Detection of coronary artery disease using real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography: a comparison with dual-isotope resting thallium-201/stress technectium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography

Diagnostic performance of myocardial perfusion imaging with conventional and CZT single-photon emission computed tomography in detecting coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We performed a meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic performance of conventional SPECT (C-SPECT) and cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT)-SPECT systems in detecting angiographically proven coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

Studies published between January 2000 and February 2018 were identified by database search. We included studies assessing C-SPECT or CZT-SPECT as a diagnostic test to evaluate patients for the presence of CAD, defined as at least 50% diameter stenosis on invasive coronary angiography. A study was eligible regardless of whether patients were referred for suspected or known CAD.

RESULTS

We identified 40 eligible articles (25 C-SPECT and 15 CZT-SPECT studies) including 7334 patients (4997 in C-SPECT and 2337 in CZT-SPECT studies). The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 85% and 66% for C-SPECT and 89% and 69% for CZT-SPECT imaging studies. The area under the curve was slightly higher for CZT-SPECT (0.89) compared to C-SPECT (0.83); accordingly, the summary diagnostic OR was 17 for CZT-SPECT and 11 for C-SPECT. The accuracy of the two tests slightly differs between C-SPECT and CZT-SPECT (chi-square 11.28, P < .05). At meta-regression analysis, no significant association between both sensitivity and specificity and demographical and clinical variables considered was found for C-SPECT and CZT-SPECT studies.

CONCLUSIONS

C-SPECT and CZT-SPECT have good diagnostic performance in detecting angiographic proven CAD, with a slightly higher accuracy for CZT-SPECT. This result supports the use of the novel gamma cameras in clinical routine practices also considering the improvements in acquisition time and radiation exposure reduction.

Clinical practice of contrast echocardiography: recommendation by the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) 2017

Contrast echocardiography is widely used in cardiology. It is applied to improve image quality, reader confidence and reproducibility both for assessing left ventricular (LV) structure and function at rest and for assessing global and regional function in stress echocardiography. The use of contrast in echocardiography has now extended beyond cardiac structure and function assessment to evaluation of perfusion both of the myocardium and of the intracardiac structures. Safety of contrast agents have now been addressed in large patient population and these studies clearly established its excellent safety profile. This document, based on clinical trials, randomized and multicentre studies and published clinical experience, has established clear recommendations for the use of contrast in various clinical conditions with evidence-based protocols.

The value of quantitative real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography for detection of angiographically significant coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Real-time (RT) myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) is a novel method for the assessment of regional myocardial perfusion. We sought to evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of quantitative RT-MCE in predicting significant coronary stenosis, with reference to quantitative coronary angiography.

HYPOTHESIS

RT-MCE can identify anatomically significant coronary artery stenosis in selected patients. RT-MCE is probably an effective method for detection of angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis.

METHODS

Thirty-five patients (mean age, 59.94 ± 10.63 years; 25 males) scheduled for coronary angiography underwent RT-MCE at rest, and shortly afterward underwent gated single-photon emission computed tomography (gated-SPECT). Coronary angiography was performed within 1 week after RT-MCE in all patients. The observing indexes included the images of RT-MCE that were analyzed quantitatively from microbubble replenishment curves for myocardial perfusion by using the Q-Lab software. The sensitivity and specificity of RT-MCE for quantitative detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) were obtained. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the differences of accuracy in ischemic segments with A, β and A × β respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of gated-SPECT and RT-MCE for assessment of CAD were calculated using a 4-score method.

RESULTS

A total of 513 segments among 595 segments in 35 patients were obtained. The cutoffs for A, β and A × β were 4.58, 0.64, and 2.73, and the sensitivity and specificity of quantitative RT-MCE for detection of CAD were 86.0%, 80.2%, 88.9%, and 84.1%, 64.6%, 79.9%, respectively. Meanwhile, the sensitivity and specificity of semiquantitative analysis for assessment of CAD were 66.7% and 61.8%. The ROC curve area of A and A × β was 0.91 and 0.90 in the middle segments. The ROC area of A was 0.52 in the base segments. The sensitivity and specificity of gated-SPECT for assessment of CAD were 84.8% and 82.7%, respectively. The sensitivity of multi-indexes RT-MCE increased. The sensitivity was 89.1%, 90.4%, and 96.3% by A + β, A + A × β, and β + A × β.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative RT-MCE is an effective method for the detection of coronary artery stenosis. Quantitative RT-MCE is segmented for assessment to ischemic myocardium. RT-MCE with multi-indexes has a valuable application for assessment of CAD surpassing SPECT.

Accelerated stress real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery disease: comparison with 99mTc single photon emission computed tomography

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this prospective study were to compare the diagnostic value of accelerated vasodilator stress real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) against coronary angiography and to evaluate whether the addition of MCE perfusion data improves the diagnostic accuracy of stress echocardiography.

METHODS

A total of 103 patients with suspected or known stable coronary artery disease (CAD) underwent SPECT and accelerated high-dose dipyridamole (0.84 mg/kg intravenously for 4 minutes) atropine (up to 1 mg intravenously) stress real-time qualitative MCE. The presence of CAD was detected by coronary angiography.

RESULTS

CAD defined as >or= 70% stenosis was detected in 77% of patients, whereas 86% of patients had CAD defined as >or= 50% stenosis. In a territory-by-territory analysis, the concordance between MCE and SPECT in detecting perfusion defects varied from 72.8% (kappa = 0.386) to 89.3% (kappa = 0.642). There were no significant differences between MCE and SPECT in sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy for identifying patients with CAD. Combining MCE and wall motion abnormality analysis significantly improved the sensitivity of the test compared with wall motion abnormality analysis alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Accelerated vasodilator stress real-time MCE yields a good concordance with SPECT in detection of perfusion defects and a similar diagnostic value for the detection of CAD. The addition of MCE perfusion data improves the diagnostic value of stress echocardiography.

Contrast echocardiography: evidence for clinical use

The failure of echocardiography to give diagnostically useful information in a significant proportion of patients has led to the development of specific contrast agents to enhance imaging. Suitable contrast media must have the ability to modify ultrasound characteristics, be capable of crossing the pulmonary capillary bed, show stability over the duration of a procedure, offer low blood solubility with low toxicity and be rapidly eliminated. The current generation of ultrasound contrast agents comprises microbubbles of a high molecular-weight gas encapsulated in a shell of phospholipid or protein. A review of the clinical evidence shows that these agents are clinically effective in enhancing echocardiographic imaging. They enable the rescue of failed procedures, often sparing patients from invasive tests, but appear not to add to the burden of side effects. Indeed, the benefits of using contrast agents in stress echocardiography have been recommended in recently published American Society of Echocardiography guidelines. Myocardial contrast echocardiography has now developed to the stage where assessment of myocardial perfusion for the detection of coronary artery disease is possible with the same diagnostic accuracy as radionuclide imaging. However, in comparison with the latter technique, it is less expensive, is more portable, and avoids the use of ionizing radiation. It is precisely the ability of myocardial contrast echocardiography to simultaneously assess function and perfusion at the bedside that has given it a unique role in clinical practice. This review provides an overview of the clinical evidence supporting the efficacy of contrast echocardiography in the assessment of myocardial structure, function, and perfusion.