Timineri S, Mulè M, Puzzangara E, Santangelo G, Dugo D, Schillaci V, Di Grazia A, Liotta C, Scandura S, Tempio D, Tamburino C, Calvi V. Selection of patient for cardiac resynchronization therapy: role of QT corrected dispersion.
PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY: PACE 2012;
35:850-5. [PMID:
22548384 DOI:
10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03402.x]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIMS
About 30 to 50% of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may not show clinical or echocardiographic improvement, despite fulfilling guidelines recommendations for CRT. For this reason, we need a more accurate method to assess CRT eligibility. The aims of this study were to verify, on a 12-month follow-up, the usefulness of QT corrected dispersion (QTcD) in a patient's selection for CRT.
METHODS
We stratified 53 patients who underwent CRT, into two groups based on the estimation of QTcD, that is, QTcD > 60 ms and QTcD ≤ 60 ms. In all patients were performed New York Heart Association (NYHA) class determination, six-minute walking test, QtcD, and QRS measurements, and complete echocardiographic assessment at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after implantation.
RESULTS
At baseline, there were no significant differences in clinical, echocardiographic, and electrocardiographic parameters duration between two groups. At 12-month follow-up between the two groups, there were significant differences in NYHA (1.2 ± 0.4 vs 2 ± 0.6; P < 0.01), six-minute walking distance (422 ± 68 vs 364 ± 68; P < 0.01), left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (34 ± 7% vs 28 ± 6%; P < 0.01), LV end-diastolic diameter (57 ± 7 vs 63 ± 8; P < 0.01), and LV intraventricular dyssynchrony (24 ± 14 vs 39 ± 23; P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION
This study suggests that QTc dispersion in addition to QRS duration could improve the sensitivity of electrocardiogram in a patient's selection for CRT.
Collapse