Technik der „Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty“ (DMEK)

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) Anesthesia Analysis

PURPOSE

Comparison of safety and clinical results of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in topical, peribulbar, or general anesthesia.

METHODS

Retrospective, post hoc matched study of 346 patients who received DMEK surgery with different types of anesthesia (n = 54 topical, n = 137 peribulbar, n = 155 general anesthesia). Outcome criteria were intraoperative complications, endothelial cell count (ECC), central corneal thickness (CCT) and graft rejection rate, rebubbling rate, and visual acuity (VA). Mean follow-up time was 9.4 ± 2.8 months.

RESULTS

The group with topical anesthesia showed intraoperative difficulties such as vitreous pressure (p = 0.01) and difficult graft unfolding (p = 0.4), possibly leading to a higher rebubbling rate (p = 0.03) and therefore graft failure (p = 0.39). However, rebubbling and graft failure occurred more often when the graft preparation was more difficult (p = 0.2, p = 0.13, respectively), which was independent of anesthesia. All three groups achieved comparable functional results regarding VA, ECC, and CCT after 6 months.

CONCLUSION

DMEK under topical anesthesia is feasible and shows comparable final visual outcomes but should be limited to selected cooperative patients and performed by experienced surgeons due to the potential for increased intraoperative challenges.

Excimer Laser Phototherapeutic Keratectomy for Anterior Corneal Opacification After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the long-term outcome of excimer laser phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) for treating remaining anterior corneal opacities after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

METHODS

This cohort study analyzed 67 eyes of 66 patients undergoing PTK in addition to and after DMEK between 2012 and 2021 at the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne. Patients who were treated by PTK after previous DMEK on the same eye were included. The outcome parameters were best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), changes in refraction, endothelial cell density, corneal densitometry, central corneal thickness, and total corneal higher order aberrations. Patients with visual limitations in addition to anterior opacification were analyzed separately for their visual outcome. Eyes with severe visual limitations that have a very limited visual potential were excluded from the study. In addition, patients with not at least 1 postoperative follow-up examination were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

In this study, 67 eyes of 66 patients met all inclusion criteria. The median follow-up period was 13.1 (quartiles: 4.1; 30.7; interquartile range 26.6) months. The mean (±SD) BCVA improved from (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) 0.54 (±0.32) to 0.38 (±0.27) at the first postoperative visit ( P < 0.001) and remained significantly improved at all follow-up examinations compared with preoperative BCVA. Refraction and endothelial cell density did not change significantly after PTK. There was a significant decrease in corneal backscatter in the anterior corneal layer ( P < 0.001), and the total higher order aberration ( P = 0.02) and central corneal thickness were significantly reduced at the most recent postoperative visit ( P < 0.001). No immune reactions were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Excimer laser PTK after DMEK for persisting anterior corneal opacities has the potential to significantly improve patients' vision without affecting refractive parameters or endothelial cell density.

Impact of Early Intraocular Pressure Elevation on Postoperative Outcome After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Non-glaucoma Patients

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of transient elevations in postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) on the clinical outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) surgery in non-glaucoma patients.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis from a prospective database of eyes without preexisting glaucoma that underwent DMEK with 90% anterior chamber and 20% sulfur hexafluoride endotamponade. Group A included eyes without postoperative IOP increase (IOP <30 mm Hg and a relative increase from preoperative value <10 mm Hg). Group B included eyes with IOP elevation (postoperative IOP ≥30 mm Hg or a relative increase from preoperative value ≥10 mm Hg) handled according to a standardized protocol. The impact of elevated IOP within 3 days after DMEK surgery was evaluated regarding best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), and endothelial cell count (ECC) at 1, 3, and 6 months.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-six eyes from 164 patients were included. An IOP increase after DMEK occurred in 20 eyes (11.3%; 19 patients, group B), and the mean peak IOP was 48 ± 12 mm Hg (range 32-69 mm Hg). There were no significant postoperative differences in BCVA, CCT, and ECC on comparing both groups. The BCVA increased significantly (P < 0.001, respectively), whereas CCT (P < 0.001, respectively) and ECC (P < 0.001, respectively) decreased significantly from preoperative values. The rebubbling rate tended to be higher in group B without statistical significance (6.4% vs. 10%, P = 0.648).

CONCLUSIONS

Temporary IOP elevation after DMEK may not affect functional and morphological outcomes in non-glaucoma patients. However, careful postoperative IOP monitoring and appropriate management are crucial to avoid irreversible ocular damage.

[Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty and in vascularized high-risk eyes]

BACKGROUND

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is considered the gold standard for the treatment of corneal endothelial dysfunction and generally leads to good postoperative results. Recently, studies have also analyzed the outcome of DMEK in so-called high-risk eyes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The relevant literature and own data on DMEK for graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty and in vascularized high-risk eyes are presented and discussed.

RESULTS

A DMEK for the treatment of transplant failure after penetrating keratoplasty can be considered for eyes without stromal scars and without high astigmatism. A retrospective analysis of 52 patients with failed penetrating grafts showed that DMEK leads to a significant increase in visual acuity, albeit to a lesser extent than after primary DMEK. Rejection and transplant failure rates seem to be similar those seen after penetrating re-keratoplasty and are thus higher than after primary DMEK. A DMEK might also be a feasible option for eyes with corneal neovascularization and stromal edema without stromal scars. A retrospective analysis of 24 eyes with at least 2 vascularized corneal quadrants demonstrated that DMEK leads to a significant improvement in visual acuity and regression of corneal neovascularization. The rejection rate in this cohort was 4.2% and is therefore slightly higher than after low-risk DMEK in eyes without corneal neovascularization but still much better compared to penetrating keratoplasty.

CONCLUSION

Indications for DMEK are expanding and it can be a therapeutic option for transplant failure after penetrating keratoplasty with acceptable outcomes. Furthermore, DMEK seems to be a good option for the treatment of endothelial dysfunction in vascularized high-risk eyes without stromal scars.

Fibrillar Layer as a Marker for Areas of Pronounced Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss in Advanced Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy

PURPOSE

We sought to assess the correlation of corneal endothelial cell (CEC) density to alterations of collagen composition of Descemet membrane (DM) in advanced Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) and to image such changes by slit-lamp biomicroscopy in vivo.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational consecutive case series.

METHODS

Fifty eyes (50 subjects) with advanced FECD were enrolled. After slit-lamp biomicroscopy and corneal Scheimpflug imaging, the Descemet endothelium complex (DEC) was retrieved during DM endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) surgery. The expression of collagens I, III, and IV (COL I, COL III, and COL IV) and corresponding CEC density were analyzed by immunofluorescence flat mount-staining. Presence, diameter and surface area of collagen expression, and CEC density served as the main outcome measures.

RESULTS

Immunofluorescence staining revealed central coherent collagen positive areas (mean surface area = 10 mm² ± 6 mm²) corresponding to a fibrillar layer burying the guttae of DM in 84% (42/50) of DECs. CEC density overlying the fibrillar layer compared with the periphery was significantly reduced (-54.8%, P < .0001) with a steep decline of CEC density at its borders. Subgroup analysis revealed that the fibrillar layer may be imaged by slit-lamp biomicroscopy in vivo with significant positive correlation of mean maximum diameter detected by slit-lamp biomicroscopy (d_{SL max} = 4.1 mm ± 0.9 mm) and by immunofluorescence staining (d_{IF max} = 4.7 mm ± 1.1 mm; r = 0.76; P = .001).

CONCLUSION

A fibrillar layer with a clear geographic pattern marks areas of pronounced loss of CEC density in advanced FECD eyes and may be imaged by slit-lamp biomicroscopy in vivo.

[10 years of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy : What have we learned?]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) has increased in popularity since its introduction over 10 years ago. This article presents a summary of the experiences of the past years collected at the Department of Ophthalmology at the University of Cologne.

METHODS

A literature review of DMEK studies primarily from the Department of Ophthalmology at the University of Cologne, Germany was carried out. Own experiences in the fields of donor selection and graft preparation, DMEK surgery, complication management and postoperative treatment are summarized.

RESULTS

Since the introduction of DMEK experience has been gained and ongoing improvements have occurred ranging from donor-recipient allocation to postoperative follow-up. These led to a better reproducibility of the intervention for the surgeon, to a better postoperative result and to a reduction of the complication rate.

DISCUSSION

The DMEK represents a safe and individualized procedure for endothelial transplantation for corneal endothelial dysfunction. Continuing development of the method leads to optimization and safer results.