Telescoping flow diverters for a pediatric fusiform distal anterior cerebral artery aneurysm: technical case report

Telescoping Flow Diverters for the Treatment of Brain Aneurysms: Indications and Outcome

OBJECTIVE

Few studies have reported the impact of telescoping flow diverters (FDs) in intracranial aneurysm treatment. Our study compared aneurysms treated using telescoping FDs to those treated with a single FD and identified predictors of telescoping.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of aneurysms treated with FDs between 2011 and 2023. All patients who were treated with FDs for intracranial aneurysms were included in the study.

RESULTS

The study comprised 750 patients with 750 aneurysms treated using 871 FDs. The study cohort was divided into 85 patients requiring telescoping FDs and 655 who did not. Rates of hemorrhage (7.1% vs. 1.8%, P < 0.001), symptomatic stroke (5.9% vs. 2.6, P < 0.001), and asymptomatic stroke (1.2% vs. 0.8%, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the telescoping cohorts. At final follow-up, the rate of nonocclusion (9.8% vs. 5.1%, P = 0.029) and the rate of complete occlusion (88.5% vs. 81.1%, P = 0.029) were significantly higher in the telescoping cohort. On multivariate analysis, fusiform morphology (odds ratio [OR]: 2.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-5.0, P = 0.03), increasing aneurysm height (OR: 1.0, 95% CI 1.0-1.1, P= 0.034), and the use of the Pipeline Embolization Device FD (OR: 2.4, 95% CI 1.3-4.4, P = 0.005) were independent predictors of telescoping.

CONCLUSIONS

Aneurysms with fusiform morphology, increasing aneurysm height and those that underwent flow diversion using Pipeline Embolization Device had higher odds for telescoping. Significantly higher rates of angiographic occlusion with the use of telescoping FD add to the literature on its efficacy in treating aneurysms of varying morphology.

Endovascular treatment of distal anterior cerebral artery aneurysms using flow modulation devices: mid- and long-term results from a two-center study

Purpose

Flow-diverter (FD) stents have become an established treatment for intracranial aneurysms in recent years, but their use for aneurysms in distal cerebral vessels with small carrier vessel diameters remains controversial. This study describes the method and mid- and long-term outcomes of FD treatment of distal anterior cerebral artery aneurysms (DACAAs) at two neurointerventional centers, to elucidate this topic and provide more in-depth data.

Methods

Data for all patients at two neurointerventional centers who were treated with FDs for DACAAs in the pericallosal and supracallosal segment of the anterior cerebral artery were retrospectively analyzed. Data on periprocedural complications, and short-, mid- and long-term follow-up findings were recorded.

Results

Forty-one patients were eligible for inclusion in the study. Three FD models were used, one of which had an anti-thrombotic coating. Two periprocedural complications (5%) occurred but did not cause a change in the mRS. In the long-term follow-up, at 29 months and beyond, 83% of assessable patients showed complete occlusion of the aneurysms without new neurological deficits.

Conclusion

FDs are a safe and effective treatment approach for DACAAs. This study indicated a low risk of complications, and high closure rates in short-, mid- and long-term follow-up.

Flow diverter stenting for intracranial aneurysms in the pediatric population: Two case reports and literature review

The Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) is a flow-diverting intraluminal device that is approved for use in adults 18 years or older with internal carotid artery aneurysms. However, it can also be used off-label in pediatric patients with aneurysms that cannot be resolved with traditional endovascular treatments. Herein, we present two cases of flow diversion in the pediatric population with complete obliteration of the aneurysm and excellent outcomes. Flow diversion has been shown to be a safe endovascular option in treating complex aneurysms in children. Larger-sized, multicenter trials are encouraged to compare outcomes between flow diversion and other aneurysm treatment options given the rarity of pediatric aneurysms.

Multiple telescoping flow diverter technique in endovascular treatment of a vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysm: case report

A 64-year-old man presented with headache and dizziness. A vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysm was identified via computed tomography angiography and high resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Perioperatively, standard oral dual antiplatelet drugs were given. Two flow diverters were telespcoped for endovascular treatment of the aneurysm. Postoperatively, there were no signs of cerebral infarction and no new symptoms. At the 6-month follow-up, digital subtraction angiography showed that the aneurysm was almost completely occluded, with no other complications. This case serves as a reference for using the multiple telescoping flow diverter technique to treat vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysm.

The 8-year single-center experience of telescoping flow diverter for complex intracranial aneurysms treatment

OBJECTIVE

Treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms (IAs) is still a challenging thing and this study aims to summarize the experience of telescoping flow diverters (FDs) in treating complex intracranial aneurysms.

METHOD

Between April 2013 to November 2020, 381 IA cases treated by flow diverters (FD) were retrieved from the database of 4988 IA cases, and finally 20 cases treated by telescoping FDs were enrolled for further analysis.

RESULT

Among 20 patients, 15 patients (75.0%) received Tubridge telescoping while 5 patients (25.0%) received PED telescoping. The technical success rate was 100%. The immediate occlusion results were: 7 cases of OKM grade A (35.0%), 11 cases of OKM grade B (55.0%), and 2 cases of OKM grade C (10.0%). No perioperative complications occurred. The clinical follow-up was available in 20 patients (100%) and the follow-up time was 6-96 months. One patient developed massive infarction and the other 19 patients were range between 0 and 2. The angiographic follow-up was available in 17 patients (85%) and the follow-up time was 6-27 months. The occlusion results were: 1 case of OKM grade B (5.9%), 6 cases of OKM grade C (35, 0.3%), and 10 cases of OKM grade D (58.8%). 2 patients (11.8%) developed occlusion of the patent artery.

CONCLUSION

Telescoping flow diverters showed low perioperative complications and high IA occlusion rate when treating complex intracranial aneurysms in follow-up time, which provides an alternative manner beyond conventional strategy for neurosurgeons.

Delayed diagnosis of intracranial aneurysm in pediatrics: the risk of misdiagnosis-a case report

BACKGROUND

Aneurysms in the pediatric population are uncommon, requiring a high index of suspicion for diagnosis. We report a case of a child with head trauma and delayed diagnosed cerebral aneurysm.

METHODS

A 2-year-old girl was brought to the emergency room with seizures. Head imaging showed acute intraventricular hemorrhage, hydrocephalus, and paraclinoid aneurysm of the right internal carotid artery. She had been hospitalized elsewhere 1 month prior for traumatic brain injury after falling to the ground with subarachnoid and intraventricular hemorrhage and good recovery, but without diagnosis of aneurysm.

RESULTS

The child was treated with aneurysm embolization and ventriculoperitoneal shunt, being discharged asymptomatic.

CONCLUSION

Most primary intraventricular hemorrhage in pediatric population has identifiable etiology. A high rate of clinical suspicion, associated with a low threshold for vascular neuroimaging studies for children with spontaneous or atypical intracranial hemorrhage allow accurate diagnosis, appropriate treatment, and improved outcome.

Flow Diversion for Intracranial Aneurysms Beyond the Circle of Willis

Background: Few reports have shown the therapeutic outcomes of flow diversion (FD) for intracranial aneurysms beyond the circle of Willis, and the efficacy of this technique remains unclear. Materials and methods: A retrospective study was performed on 22 consecutive patients, diagnosed with intracranial aneurysms beyond the circle of Willis, and treated with pipeline embolization device (PED) (Medtronic, Irvine, California, USA) between January 2015 and December 2019. Result: The 22 patients were between 16 and 66 years old (mean 44.5 ± 12.7 years), and six patients were male (27.3%, 6/22). Twenty-two patients had 23 aneurysms. The 23 aneurysms were 3-25 mm in diameter (12.2 ± 7.1 mm on average). The diameter of the parent artery was 1.3-3.0 mm (2.0 ± 0.6 mm on average). The 23 aneurysms were located as follows: 17 (73.9%, 17/23) were in the anterior circulation, and 6 (26.1%, 6/23) were in the posterior circulation. PED deployment was technically successful in all cases. Two overlapping PEDs were used to cover the aneurysm neck in 3 cases. One PED was used to overlap the two tandem P1 and P2 aneurysms. Other cases were treated with single PED. Coil assistance was used to treat 7 aneurysms, including 4 recurrent aneurysms and 3 new cases requiring coiling assistance during PED deployment. There were no cases of complications during PED deployment. All patients were available at the follow-up (mean, 10.9 ± 11.4 months). All patients presented with a modified Rankin Score (mRS) of 0. During angiographic follow-up, complete embolization was observed in 22 aneurysms in 21 patients, and one patient had subtotal embolization with the prolongation of stasis in the arterial phase. Conclusion: PED deployment for intracranial aneurysms beyond the circle of Willis is feasible and effective, with high rates of aneurysm occlusion.