Spatial orientation in the bushcricket Leptophyes punctatissima (Phaneropterinae; Orthoptera): II. Phonotaxis to elevated sound sources on a walking compensator

A narrow ear canal reduces sound velocity to create additional acoustic inputs in a microscale insect ear

The katydid tympanal ears have outer, middle, and inner ear components analogous to mammalian ears. Unlike mammals, each ear has two tympana exposed to sound both externally and internally, with a delayed internal version arriving via the gas-filled ear canal (EC). The two combined inputs in each ear play a significant role in directional hearing. Here, we demonstrate that the major factor causing the internal delay is the EC geometry. The EC bifurcates asymmetrically, producing two additional internal paths that impose different sound velocities for each tympanum. Therefore, various versions of the same signal reach the ears at various times, increasing the chance to pinpoint the sound source. Findings could inspire algorithms for accurate acoustic triangulation in detection sensors.

Located in the forelegs, katydid ears are unique among arthropods in having outer, middle, and inner components, analogous to the mammalian ear. Unlike mammals, sound is received externally via two tympanic membranes in each ear and internally via a narrow ear canal (EC) derived from the respiratory tracheal system. Inside the EC, sound travels slower than in free air, causing temporal and pressure differences between external and internal inputs. The delay was suspected to arise as a consequence of the narrowing EC geometry. If true, a reduction in sound velocity should persist independently of the gas composition in the EC (e.g., air, CO2). Integrating laser Doppler vibrometry, microcomputed tomography, and numerical analysis on precise three-dimensional geometries of each experimental animal EC, we demonstrate that the narrowing radius of the EC is the main factor reducing sound velocity. Both experimental and numerical data also show that sound velocity is reduced further when excess CO2 fills the EC. Likewise, the EC bifurcates at the tympanal level (one branch for each tympanic membrane), creating two additional narrow internal sound paths and imposing different sound velocities for each tympanic membrane. Therefore, external and internal inputs total to four sound paths for each ear (only one for the human ear). Research paths and implication of findings in avian directional hearing are discussed.

Directional hearing in insects: biophysical, physiological and ecological challenges

Sound localisation is a fundamental attribute of the way that animals perceive their external world. It enables them to locate mates or prey, determine the direction from which a predator is approaching and initiate adaptive behaviours. Evidence from different biological disciplines that has accumulated over the last two decades indicates how small insects with body sizes much smaller than the wavelength of the sound of interest achieve a localisation performance that is similar to that of mammals. This Review starts by describing the distinction between tympanal ears (as in grasshoppers, crickets, cicadas, moths or mantids) and flagellar ears (specifically antennae in mosquitoes and fruit flies). The challenges faced by insects when receiving directional cues differ depending on whether they have tympanal or flagellar years, because the latter respond to the particle velocity component (a vector quantity) of the sound field, whereas the former respond to the pressure component (a scalar quantity). Insects have evolved sophisticated biophysical solutions to meet these challenges, which provide binaural cues for directional hearing. The physiological challenge is to reliably encode these cues in the neuronal activity of the afferent auditory system, a non-trivial problem in particular for those insect systems composed of only few nerve cells which exhibit a considerable amount of intrinsic and extrinsic response variability. To provide an integrative view of directional hearing, I complement the description of these biophysical and physiological solutions by presenting findings on localisation in real-world situations, including evidence for localisation in the vertical plane.

Position-dependent hearing in three species of bushcrickets (Tettigoniidae, Orthoptera)

A primary task of auditory systems is the localization of sound sources in space. Sound source localization in azimuth is usually based on temporal or intensity differences of sounds between the bilaterally arranged ears. In mammals, localization in elevation is possible by transfer functions at the ear, especially the pinnae. Although insects are able to locate sound sources, little attention is given to the mechanisms of acoustic orientation to elevated positions. Here we comparatively analyse the peripheral hearing thresholds of three species of bushcrickets in respect to sound source positions in space. The hearing thresholds across frequencies depend on the location of a sound source in the three-dimensional hearing space in front of the animal. Thresholds differ for different azimuthal positions and for different positions in elevation. This position-dependent frequency tuning is species specific. Largest differences in thresholds between positions are found in Ancylecha fenestrata. Correspondingly, A. fenestrata has a rather complex ear morphology including cuticular folds covering the anterior tympanal membrane. The position-dependent tuning might contribute to sound source localization in the habitats. Acoustic orientation might be a selective factor for the evolution of morphological structures at the bushcricket ear and, speculatively, even for frequency fractioning in the ear.

Directional hearing: from biophysical binaural cues to directional hearing outdoors

When insects communicate by sound, or use acoustic cues to escape predators or detect prey or hosts they have to localize the sound in most cases, to perform adaptive behavioral responses. In the case of particle velocity receivers such as the antennae of mosquitoes, directionality is no problem because such receivers are inherently directional. Insects equipped with bilateral pairs of tympanate ears could principally make use of binaural cues for sound localization, like all other animals with two ears. However, their small size is a major problem to create sufficiently large binaural cues, with respect to both interaural time differences (ITDs, because interaural distances are so small), but also with respect to interaural intensity differences (IIDs), since the ratio of body size to the wavelength of sound is rather unfavorable for diffractive effects. In my review, I will only shortly cover these biophysical aspects of directional hearing. Instead, I will focus on aspects of directional hearing which received relatively little attention previously, the evolution of a pressure difference receiver, 3D-hearing, directional hearing outdoors, and directional hearing for auditory scene analysis.

Spatial orientation in the bushcricket Leptophyes punctatissima (Phaneropterinae; Orthoptera): III. Peripheral directionality and central nervous processing of spatial cues

We examined peripheral and central nervous cues underlying the ability of the bushcricket Leptophyes punctatissima to orient to elevated and depressed sound sources broadcasting the female acoustic reply. The peripheral spatial directionality of the ear was measured physiologically using monaural preparations of an auditory interneuron (T-fibre). In the azimuth, maximal interaural intensity differences of 18 dB occur between ipsi- and contralateral stimulation. With increasing elevation or depression of the sound sources, IIDs decrease systematically and reach zero with the source exactly above or below the preparation. Bilateral, simultaneous recordings of the activity of the pair of interneurons allowed determining the binaural discharge differences which occur in response to the extremely short (1 ms) female reply. These discharge differences are large (four action potentials/stimulus) and reliable in the azimuth with lateral stimulation, and decrease gradually with more frontal stimulation. With elevation and depression of sound sources these differences again decrease to one action potential/stimulus at 60 degrees or 75 degrees elevation, and lateral stimulus angles of about 60 degrees . We also calculated the reliability with which a receiver could correctly determine the location of the sound source. We discuss these quantitative measures in relation to the spatial phonotactic behaviour of male L. punctatissima.