Effect of high-dose strong statin for preventing periprocedural ischemic complications of carotid artery stenting

A single-center pilot randomized controlled trial of atorvastatin loading for preventing ischemic brain damage after carotid artery stenting

Objective

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) performed perioperatively with high-dose atorvastatin may reduce the incidence of new ischemic brain lesions, but more high-level evidence is needed. Furthermore, the optimal dose and course of perioperative statin therapy remain uncertain.

Methods

A single-center, prospective, parallel controlled, pilot randomized clinical trial was conducted at Beijing Hospital. The study includes a total of 130 patients with CAS. The patients were randomly assigned to receive a high-dose of 80 mg/day atorvastatin (n = 65) or a standard-dose of 20 mg/day atorvastatin (n = 65) 3 days before and 3 days after planned CAS. The primary endpoint event was the cumulative incidence of silent new ischemic cerebral lesions (sNICL) on post-CAS cerebral diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), transient ischemic attack (TIA), or ischemic stroke within 30 days after CAS.

Results

Among the 130 patients, 123 completed the study, of which 63 were in the high-dose group and 60 were in the standard-dose group. The incidence of major endpoint events was 69.8% (44 cases) and 78.3% (46 cases) in the high-dose and standard-dose groups, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups (HR, 0.705; 95% CI, 0.315-1.576; p = 0.393). According to the stratified analysis results, the sNICL incidence was significantly different between the two groups in the symptomatic patients (HR, 0.263; 95% CI, 0.70-0.984; p = 0.04).

Conclusion

Among patients with CAS, a periprocedural high-dose of atorvastatin did not reduce the rate of periprocedural ischemic brain damage. However, high-dose statins can reduce the incidence of sNICL after CAS in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis.

Clinical Trial Registration

Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT03079115.

A retrospective study on the preventive effect of statin after carotid artery stenting

This retrospective study appraised the preventive effect of statin after carotid artery stenting (CAS).Records were extracted for 100 patients with CAS surgery indicator, aged between 20 and 75 years old, and treated for statin. The cohort study included treatment group (statin and routine treatment) and control group (routine treatment), each group 50 patients. Outcomes consisted of degree of nerve defect (as measured by National Institute of Health Stroke Scale), lipid profiles (mg/dL), and CAS complications within 30 days after surgery.After treatment, there were no significant differences in National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, lipid profiles, and mortality rate between 2 groups. However, significant differences in total cholesterol (mg/dL, P = .03), low-density lipoprotein (mg/dL, P = .01), transient ischemic attack (P = .03), ischemic stroke (P = .04), and cardiac complications (P = .03) were identified within 30 days after CAS between 2 groups.The results of this study showed that prior statin treatment may be effective for the prevention of CAS complications.

Prevalence of the Academic Research Consortium high bleeding risk criteria in patients undergoing endovascular therapy for peripheral artery disease in lower extremities

The Academic Research Consortium (ARC) recently published a definition of patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. However, the prevalence of the ARC-HBR criteria in patients undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT) for peripheral artery disease in lower extremities has not been thoroughly investigated. This study sought to investigate the prevalence and impact of the ARC-HBR criteria in patients undergoing EVT. We analyzed 277 consecutive patients who underwent their first EVT from July 2011 to September 2019. We applied the full ARC-HBR criteria to the study population. The primary end point was a composite outcome of all-cause mortality, Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 or 5 bleeding, and lower limb amputation within 12 months of EVT. Among the 277 patients, 193 (69.7%) met the ARC-HBR criteria. HBR patients had worse clinical outcomes compared with non-HBR patients at 12 months after EVT, including a higher incidence of the composite primary outcome (19.2% vs. 3.6%, p < 0.001) and all-cause death (7.8% vs. 0%, p = 0.007). In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, presence of the ARC-HBR criteria [hazard ratio (HR) 4.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-13.80, p = 0.020], body mass index (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.01-1.27, p = 0.042), diabetes mellitus (HR 2.70, 95% CI 1.28-5.69, p = 0.009), hyperlipidemia (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.21-0.80, p = 0.009), and infrapopliteal lesions (HR 3.51, 95% CI 1.63-7.56, p = 0.001) were independent predictors of the primary composite outcome. Approximately 70% of Japanese patients undergoing EVT met the ARC-HBR criteria, and its presence was strongly associated with adverse outcomes within 12 months of EVT.