Stellungnahme der DOG, der RG und des BVA zur Therapie des diabetischen Makulaödems

[Analysis of adverse drug reactions (ADR) in fluorescein angiography (FAG) and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) and indications before and during the COVID-19 pandemic at a university eye hospital]

BACKGROUND

This study was an analysis of fluorescein angiography (FAG) and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) at a university eye hospital. The primary objective of the study was to analyze adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and their severity (mild, moderate, severe). The secondary objective was to investigate the indications of FAG and ICGA before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all FAG and ICGA at the University Eye Hospital in Würzburg from January 2016 to the end of December 2021 was performed. The ADRs, gender, age, examination time points and indications were evaluated. The ADRs were classified into mild, moderate, and severe, following the definition of Kornblau et al. [1] RESULTS: A total of 4900 examinations from 4193 patients were analyzed. An FAG was performed slightly more frequently in men (54.8%) than in women (45.2%) and the mean age was 63.2 ± 16.9 years (median: 65 years). The ADRs occurred in only 1.65% of all FAG, of which 1.27% were mild and 0.39% were moderate. No severe ADRs occurred. The most common ADR was nausea at 59.26%. No ADR occurred in ICGA. The annual number of FAGs averaged 816.7 ± 91.1 and was relatively constant throughout the period except for a significantly reduced number in 2016 (compared with 2018, 2019, and 2021). The most common indication for FAG was venous retinal occlusion at 22.93% (N = 774), showing a significant increase in 2021 compared to 2018-2020. An ICGA was performed in 4.18% of cases, with the most common indication being uveitis at 31.82% (N = 63).

CONCLUSION

Compared to other studies very few ADRs occurred and no life-threatening ADR occurred in any case. Venous retinal occlusions were very common indications for FAG, probably due to the frequent need for repeated examinations in this condition. Briefly, during the first lockdown (18 March-8 May 2020), a decrease in angiographies was observed, but over a longer period, no significant differences were seen compared with the prepandemic period.

A model to quantify the influence of treatment patterns and optimize outcomes in nAMD

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is a progressive retinal disease that often leads to severe and permanent vision loss. Early initiation of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy has been shown to preserve vision in nAMD patients. Concurrently, treatment outcomes in real-world are inferior to those reported in clinical trials. The most likely reasons observed are fewer treatment-intensity in routine clinical practice than in clinical trials. The other possibility could be the delay in starting treatment and the re-treatment interval. Although a negative impact of aforementioned parameters seems obvious, quantitative impact measures remain elusive in a real-world setting due to a lack of an ‘optimal treatment’ control group. To overcome this shortcoming, we developed, validated, and applied a model to assess and quantify the impact of anti-VEGF administration variables on visual acuity development in a prospective nAMD patient cohort. The model was further applied to probe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on visual progressions in nAMD patients. The presented model paves the way to systematically explore and evaluate realistic interventions in the current treatment paradigm, that can be adopted in routine clinical care.

Ellipsoid Zone Integrity and Visual Acuity Changes during Diabetic Macular Edema Therapy: A Longitudinal Study

PURPOSE

Ellipsoid zone (EZ) integrity is identified as a potential biomarker for therapy surveillance and outcome prediction of visual acuity (VA). However, only a few studies report long-term results of over 1 year of clinical and anatomical changes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). This study is aimed at describing the long-term VA and anatomical outcomes in spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) (relative ellipsoid zone reflectivity ratio, central macular thickness, and volume) in patients with DME treated with antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy. Furthermore, we studied the correlation between EZ integrity and changes in visual acuity.

METHODS

71 eyes of 71 patients were included in this retrospective study. Clinical characteristics were reviewed yearly. OCT data were assessed at baseline and after 1, 3, and 5 years. EZ parameters were quantified automatically. OCT parameters and visual outcome were correlated and analyzed in multivariable regression models.

RESULTS

EZ reflectivity ratio correlated with functional outcome in DME patients from baseline to fifth year at all time points (for all p < 0.05). EZ reflectivity improved the most in the first year of treatment (0.68 to 0.75; p < 0.05) and declined gradually until year 5 of therapy (0.71; compared to baseline p > 0.05). Similarly, best VA was achieved after 1 year (0.40 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) to 0.28 logMAR; p < 0.001) and declined gradually until year 5. Final VA in year 5 was comparable to baseline (0.45 logMAR, compared to baseline p > 0.05). Together with baseline VA, baseline EZ parameters did predict VA outcome after 1 year (p < 0.05). Concordantly, VA and EZ parameters from year 1 were associated with VA outcome in year 2.

CONCLUSION

This study described the long-term course of EZ changes during anti-VEGF treatment in DME patients. In addition, our results underlined the potential of EZ parameters as novel OCT biomarkers for prediction of VA outcomes during therapy.

[Diabetic Macular Edema]

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a chronic retinal disease, which requires intensive clinical monitoring. Within the last ten years the intravitreal anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) therapy has become the standard of care to improve and stabilize vision in patients with centre involving DME. Long-acting intravitreal corticosteroids can achieve similar visual results with fewer injection rates. Because of steroid-induced side effects (progression of cataract, glaucoma) these drugs are regarded as second-line medication. Since the introduction of anti-VEGF-medication the focal laser photocoagulation is no longer considered as first-line therapy for DME. However, a focal laser treatment can sometimes be a possible alternative in specific situations. In patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy and DME, the intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy is approved for both conditions. In ischemic maculopathy the functional outcome is restricted. For the indication of anti-VEGF-treatment for DME with accompanying central ischemia not only visual acuity and optical coherence tomography parameters should be considered, the amount of ischemia seen on fluorescein angiography should also be taken into account. In tractional macular edema due to epiretinal membranes and vitreomacular adhesions a pars-plana vitrectomy with membrane peeling is indicated.

[Diabetic retinopathy]

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a vision-threatening microvascular complication of diabetes and the leading cause of blindness in working-age people. At the beginning of the metabolic disorder and in early stages of DR the patient's eyesight is often not affected. Depending on the duration of diabetes and in more advanced stages of DR the vision is compromised through the presence of diabetic macular edema (DME) and/or proliferative retinal complications. The management of DR comprises regular ophthalmic examinations according to clinical guidelines, the targeted application of multimodal imaging, and the specific treatment of DME and proliferative DR including secondary disorders such as neovascular glaucoma or persistent vitreous haemorrhage. Innovative ocular imaging techniques like optical coherence tomography (OCT), OCT angiography (OCT-A) and ultrawide field imaging play an important role in the assessment of diabetic patients. Various non-invasive imaging modalities have become part of the routine clinical work-up and help to identify new biomarkers for early diagnosis and long-term prognosis. In early stages of DR, the multifactorial intervention including glucose level and blood pressure control as well as optimizing the patient's cardiovascular risk profile is essential. A specific ophthalmic therapy is available for DME and proliferative DR (PDR). In patients with PDR the treatment regime includes panretinal laser photocoagulation or alternatively intravitreal anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor)-injections accompanied by close-meshed clinical monitoring. In patients with both, DME and PDR, it is suggested to start with Anti-VEGF drugs. In severe PDR with persistent vitreous haemorrhage, tractional maculopathy or tractional retinal detachment vitreoretinal surgery is recommended.

Diabetische Retinopathie

Die diabetische Retinopathie (DR) ist die häufigste Ursache für schwere Sehbehinderung und Erblindung im erwerbstätigen Alter. Eine subjektive Beeinträchtigung des Sehvermögens tritt häufig erst in fortgeschrittenen Stadien der DR ein. Daher sind Screening-Maßnahmen asymptomatischer Patienten und eine stadiengerechte Behandlung essenziell. Dieser Beitrag gibt einen praxisbezogenen Überblick über diagnostische und therapeutische Prinzipien der nicht-proliferativen und proliferativen Form.

Diabetisches Makulaödem

Das diabetische Makulaödem (DMÖ) ist für den Großteil der Visusminderungen bei Diabetikern verantwortlich. Eine Reduktion der Sehschärfe durch ein DMÖ kann schon im milden nicht-proliferativen Stadium der diabetischen Retinopathien (DR) auftreten 1. Der chronische Verlauf der diabetischen Makulopathie erfordert ein intensives klinisches Monitoring über einen langen Zeitraum. Dieser Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über das diagnostische und therapeutische Management beim Vorliegen eines DMÖ.

[The modified treat and extend scheme with injection blocks in intravitreal injection treatment : Retrospective analysis from the routine clinical application]

Hintergrund

Die regelmäßige Therapie mittels intravitrealer operativer Medikamentenapplikation (IVOM) und die damit verbundenen Kontrolluntersuchungen stellen für viele Patienten eine große Herausforderung dar, die bis zum Behandlungsabbruch führen kann. Das modifizierte blockweise Treat-and-Extend(TAE)-Schema verfolgt das Ziel, mit möglichst wenigen Kontrollvisiten stabile Netzhaut- und Visusbefunde zu erreichen und dadurch die Belastung der Patienten zu minimieren.

Methoden

Diese monozentrische retrospektive Studie untersuchte Behandlungsverläufe von insgesamt 387 Patienten mit neovaskulärer altersbedingter Makuladegeneration (AMD), diabetischem Makulaödem (DMÖ), Venenastverschluss (VAV) und Zentralvenenverschluss (ZVV), bei denen das TAE-Regime jeweils in 3er-Blöcken angewendet wurde. Primärer Endpunkt war das Erreichen eines Injektionsintervalls von 12 Wochen.

Ergebnisse

Durch die blockweise applizierte IVOM konnte die Netzhautdicke signifikant reduziert und der Visus verbessert werden. Über die verschiedenen Indikationen konnte im Mittel ein Behandlungsintervall von 2 Monaten erreicht werden.

Schlussfolgerung

Ein in 3er-Blöcken angepasstes TAE-Schema im Rahmen der IVOM kann bei reduzierter Patientenbelastung zu stabilen Netzhaut- und Visusbefunden führen.

Zusatzmaterial online

Zusätzliche Informationen sind in der Online-Version dieses Artikels (10.1007/s00347-020-01218-y) enthalten.