Arachnoid cyst: a further anomaly associated with Kallmann syndrome?

Olfactory Dysfunction in Children: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE

Olfactory disorders are well-studied in the adult population, however, there is a paucity of literature characterizing olfactory dysfunction in pediatric patients. The purpose of this scoping review was to identify known causes of olfactory loss in pediatric populations, clarify the extent of use and validity of smell tests, and summarize current therapies for olfactory loss.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Web of Science.

REVIEW METHODS

Databases were systematically searched in September 2020. Two independent reviewers conducted the title and abstract screen, followed by review of full-texts for inclusion based on preset inclusion and exclusion criteria. Extracted data included study type, age/age-range of participants, gender, radiological evidence of olfactory dysfunction, types and results of smell tests used, etiology of olfactory loss, and therapies employed for olfactory loss.

RESULTS

A total of 103 articles (n = 1654) were eligible for final data extraction. The University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test was used most frequently for smell testing (21% of studies). In total, 45 causes of olfactory dysfunction have been elucidated by this study: 22 congenital and 23 acquired. Few therapies were described, and all were specific to the etiology of olfactory loss.

CONCLUSION

Olfactory dysfunction has a wide range of etiologies in the pediatric population, and clinicians should have a diagnostic algorithm for how to identify a cause should they encounter it in practice. If no etiology can be identified, education around safety should be provided to both the patient and their caregivers.

Controversies in the Treatment of Arachnoid Cysts with Special Emphasis on Temporal Arachnoid Cysts

Intracranial arachnoid cysts (ACs) are benign lesions. The incidence in children is 2.6%. ACs are often diagnosed incidentally. Because of the broad use of CT and MR imaging, the frequency of AC diagnosis has increased. In addition, prenatal diagnosis of ACs is becoming more common. This places clinicians in a difficult situation with regard to the optimal treatment, since the presenting symptoms are often vague and operative management includes not negligible risks. It is generally accepted that conservative management is indicated in cases with small and asymptomatic cysts. In contrast, patients with definite signs of raised intracranial pressure should be treated. There are however clinical situations in whom the decision about the preferred treatment is difficult to make. Unspecific symptoms such as headaches and neurocognitive or attention deficits can be challenging to evaluate, whether they are related to the presence of the AC or not. The treatment techniques intent to establish a communication between the cyst and the normal cerebrospinal spaces or consist of a diversion of the cyst fluid by a shunt system. Which surgical method (open craniotomy for cyst fenestration, endoscopic fenestration, or shunting) is preferred differs between neurosurgical centers or the pediatric neurosurgeon in charge. Each treatment option has a unique profile of advantages and disadvantages which should be considered when discussing treatment with the patients or their caregivers.