[Pharmacological vitreolysis]

[Pharmaological vitreolysis with ocriplasmin as a treatment option for symptomatic focal vitreomacular traction with or without macular holes (≤400 μm) compared to tranconjunctival vitrectomy]

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the resolution rate in patients with symptomatic vitreomacular traction (VMT) ≤ 1500 μm with or without macular holes ≤ 400 μm after therapy with intravitreal ocriplasmin (Jetrea®) injections in a clinical setting in comparison to transconjunctival vitrectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined 21 eyes of 21 consecutive patients with vitreomacular traction with or without macular holes who underwent intravitreal injection of 0.1 ml ocriplasmin and we retrospectively reviewed 18 eyes of 18 patients with VMT with or without FTMH who underwent 23-gauge vitrectomy.

RESULTS

Vitreomacular traction resolved in 15 of 21 eyes treated with ocriplasmin after 6 month (71 %) compared to 100 % of eyes treated by vitrectomy. Of the 5 eyes that initially presented FTMH with VMT in the ocriplasmin group, 2 were closed 1 month after ocriplasmin treatment. The remaining 3 had vitrectomy and closed thereafter. Best corrected visual acuity was 0.38 ± 0.23 LogMAR at baseline, improving to 0.34 ± 0.24 LogMAR at 6 months after ocriplasmin treatment. Best corrected visual acuity in the vitrectomy group improved from 0.55 ± 0.29 LogMAR before operation to 0.53 ± 0.51 LogMAR 6 months postoperatively. Foveal thickness was 355.95 ± 114.53 μm at baseline, reducing to 277.77 ± 40.26 μm at 6 months after ocriplasmin treatment. Foveal thickness of eyes that underwent vitrectomy was 494.61 ± 126.02 μm at baseline, decreasing to 330.2 ± 88.85 μm 6 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

When traction is ≤ 1500 μm, enzymatic vitreolysis with ocriplasmin is a therapeutic option. In the presence of VMT >1500 μm or ERM, surgical treatment with vitrectomy is associated with better outcomes. In small macular holes with VMT and in the absence of ERM, enzymatic vitreolysis with ocriplasmin is an option. In cases of holes >400 μm, or in the absence of evident VMT, or in the presence of ERM, vitrectomy is the first choice.

[Ocriplasmin as a treatment option for symptomatic vitreomacular traction with and without macular hole. First clinical experiences]

PURPOSE

To evaluate the resolution rate in patients with symptomatic vitreomacular traction (≤ 1500 μm) with or without macular holes (≤ 400 μm) after therapy with intravitreal ocriplasmin (Jetrea®) injection in a clinical setting.

METHODS

Until now we have prospectively examined 21 eyes of 21 consecutive patients with symptomatic vitreomacular traction with or without macular holes who underwent intravitreal operative injection of 0.1 ml ocriplasmin. The best corrected visual acuity and high-resolution optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) ultrastructural parameters were measured before injection and again 1, 3 and 4 months after treatment. The numbers of resolved vitreomacular traction and closed macular holes were documented.

RESULTS

Vitreomacular traction was resolved in 15 out of 21 (71 %) eyes. Of the five eyes which initially presented with vitreomacular traction with macular holes, all showed resolution of vitreomacular traction but only two of the macular holes were closed. The average best corrected visual acuity was 0.38 logMAR (± 0.23) at baseline and 0.43 logMAR (± 0.28), 0.38 logMAR (± 0.27) and 0.36 logMAR (± 0.24) 1, 3 and 4 months after injection, respectively. The average foveal thickness was 355.95 μm (± 114.53 μm) at baseline, reducing to 304.61 μm (± 100.91 μm), 308.00 μm (±76.17 μm) and 277.50 μm (± 26.24 μm) after 1, 3 and 4 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In this ongoing study there was a high percentage of resolution of vitreomacular traction (71 %) 1 month after intravitreal operative injection of Jetrea® and closure of two out of five macular holes. This was further associated with stabilization of visual acuity and reduction of foveal thickness. Further investigations are necessary to document the effectiveness of the pharmacological vitreolysis in a clinical setting.

A retrospective cohort study in patients with tractional diseases of the vitreomacular interface (ReCoVit)

Purpose

To assess how vitreomacular adhesion (VMA), vitreomacular traction (VMT), and macular holes (MH) evolve, and to assess visual acuity outcomes associated with different management strategies for each subgroup.

Methods

Retrospective, single-center, observational study of 400 patients (556 eyes) who presented with optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings related to tractional diseases of the vitreomacular interface (187 with bilateral disease). The outcomes measured include prevalence of symptoms, rates of disease stabilization, spontaneous resolution, and disease progression necessitating surgical intervention. Size of VMA/VMT was not measured.

Results

Vision loss and metamorphopsia were the leading causes for referral. Patients were followed for a mean of 10.9 months (median 6.9 months). Spontaneous resolution occurred in 22.7 % (46/203) of eyes with VMT and in 7.3 % (9/124) of eyes with VMA (P < .001). In the former group, 34.1 % (14 eyes) showed improved visual acuity (P = .001). During follow-up, 11.3 % (14/124) of eyes with VMA showed disease progression; six (4.8 %) developed a macular hole. Eleven of the 203 eyes with VMT (5.4 %) developed a macular hole; 52 of 203 eyes with VMT (25.6 %) had disease progression that resulted in patients opting for pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Of the eyes with VMA, 4.8 % (6/124) had disease progression resulting in patients opting for PPV.

Conclusions

Better visual acuity outcomes were found in eyes with spontaneous resolution compared to the other groups. Spontaneous resolution of VMT and VMA was rare, whereas disease progression resulting in PPV was more common.