Rigid segmental cervical spine instrumentation is safe and efficacious in younger children

Pediatric craniocervical fusion: predictors of surgical outcomes, risk of recurrence, and re-operation

PURPOSE

Craniocervical junction abnormalities include a wide variety of disorders and can be classified into congenital or acquired. This study aimed to review the surgical outcome of pediatric patients who underwent craniocervical and/or atlantoaxial fusion.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study including all pediatric patients (≤ 18 years) who underwent craniocervical and/or atlantoaxial fusion between 2009 and 2019 at quaternary medical city.

RESULTS

A total of 25 patients met our criteria and were included in the study. The mean age was 9 years (range: 1-17 years). There was a slight female preponderance (N = 13; 52%). Most patients (N = 16; 64%) had non-trauamatic/chronic causes of craniocervical instability. Most patients presented with neck pain and/or stiffness (N = 14; 56%). Successful fusion of the craniocervical junction was achieved in most patients (N = 21; 84%). Intraoperative complications were encountered in 12% (N = 3) of the patients. Early postoperative complications were observed in five patients (20%). Five patients (20%) experienced long-term complications. Revision was needed in two patients (8%). Older age was significantly associated with higher fusion success rates (p = 0.003). The need for revision surgery rates was significantly higher among younger age group (3.75 ± 2, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrates the surgical outcome of craniocervical and/or atlantoaxial fusion in pediatric patients. Successful fusion of the craniocervical junction was achieved in most patients. Significant association was found between older age and successful fusion, and between younger age and need for revision surgery.

Use of halo fixation therapy for traumatic cranio-cervical instability in children: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Traumatic cranio-cervical instability in childhood is rare and constitutes a challenge for the treating surgeon. The aim of therapy is to restore cervical stability without limiting the range of motion. The goal of this systematic review was to find out whether, over the last 10 years, halo fixation (HF) could still be considered a successful treatment option without major risks or complications.

METHODS

We analyzed studies describing the use of HF in traumatic injuries of the cranio-cervical junction in children under the age of 17. Searches were performed in PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase databases for the years from 2010 to 2020. The general success rate, the success rate related to underlying pathologies, and complication rates were evaluated.

RESULTS

The main indications for HF range from pre-surgical correction to postoperative fusion support. C2 is the most frequently injured vertebra in children. The overall success rate of HF was very high. Evaluation according to the underlying pathology showed that, except for atlanto-occipital dislocation, HF generates high fusion rates among different patient cohorts, mainly in C2 vertebra injuries and atlantoaxial rotatory subluxation. Only minor complications were reported, such as pin infections.

CONCLUSION

The current data show that, when used according to the appropriate indication, HF is an effective conservative treatment option for cranio-cervical instability, associated with only minor complications.