[Pupil reconstruction with an artificial iris]

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Eyes with an Artificial Iris

The purpose of this study is to report the outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in three eyes with a complex anterior segment and an artificial iris. A retrospective chart review of three cases was performed and clinically meaningful patient characteristics, clinical events, and therapeutic interventions were outlined. A literature search was performed and the clinical course of the three cases was discussed in the context of the published literature. DMEK in the presence of an artificial iris did not match the clinical results of DMEK in uncomplicated eyes. All three eyes experienced major complications, such as failure to achieve graft adherence, early graft failure, or an immune reaction. The indication for DMEK in complex anterior segments with an artificial iris should be made with the awareness of multiple possible complications and the potentially poor prognosis of the procedure.

Traumatic dislocation of the iris into the vitreous cavity with intact lens: a case report

BACKGROUND

Traumatic aniridia occurs when the iris is extruded from the eye and is often accompanied by lens injuries. However, traumatic aniridia due to dislocation of the iris into the vitreous cavity without lens damage has never been reported.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 30-year-old man presented with visual loss and pain for 6 h after a thin wire injured his right eyeball. Ophthalmologic examinations manifested a 2 mm full-thickness corneal laceration and total hyphema. An intact clear lens, healthy attached retina, and almost complete iris tissue in the vitreous cavity were found after resolution of hyphema the next day. Further examination revealed that the defect in the zonule below the corneal wound was the path for the iris to enter the vitreous cavity. The patient opted for nonsurgical treatment until pigment granules and opacity were observed in the vitreous cavity after 50 days. Vitrectomy was performed to remove the dislocated iris.

CONCLUSIONS

The presentation of this unique case indicates that the torn iris was displaced to the vitreous cavity with an intact lens and missing local zonula instead of out the corneal laceration after a penetrating injury. The type of injury, mechanism, and force on the spot may contribute to the occurrence of this rare condition. Instead of artificial irises, tinted glasses were more appropriate treatment option for this patient. Peripheral retinal examination was essential in the management of this case. In such cases, the iris in the vitreous cavity should be resected to prevent complications.

Laboratory and Clinical Experience With a Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lens Sutured to an Artificial Iris

PURPOSE

To determine in vitro, using a translational research approach before realizing the procedure in a patient with iatrogenic aphakia and partial aniridia, whether suturing a trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) to an artificial iris degrades the IOL's optical quality.

METHODS

Optical quality was analyzed by measuring the modulation transfer function (MTF) at a 3-mm aperture and at 50 and 100 lp/mm spatial frequencies. The FineVision Pod F GF IOL (PhysIOL) was assessed in two powers: two +20.00 diopters (D) (20A and 20B IOLs) and two +30.00 D (30A and 30B IOLs). The IOLs' decentration in relation to the artificial iris's center was evaluated. The laboratory results provided empirical evidence in the informed consent for surgical intervention in a patient with iatrogenic aphakia and iris defect in one eye. Clinical results were measured using the parameter of corrected distance visual acuity plus a patient self-assessment of the cosmetic appearance of the operated eye.

RESULTS

The 20A and 20B IOLs demonstrated a mean MTF reduction of up to 1.1%, whereas the 30A and 30B IOLs showed a decrease of up to 5.2% for both spatial frequencies. All lenses showed good centration levels. In the clinical case, the patient showed corrected distance visual acuity, distance-corrected near visual acuity, and distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity of 0.20, 0.20, and 0.22 logMAR, respectively. The patient was satisfied with the cosmetic outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

There was merely a slight reduction in trifocal IOL optical quality after it was sutured to an artificial iris. Clinically, the combined implantation of the artificial iris and FineVision IOL provided good functional and cosmetic outcomes. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(1):61-68.].

[Exchange of aniridia IOLs for customized iris IOL implants]

BACKGROUND

Three groups of iris prostheses can be distinguished for the surgical treatment of iris defects: (1) segmental iris implants, (2) combined iris diaphragm intraocular lenses (IOL) and (3) pure iris implants. Most iris reconstructions are accompanied by aphakia correction with secondary IOL implantation. Although the primary goal is to create a pupil and to improve glare perception, contrast sensitivity and visual acuity, the esthetic result is also a relevant component.

OBJECTIVE

Functional and esthetic results after replacement of an aniridia IOL implant with a custom-made artificial iris with IOL.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this retrospective study with seven eyes from seven patients, an iris diaphragm IOL (Morcher GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany) was exchanged for medical reasons (subluxation) against a custom-made artificial iris made of silicone (ArtificialIris, HumanOptics, Erlangen, Germany) in combination with a sutured IOL. The follow-up period was at least 3 months. Best corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell count (ECC), complications, glare perception as well as esthetic outcome and patient satisfaction were evaluated.

RESULTS

The BCVA and ECC showed no statistically significant change between the preoperative and postoperative values (p > 0.05). There was a decentration of the iris IOL implant of 0.27 ± 0.19 mm three months postoperatively. On a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 1 to 10 (1 = not satisfied at all, 10 = extremely satisfied), satisfaction with the overall result was rated 8.6 ± 2.5. Subjective glare perception improved to 5.6 ± 3.5 and subjective esthetic impairment improved to 2.4 ± 2.0 on the VAS (1 = none, 10 = extremely strong). Postoperative complications included transient intraocular hypotonia in two eyes, intraocular pressure increase in two eyes, retinal detachment and transient vitreous hemorrhage in one eye each. Of the seven patients six would repeat the procedure.

CONCLUSION

Compared to a rigid aniridia IOL implant, replacement with a custom-made artificial iris in combination with an IOL provides not only a good functional result but simultaneously also an esthetically pleasing result.