[Chronic open angle glaucoma: correlation of pattern electroretinography and visual field indices]

MfERG responses to long-duration white stimuli in glaucoma patients

The intent of our study was to evaluate whether the response to a long-duration white stimulus in the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) is sufficiently sensitive to detect early retinal dysfunction in glaucoma. On-off mfERGs were recorded from 15 NTG and 15 HTG patients and compared with 14 control subjects. Recording parameters were the following: LED stimulus screen (RETIscan™), 100-ms stimulus duration, 200-ms stimulus interval, 11-min total recording time, stimulus matrix of 61 elements, frame rate: 70 Hz, Lmax: 180 cd/m(2), Lmin: 0 cd/m(2), and filter setting: 1-200 Hz. The second negative response following stimulus onset (N2-on), as well as following stimulus offset (N2-off), was analyzed as an overall response and in quadrants, as well as in 4 small central and four adjoining peripheral areas per quadrant. The latency of the N2-on was significantly delayed in HTG in all response averages tested, while in NTG this was only seen in the overall response and in the small central response averages (P < 0.05). The most sensitive measure in HTG was the latency of the N2-on of the small peripheral response average of the superior temporal quadrant with an area under the ROC curve of 0.881. For NTG, the most representative measure was the latency of the N2-on of the small central response average of the inferior nasal quadrant with an area under the ROC curve of 0.793. Our results showed that in stimulation with long-duration flashes, the second negative response following the on response, representative of the early PhNR, is affected in glaucoma where N2-on showed a latency delay in POAG patients. The latency delay of the N2-on was more prominent for HTG than for NTG.

Slow-stimulated multifocal ERG in high- and normal-tension glaucoma

PURPOSE

To study the ability and sensitivity of the slow stimulation multifocal ERG (mfERG) to detect glaucomatous damage.

METHODS

Right eyes of 20 patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG), 15 patients with high-tension glaucoma (HTG) and 15 healthy volunteers underwent testing with the mfERG (VERIS 4.1). The central 50 degrees of the retina were stimulated by 103 hexagons (m-sequence: 2(13)-1, Lmax: 100 cd/m(2), Lmin: 1 cd/m(2), background: 50 cd/m(2)). Each m-sequence step was followed by 3 black frames (Lmax: < 1 cd/m(2)). Five response averages of the first order response component (KI) were analyzed: the central 7.5 degrees and the 4 adjoining quadrants. The amplitudes from the first minimum, N1, to the first maximum, P1, and from P1 to the second minimum, N2, were analyzed as well as the latencies of N1, P1, N2 and the latencies of 3 multifocal oscillatory potentials (mfOPs) with their maxima at about 73, 80 and 85 ms.

RESULTS

For each parameter the percentage of deviation from the mean of the control group was calculated. These values were then added for each individual to form a deviation index (DI). Seventeen patients (85.0%) with NTG and 3 patients (20.0%) with HTG showed a DI outside the normal range. The major changes were observed in the mfOPs of the NTG patients. MfOPs were then selectively filtered at 100-300 Hz and their scalar product was analyzed over an epoch of 68-105 ms. This confirmed that mfOPs differed significantly from the control in the central 7.5 degrees and, for NTG, in the nasal field. With a logistic regression analysis the mfOPs had a sensitivity to differentiate 85% of the NTG patients and 73% of the HTG patients from normal.

CONCLUSIONS

Under these conditions, the slow-stimulated mfERG can detect glaucomatous dysfunction in NTG (85.0%). The differences observed between NTG and HTG are in support of a different underlying pathomechanism.