Endoscopic technique for sagittal synostosis

Endoscopic surgery for craniosynostosis: a bibliometric analysis of primary studies

INTRODUCTION

Bibliometrics, a statistical method assessing the influence of scholarly works, was employed to analyze the evolution of endoscopic surgery for craniosynostosis.

METHODS

This comprehensive review followed PRISMA guidelines, sourcing data from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, focusing on clinical and surgical outcomes up to December 2023. We identified 1409 records, with 83 papers meeting inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

The majority of studies originated from the Americas (79%), predominantly from the United States (75.9%). The typical study design was retrospective cohort studies (62%), involving a total of 8,175 patients with median research duration of 8 years. Citation metrics indicated an average count of 38.9 per paper, with notable contributions from several key authors. A distinct increase in research was observed in recent years, particularly from 2011 onwards, peaking in 2022 and 2023. The top 10 most cited papers, largely emanating from the U.S., had a higher median patient number (103) compared to the overall median (53), suggesting their significant impact. These papers were primarily published in journals with higher impact factors and citation indicators. The most cited research was notably published in the Journal of Neurosurgery-Pediatrics.

CONCLUSION

This analysis provides a comprehensive view of the field, highlighting the growing trend and clinical importance of endoscopic approaches in craniosynostosis, offering a valuable resource for future research and clinical practice.

Comparison of Morphometric Outcomes following Open Posterior Expansion versus Endoscopic Strip Craniectomy for Sagittal Synostosis

BACKGROUND

Open middle and posterior cranial vault expansion (OPVE) or endoscopic (ES) strip craniectomy are two surgical techniques for normalization of head shape in isolated sagittal synostosis. This study aims to compare 2-year cranial morphometrics after these two approaches.

METHODS

The authors performed morphometric analysis on preoperative [time (T) 0], immediately postoperative (T1), and 2-year (T2) postoperative computed tomographic scans of patients who underwent OPVE or ES before 4 months of age. Perioperative data and morphometrics were compared between the two groups and age-matched controls.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were included in the ES cohort, 19 age-matched patients were included in the OPVE cohort, and 57 were included as controls. Median surgery time and blood transfusion volume were less for the ES approach (118 minutes and 0 cc, respectively) compared with OPVE (204 minutes and 250 cc, respectively). Anthropometric measurements after OPVE were closer in normal controls at T1 compared with ES, but the skull shapes were comparable at T2. In the midsagittal plane, anterior vault was higher after OPVE at T2 compared with both ES and controls, but the posterior length was shorter and closer to controls than in the ES cohort. Cranial volumes were like controls for both cohorts at T2. There was no difference in complication rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Both OPVE and ES techniques result in normalization of cranial shape in patients with isolated sagittal synostosis after 2 years with minimal morphometric differences. Family decision-making between the two approaches should be based on age at presentation, avoidance of blood transfusion, scar pattern, and availability of helmet molding and not on expected outcome.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Long-term results of minimally invasive strip craniectomy without helmet therapy for scaphocephaly - a single-centre experience

Scaphocephaly is the most common type of craniosynostosis and various surgical techniques are used for treatment. Due to late postoperative changes of the head shape, long-term outcome data is important for evaluating any new surgical technique. At our institution, minimally invasive strip craniectomy without regular helmet therapy is the standard treatment in scaphocephalic patients. Between October 2021 and February 2023, we retrospectively examined the skull shape of patients who underwent minimally invasive strip craniectomy for scaphocephaly using a 3D surface scan technique. The cephalic index (CI), the need for helmet therapy and additional cosmetic outcome parameters were investigated. We included 70 patients (72.5% male). The mean follow-up time was 46 (10-125) months and the mean CI was 75.7 (66.7-85.2). In 58 patients, the final cosmetic result was rated as "excellent/good" (mean CI: 76.3; 70.4-85.0), in 11 as "intermediate" (mean CI: 73.3; 66.7-77.6), and in one case as "unsatisfactory" (CI 69.3). The presence of a suboccipital protrusion was associated with a "less than good" outcome. The CI correlated significantly with the overall outcome, the presence of frontal bossing, and the interval between scan and surgery (age at scan). Minimally invasive strip craniectomy is an elegant and safe method to correct scaphocephaly. Our data show good cosmetic results in the long term even without regular postoperative helmet therapy.

Endoscopy-Assisted Craniosynostosis Surgery without Postoperative Helmet Molding Therapy

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopy-assisted craniosynostosis surgery (EACS) yields excellent surgical outcomes by minimizing blood loss, operative time, and hospital stays. Postoperative helmet therapy (PHT), commonly employed for head shape correction, involves frequent adjustments, potential complications, and high costs. Given the rising cost of helmet therapy, reduced insurance coverage, and limited availability in low- and middle-income countries, understanding success rates without helmet use is crucial. The present study analyses the anthropometric results of the first EACS series without PHT.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a single-center series involving 90 consecutive patients who underwent EACS without PHT from 2012 to 2022 was conducted, with a follow-up exceeding 3 years. The study exclusively included patients with nonsyndromic isolated sagittal synostosis, with 33 meeting the criteria. Craniometric measurements were obtained from preoperative, 1-year postoperative, and the latest computed tomography scans. For isolated sagittal synostosis cases, the cephalic index (CI) was calculated (CI >75 for excellent results, CI 70-75 for good results, and <70 for poor results). Collected data encompassed patient sex, age, and follow-up time.

RESULTS

The mean age was 84.8 ± 45.3 days (2.79 ± 1.49 months) within a range of 3-172 days. The preoperative mean CI was 68 ± 42, increasing to 76 ± 6 1 year postoperatively (mean difference +8 ± 6.3; P = 0.0001). Seventy-one percent of patients achieved excellent results, 23% good (CI = 70-75), and 6% poor. Reintervention was unnecessary.

CONCLUSIONS

EACS without PHT demonstrates favorable anthropometric results, cost reduction, and simplified postoperative management.

Isolated Sagittal Craniosynostosis: A Comprehensive Review

Sagittal craniosynostosis, a rare but fascinating craniofacial anomaly, presents a unique challenge for both diagnosis and treatment. This condition involves premature fusion of the sagittal suture, which alters the normal growth pattern of the skull and can affect neurological development. Sagittal craniosynostosis is characterised by a pronounced head shape, often referred to as scaphocephaly. Asymmetry of the face and head, protrusion of the fontanel, and increased intracranial pressure are common clinical manifestations. Early recognition of these features is crucial for early intervention, and understanding the aetiology is, therefore, essential. Although the exact cause remains unclear, genetic factors are thought to play an important role. Mutations in genes such as FGFR2 and FGFR3, which disrupt the normal development of the skull, are suspected. Environmental factors and various insults during pregnancy can also contribute to the occurrence of the disease. An accurate diagnosis is crucial for treatment. Imaging studies such as ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and three-dimensional reconstructions play a crucial role in visualising the prematurely fused sagittal suture. Clinicians also rely on a physical examination and medical history to confirm the diagnosis. Early detection allows for quick intervention and better treatment outcomes. The treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis requires a multidisciplinary approach that includes neurosurgery, craniofacial surgery, and paediatric care. Traditional treatment consists of an open reconstruction of the cranial vault, where the fused suture is surgically released to allow normal growth of the skull. However, advances in minimally invasive techniques, such as endoscopic strip craniectomy, are becoming increasingly popular due to their lower morbidity and shorter recovery times. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of sagittal craniosynostosis, highlighting the aetiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic methods, and current treatment options.

Biparietal remodelling and total vault remodelling in scaphocephaly-a comparative study using 3d stereophotogrammetry

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to compare the results of two surgical techniques for the treatment of isolated sagittal synostosis (ISS) by means of 3D stereophotogrammetry. One technique, the Renier's "H" technique (RHT) comprised a biparietal expansion, the other, the total vault remodeling (TVR) included also a frontal remodeling.

METHODS

The two groups of operated children were compared with a third control group of normocephalic children. The 3D scanning was performed in all children between 12 and 245 months of age. On each 3D image six measurements and indices have been made, with the aim of evaluating not only length and width of the head, but also the height. The cranial index (CI) was measured in a plane parallel to the nasion-tragus plane, at the intersection with the opisthocranion.

RESULTS

Each of the three groups (RHT, TVR, control group) included 28 children. The measurements that were influenced by the correction of the frontal bossing, namely the CI and the sagittal length, were closer to normocephaly after TVR than after RHT. Lesser or no statistical difference was documented in the measurements evaluating the biparietal aspect and the height of the vertex, indicating that the biparietal expansion is effective in both procedures.

CONCLUSION

Based on our results TVR results in a better esthetical outcome, particularly in relation to the direct surgical remodeling of the frontal bossing.

The Outcomes of Endoscopic Suturectomy in Syndromic Craniosynostosis

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic suturectomy is a widely practiced surgical option for infants with craniosynostosis. But the efficacy and safety of the procedure remain unclear in syndromic patients. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic suturectomy for patients with syndromic craniosynostosis.

METHODS

From January 2013 to December 2020, 242 patients underwent endoscopic suturectomy at our institution. The surgical outcome was determined to be favorable or unfavorable based upon the necessity of an additional cranial surgery upon the last follow-up. First, we analyzed the outcomes of 26 syndromic craniosynostosis patients who have followed up for over a year. Second, we compared the outcomes between the syndromic (N=12) and nonsyndromic (N=11) patients with bilateral coronal synostosis who have followed up for over a year.

RESULTS

Twenty-three out of 26 syndromic craniosynostosis patients (88%) showed favorable outcomes without significant complications. In the analysis for bilateral coronal synostosis patients, 11 of 12 syndromic patients (92%) presented favorable outcomes, and all nonsyndromic patients showed favorable outcomes. No significant differences were observed in various anthropometric indices (cranial index, intracranial volume, anterior cranial height, anterior cranial base length, and cranial height-length index) and surgical outcomes between syndromic and nonsyndromic groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic suturectomy has the potential to be a surgical option for syndromic craniosynostosis. Even for patients with unfavorable outcomes, endoscopic suturectomy could serve as a bridge treatment for infants to counter cranial deformation before additional extensive surgery.

Flexible endoscope-assisted suture release and barrel stave osteotomy for the correction of sagittal synostosis

OBJECTIVE

Early suturectomy with a rigid endoscope followed by orthotic cranial helmet therapy is an accepted treatment option for single-suture craniosynostosis. To the authors' knowledge, flexible endoscope-assisted suture release (FEASR) has not been previously described. Presented herein is their experience with FEASR for the treatment of isolated sagittal craniosynostosis.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the health records of patients who had undergone FEASR between March 2018 and December 2020 was performed. Patients under the age of 6 months who had been diagnosed with isolated sagittal synostosis were considered eligible for FEASR. Exclusion criteria included syndromic synostosis or multiple-suture synostosis. The cephalic index, the primary measure of the cosmetic endpoint, was calculated at prespecified intervals: immediately preoperatively and 6 weeks and 12 months postoperatively. Parental satisfaction with the cosmetic outcome was determined throughout the clinical follow-up and documented according to a structured questionnaire for the first 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 18 consecutive patients met the criteria for study inclusion. The mean patient age at the time of surgery was 3.4 months (range 2-6 months). All patients underwent a wide craniectomy with no need to convert to an open procedure. The mean craniectomy width was 3.61 cm. Estimated blood loss ranged from 5 to 30 ml. The mean operative time was 75 minutes. No intraoperative complications were observed. The average length of stay was 2.6 days. The mean cephalic index was 67.7 preoperatively, 77.1 at 6 weeks postoperatively, and 76.3 at 1 year postoperatively. The mean percentage change in the cephalic index from preoperatively to the 12-month follow-up was 10.44 (p < 0.001). The mean follow-up was 17 months (range 12-28 months). All parents were satisfied with the cosmetic outcome of the procedure. No patients developed symptoms of raised intracranial pressure (ICP) or needed invasive ICP monitoring during the follow-up period. No patients required reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

In this modest single-hospital series, the authors demonstrated the feasibility of FEASR in treating sagittal synostosis with favorable cosmetic outcomes. The morbidity profile and resource utilization of the procedure appear similar to those of procedures conducted via traditional rigid endoscopy.

Endoscopic strip craniectomy with molding helmet therapy versus spring-assisted cranioplasty for nonsyndromic single-suture sagittal craniosynostosis: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic strip craniectomy with postoperative molding helmet therapy (ESC-H) and spring-assisted cranioplasty (SAC) are commonly used minimally invasive techniques for correction of nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis, but it is unclear which, if either, is superior. Therefore, the authors undertook a systematic review to compare ESC-H with SAC for the surgical management of nonsyndromic single-suture sagittal craniosynostosis.

METHODS

Studies were identified through a systematic and comprehensive search of four databases (Embase, MEDLINE, and two databases in the Cochrane Library). Databases were searched from inception until February 19, 2021. Pediatric patients undergoing either ESC-H or SAC for the management of nonsyndromic single-suture sagittal craniosynostosis were included. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses, single-patient case reports, mixed cohorts of nonsyndromic and syndromic patients, mixed cohorts of different craniosynostosis types, and studies in which no outcomes of interest were reported were excluded. Outcomes of interest included reoperations, blood transfusion, complications, postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admission, operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, and cephalic index. Pooled summary cohort characteristics were calculated for each outcome of interest. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The study was reported in accordance with the 2020 PRISMA statement.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies were eligible for inclusion in the review, including 1094 patients, of whom 605 (55.3%) underwent ESC-H and 489 (44.7%) underwent SAC for nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis. There was no difference between the pooled estimates of the ESC-H and SAC groups for operative time, length of stay, estimated blood loss, and cephalic index. There was no difference between the groups for reoperation rate and complication rate. However, ESC-H was associated with a higher blood transfusion rate and higher postoperative ICU admission.

CONCLUSIONS

The available literature does not demonstrate superiority of either ESC-H or SAC, and outcomes are broadly similar for the treatment of nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis. However, the evidence is limited by single-center retrospective studies with low methodological quality. There is a need for international multicenter randomized controlled trials comparing both techniques to gain definitive and generalizable data.

Historical Perspectives on the Management of Craniosynostosis

The history of craniofacial surgery is one of many fundamental advances by monumental figures. Although craniosynostosis has been known to exist for multiple centuries, modern management has evolved over roughly the last century. An overview of early history, early scientific exploration, the advancement of surgical treatment of craniofacial deformities and the current state of craniosynostosis management is discussed. To fully appreciate the evolution of craniosynostosis surgery, one must understand the gradual advancements that have brought the specialty to this modern era.

Management of Sagittal and Lambdoid Craniosynostosis: Open Cranial Vault Expansion and Remodeling

The prevalence of sagittal and lambdoid suture craniosynostosis differs considerably, as they are notably the most and least prevalent sutures involved in isolated suture craniosynostosis, respectively. The goals of reconstructing the cranial vault in both entities is the same: to release the fused suture, expand cranial volume, restore normal head shape and morphology, and allow for normal growth of the cranial vault. With regards to sagittal suture synostosis, opinions vary on whether reconstruction should focus on either the anterior or poster cranial vault. In contrast, the poster cranial vault is always targeted in lambdoid suture craniosynostosis.

A Computational Framework to Predict Calvarial Growth: Optimising Management of Sagittal Craniosynostosis

The neonate skull consists of several bony plates, connected by fibrous soft tissue called sutures. Premature fusion of sutures is a medical condition known as craniosynostosis. Sagittal synostosis, caused by premature fusion of the sagittal suture, is the most common form of this condition. The optimum management of this condition is an ongoing debate in the craniofacial community while aspects of the biomechanics and mechanobiology are not well understood. Here, we describe a computational framework that enables us to predict and compare the calvarial growth following different reconstruction techniques for the management of sagittal synostosis. Our results demonstrate how different reconstruction techniques interact with the increasing intracranial volume. The framework proposed here can be used to inform optimum management of different forms of craniosynostosis, minimising the risk of functional consequences and secondary surgery.

Endoscopic treatment of sagittal suture synostosis - a critical analysis of current management strategies

While many centers nowadays offer minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of single suture synostosis, surgical techniques and patient management vary significantly. We provide an overview of how scaphocephaly treated with endoscopic techniques is managed in the reported series and analyze the crucial steps that need to be dealt with during the management process. We performed a review of the published literature including all articles that examined sagittal-suture synostosis treated with endoscopic techniques as part of single- or multicenter studies. Fourteen studies reporting results of 885 patients were included. We identified 5 key steps in the management of patients. A total of 188 patients were female and 537 male (sex was only specified in 10 articles, for 725 included patients, respectively). Median age at surgery was between 2.6 and 3.9 months with a total range from 1.5 to 7.0 months. Preoperative diagnostics included clinical and ophthalmologic examinations as well as neuropsychological and genetic consultations if needed. In 5 publications, a CT scan was routinely performed. Several groups used anthropometric measurements, mostly the cephalic index. All groups analyzed equally recommended to perform endoscopically assisted craniosynostosis surgery with postoperative helmet therapy in children < 3 months of age, at least for non-syndromic cases. There exist significant variations in surgical techniques and patient management for children treated endoscopically for single suture sagittal synostosis. This heterogeneity constitutes a major problem in terms of comparability between different strategies.

Novel Method of Lateral Vault Modification in Scaphocephaly

BACKGROUND

Scaphocephaly is the commonest from of craniosynostosis. There are several surgical methods to correct this and is influenced by the areas affected. A common thread in any of these corrections is an attempt to increase the biparietal diameter by modifying the lateral vault panel (LVP). A simple and novel method is proposed.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

The records of all patients undergoing scaphocephaly correction in the craniofacial unit at the institution were reviewed from 2003 to 2019. There were 106 patients, 57 males, and 49 females. The age ranged from 6 months to 5 years with a mean of 11 months. The method of vault remodeling was LVP only in 36 (34%), subtotal vault remodeling in 59 (56%), and total vault remodeling in 11 (10%). All 106 patients underwent LVP remodeling as part of the procedure. One or 2 wedge excisions was performed to increase the curvature of the LVP and this panel was fixed on the outside of the temporal squame bone.

RESULTS

The patients were followed up for a minimum of 1 year. Satisfactory results were obtained. The mean preoperative cephalic index was 64% and the mean postoperative index was 75%. There were minor complications such as screw visibility in a few patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Wedge excisions of the LVP is a simple and effective maneuver that can be used as strategy when performing scaphocephaly correction.

Conventional posterior cranial vault expansion: indications and results-review of the literature

In the late 1980s, craniofacial surgery units reported suboptimal cosmetic results, cranial volume restriction, and intracranial hypertension after anterior cranial vault remodeling in bilateral coronal synostosis associated with severe brachyturricephaly. A possible explanation was a severe associated growth restriction of the posterior calvaria with radiological synostosis at the lambda sutures. "Conventional" or "fixed" posterior cranial vault expansion techniques were developed to address these limitations, sometimes as the first surgical step in a two-staged protocol of total calvarial reconstruction, combined with suboccipital decompression in cases of symptomatic cerebellar tonsillar herniation or, more easily, to resolve the characteristic occipital flattening of lambdoid synostosis. Various surgical approaches have been described; however, the indications for and timing of surgical treatment and postoperative evaluation of results still remain controversial. Although more invasive, conventional posterior cranial vault expansion has proven to be safe and offers a remodeled and protective bony vault immediately after surgery, but the underlying cranial base malformation remained untreated, with implications in the postoperative growth of the facial skeleton. Overcorrection, rigid stabilization, and grafting are also concerns to be addressed.

Endoscopic-Assisted Fronto-Orbital Distraction Osteogenesis: Initial Patient Report

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this manuscript is to introduce a novel endoscopic-assisted approach for creation of osteotomies and distractor hardware placement for unicoronal craniosynostosis.

METHODS

Only three small incisions are performed, one at the anterior fontanelle, pterional region, and upper lateral blepharoplasty location. Unicoronal strip craniectomy and osteotomies in temporal bone, nasofrontal junction, lateral orbital rim, sphenoid wing, orbital roof, and contralateral frontal bone are performed through these incisions with the assistance of a 30° 5-mm endoscope. One linear cranial distractor is inserted through the pterional incision and fixated across the unicoronal suturectomy.

RESULTS

Endoscopic-assisted fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis has been performed on 3 patients with unicoronal craniosynostosis. Median age at surgery was 5.4 months (95%CI 5.0-6.1). Median operative duration was 98 minutes (95%CI 91-112), and estimated blood loss was 25 mL (95%CI 15-150). Median length of distraction achieved was 25.7 mm (95%CI 21.9-28.0), based on lateral skull x-rays obtained on the last day of activation. Distractors were removed 2.3 months postoperatively (95%CI 2.1-3.1), and operative duration of distractor removal was 20 minutes (95%CI 19-29). There was 1 complication, a transient cerebrospinal fluid leak thought to have been caused by a pinpoint injury to the dura at the nasofrontal junction, which was managed expectantly and resolved spontaneously by the fourth postoperative day.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic-assisted fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis is a promising treatment modality for children with unicoronal craniosynostosis combining the benefits of distraction osteogenesis with a minimally invasive approach. Additional experience and follow-up are needed to determine its utility, safety, and longevity.

Comparisons of Intracranial Volume and Cephalic Index After Correction of Sagittal Craniosynostosis With Either Two or Three Springs

ABSTRACT

In this retrospective study, the authors determined changes in intracranial volume (ICV) and cephalic index (CI) in patients with sagittal craniosynostosis and operated with craniotomy combined with either 2 or 3 springs. The authors included patients (n = 112) with complete follow-up that had undergone surgical correction for isolated sagittal craniosynostosis with craniotomy combined with springs between 2008 and 2017. All patients underwent computed tomography examination preoperative, at the time of spring extraction, and at 3 years of age. Intracranial volume was measured using a semiautomatic MATLAB program, and CI was calculated as the width/length of the skull. The authors found that craniotomy combined with 2 springs increased the ICV from a preoperative value of 792 ± 113 mL (mean ± standard deviation) to 1298 ± 181 mL at 3 years of age and increased the CI from 72.1 ± 4.1 to 74.6 ± 4.3, whereas craniotomy combined with 3 springs increased the ICV from 779 ± 128 mL to 1283 ± 136 mL and the CI from 70.7 ± 4.3 to 74.8 ± 3.7. The relative increase in ICV was 65 ± 21% in the two-spring group and 68 ± 34% in the three-spring group (P value = 0.559), and the relative increase in CI was 3.6 ± 3.3% in the two-spring group as compared with 6.0 ± 5.0% in the three-spring group (P = 0.004). These findings demonstrated that use of 3 springs resulted in additional absolute and relative CI-specific effects as compared with 2 springs during the time when the springs were in place, with this effect maintained at 3 years of age.

Ultra-early synostectomy and cranial remodeling orthoses in the management of craniosynostoses

OBJECTIVE

The advent of endoscopic synostectomy has enabled early surgery for infants with craniosynostosis. Even though diagnosis is often made at birth, endoscopic synostectomy has traditionally been delayed until the infant is 3 months of age. There have been very few published reports of this procedure being performed in the early neonatal period. The authors discuss their experience with ultra-early endoscopic synostectomy, defined as an operation for infants aged 8 weeks or younger.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of infants who underwent operations at or before 8 weeks of age between 2011 and 2020 was done.

RESULTS

Twenty-five infants underwent operations: 11 were 2 weeks of age or younger, 8 were between 3 and 4 weeks of age, and 6 were between 5 and 8 weeks of age. The infants weighed between 2.25 and 4.8 kg. Eighteen had single-suture synostosis, and 7 had multiple sutures involved. Of these 7, 4 had syndromic craniosynostosis. The average operative time was 35 minutes, and it was less than 40 minutes in 19 cases. The estimated operative blood loss was 25 ml or less in 19 cases; 5 infants required an intraoperative blood transfusion. In 1 child with syndromic multisuture craniosynostosis, the surgery was staged due to blood loss. Two children experienced complications related to the procedure: one had an incidental durotomy with skin infection, and the other had postoperative kernicterus. All infants were fitted for cranial remodeling orthoses following surgery. Three of the 25 infants required reoperations, with 2 patients with syndromic craniosynostosis needing repeat surgery for cranial volume expansion and cosmetic appearance. Another child with syndromic craniosynostosis is awaiting cranial expansion surgery. Follow-up varied between 6 months and 8 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The data show that ultra-early synostectomy is safe and not associated with increased complications compared with surgery performed between 3 and 6 months of age. Infants with multisuture synostosis had increased operative time, required blood transfusion, and were more likely to require a second operation.

Minimally invasive endoscopically assisted remodelation (MEAR) of sagittal craniosynostosis: an alternative technique to open and endoscopic procedures with cranial orthosis time span reduction

INTRODUCTION

Sagittal craniosynostosis represents the most frequent simplex skull suture pathology. There are currently several operative approaches to this defect. Minimally invasive techniques are preferred for young infants. Since July 2017, we have employed endoscopically assisted craniectomies followed by cranial orthosis. Gradually, we have developed our modified technique, the minimally invasive endoscopically assisted remodelation (MEAR).

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

MEAR is a combination of principles gained from classical cranial vault remodeling techniques and minimal invasive approaches. The long and wider lateral osteoectomies performed in the parietal and occipital bones along with loosening of the periosteum and dura adhesions at the lambdoid sutures lead to early correction of parieto-occipital dimensions.

RESULTS

Thirty-one consecutive patients with scaphocephaly underwent MEAR. The median preoperative cephalic index of 67 units (P25:63.3, P75:70) was improved to a median postoperative cephalic index of 77 units (P25:75, P75: 81). Sufficient correction was achieved in all patients. Cranial orthosis was needed for a median of 1.5 months (P25:1, P75:2). We had no major surgical complications in this pilot series.

CONCLUSIONS

With MEAR, we have achieved good cosmetic results. Duration of cranial orthosis was significantly shortened compared to conventional endoscopic-assisted procedures.

Endoscopic Versus Open Total Vault Reconstruction of Sagittal Craniosynostosis

: Sagittal craniosynostosis is the most common form of congenital cranial deformity. Surgical interventions are performed either open or endoscopic. Advancements in minimally invasive surgery have enabled the development of the endoscopic suturectomy technique. This is contrasted to the traditional open cranial vault reconstruction. There is a paucity of data comparing the head shape changes from both techniques. This study aims to compare the morphological outcome of endoscopic suturectomy versus total cranial vault reconstruction.

METHODS

This is a retrospective comparative study involving 55 cases of sagittal craniosynostosis, 37 of which has open total cranial vault reconstruction and 18 had endoscopic suturectomy procedure. Preoperative and postoperative 3D photographs of both groups were analyzed and compared. The change in correction between preoperative and postoperative state was measured against a crowd-driven standard for acceptable head shape.

RESULTS

Total cranial vault had higher percentage change between pre and postoperative cranial index than endoscopic suturectomy (14.7% versus 7.7%, P = 0.003). However, both techniques were able to achieve the minimum standard of 70% correction (TCV 107.5%, ES 100.4%, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Total cranial vault and endoscopic suturectomy are effective in correcting scaphocephaly among children with sagittal craniosynostosis. Additionally, both techniques are able to achieve a percentage correction that exceeds the 70% benchmark established by the lay public.

Comparison of Head Shape Outcomes in Metopic Synostosis Using Limited Strip Craniectomy and Open Vault Reconstruction Techniques

AIM

Metopic craniosynostosis (MCS), with its trigonocephalic head shape, is often treated with either limited incision strip craniectomy (LISC) followed by helmet orthotic treatment, or open cranial vault reconstruction techniques (OCVR). There is controversy regarding resultant shape outcomes among craniofacial surgeons. Those adverse to LISC claim normal head shape is never attained, while proponents believe there is gradual correction to an equivalent outcome. This study aims to quantitate, over time, the three-dimensional (3D) head shapes in patients who have undergone LISC or OCVR intervention for MCS.

METHODS

Sixty-three 3D images of 26 patients with MCS were analyzed retrospectively. Head shape analyses were performed at: (1) preoperative, (2) 1-month postoperative, (3) 10 to 14 months postoperative (1 year), and (4) 2 years postoperative. Composite 3D head shapes of patients were compared at each time point. Two-dimensional (2D) standardized cross sections of the forehead were also compared.

RESULTS

Composite head shapes for both groups were nested, to allow visual comparison as the child's forehead grows and expands. The difference between LISC and OCVR 2D cross sections was calculated; 108.26 mm preoperatively, 127.18 mm after 1-month postoperative, 51.05 mm after 10 to 14 months postoperative, and 27.03 mm after 2 years postoperative.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found excellent head shape outcomes for both the LISC and OCVR techniques at 2 years of age. It also corroborates the slow and progressive improvement in head shape with the LISC technique. This study highlights the advantages of 3D photography for measurement of contour outcomes, utilizing both 2D vector and 3D whole head analytical techniques.

Comparison of 2 Sagittal Craniosynostosis Repair Techniques: Spring-Assisted Surgery Versus Endoscope-Assisted Craniectomy With Helmet Molding Therapy

INTRODUCTION

This study compares anthropometric outcomes of 2 sagittal synostosis repair techniques: spring-assisted surgery and endoscope-assisted craniectomy with molding helmet therapy.

METHODS

Patients undergoing spring-assisted surgery (n = 27) or endoscope-assisted craniectomy with helmet therapy (n = 40) at separate institutions were retrospectively reviewed. Pre- and 1-year postoperative computed tomography (CT) or laser scans were analyzed for traditional cranial index (CI), adjusted cranial index (aCI), and cranial vault volume (CVV). Nine patient-matched scans were analyzed for measurement consistency.

RESULTS

The spring-assisted group was older at both time points (P < .050) and spring-assisted group CVV was larger preoperatively and postoperatively (P < .01). However, the change in CVV did not differ between the groups (P = .210). There was no difference in preoperative CI (helmet vs spring: 70.1 vs 71.2, P = .368) between the groups. Postoperatively, helmet group CI (77.0 vs 74.3, P = .008) was greater. The helmet group also demonstrated a greater increase in CI (6.9 vs 3.1, P < .001). The proportion of patients achieving CI of 75 or greater was not significantly different between the groups (helmet vs spring: CI, 65% vs 52%, P = .370). There was no detectable bias in CI between matched CT and laser scans. Differences were identified between scan types in aCI and CVV measurements; subsequent analyses used corrected CVV and aCI measures for laser scan measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Both techniques had equivalent proportions of patients achieving normal CI, comparable effects on cranial volume, and similar operative characteristics. The study suggests that there may be greater improvement in CI in the helmet group. However, further research should be performed.

Public Perception of a Normal Head Shape in Children With Sagittal Craniosynostosis

: A question that remains unanswered is at what level of surgical correction does the public perceive a head shape to be "normal" or "acceptable?" For most cases of non-syndromic asymptomatic craniosynostosis, the parents desire for surgical correction is to improve the cosmetic appearance of head shape. At the time of this writing, the intraoperative surgeons' perspective of what constitutes an acceptable head shape is the target for surgical correction. In introducing an improved objectively cosmetic goal, an appropriate outcome measure would be to assess what the general public considers a normal or acceptable head shape in children with craniosynostosis.

METHOD

Twenty-two unique images were presented via an online crowdsourcing survey of a severe case of non-syndromic sagittal craniosynosis gradually corrected to an age and gender matched normalized head shape. Participants were recruited via the Sick Kids Twitter account. Participants were invited to rate the head shapes as "normal" or "abnormal."

RESULTS

The 538 participants completed the online survey. Participants were able to reliably and consistently identify normal and abnormal head shapes with a Kappa Score >0.775. Furthermore, participants indicated that a correction of 70% is required in order for the cranial deformity to be regarded as "normal." This threshold closely reflects a normal Cranial Index, which is a widely used morphometric outcome in craniosynostosis.

CONCLUSION

Crowdsourcing provides an ideal method for capturing the general population's perspective on what constitutes a normal and acceptable head shape in children with sagittal craniosynostosis. Laypersons are able to reliably and consistently distinguish cranial deformities from a "normal" head shape. The public indicates a threshold correction of 70% in sagittal craniosynosis to regard it as a "normal" head shape.

Effect of Operative Timing and Bone Grafting on Postoperative Cephalometric Indices in Nonsyndromic Sagittal Synostosis

ABSTRACT

Surgical repair of sagittal suture craniosynostosis is highly variable, and optimal timing/use of bone grafts remains a subset of parameters that continue to be studied. We sought to compare cephalometric outcomes of early surgical intervention without bone grafting compared to later intervention with bone grafting. Patients undergoing primary surgical repair of nonsyndromic sagittal suture craniosynostosis between 2015 and 2019 were followed with preoperative measurements of cephalic index along with postoperative measurements at 6 months to 1 year, respectively. Nineteen patients undergoing cranial vault reconstruction were studied in 2 groups, namely those younger than 6 months who did not have bone grafting performed during primary repair (31.6%) and patients 6 months and older who underwent cranial vault reconstruction with bone grafting during primary repair (68.4%). Mean 6-month to 1-year postoperative cranial index was significantly increased in both groups (P < 0.001). The average cephalic index change for both groups (younger than 6 months without bone grafting, CI value change 9; 6 months and older with bone grafting; CI value change 6) was not significantly different with regards to 95% confidence interval (P = 0.30). Patients older than 6 months of age undergoing cranial vault reconstruction with bone grafting have similar cephalometric outcomes as their younger counterparts undergoing cranial vault remodeling without bone grafting. Bone grafting in the appropriate cohort may improve functional and esthetic outcomes without compromising primary surgical goals of improving cranial vault cephalometric indices.

Identifying the Misshapen Head: Craniosynostosis and Related Disorders

Pediatric care providers, pediatricians, pediatric subspecialty physicians, and other health care providers should be able to recognize children with abnormal head shapes that occur as a result of both synostotic and deformational processes. The purpose of this clinical report is to review the characteristic head shape changes, as well as secondary craniofacial characteristics, that occur in the setting of the various primary craniosynostoses and deformations. As an introduction, the physiology and genetics of skull growth as well as the pathophysiology underlying craniosynostosis are reviewed. This is followed by a description of each type of primary craniosynostosis (metopic, unicoronal, bicoronal, sagittal, lambdoid, and frontosphenoidal) and their resultant head shape changes, with an emphasis on differentiating conditions that require surgical correction from those (bathrocephaly, deformational plagiocephaly/brachycephaly, and neonatal intensive care unit-associated skill deformation, known as NICUcephaly) that do not. The report ends with a brief discussion of microcephaly as it relates to craniosynostosis as well as fontanelle closure. The intent is to improve pediatric care providers' recognition and timely referral for craniosynostosis and their differentiation of synostotic from deformational and other nonoperative head shape changes.

Visualization of skull remodeling and re-ossification after reconstructive surgery and mosaic-like cranioplasty in sagittal synostosis and deformational brachycephaly1

INTRODUCTION

Extended vertex craniectomy in sagittal synostosis (SS) and transposition craniectomy in severe deformational brachycephaly (DB) combined with mosaic-like cranioplasty (M-LC) have been performed in 17 and 24 infants from 2001 to 2003. The hitherto not well-known mechanisms of remodeling and effectiveness of M-LC is assessed by X-ray and anthropometry.

METHODS

Follow-ups included skull radiograms preoperatively and 3 and 15 months postoperatively, which were analyzed by craniometry according to Haas, long-term anthropometry, and clinical follow-up till mean age of 7.6 and 7.4 years. Analysis included the following: time course of cephalic indexes (CI), sizes of distances (breadth, length, height) and modulus, and mean deviation of distances and modulus from the normal age- and sex-dependent values; evaluation of re-ossification of the operative defects covered by M-L C.

RESULTS

CI in SS is normalized in early follow-up with stabilization thereafter; CI of DB is gradually normalized till late follow-up. Remodeling occurs in both disorders by active and passive mechanisms: increased growth of distances with preoperative minus and decreased growth of distances with surplus. The latter mechanism adds more to the postoperative remodeling. M-LC leads to concentric and final complete re-ossification of the defects.

DISCUSSION

Significant remodeling of the skull vault is observed in both disorders by the demonstrated time course and mechanisms. M-LC does not hinder early remodeling and guarantees re-ossification of the defects.

A comparison of endoscopic strip craniectomy and pi craniectomy for treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis

OBJECTIVE

Sagittal craniosynostosis is managed with a wide variety of operative strategies. The current investigation compares the clinical outcomes of two widely performed techniques: pi craniectomy and minimally invasive endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC) followed by helmet therapy.

METHODS

This IRB-approved retrospective study examined patients diagnosed with nonsyndromic, single-suture sagittal craniosynostosis treated with either pi craniectomy or ESC. Included patients had a minimum postoperative follow-up of 5 months.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients met the inclusion criteria (pi 21 patients, ESC 30 patients). Compared to patients who underwent ESC, the pi patients were older at the time of surgery (mean age 5.06 vs 3.11 months). The mean follow-up time was 23.2 months for ESC patients and 31.4 months for pi patients. Initial cranial index (CI) was similar between the groups, but postoperatively the ESC patients experienced a 12.3% mean increase in CI (from 0.685 to 0.767) compared to a 5.34% increase for the pi patients (from 0.684 to 0.719), and this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Median hospital length of stay (1 vs 2 days) and operative duration (69.5 vs 93.3 minutes) were significantly less for ESC (p < 0.001 for both). The ESC patients showed a trend toward better results when surgery was done at younger ages. Craniectomy width in ESC cases was positively associated with CI improvement (slope of linear regression = 0.69, p = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

While both techniques effectively treated sagittal craniosynostosis, ESC showed superior results compared to pi craniectomy. ESC showed a trend for better outcomes when done at younger ages, although the trend did not reach statistical significance. A wider craniectomy width (up to 2 cm) was associated with better outcomes than smaller craniectomy widths among the ESC patients.

Long-Term Characterization of Cranial Defects After Surgical Correction for Single-Suture Craniosynostosis

INTRODUCTION

Craniosynostosis is typically corrected surgically within the first year of life through cranial vault reconstruction. These procedures often leave open calvarial defects at the time of surgery, which are anticipated to close over time in a large proportion of cases. However, residual calvarial defects may result as long-term sequelae from cranial vault remodeling. When larger defects are present, they may necessitate further reconstruction for closure.Better understanding of the calvarial osseous healing process may help to identify which defects will resolve or shrink to acceptable size and which will require further surgery. Our study aims to assess the long-term changes in defect size after cranial vault reconstruction for craniosynostosis.

METHODS

One-year postoperative and long-term computed tomography scans were retrieved from the craniofacial anomalies archive. Analysis used custom software. All defects above the size of 1 cm were analyzed and tracked for calvarial location, surface area, and circularity. Monte Carlo simulation was performed to model the effect of initial defect size on the rate of defect closure.

RESULTS

We analyzed a total of 74 defects. The mean ± SD initial defect surface area was 3.27 ± 3.40 cm. The mean ± SD final defect surface area was 1.71 ± 2.54 cm. The mean ± SD percent decrease was 55.06% ± 28.99%. There was a significant difference in the percentage decrease of defects in the parietal and frontoparietal locations: 68.4% and 43.7%, respectively (P = 0.001). Monte Carlo simulation results suggest that less than 10% of defects above the size of 9 cm will close to the size of 2.5 cm or less.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe and make available a novel validated method of measuring cranial defects. We find that the large majority of initial defects greater than 9 cm remain at least 1 in in size (2.5 cm) 1 year postoperatively. In addition, there appear to be regional differences in closure rates across the cranium, with frontoparietal defects closing more slowly than those in the parietal region. This information will aid surgeons in the decision-making process regarding cranioplasty after craniosynostosis correction.

Calculated Blood Loss and Transfusion Requirements in Primary Open Repair of Craniosynostosis

Background:

Open surgical correction is effective in the treatment of craniosynostosis but may result in significant blood loss and transfusions. This study seeks to compare surgeon estimated blood loss with calculated blood loss and provide contemporary data that objectively quantify blood loss and transfusion rate associated with open repair of craniosynostosis.

Methods:

A retrospective review of patients undergoing primary open repair of craniosynostosis between May 2011 and November 2016 was performed. The medical records of 43 patients were reviewed to obtain the operative age, weight, affected suture, pre- and postoperative hematocrit, blood transfusion volume, estimated blood loss, and syndromic status. Estimated blood volume (EBV) and red cell mass were calculated for analysis.

Results:

The median age and weight at the time of surgery were 9 months and 8.6 kg, respectively. Mean surgeon estimated blood loss was 207.4 mL (28.1% of EBV). Mean calculated blood loss was 318 mL (44.3% of EBV). The mean transfusion volume was 188 mL (26.5% of EBV). The mean transfusion as a percent of estimated red cell mass was 59.1%. Fourteen percent of patients did not require any transfusion.

Conclusions:

We report intraoperative blood losses and transfusion requirements that are lower than those of many previous studies of open repair of craniosynostosis. Additionally, we found that calculated blood loss estimates may be more reliable than surgeon-derived estimated blood loss. We hope that these updated, objective data will be useful in comparisons of open repair to minimally invasive surgery or to new blood loss reducing procedures.

Endoscopic Versus Open Repair for Craniosynostosis in Infants Using Propensity Score Matching to Compare Outcomes: A Multicenter Study from the Pediatric Craniofacial Collaborative Group

BACKGROUND

The North American Pediatric Craniofacial Collaborative Group (PCCG) established the Pediatric Craniofacial Surgery Perioperative Registry to evaluate outcomes in infants and children undergoing craniosynostosis repair. The goal of this multicenter study was to utilize this registry to assess differences in blood utilization, intensive care unit (ICU) utilization, duration of hospitalization, and perioperative complications between endoscopic-assisted (ESC) and open repair in infants with craniosynostosis. We hypothesized that advantages of ESC from single-center studies would be validated based on combined data from a large multicenter registry.

METHODS

Thirty-one institutions contributed data from June 2012 to September 2015. We analyzed 1382 infants younger than 12 months undergoing open (anterior and/or posterior cranial vault reconstruction, modified-Pi procedure, or strip craniectomy) or endoscopic craniectomy. The primary outcomes included transfusion data, ICU utilization, hospital length of stay, and perioperative complications; secondary outcomes included anesthesia and surgical duration. Comparison of unmatched groups (ESC: N = 311, open repair: N = 1071) and propensity score 2:1 matched groups (ESC: N = 311, open repair: N = 622) were performed by conditional logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Imbalances in baseline age and weight are inherent due to surgical selection criteria for ESC. Quality of propensity score matching in balancing age and weight between ESC and open groups was assessed by quintiles of the propensity scores. Analysis of matched groups confirmed significantly reduced utilization of blood (26% vs 81%, P < .001) and coagulation (3% vs 16%, P < .001) products in the ESC group compared to the open group. Median blood donor exposure (0 vs 1), anesthesia (168 vs 248 minutes) and surgical duration (70 vs 130 minutes), days in ICU (0 vs 2), and hospital length of stay (2 vs 4) were all significantly lower in the ESC group (all P < .001). Median volume of red blood cell administered was significantly lower in ESC (19.6 vs 26.9 mL/kg, P = .035), with a difference of approximately 7 mL/kg less for the ESC (95% confidence interval for the difference, 3-12 mL/kg), whereas the median volume of coagulation products was not significantly different between the 2 groups (21.2 vs 24.6 mL/kg, P = .73). Incidence of complications including hypotension requiring treatment with vasoactive agents (3% vs 4%), venous air embolism (1%), and hypothermia, defined as <35°C (22% vs 26%), was similar between the 2 groups, whereas postoperative intubation was significantly higher in the open group (2% vs 10%, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter study of ESC versus open craniosynostosis repair represents the largest comparison to date. It demonstrates striking advantages of ESC for young infants that may result in improved clinical outcomes, as well as increased safety.

Analysis of clinical outcomes for treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis: a comparison of endoscopic suturectomy and cranial vault remodeling

The authors compared the effectiveness of two main surgical techniques used for treating sagittal craniosynostosis (SC): endoscopic suturectomy (ES) and cranial vault remodeling (CVR). The safety, head growth, and aesthetic results following ES and CVR were compared by reviewing the charts of more than 200 patients. By comparing the effectiveness of these two treatments, this study will help guide selection of the optimal surgical treatment for patients with SC.

A New Technique for Sagittal Synostosis: A Plurality of Small Incisions Minimally Invasive Technique Used on Infants and Young Patients

OBJECTIV

The authors devised a multiple small incisions minimally invasive technique for use in isolated nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis to achieve better esthetic effect and satisfactory reshaping of the calvarial vault. The purpose of this study is to provide clinicians with new and feasible solution.

METHODS

From April 2016 to January 2017, 5 male patients were successfully treated with minimally invasive surgery. The age ranges from 1.5 to 3.3 years. The authors designed 9 short skin linear incisions (2-3 cm long) strategically to disperse in the scalp. The patient was assessed in a series including sex, age of surgery, blood loss, blood transfusion, duration of surgery, postoperative complications, preoperative and postoperative cephalic index (CI), length of stay (LOS), esthetic outcomes, and intellectual developmental quotient (DQ).

RESULTS

The shortest operation time is 1.5 hours. The shortest hospital stay is 6 days. The blood loss ranged from 135 to 280 mL. No serious complications occurred during the follow-up time. Postoperative 3-dimensional CT scan showed that the extensive floating bone formed well. Preoperative CI ranged from 64.2 to 68 and postoperatively 69.4 to 74.3. Mental development was tested by children heath care practioners, significantly improving DQ from 67 to 81 preoperatively and 76 to 90 postoperatively. All children receive good esthetic results.

CONCLUSION

The new technique is safe and effective. The advantages are satisfactory: calvarial fornix remodeling, less visible appearance of scars, shorter length of surgery, lower mental and financial stress, optimal age for surgery, no endoscopic adjuvant and postoperative helmet are needed.

Development of synthetic simulators for endoscope-assisted repair of metopic and sagittal craniosynostosis

OBJECTIVE Endoscope-assisted repair of craniosynostosis is a safe and efficacious alternative to open techniques. However, this procedure is challenging to learn, and there is significant variation in both its execution and outcomes. Surgical simulators may allow trainees to learn and practice this procedure prior to operating on an actual patient. The purpose of this study was to develop a realistic, relatively inexpensive simulator for endoscope-assisted repair of metopic and sagittal craniosynostosis and to evaluate the models' fidelity and teaching content. METHODS Two separate, 3D-printed, plastic powder-based replica skulls exhibiting metopic (age 1 month) and sagittal (age 2 months) craniosynostosis were developed. These models were made into consumable skull "cartridges" that insert into a reusable base resembling an infant's head. Each cartridge consists of a multilayer scalp (skin, subcutaneous fat, galea, and periosteum); cranial bones with accurate landmarks; and the dura mater. Data related to model construction, use, and cost were collected. Eleven novice surgeons (residents), 9 experienced surgeons (fellows), and 5 expert surgeons (attendings) performed a simulated metopic and sagittal craniosynostosis repair using a neuroendoscope, high-speed drill, rongeurs, lighted retractors, and suction/irrigation. All participants completed a 13-item questionnaire (using 5-point Likert scales) to rate the realism and utility of the models for teaching endoscope-assisted strip suturectomy. RESULTS The simulators are compact, robust, and relatively inexpensive. They can be rapidly reset for repeated use and contain a minimal amount of consumable material while providing a realistic simulation experience. More than 80% of participants agreed or strongly agreed that the models' anatomical features, including surface anatomy, subgaleal and subperiosteal tissue planes, anterior fontanelle, and epidural spaces, were realistic and contained appropriate detail. More than 90% of participants indicated that handling the endoscope and the instruments was realistic, and also that the steps required to perform the procedure were representative of the steps required in real life. CONCLUSIONS Both the metopic and sagittal craniosynostosis simulators were developed using low-cost methods and were successfully designed to be reusable. The simulators were found to realistically represent the surgical procedure and can be used to develop the technical skills required for performing an endoscope-assisted craniosynostosis repair.

Minimally invasive approaches to craniosynostosis

Craniosynostosis (CS) is defined as the premature fusion of one or more calvarial sutures. This carries several consequences, including abnormal/asymmetric cranial vault development, increased intracranial pressure, compromised neurocognitive development, and craniofacial deformity. Definitive management is surgical with the goal of protecting cerebral development by re-establishing normal cranial vault expansion and correcting cosmetic deformity. In today's practice, CS surgery has advanced radically from simple craniectomies to major cranial vault reconstructive (CVR) procedures. More recently there has been considerable interest in endoscopic assisted surgery (EAS). Theoretical benefits include decreased operative time, morbidity, blood loss, postoperative pain, cost and faster recovery times. In this focused review, we summarize the current body of literature reporting clinical outcomes in EAS and review the data comparing EAS and CVR.

Craniosynostosis - Recognition, clinical characteristics, and treatment

Craniosynostosis is a developmental craniofacial anomaly, resulting in impairment of brain development and abnormally shaped skull. The main cause of craniosynostosis is premature closure of one or more cranial sutures. It usually occurs as an isolated condition, but may also be associated with other malformations as part of complex syndromes. When left untreated, craniosynostosis can cause serious complications, such as developmental delay, facial abnormality, sensory, respiratory and neurological dysfunction, anomalies affecting the eye, and psychological disturbances. Thus, early diagnosis, expert surgical techniques, postoperative care, and adequate follow-up are of vital importance in treating craniosynostosis.

Endoscopy-assisted craniosynostosis surgery followed by helmet therapy

Background

Surgical methods to treat craniosynostosis have evolved from a simple strip craniectomy to a diverse spectrum of partial or complete cranial vault remodeling with excellent results but often with high comorbidity. Therefore, minimal invasive craniosynostosis surgery has been explored in the last few decades. The main goal of minimal invasive craniosynostosis surgery is to reduce the morbidity and invasiveness of classical surgical procedures, with equal long-term results, both functional as well as cosmetic.

Methods

To reach these goals, we adopted endoscopy-assisted craniosynostosis surgery (EACS) supplemented with helmet molding therapy in 2005.

Results

We present in detail our surgical technique used for scaphocephaly, trigonocephaly, plagiocephaly, complex multisutural, and syndromic cases of craniosynostosis.

Conclusions

We conclude that EACS with helmet therapy is a safe and suitable treatment option for any type of craniosynostosis, if performed at an early age, preferably around 3 months of age.

One hundred consecutive endoscopic repairs of sagittal craniosynostosis: an evolution in care

OBJECTIVE Endoscope-assisted repair of sagittal craniosynostosis was adopted at St. Louis Children's Hospital in 2006. This study examines the first 100 cases and reviews the outcomes and evolution of patient care protocols at our institution. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective chart review of the first 100 consecutive endoscopic repairs of sagittal craniosynostosis between 2006 and 2014. The data associated with length of hospital stay, blood loss, transfusion rates, operative times, cephalic indices (CIs), complications, and cranial remolding orthosis were reviewed. Measurements were taken from available preoperative and 1-year postoperative 3D reconstructed CT scans. RESULTS The patients' mean age at surgery was 3.3 ± 1.1 months. Of the 100 patients, 30 were female and 70 were male. The following perioperative data were noted. The mean operative time (± SD) was 77.1 ± 22.2 minutes, the mean estimated blood loss was 34.0 ± 34.8 ml, and the mean length of stay was 1.1 ± 0.4 days; 9% of patients required transfusions; and the mean pre- and postoperative CI values were 69.1 ± 3.8 and 77.7 ± 4.2, respectively. Conversion to open technique was required in 1 case due to presence of a large emissary vein that was difficult to control endoscopically. The mean duration of helmet therapy was 8.0 ± 2.9 months. Parietal osteotomies were eventually excluded from the procedure. CONCLUSIONS The clinical outcomes and improvements in CI seen in our population are similar to those seen at other high-volume centers. Since the inception of endoscope-assisted repair at our institution, the patient care protocol has undergone several significant changes. We have been able to remove less cranium using our "narrow-vertex" suturectomy technique without affecting patient safety or outcome. Patient compliance with helmet therapy and collaborative care with the orthotists remain the most essential aspects of a successful outcome.

Multidirectional Cranial Distraction Osteogenesis with Simplified Modifications for Treating Sagittal Synostosis

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background:

Multidirectional cranial distraction osteogenesis (MCDO) is a procedure of ours developed earlier for treating craniosynostosis. However, the numerous bone flaps led to prolonged operative time and occasional bone detachment from dura. We have since simplified the osteotomy design. In treating sagittal synostosis, required bone flaps have been reduced to 11 (from ~20).

Methods:

In a 2-year period (2014–2015), 5 boys with sagittal synostosis underwent MCDO using our simplified and fixed-form osteotomy. Mean age at surgery was 9.4 months (range, 8–11 months). Pre- and postoperative cranial morphology was assessed by cephalic index and by mid-sagittal vector analysis.

Results:

Improved cranial shape was confirmed by 3-dimensional CT scans and by mid-sagittal vector index. Mean preoperative cephalic index (68.7) progressively increased to means of 78.5 immediately after distraction device removal, 75.2 at postoperative month 6, and 75.1 at 1 year postoperatively. There were no major complications, although transient cerebrospinal fluid leakage and loosening of anchor pins occurred in 1 patient.

Conclusions:

Simplified MCDO has a number of advantages over conventional distraction procedures such as discretionary reshaping/expansion of cranium and predictable osteogenesis and is a valid treatment option for patients with sagittal synostosis.

Less is more: does the addition of barrel staves improve results in endoscopic strip craniectomy for sagittal craniosynostosis?

OBJECTIVE Endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC) with postoperative helmet orthosis is a well-established treatment option for sagittal craniosynostosis. There are many technical variations to the surgery ranging from simple strip craniectomy to methods that employ multiple cranial osteotomies. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the addition of lateral barrel-stave osteotomies during ESC improved morphological outcomes. METHODS An IRB-approved retrospective review was conducted on a consecutive series of cases involving ESC for sagittal craniosynostosis at 2 different institutions from March 2008 to August 2014. The patients in Group A underwent ESC and those in Group B had ESC with lateral barrel-stave osteotomies. Demographic and perioperative data were recorded; postoperative morphological outcomes were analyzed using 3D laser scan data acquired from a single orthotic manufacturer who managed patients from both institutions. RESULTS A total of 73 patients were included (34 in Group A and 39 in Group B). Compared with Group B patients, Group A patients had a shorter mean anesthetic time (161.7 vs 195 minutes; p < 0.01) and operative time (71.6 vs 111 minutes; p < 0.01). The mean hospital stay was similar for the 2 groups (1.2 days for Group A vs 1.4 days for Group B; p = 0.1). Adequate postoperative data on morphological outcomes were reported by the orthotic manufacturer for 65 patients (29 in Group A and 36 in Group B). The 2 groups had similar improvement in the cephalic index (CI): Group A, mean change 10.5% (mean preoperative CI 72.6, final 80.4) at a mean follow-up of 13.2 months; Group B, mean change 12.2% (mean preoperative CI 71.0, final 79.6) at a mean follow-up of 19.4 months. The difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS Both ESC alone and ESC with barrel staving produced excellent outcomes. However, the addition of barrel staves did not improve the results and, therefore, may not be warranted in the endoscopic treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis.

Nonsyndromic Craniosynostosis and Deformational Head Shape Disorders

This article provides an overview of etiology, epidemiology, pathology, diagnosis, and treatment of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis, including sagittal, metopic, coronal, lambdoid, and complex synostosis. Detailed discussion is presented regarding indications for surgical intervention and management options, including frontoorbital advancement, cranial vault reconstruction, endoscopic strip craniectomy, spring-assisted strip craniectomy, and cranial vault distraction osteogenesis. Deformational plagiocephaly is also presented with treatment options including repositioning, physical therapy, and helmet therapy.

Single incision endoscope-assisted surgery for sagittal craniosynostosis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to present the novel technique and associated results of a single-incision endoscope-assisted procedure for the treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of infants who underwent single-incision endoscope-assisted sagittal craniectomy for craniosynostosis at our institution. Demographic data collected included patient age, blood loss, operative time, pre- and post-operative hemoglobin, pre- and post-operative cephalic index (CI), and hospital length of stay.

RESULTS

Seven consecutive infants underwent surgery for sagittal craniosynostosis using a single-incision endoscopic technique. Average operative time was 87 (±10.5) minutes. Average blood loss was 32 (±13.5) cubic centimeters (cc). Post-operative hemoglobin was an average of 7.1 (±0.2) g/dL. No patients required a blood transfusion intra-operatively or in the post-operative setting. Dural tears were encountered in one patient. The average hospital length of stay was 1.4 (±1.1) days. Difference between pre- and post-operative CI was 8.4 % (±3.5; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate the novel use of a single-incision technique for endoscope-assisted sagittal craniosynostosis correction that improves upon the classically described surgical procedure by decreasing invasiveness, while allowing for excellent clinical outcomes.