Eye spectral sensitivity in fresh- and brackish-water populations of three glacial-relict Mysis species (Crustacea): physiology and genetics of differential tuning

In-silico predicted mouse melanopsins with blue spectral shifts deliver efficient subcellular signaling

Melanopsin is a photopigment belonging to the G Protein-Coupled Receptor (GPCR) family expressed in a subset of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) and responsible for a variety of processes. The bistability and, thus, the possibility to function under low retinal availability would make melanopsin a powerful optogenetic tool. Here, we aim to utilize mouse melanopsin to trigger macrophage migration by its subcellular optical activation with localized blue light, while simultaneously imaging the migration with red light. To reduce melanopsin's red light sensitivity, we employ a combination of in silico structure prediction and automated quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics modeling to predict minimally invasive mutations to shift its absorption spectrum towards the shorter wavelength region of the visible spectrum without compromising the signaling efficiency. The results demonstrate that it is possible to achieve melanopsin mutants that resist red light-induced activation but are activated by blue light and display properties indicating preserved bistability. Using the A333T mutant, we show that the blue light-induced subcellular melanopsin activation triggers localized PIP3 generation and macrophage migration, which we imaged using red light, demonstrating the optogenetic utility of minimally engineered melanopsins.

Review: Use of Electrophysiological Techniques to Study Visual Functions of Aquatic Organisms

The light environments of natural water sources have specific characteristics. For the majority of aquatic organisms, vision is crucial for predation, hiding from predators, communicating information, and reproduction. Electroretinography (ERG) is a diagnostic method used for assessing visual function. An electroretinogram records the comprehensive potential response of retinal cells under light stimuli and divides it into several components. Unique wave components are derived from different retinal cells, thus retinal function can be determined by analyzing these components. This review provides an overview of the milestones of ERG technology, describing how ERG is used to study visual sensitivity (e.g., spectral sensitivity, luminous sensitivity, and temporal resolution) of fish, crustaceans, mollusks, and other aquatic organisms (seals, sea lions, sea turtles, horseshoe crabs, and jellyfish). In addition, it describes the correlations between visual sensitivity and habitat, the variation of visual sensitivity as a function of individual growth, and the diel cycle changes of visual sensitivity. Efforts to identify the visual sensitivity of different aquatic organisms are vital to understanding the environmental plasticity of biological evolution and for directing aquaculture, marine fishery, and ecosystem management.

Dark-adaptation in the eyes of a lake and a sea population of opossum shrimp (Mysis relicta): retinoid isomer dynamics, rhodopsin regeneration, and recovery of light sensitivity

We have studied dark-adaptation at three levels in the eyes of the crustacean Mysis relicta over 2-3 weeks after exposing initially dark-adapted animals to strong white light: regeneration of 11-cis retinal through the retinoid cycle (by HPLC), restoration of native rhodopsin in photoreceptor membranes (by MSP), and recovery of eye photosensitivity (by ERG). We compare two model populations ("Sea", S_p, and "Lake", L_p) inhabiting, respectively, a low light and an extremely dark environment. 11-cis retinal reached 60-70% of the pre-exposure levels after 2 weeks in darkness in both populations. The only significant L_p/S_p difference in the retinoid cycle was that L_p had much higher levels of retinol, both basal and light-released. In S_p, rhodopsin restoration and eye photoresponse recovery parallelled 11-cis retinal regeneration. In L_p, however, even after 3 weeks only ca. 25% of the rhabdoms studied had incorporated new rhodopsin, and eye photosensitivity showed only incipient recovery from severe depression. The absorbance spectra of the majority of the L_p rhabdoms stayed constant around 490-500 nm, consistent with metarhodopsin II dominance. We conclude that sensitivity recovery of S_p eyes was rate-limited by the regeneration of 11-cis retinal, whilst that of L_p eyes was limited by inertia in photoreceptor membrane turnover.

Increasing the illumination slowly over several weeks protects against light damage in the eyes of the crustacean Mysis relicta

The eyes of two glacial-relict populations of opossum shrimp Mysis relicta inhabiting the different photic environments of a deep, dark-brown freshwater lake and a variably lit bay of the Baltic Sea differ in their susceptibility to functional depression from strong light exposures. The lake population is much more vulnerable than the sea population. We hypothesized that the difference reflects physiological adaptation mechanisms operating on long time scales rather than genetically fixed differences between the populations. To test this, we studied how acclimation to ultra-slowly increased illumination (on time scales of several weeks to months) affected the resilience of the eyes to bright-light exposures. Light responses of whole eyes were measured by electroretinography, the visual-pigment content of single rhabdoms by microspectrophotometry and the structural integrity of photoreceptor cells by electron microscopy (EM). Slow acclimation mitigated and even abolished the depression of photoresponsiveness caused by strong light exposures, making a dramatic difference especially in the lake animals. Still, acclimation in the sea animals was faster and the EM studies suggested intrinsic differences in the dynamics of microvillar membrane cycling. In conclusion, we report a novel form of physiological adaptation to general light levels, effective on the time scale of seasonal changes. It explains part but not all of the differences in light tolerance between the lake and sea populations.