Endothelial vascular markers in coronary surgery

Role of endothelial-microparticles and the tissue factor pathway in ginsenoside Rb1-mediated prevention of umbilical vein endothelial cell injury

Hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) is a life-threatening complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, which urgently requires effective prevention and treatment. Endothelial damage is recognized as the first event in patients with hepatic VOD. However, the mechanism by which endothelial injury induces thrombosis in hepatic VOD is still not clear. In the present study, monocrotaline (MCT) was used to induce endothelial cell injury in EA.hy926 cells to imitate in vitro hepatic VOD. MCT significantly increased apoptosis in EA.hy926 endothelial cells and the secretion of endothelial microparticles (EMPs) which can be used to reflect the level of endothelial injury. Additionally, MCT significantly enhanced the expression of soluble tissue factor (TF) and EMP-bound TF protein, suggesting that EMPs may participate in the development of hepatic VOD by regulating coagulation. Ginsenoside Rb1, a major constituent and effective ingredient of Panax ginseng, was found to significantly decrease MCT-induced endothelial injury and release of EMPs. Moreover, Ginsenoside Rb1 decreased soluble TF released by EA.hy926 cells and EMP-bound TF protein induced by MCT. These data suggest that ginsenoside Rb1 may serve as a potent prophylactic and/or as a treatment of hepatic VOD by protecting endothelial cells and preventing microthrombosis induced by endothelial injury.

Oscillating shear stress mediates mesenchymal transdifferentiation of EPCs by the Kir2.1 channel

Although endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are considered to be an essential source of vascular endothelial repair, their bidirectional differentiation determines that they play a double-edged role in the restoration of endothelial injury. In this research, we investigated the effect of Kir2.1 ion channel on the transdifferentiation of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) under the oscillating shear stress (OSS) and the molecular mechanisms underlying the pathological vascular remodeling. EPCs were treated with OSS (± 3.5 dynes/cm², 1 Hz) simulated with the parallel flow chamber system. The results have shown that OSS promoted the expression of α-SMA and SM22, markers of mesenchymal cells on EPCs. Moreover, OSS also increased expression of Kir2.1 in EPCs. The down-regulation of Kir2.1 reduced OSS-induced EPC mesenchymal transdifferentiation. The overexpression of Kir2.1 suppressed the angiogenic abilities of EPCs in vitro. In parallel, the overexpression of Kir2.1 on EPCs thickened the carotid tunica intima in rat carotid artery balloon injured model in vivo. Taken together, those data indicated that the OSS could facilitate the transdifferentiation of EPCs by increasing Kir2.1 expression. This study provides a novel insight into the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases and gives evidence for Kir2.1 as a potential therapeutic target.

Lytic cycle of Besnoitia besnoiti tachyzoites displays similar features in primary bovine endothelial cells and fibroblasts

BACKGROUND

Bovine besnoitiosis, caused by the cyst-forming apicomplexan parasite Besnoitia besnoiti, is a chronic and debilitating cattle disease that continues to spread in Europe in the absence of control tools. In this scenario, in vitro culture systems are valuable tools to carry out drug screenings and to unravel host-parasite interactions. However, studies performed in bovine target cells are scarce.

METHODS

The objective of the present study was to obtain primary bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAECs) and fibroblast cell cultures, target cells during the acute and the chronic stage of the disease, respectively, from healthy bovine donors. Afterwards, expression of surface (CD31, CD34 and CD44) and intracellular markers (vimentin and cytokeratin) was studied to characterize cell populations by flow cytometry. Next, the lytic cycle of B. besnoiti tachyzoites was studied in both target cells. Invasion rates (IRs) were determined by immunofluorescence at several time points post-infection, and proliferation kinetics were studied by quantitative PCR (qPCR). Finally, the influence of bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) co-infection on the host cell machinery, and consequently on B. besnoiti invasion and proliferation, was investigated in BAECs.

RESULTS

Morphology and cytometry results confirmed the endothelial and fibroblast origins. CD31 was the surface marker that best discriminated between BAECs and fibroblasts, since fibroblasts lacked CD31 labelling. Expression of CD34 was weak in low-passage BAECs and absent in high-passage BAECs and fibroblasts. Positive labelling for CD44, vimentin and cytokeratin was observed in both BAECs and fibroblasts. Regarding the lytic cycle of the parasite, although low invasion rates (approximately 3-4%) were found in both cell culture systems, more invasion was observed in BAECs at 24 and 72 hpi. The proliferation kinetics did not differ between BAECs and fibroblasts. BVDV infection favoured early Besnoitia invasion but there was no difference in tachyzoite yields observed in BVDV-BAECs compared to BAECs.

CONCLUSIONS

We have generated and characterized two novel standardized in vitro models for Besnoitia besnoiti infection based on bovine primary target BAECs and fibroblasts, and have shown the relevance of BVDV coinfections, which should be considered in further studies with other cattle pathogens.

Pivotal micro factors associated with endothelial cells

Objective:

Recent studies have shown the important influence of various micro factors on the general biological activity and function of endothelial cells (ECs). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and angiogenin (ANG) are classic micro factors that promote proliferation, differentiation, and migration of ECs. The underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and related pathways of these micro factors remain the focus of current research.

Data sources:

An extensive search was undertaken in the PubMed database by using keywords including “micro factors” and “endothelial cell.” This search covered relevant research articles published between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2018.

Study selection:

Original articles, reviews, and other articles were searched and reviewed for content on micro factors of ECs.

Results:

VEGF and ANG have critical functions in the occurrence, development, and status of the physiological pathology of ECs. Other EC-associated micro factors include interleukin 10, tumor protein P53, nuclear factor kappa B subunit, interleukin 6, and tumor necrosis factor. The results of Gene Ontology analysis revealed that variations were mainly enriched in positive regulation of transcription by the RNA polymerase II promoter, cellular response to lipopolysaccharides, negative regulation of apoptotic processes, external side of the plasma membrane, cytoplasm, extracellular regions, cytokine activity, growth factor activity, and identical protein binding. The results of the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis revealed that micro factors were predominantly enriched in inflammatory diseases.

Conclusions:

In summary, the main mediators, factors, or genes associated with ECs include VEGF and ANG. The effect of micro factors on ECs is complex and multifaceted. This review summarizes the correlation between ECs and several micro factors.

Common Injuries and Repair Mechanisms in the Endothelial Lining

Objective:

Endothelial cells (ECs) are important metabolic and endocrinal organs which play a significant role in regulating vascular function. Vascular ECs, located between the blood and vascular tissues, can not only complete the metabolism of blood and interstitial fluid but also synthesize and secrete a variety of biologically active substances to maintain vascular tension and keep a normal flow of blood and long-term patency. Therefore, this article presents a systematic review of common injuries and healing mechanisms for the vascular endothelium.

Data Sources:

An extensive search in the PubMed database was undertaken, focusing on research published after 2003 with keywords including endothelium, vascular, wounds and injuries, and wound healing.

Study Selection:

Several types of articles, including original studies and literature reviews, were identified and reviewed to summarize common injury and repair processes of the endothelial lining.

Results:

Endothelial injury is closely related to the development of multiple cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. However, the mechanism of vascular endothelial injury is not fully understood. Numerous studies have shown that the mechanisms of EC injury mainly involve inflammatory reactions, physical stimulation, chemical poisons, concurrency of related diseases, and molecular changes. Endothelial progenitor cells play an important role during the process of endothelial repair after such injuries. What's more, a variety of restorative cells, changes in cytokines and molecules, chemical drugs, certain RNAs, regulation of blood pressure, and physical fitness training protect the endothelial lining by reducing the inducing factors, inhibiting inflammation and oxidative stress reactions, and delaying endothelial caducity.

Conclusions:

ECs are always in the process of being damaged. Several therapeutic targets and drugs were seeked to protect the endothelium and promote repair.