[Statement of the Professional Association of Ophthalmologists (BVA), the German Ophthalmological Society (DOG) and the Retinological Society (RG) on intravitreal treatment of vision-reducing macular edema by retinal vein occlusion : Treatment strategies, status 24 April 2018]

[Internistic clarification of retinal vascular occlusions]

Retinal vascular occlusions require close cooperation of different medical disciplines to ensure optimal care of the affected patients. The medical clarification between arterial and venous occlusions is comparable but in the case of retinal arterial occlusions it should be carried out immediately. The most important associated diagnoses are arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and atrial fibrillation. In younger patients and in the absence of risk factors, a search for rarer causes should be carried out giant cell arteritis in particular should be excluded. In both types of occlusions a causative glaucoma must also be considered.

[Analysis of adverse drug reactions (ADR) in fluorescein angiography (FAG) and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) and indications before and during the COVID-19 pandemic at a university eye hospital]

BACKGROUND

This study was an analysis of fluorescein angiography (FAG) and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) at a university eye hospital. The primary objective of the study was to analyze adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and their severity (mild, moderate, severe). The secondary objective was to investigate the indications of FAG and ICGA before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all FAG and ICGA at the University Eye Hospital in Würzburg from January 2016 to the end of December 2021 was performed. The ADRs, gender, age, examination time points and indications were evaluated. The ADRs were classified into mild, moderate, and severe, following the definition of Kornblau et al. [1] RESULTS: A total of 4900 examinations from 4193 patients were analyzed. An FAG was performed slightly more frequently in men (54.8%) than in women (45.2%) and the mean age was 63.2 ± 16.9 years (median: 65 years). The ADRs occurred in only 1.65% of all FAG, of which 1.27% were mild and 0.39% were moderate. No severe ADRs occurred. The most common ADR was nausea at 59.26%. No ADR occurred in ICGA. The annual number of FAGs averaged 816.7 ± 91.1 and was relatively constant throughout the period except for a significantly reduced number in 2016 (compared with 2018, 2019, and 2021). The most common indication for FAG was venous retinal occlusion at 22.93% (N = 774), showing a significant increase in 2021 compared to 2018-2020. An ICGA was performed in 4.18% of cases, with the most common indication being uveitis at 31.82% (N = 63).

CONCLUSION

Compared to other studies very few ADRs occurred and no life-threatening ADR occurred in any case. Venous retinal occlusions were very common indications for FAG, probably due to the frequent need for repeated examinations in this condition. Briefly, during the first lockdown (18 March-8 May 2020), a decrease in angiographies was observed, but over a longer period, no significant differences were seen compared with the prepandemic period.

[Ischemia and laser photocoagulation in retinal vein occlusion]

BACKGROUND

Retinal vein occlusions (RVO) are associated with retinal ischemia to a highly variable extent. An ischemic retina may lead to the development of neovascularization and further to secondary complications such as neovascular glaucoma, vitreous hemorrhage or tractional retinal detachment. Numerous factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and other cytokines are produced in the ischemic area, which cause macular edema. Before the introduction of intravitreal drug injections (IVI), retinal laser photocoagulation was the leading form of treatment. Macular laser photocoagulation was applied in the form of focal laser or grid laser in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) to treat macular edema. In patients with ischemic RVO, panretinal laser photocoagulation (PRP) was recommended for treatment of secondary neovascular complications. The value of laser treatment in the management of patients with RVO changed after the introduction of IVI treatment.

AIM

This article presents a review of the current study results and the recommendations for performing laser photocoagulation of the central and peripheral retina in patients with RVO.

CONCLUSION

Conventional focal or grid laser photocoagulation has been replaced by IVI treatment in the management of macular edema secondary to BRVO; however, macular laser treatment can still be considered in patients with BRVO if the macular edema persists despite the use of available IVI drugs. The use of central laser photocoagulation in these cases is based on the findings of fluorescein angiography. Disseminated panretinal laser photocoagulation is still indicated in RVO patients who have large areas of nonperfusion, have developed neovascularization and/or late complications. Targeted laser photocoagulation of the peripheral areas of nonperfusion has recently been recommended by several authors and is expected to improve not only the visual outcome of IVI treatment, but more importantly to also reduce the duration of treatment and the number of re-injections needed. Clear evidence for targeted laser treatment is not yet available and is a focus of currently ongoing prospective randomized studies.

[Retinal laser treatment-avoiding mistakes]

Even in the era of intravitreal injection therapy (intravitreal operative injection of medication, IVOM) for the treatment of macular and retinal diseases, such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD), proliferative diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME) as well as proliferative stages and/or macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO), conventional retinal laser treatment is still of importance. It can be focally performed on an on-label basis for DME and macular edema due to branch RVO (BRVO) and its use as panretinal treatment for proliferative stages in retinal diseases as well as for the treatment of retinal holes is undisputed. The spectrum is extended by the treatment of less common diseases, such as retinal hemangioblastoma, macroaneurysms and subhyaloid macular hemorrhage. There is cause for concern that knowledge about the correct performance of retinal laser application might be shifted into the background due to an increase of IVOM treatment, which could lead to an increase in unnecessary errors. The aim of this manuscript is to increase awareness for the correct indications and execution of retinal laser treatment based on case examples of flawed or insufficient treatment.