessions of PDT. Mean tumour thickness was 1.92 mm (median 1.75, range 0.5-4.4 mm) while the mean basal diameter was 7.1 mm (median 6.3, range 5.2-11 mm). Patients were assessed for visual acuity, complications, tumour status and systemic metastases.

RESULTS

In 16 cases, the tumour regressed with stable or improved vision in 15 patients (83%) over a mean follow-up period of 28 months (median 26.5, range 12-44 months). One patient developed an edge recurrence on two occasions ultimately requiring proton beam therapy while one patient showed no response to PDT before being successfully treated with proton beam therapy. Two patients developed scleritis requiring a short course of systemic steroids. No patient developed metastatic disease in the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior uveal melanomas may be successfully treated with high dose PDT with retention of good vision in the majority of cases, at least in the short-term. Longer follow-up is required to see if these encouraging results are maintained.

Treatment of amelanotic choroidal melanoma with photodynamic therapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of photodynamic therapy on amelanotic choroidal melanoma.

METHODS

Nine patients with posteriorly located amelanotic choroidal melanomas, one with a pigmented portion, underwent photodynamic therapy using verteporfin as the photosensitizing agent. The basal diameters ranged from 4 mm to 16 mm and the heights from 1.3 mm to 5.7 mm. Treatment was repeated until the melanoma was completely flat or its height had reached a stable end point. Tumor response was assessed by clinical examination, photography, and ultrasonography. Annual screening for hepatic metastases was performed.

RESULTS

Eight tumors demonstrated apparent complete regression over 1 month to 14 months. The amelanotic portion of the mixed tumor flattened, whereas the height of the pigmented part remained stable at 2 mm. In 8 patients there has been no recurrence during follow-up of between 34 months and 81 months. One case developed 2 separate local recurrences at 21 months and 34 months. There were no serious complications, no patient lost vision after treatment, and none developed metastatic disease.

CONCLUSION

In this series photodynamic therapy was highly effective in causing regression of posteriorly located amelanotic choroidal melanomas, without a detrimental effect on vision. While the short-term results are encouraging, there is some uncertainty regarding complete tumor destruction and long-term efficacy.

Clinical and histopathologic findings after photodynamic therapy of choroidal melanoma

BACKGROUND

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been used occasionally as an alternative treatment for uveal melanomas. The present study describes the clinical and histopathologic features of five choroidal melanomas after PDT.

METHODS

Three patients with pigmented choroidal melanomas were treated with PDT and intravitreal bevacizumab 1 week before undergoing biopsy and brachytherapy to minimize the risks of bleeding during the biopsy. Another two patients received PDT as a primary treatment for peripapillary amelanotic melanomas, one of them also in combination with bevacizumab.

RESULTS

The tumors treated with PDT and bevacizumab showed a marked reduction in tumor vascularity assessed by indocyanine angiography, and the biopsies were conducted without recognizable bleeding, showing viable tumor cells. The tumors receiving PDT as a primary treatment were followed by progressive tumor growth that led to enucleation years after. The histopathology revealed overlying fibrosis with invasion of sclera and optic nerve.

CONCLUSION

Photodynamic therapy and bevacizumab can induce closure of the superficial vasculature of a pigmented choroidal melanoma, but in none of our cases, there was evidence of tumor destruction from this treatment. Preoperative PDT may be useful to reduce the potential of bleeding at the time of tumor biopsy. Our cases do not support the use of a single session of PDT as a primary treatment for pigmented small choroidal melanomas.

Evaluation of verteporfin pharmakokinetics--redefining the need of photosensitizers in ophthalmology

INTRODUCTION

The benzoporphyrine derivative verteporfin has lost its importance to the treatment of the most frequent neovascular eye diseases. Nevertheless, it is still mandatory to define the remaining applications, role, and potential of verteporfin in ocular photodynamic therapy (PDT), including the dosages of administration, effectiveness, and safety profile.

AREAS COVERED

Although verteporfin PDT has forfeited the first-line status and value of treating subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) due to age-related macular degeneration or pathologic myopia, the treatment remains the standard of care for choroidal haemangioma and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. PDT is effective in less pigmented choroidal melanoma as well as in retinal vascular proliferations and retinal angioma. Verteporfin was granted the orphan drug designation for the treatment of chronic or recurrent central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).

EXPERT OPINION

Evidence-based data regarding optimized parameters (low fluence, reduced dose, fractionated irradiation) adapted to the treated diseases (target structure, dosimetry, blood supply) are scarce. Prospective and large clinical trials are missing, although the scientific community agrees on the fact that the standard treatment protocol does not necessarily provide the optimal efficacy to the specific disease or individual patient. Within the reviewed indications, the adverse effect profile is favorable compared with other therapies.

Ocular Photodynamic Therapy – Standard Applications and New Indications (Part 2)

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has become a well-established treatment for vascular forms of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The implementation of evidence-based medicine principles into the treatment regimen of AMD seems to be immensly important, since AMD continues to be the most frequent cause of blindness among patients older than 65 years in industrialized countries. Numerous randomized prospective studies demonstrated high levels of evidence for the efficacy of various treatment approaches such as laser photocoagulation, PDT, subretinal surgery or novel anti-angiogenic drugs [Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:597-599]. The high evidence shown by these studies supported the rationale to use PDT also in additional, less frequent, vasoproliferative diseases. Although these 'case series' and 'individual case control studies' have a low level of evidence, they give us important information for treatment decisions in these rare conditions. The goal of this survey is to review the current literature regarding PDT in vasoproliferative and exudative ocular diseases outside AMD. Many studies modified the treatment parameters of PDT to address the specific pathology of the underlying disease. Table 1 summarizes the diseases and treatment parameters that are described in this part 2, the entire table of this review is included in part 1 (www.karger.com/doi/10.1159/ 000101922).

Ocular photodynamic therapy--standard applications and new indications (part 1). Review of the literature and personal experience

Ocular photodynamic therapy (PDT) was introduced as a novel treatment for neovascular forms of age-related macular degeneration and choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to pathologic myopia in the mid/end 1990s. The current treatment recommendations are based on the results of two large, prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trials (Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Photodynamic Therapy and Verteporfin in Photodynamic Therapy Studies) and thousands of patients have been treated worldwide over the last years. Meanwhile, PDT has been performed in several other ocular pathologies with some remarkable results, however, with most reports being case reports and small case series without statistical significance. These extended applications include CNV secondary to choroiditis and retinochoroiditis, angioid streaks, central serous chorioretinopathy, retinal angiomatous proliferation, parafoveal telangiectasia or CNV associated with macular dystrophy and idiopathic CNV, as well as diseases without CNV, such as choroidal hemangioma, retinal hamartoma, choroidal melanoma, chronic central serous chorioretinopathy, angiomatous lesions secondary to systemic diseases, rubeosis iridis or neovascular glaucoma. To date, with the introduction of anti-VEGF therapy, the role of PDT will certainly change. However, it is reasonable to believe that it will maintain an important role in combination therapy due to its unique properties of selective vascular targeting. Therefore, it is essential for the ophthalmologist to be familiar with the extended applications and their modifications of treatment parameters. This review will summarize the standard and experimental applications of PDT based on our own results and the literature.