Direct syrinx drainage in patients with Chiari I malformation

Syringo-Subarachnoid Shunt with Tube Versus T-Tube via the Dorsal Root Entry Zone Approach for Eccentric Syringomyelia

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the clinical therapeutic efficacy of syringo-subarachnoid shunt placement with direct tube and T-tube via the dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) approach for treatment of eccentric syringomyelia.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed of 41 patients with idiopathic or secondary eccentric syringomyelia from November 2011 to December 2022. Syringo-subarachnoid shunt placement with direct tube or T-tube via the DREZ approach was performed. The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association low back pain scale was used to investigate the severity of clinical symptoms. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to investigate therapeutic efficacy（reduction of the cavity volume by >10% was considered an improvement and 50% was considered a significant improvement).

RESULTS

Incision length of the spinal cortex in the direct tube group was shorter than in the T-tube group (3.10 ± 0.28 cm vs. 5.03 ± 0.19 cm), with a significant difference between the 2 groups (t = -52.56, P < 0.001). Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score 3 months postoperatively was significantly better than the preoperative score in both the direct tube group（t = 40.954, P < 0.001） and the T-tube group（t = 24.769, P < 0.001）. Statistical comparison revealed there was no difference in imaging improvement between the direct tube group and T-tube group 3 months (χ2 = 0.20, P = 0.655) and 12 months (χ2 = 0.21, P = 0.647) postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Syringo-subarachnoid shunt placement with direct tube via the DREZ approach for treatment of eccentric syringomyelia is safer than with T-tube via the DREZ approach due to smaller incision length and less of a space-occupying effect with same therapeutic efficacy.

Management of Persistent Syringomyelia in Patients Operated for Chiari Malformation Type 1

BACKGROUND

The treatment of persistent syringomyelia associated with Chiari malformation type 1 (CM1) is unclear. This study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiologic outcomes of syringo-subarachnoid shunt (SSS) as a treatment for persistent syringomyelia following posterior fossa decompression (PFD) for CM1.

METHODS

Forty-nine cases treated for CM1 associated syringomyelia at a single center were analyzed, 17 of them undergoing reoperation due to persistent syrinx formation. The patients' demographic data, neurologic presentations, and radiologic results were analyzed, including cerebellar herniation, posterior fossa volume, the level at which the syrinx started and finished, the size and diameter of the syrinx.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients underwent SSS placement, with 1 minor surgical complication (a cerebrospinal fluid leak) occurring and requiring revision. No morbidity or mortality was observed. Among these 17 reoperated patients, partial or complete resorption of the syrinx was observed in all cases. The results suggest that if the syrinx diameter is >10 mm at its thickest point, extends for more than 10 vertebrae, and starts from the upper cervical region and extends to the upper thoracic region, the syrinx may not regress after the first surgery and potentially predicting the need for a second operation before PFD.

CONCLUSIONS

SSS placement for persistent syrinx following PFD for CM1 is a safe and effective surgical treatment method. These criteria may also help predict the need for a second surgery and the overall disease outcome for both the surgeon and patient.

Chiari Type 1 Malformation and Syringomyelia in Children: Classification and Treatment Options

Chiari type 1 malformation (CIM) is defined as tonsillar ectopia of >5 mm, while syringomyelia (SM) is defined as a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-filled cavity larger than 3 mm dissecting the spinal cord. Over the last decades, our understanding of these pathologies has grown; however, many controversies still exist almost in every aspect of CIM and SM, including etiology, indication for treatment, timing of treatment, surgical technique, follow-up regime, and outcome. This chapter provides a comprehensive overview on different aspects of CIM and SM and on the still existing controversies, based on the evidence presently available. Future directions for clinical research concerning CIM and SM treatment and outcome are elaborated and discussed as well.

The Management of Idiopathic and Refractory Syringomyelia

Idiopathic syringomyelia (IS) and refractory syringomyelia (RS) are types of syringomyelia that often pose a management challenge and are associated with long-term clinical sequela. They are usually an epiphenomenon reflecting an underlying pathology where the treatment of the primary cause should be the aim for any surgical intervention. In the case of IS, the initial step is agreeing on the definition of the terms idiopathic and syringomyelia. After a rigorous exhaustive clinic-radiological workup, only IS patients with progressive neurology are treated, usually unblocking subarachnoid cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pathway obstruction somewhere in the thoracic spinal canal and reserving shunting techniques to nonresponsive cases. Similar to IS, also RS is multifactorial, and its management varies based on the initial pathology, strongly supported by radiological and clinical features. We aim to address this topic focusing on the etiopathology, investigation paradigm, and surgical pathway, formulating algorithms of management with available evidence in literature. Surgical techniques are discussed in detail.

Diagnosis and treatment of Chiari malformation type 1 in children: the International Consensus Document

BACKGROUND

Chiari malformation type 1 (CM1) is a rare condition where agreed classification and treatment are still missing. The goal of this study is to achieve a consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of CM1 in children.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary panel formulated 57 provisional statements based on a review of the literature. Thirty-four international experts (IE) participated in a Delphi study by independently rating each statement on a 4-point Likert scale ("strongly disagree," "disagree," "agree," "strongly agree"). Statements that were endorsed ("agree" or "strongly agree") by < 75% of raters were re-formulated, or new statements were added, and another Delphi round followed (up to a maximum of three).

RESULTS

Thirty-five IE were contacted and 34 agreed to participate. A consensus was reached on 30/57 statements (52.6%) after round 1. Three statements were added, and one removed. After round 2, agreement was reached on 56/59 statements (94.9%). Finally, after round 3, which took place during the 2019 Chiari Consensus Conference (Milan, Italy), agreement was reached on 58/59 statements (98.3%) about four main sections (Definition and Classification, Planning, Surgery, Isolated Syringomyelia). Only one statement did not gain a consensus, which is the "definition of radiological failure 24 month post-surgery."

CONCLUSIONS

The consensus document consists of 58 statements (24 on diagnosis, 34 on treatment), serving clinicians and researchers following children with CM1. There is a clear need for establishing an international network and registry and to promote collaborative studies to increase the evidence base and optimize the long-term care of this patient population.

Comparative Assessment of Three Posterior Fossa Decompression Techniques and Evaluation of the Evidence Supporting the Efficacy of Syrinx Shunting and Filum Terminale Sectioning in Chiari Malformation Type I. A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of posterior fossa decompression (PFD), posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty (PFDD), and posterior fossa decompression with resection of tonsils (PFDRT) in Chiari malformation type I (CMI). Furthermore, we aimed to evaluate the evidence supporting the efficacy of filum terminale sectioning (FTS), syringosubarachnoid shunting (SSS), and syringoperitoneal shunting (SPS) in CMI.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were screened for English-language studies published from inception until August 11, 2020. A total of 3593 studies were identified through the searching process. Fifteen cohort studies were included in the systematic review and network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

No studies concerning FTS, SSS, and SPS were found eligible. Therefore, only PFD, PFDD, and PFDRT were compared. PFDD showed significantly higher incidence of complications (relative risk [RR], 3.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.54-5.64) cerebrospinal fluid leak (RR, 9.74; 95% CI, 2.33-40.78) and neurologic deficit (RR, 8.76; 95% CI, 2.08-36.90) than did PFD. Both PFDD and PFDRT achieved higher syringomyelia improvement (RR, 1.23, 95% CI, 1.09-1.39 and RR, 1.32, 95% CI, 1.15-1.51, respectively) and greater clinical improvement (RR, 1.24, 95% CI, 1.10-1.39 and RR, 1.24, 95% CI, 1.08-1.44, respectively) than did PFD. No differences were found between PFDD and PFDRT.

CONCLUSIONS

PFDD and PFDRT are superior to PFD, especially in patients with syringomyelia-Chiari complex, because of greater syringomyelia reduction and better clinical improvement. However, PFDD and PFDRT can be considered equally efficient. There is no evidence pleading in favor of SFT, SSS, and SPS over any PFD technique.