1
|
Casolo G, Gulizia MM, Aschieri D, Chinaglia A, Corda M, Nassiacos D, Caico SI, Chimenti C, Giaccardi M, Gotti E, Maffé S, Magnano R, Solarino G, Gabrielli D, Oliva F, Colivicchi F. ANMCO position paper: guide to the appropriate use of the wearable cardioverter defibrillator in clinical practice for patients at high transient risk of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J Suppl 2023; 25:D294-D311. [PMID: 37213799 PMCID: PMC10194821 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suad101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Extended risk stratification and optimal management of patients with a permanently increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) are becoming increasingly important. There are several clinical conditions where the risk of arrhythmic death is present albeit only transient. As an example, patients with depressed left ventricular function have a high risk of SCD that may be only transient if there will be a significant recovery of function. It is important to protect the patients while receiving and titrating to the optimal dose the recommended drugs that may lead to an improved left ventricular function. In several other conditions, a transient risk of SCD can be observed even if the left ventricular function is not compromised. Examples are patients with acute myocarditis, during the diagnostic work-up of some arrhythmic conditions or after extraction of infected catheters while eradicating the associated infection. In all these conditions, it is important to offer a protection to these patients. The wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) is of particular importance as a temporary non-invasive technology for both arrhythmia monitoring and therapy in patients with increased risk of SCD. Previous studies have shown the WCD to be an effective and safe therapy for the prevention of SCD caused by ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation. The aim of this ANMCO position paper is to provide a recommendation for clinical utilization of the WCD in Italy, based upon current data and international guidelines. In this document, we will review the WCD functionality, indications, clinical evidence, and guideline recommendations. Finally, a recommendation for the utilization of the WCD in routine clinical practice will be presented, in order to provide physicians with a practical guidance for SCD risk stratification in patients who may benefit from this device.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giancarlo Casolo
- Corresponding author. Tel +39 0584 6057119, Fax +39 0584 6059897, Emails: ;
| | - Michele Massimo Gulizia
- U.O.C. Cardiology, Garibaldi-Nesima Hospital, Azienda di Rilievo Nazionale e Alta Specializzazione ‘Garibaldi’, Catania
| | | | | | - Marco Corda
- S.C. Cardiology-UTIC, ARNAS ‘G. Brotzu’, Cagliari
| | - Daniele Nassiacos
- U.O.C Cardiology-UTIC, P.O. Saronno, ASST Valle Olona, Saronno, Varese
| | | | - Cristina Chimenti
- Department of Clinical Internal, Anaesthesiological and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico Umberto I, Rome
| | - Marzia Giaccardi
- U.O. Cardiology, Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital, Bagno a Ripoli, Florence
| | - Enrico Gotti
- Department of Nephrological, Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Baggiovara Civil Hospital, Modena
| | - Stefano Maffé
- U.O. Cardiology, SS Trinità Hospital, ASL NO, Borgomanero, Novara
| | | | | | - Domenico Gabrielli
- U.O.C. Cardiology, Department of Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini, Rome
- Fondazione per il Tuo cuore—Heart Care Foundation, Florence
| | - Fabrizio Oliva
- Cardiology 1-Emodinamics, Cardiothoracovascular Department ‘A. De Gasperis’, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan
| | - Furio Colivicchi
- U.O.C. Clinical and Rehabilitation Cardiology, Presidio Ospedaliero San Filippo Neri—ASL Roma 1, Rome
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Usage of the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator during pregnancy. IJC HEART & VASCULATURE 2022; 41:101066. [PMID: 35676917 PMCID: PMC9168609 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Revised: 05/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Background Pregnancy can trigger or aggravate the risk for life-threating arrhythmias in cardiac diseases. Pregnancy is associated with reluctance for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) due to concerns about radiation. Thus, the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) might be an option during pregnancy. Aim of the study was to collect experiences about the use of WCD in pregnancy. Methods and results This study retrospectively included eight women who received a WCD during pregnancy. They suffered from ventricular tachycardia (VT) without known cardiac disease (n = 3), Brugada syndrome (n = 1), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n = 1), dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 1), non-compaction (n = 1), and survived sudden cardiac arrest during a preceding pregnancy (n = 1). WCD usage was started between 13 and 28 weeks of gestation. WCD wearing period ranged from 3 days to 30.9 weeks, WCD wearing time ranged from 13.0 to 23.7 h per day. Two women (25%) abandoned WCD already during pregnancy. Neither appropriate nor inappropriate WCD shocks were recorded. Antiarrhythmic management included beta-blockers (n = 5) and flecainide (n = 2). After delivery, ICD were implanted (n = 4), refused (n = 2) and estimated not necessary after successful catheter ablation (n = 2). Conclusion Uneventful pregnancy is possible in women at risk for sudden cardiac death by interdisciplinary monitoring and diligent pharmacotherapy protected by the WCD. Since no WCD shocks were recorded, the effectiveness of WCD during pregnancy is still unclear. However, arrhythmia detection by WCD was very good despite the changed anatomy in pregnancy. Nevertheless, further studies are necessary to assess effectiveness of WCD in pregnant women. Furthermore, efforts should be made to increase the wearing adherence of WCD during pregnancy.
Collapse
|
3
|
Poole JE, Gleva MJ, Birgersdotter-Green U, Branch KRH, Doshi RN, Salam T, Crawford TC, Willcox ME, Sridhar AM, Mikdadi G, Beinart SC, Cha YM, Russo AM, Rowbotham RK, Sullivan J, Gustavson LM, Kivilaid K. A Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator with a Low False Alarm Rate. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2022; 33:831-842. [PMID: 35174572 PMCID: PMC9305432 DOI: 10.1111/jce.15417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Revised: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) is indicated in appropriate patients to reduce risk for sudden cardiac death. Challenges for patients wearing a WCD have been frequent false shock alarms primarily due to ECG noise and wear discomfort. OBJECTIVE To test a contemporary WCD designed for reduced false shock alarms and improved comfort. METHODS 130 patients with LVEF ≤ 40% and an active implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) were fitted with the ASSURE WCD (Kestra Medical Technologies) and followed 30 days. WCD detection was enabled and shock alarm markers recorded, but shocks and shock alarms disabled. All WCD episodes and ICD VT/VF episodes were adjudicated. The primary endpoint was the false positive shock alarm rate with a performance goal of 1 every 3.4 days (0.29 per patient-day). RESULTS Of 163 WCD episodes, 4 were VT/VF and 159 non-VT/VF (121 rhythms with noise, 32 uncertain with noise, 6 atrial flutter without noise). Only 3 false positive shock alarm markers were recorded; 1 false positive shock alarm every 1,333 patient-days (0.00075 per patient-day, 95% CI: 0.00015-0.00361; p < 0.001). No ICD recorded VT/VF episodes meeting WCD detection criteria (≥ 170 bpm for ≥ 20 seconds) were missed by the WCD during 3,501 patient-days of use. Median wear was 31.0 days (IQR 2.0) and median daily use 23.0 hours (IQR 1.7). Adverse events were mostly mild: skin irritation (19.4%) and musculoskeletal discomfort (8.5%). CONCLUSION The ASSURE WCD demonstrated a low false positive shock alarm rate, low patient-reported discomfort, and no serious adverse events. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ghiath Mikdadi
- Heart Clinic of Hammond, Hammond, Louisiana, Center for Cardiac and Vascular Research
| | - Sean C Beinart
- Washington Adventist Healthcare White Oak Medical Center, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rohrer U, Manninger M, Zirlik A, Scherr D. Multiparameter Monitoring with a Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2021; 22:22. [PMID: 35009564 PMCID: PMC8747379 DOI: 10.3390/s22010022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
A wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) is a temporary treatment option for patients at high risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD) and for patients who are temporarily not candidates for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). In addition, the need for telemedical concepts in the detection and treatment of heart failure (HF) and its arrhythmias is growing. The WCD has evolved from a shock device detecting malignant ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and treating them with shocks to a heart-failure-monitoring device that captures physical activity and cardioacoustic biomarkers as surrogate parameters for HF to help the treating physician surveil and guide the HF therapy of each individual patient. In addition to its important role in preventing SCD, the WCD could become an important tool in heart failure treatment by helping prevent HF events by detecting imminent decompensation via remote monitoring and monitoring therapy success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Daniel Scherr
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria; (U.R.); (M.M.); (A.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hillmann HAK, Hohmann S, Mueller-Leisse J, Zormpas C, Eiringhaus J, Bauersachs J, Veltmann C, Duncker D. Feasibility and First Results of Heart Failure Monitoring Using the Wearable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Newly Diagnosed Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2021; 21:7798. [PMID: 34883802 PMCID: PMC8659567 DOI: 10.3390/s21237798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2021] [Revised: 11/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) is used in patients with newly diagnosed heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). In addition to arrhythmic events, the WCD provides near-continuous telemetric heart failure monitoring. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical relevance of additionally recorded parameters, such as heart rate or step count. We included patients with newly diagnosed HFrEF prescribed with a WCD. Via the WCD, step count and heart rate were acquired, and an approximate for heart rate variability (HRV5) was calculated. Multivariate analysis was performed to analyze predictors for an improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Two hundred and seventy-six patients (31.9% female) were included. Mean LVEF was 25.3 ± 8.5%. Between the first and last seven days of usage, median heart rate fell significantly (p < 0.001), while median step count and HRV5 significantly increased (p < 0.001). In a multivariate analysis, a delta of HRV5 > 23 ms was an independent predictor for LVEF improvement of ≥10% between prescription and 3-month follow-up. Patients with newly diagnosed HFrEF showed significant changes in heart rate, step count, and HRV5 between the beginning and end of WCD prescription time. HRV5 was an independent predictor for LVEF improvement and could serve as an early indicator of treatment response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - David Duncker
- Hannover Heart Rhythm Center, Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany; (H.A.K.H.); (S.H.); (J.M.-L.); (C.Z.); (J.E.); (J.B.); (C.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Blockhaus C, List S, Waibler HP, Gülker JE, Klues H, Bufe A, Seyfarth M, Koektuerk B, Shin DI. Wearable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Used as a Telemonitoring System in a Real-Life Heart Failure Unit Setting. J Clin Med 2021; 10:5435. [PMID: 34830724 PMCID: PMC8618886 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10225435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) who are at risk of sudden cardiac death, a wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) is recommended as a bridge to the recovery of LVEF or as a bridge to the implantation of a device. In addition to its function to detect and treat malignant arrhythmia, WCD can be used via an online platform as a telemonitoring system to supervise patients' physical activity, compliance, and heart rate. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 173 patients with regard to compliance and heart rate after discharge. RESULTS Mean WCD wearing time was 59.75 ± 35.6 days; the daily wearing time was 21.19 ± 4.65 h. We found significant differences concerning the patients' compliance. Men showed less compliance than women, and younger patients showed less compliance than patients who were older. Furthermore, we analyzed the heart rate from discharge until the end of WCD prescription and found a significant decrease from discharge to 4, 8, or 12 weeks. CONCLUSION WCD can be used as a telemonitoring system to help the involved heart failure unit or physicians attend to and adjust the medical therapy. Furthermore, specific patient groups should be educated more intensively with respect to compliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Blockhaus
- Heart Centre Niederrhein, Department of Cardiology, Helios Clinic Krefeld, 47805 Krefeld, Germany; (S.L.); (H.-P.W.); (H.K.); (A.B.); (B.K.); (D.-I.S.)
- Witten-Herdecke University, 58455 Witten, Germany; (J.-E.G.); (M.S.)
| | - Stephan List
- Heart Centre Niederrhein, Department of Cardiology, Helios Clinic Krefeld, 47805 Krefeld, Germany; (S.L.); (H.-P.W.); (H.K.); (A.B.); (B.K.); (D.-I.S.)
| | - Hans-Peter Waibler
- Heart Centre Niederrhein, Department of Cardiology, Helios Clinic Krefeld, 47805 Krefeld, Germany; (S.L.); (H.-P.W.); (H.K.); (A.B.); (B.K.); (D.-I.S.)
| | - Jan-Erik Gülker
- Witten-Herdecke University, 58455 Witten, Germany; (J.-E.G.); (M.S.)
- Department of Cardiology, Petrus Hospital Wuppertal, 42283 Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Heinrich Klues
- Heart Centre Niederrhein, Department of Cardiology, Helios Clinic Krefeld, 47805 Krefeld, Germany; (S.L.); (H.-P.W.); (H.K.); (A.B.); (B.K.); (D.-I.S.)
| | - Alexander Bufe
- Heart Centre Niederrhein, Department of Cardiology, Helios Clinic Krefeld, 47805 Krefeld, Germany; (S.L.); (H.-P.W.); (H.K.); (A.B.); (B.K.); (D.-I.S.)
- Witten-Herdecke University, 58455 Witten, Germany; (J.-E.G.); (M.S.)
| | - Melchior Seyfarth
- Witten-Herdecke University, 58455 Witten, Germany; (J.-E.G.); (M.S.)
- Department of Cardiology, Helios University Hospital, 42117Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Buelent Koektuerk
- Heart Centre Niederrhein, Department of Cardiology, Helios Clinic Krefeld, 47805 Krefeld, Germany; (S.L.); (H.-P.W.); (H.K.); (A.B.); (B.K.); (D.-I.S.)
- Witten-Herdecke University, 58455 Witten, Germany; (J.-E.G.); (M.S.)
| | - Dong-In Shin
- Heart Centre Niederrhein, Department of Cardiology, Helios Clinic Krefeld, 47805 Krefeld, Germany; (S.L.); (H.-P.W.); (H.K.); (A.B.); (B.K.); (D.-I.S.)
- Witten-Herdecke University, 58455 Witten, Germany; (J.-E.G.); (M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
[Interpretation of paced ECGs by the wearable defibrillator : Pitfalls and solutions]. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol 2021; 32:500-503. [PMID: 34713343 DOI: 10.1007/s00399-021-00822-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
The wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) can protect patients against sudden cardiac death during temporarily increased or unknown risk of ventricular arrhythmias or in the situation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) explantation due to infection. In unusual cases, misinterpretation of the ECG by the tachycardia detection and discrimination algorithm of the WCD can occur which can lead to inappropriate acoustic alerts or inappropriate WCD therapy. We explain the mechanisms of inappropriate WCD therapy in two cases from daily clinical practice together with potential strategies to avoid such events in this special group of patients.
Collapse
|
8
|
Aidelsburger P, Seyed-Ghaemi J, Guinin C, Fach A. Effectiveness, efficacy, and safety of wearable cardioverter-defibrillators in the treatment of sudden cardiac arrest - Results from a health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2020; 36:1-9. [PMID: 32600490 DOI: 10.1017/s0266462320000379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness, efficacy, and safety of a wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) in adult persons with high risk for sudden cardiac arrest and for which an implantable cardioverter is currently not applicable. METHODS We performed a systematic literature search in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CRD-databases. Study selection was performed by two reviewers independently. Data were presented quantitatively; due to heterogeneity of studies no meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS One randomized-controlled trial (RCT), one non-randomized comparative trial, and forty-four non-comparative trials were included. The RCT reported an overall mortality of 3.1 percent in the WCD group versus 4.9 percent in controls (relative risk [RR]: .64; 95 percent confidence interval [CI], .43-.98, p = .04), but no significant effect on arrhythmia-related mortality. The RR for arrhythmia-related mortality amounted to .67 (95 percent CI, .37-1.21, p = .18) as assessed in the RCT. Appropriate shocks were observed in 1.3 percent of patients in both comparative studies, and inappropriate shocks in .6 percent of patients in the RCT. Termination of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) was successful in 75 to 100 percent of appropriate shocks in all studies. Adverse events assessed in the RCT showed a lower incidence of shortness of breath (38.8 percent vs. 45.3 percent; p = .004), higher incidence of rash at any location (15.3 percent vs. 7.1 percent; p < .001), and higher incidence of itching at any location (17.2 percent vs. 6.4 percent; p < .001) for WCD. CONCLUSIONS Available evidence demonstrates that the WCD detects and terminates VT/VF events reliably and shows a high rate of appropriate shocks in mixed patient populations. Data of large registries confirm that the WCD is a safe intervention.
Collapse
|
9
|
MILAN DAVID, KLEIN HELMUT, GIMBEL JROD, KNILANS TIMOTHY, MIRRO MICHAEL, ZIRILLE FRANCIS. Considering the Need to Expand the Indications for Wearable Defibrillator Therapy. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag 2019; 10:3751-3760. [PMID: 32494421 PMCID: PMC7252810 DOI: 10.19102/icrm.2019.100707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
|
10
|
[Wearable defibrillator : Current evidence]. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol 2018; 29:362-368. [PMID: 30357452 DOI: 10.1007/s00399-018-0601-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2018] [Accepted: 10/04/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
The wearable cardioverter/defibrillator (WCD) is safe and effective in the prevention of sudden cardiac death, and has found its way into international guidelines and clinical practice. Nearly 40,000 patients with a WCD have been published in clinical registries and one randomized study has recently been presented. Especially patients with newly diagnosed cardiomyopathy with severely reduced left ventricular function show an increased risk for ventricular tachyarrhythmias and may benefit from a WCD. In these patients without an indication for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), the WCD offers protection from sudden cardiac death during initiation and optimization of heart failure medication. Critical patient selection and structured patient management is crucial for successful WCD prescription. This review gives an overview of the current data and recommendations on WCD.
Collapse
|
11
|
Jagadish PS, Aziz M, Chinta V, Khouzam RN. Misunderstood or Mistrusted? The Under-Utilization of the Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Clinical Practice. Curr Probl Cardiol 2018; 45:100395. [PMID: 30340770 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2018.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2018] [Accepted: 09/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Annually in the United States, sudden cardiac death (including out-of-hospital cardiac arrests) is responsible for over 300,000 deaths, comprising 40%-50% of total mortality rates from cardiovascular disease. Among the highest-risk patients are those with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy who have a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (≤ 35%-40%). However, not everyone is a candidate for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. In 2002, the wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) gained Food and Drug Administration approval for its efficacy in the prevention of sudden cardiac arrest or death in certain at-risk populations and has been making its way into national guidelines with Class IIa to IIb strength of evidence. Despite the prevalence of sudden cardiac death and the demonstrated efficacy of the WCD, this technology remains under-prescribed. This study seeks to explicate the potential causes for under-utilization of WCDs and offer means of overcoming barriers to its use. Among these reasons include confusion about the guidelines and when to prescribe, who can prescribe the device, and debate about whether the WCD is efficacious based on recent studies. Other social barriers to prescription include cost and adherence to therapy by the patient. This study sets the stage for further research on the improvement of education about the device and opens discourse about its prescription in clinical practice.
Collapse
|