Paraventricular or centrum ovale cavernous hemangioma involving the pyramidal tract in children: intraoperative MRI and functional neuronavigation-guided resection

Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging for cerebral cavernous malformations: When is it maybe worth it?

OBJECTIVE

Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) can be useful for cerebral cavernous malformations (CCM) surgery. However, literature on this topic is scarce. We aim to investigate its clinical utility and propose criteria for the selection of patients who may benefit the most from iMRI.

METHODS

From 2017 to 2019, all patients with CCMs who required surgery assisted with iMRI were included in the study. Clinical and radiological features were analyzed. Outcome measures included the need for an immediate second-look resection and clinical course in early post-surgery -Timepoint 1- (Tp1) and at the 6-to-12-month follow-up -Timepoint2- (Tp2).

RESULTS

Out of 19 patients with 20 CCMs, 89% had bleeding in the past, and in 75% the CCM affected an eloquent area. According to the iMRI results, an immediate second-look resection was needed in 16% of them. In one patient, a remnant was not seen on iMRI. The mRS worsened in the immediate post-surgical exam (median, 1; IQR, 1) with improvements on the 6-month visit (median, 1; IQR, 2), (p = 0.018). When comparing the outcome of patients with and without symptoms at baseline, the latter fared better at Tp2 (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

iMRI is an intraoperative imaging tool that seems safe for CCM surgery and might reduce the risk of lesion remnants. In our series, it allowed additional revision for further resection in 16% of the patients. In our experience, iMRI may be especially useful for lesions in eloquent areas, those with a significant risk of brain shift and for large CCMs.

Supratentorial Cavernous Malformations Involving the Corticospinal Tract and Sensory Motor Cortex: Treatment Strategies, Surgical Considerations, and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Cavernous malformations (CMs) are congenital malformations and may be located anywhere in the brain. We present a series of CMs located close to or inside of the motor-sensory cortex or corticospinal tract (CST) with clinical onset due to hemorrhage or mass effect. In such cases, surgery becomes an acceptable option.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), functional-magnetic-resonance imaging (fMRI), intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring, neuronavigation, and brain-mapping and the clinical results of surgical treatment of CMs in this critical location.

METHODS

The study included 54 patients harboring 22 cortical and 32 deep locations. This series was distinct because in group I, where the DTI was not obtained, and in the group II, where this evaluation was performed.

RESULTS

The postoperative permanent morbidity rate was 4% in the historical group for the deeper CMs, and there was no morbidity in the second group. DTI and fMRI permitted us to estimate the distance between the CMs and both the cortical activation cluster and the pyramidal tract. These data, in addition to intraoperative mapping and monitoring, made it necessary for us to perform a partial resection in 2 cases in the second series.

CONCLUSION

CMs are congenital lesions and CST fibers can run directly on their surface. Integration of fMRI and DTI data with intraoperative functional monitoring and direct cortical and subcortical mapping are mandatory to accomplish an optimal resection, tailoring the best surgical approach to the acceptable morbidity. A subtotal resection could be considered an option for deep locations.