Einfluss des Alters auf die optischen Aberrationen des menschlichen Auges

Higher order aberrations of the eye: Part two

This article is the second in a series of two articles, which provides a discussion of the factors that may possibly contribute to variable results when wavefront aberrations of the human eye are measured. Some of the factors discussed in this article are the influences that refractive errors (specifically myopia and astigmatism), pupil diameter, accommodation of the crystalline lens, age, mydiatric drops and the integrity of the tear film may have on these wavefront measurements. The first article in the series explained the general principles of higher order aberrations (HOAs), as well as HOAs of importance in the eye and the measuring apparatus used to measure HOAs of the eye.Keywords: wavefront aberrations; aberrometry

Higher order aberrations of the eye: Part one

This article is the first in a series of two articles that provide a comprehensive literature review of higher order aberrations (HOAs) of the eye. The present article mainly explains the general principles of such HOAs as well as HOAs of importance, and the measuring apparatus used to measure HOAs of the eye. The second article in the series discusses factors contributing to variable results in measurements of HOAs of the eye.Keywords: Higher order aberrations; wavefront aberrations; aberrometer

Ocular aberrations in barn owl eyes

Optical quality in barn owl eyes is presented in terms of measuring the ocular wavefront aberrations with a standard Tscherning-type wavefront aberrometer under natural viewing conditions. While accommodative state was uncontrolled, all eyes were focused within 0.4D with respect to the plane of the aberrometer. Total RMS wavefront error was between 0.06 and 0.15 microm (mean: 0.10 microm, STD: 0.03 microm, defocus cancelled) for a 6 mm pupil. The results suggest that image quality in barn owl eyes is excellent.

Aberration and contrast sensitivity comparison of aspherical and monofocal and multifocal intraocular lens eyes

BACKGROUND

Higher-order aberrations and contrast sensitivity were evaluated in patients who underwent phacoemulsification cataract extraction followed by implantation of aspherical, monofocal or multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) replacements.

METHODS

In this comparative trial, 124 patients with an average age of 66.8+/-5.2 years and their 124 eyes were randomly divided into three surgical implantation groups to receive one of three types of IOLs in replacement of cataract lenses. The patients of group 1 were given an aspherical IOL Z9001 (AMO, Santa Ana, CA, USA) replacement, and group 2 was implanted a monofocal IOL SA60AT (Alcon, Fort Worth, TX, USA) and group 3 the multifocal IOL SA40N (AMO). Post-surgical best-corrected visual acuity, corneal aberrations, total ocular aberrations, pupil diameters, capsulorhexsis sizes and contrast sensitivity were measured and compared.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference for mean best-corrected visual acuity, pupil diameter, curvilinear capsulorhexis size and corneal aberration among the three groups. For the spherical aberration, fourth-order higher-order aberration and total ocular higher-order aberration, the SA40N group was higher than the SA60AT group and the SA60AT group was higher than the Z9001 group, and the differences between the three groups were statistically significant for these measurements. Contrast sensitivity was higher for the Z9001 group than the SA60AT group and the SA60AT group was higher than the SA40N group, and the difference was statistically significant in all the spatial frequencies of 3, 6, 12 and 18.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the multifocal IOL can provide near vision, it can increase higher-order aberration and negatively influence contrast sensitivity. However, the aspherical IOL can reduce aberration and improve contrast sensitivity as compared with the monofocal IOL.