A critical appraisal of surgical outcomes following orbital hypertelorism correction: what is the incidence of true bony relapse versus soft tissue telecanthus?

Three-dimensional quantification of soft tissue changes and its relationship to skeletal changes after Le Fort III, monobloc, and facial bipartition in syndromic craniosynostosis

To determine the effect of midface surgery on soft tissue changes and their relationship to hard tissue changes in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis. A retrospective analysis of patients who had undergone Le Fort III (LFIII), monobloc (MB), or facial bipartition (FB) was conducted. A 3D soft tissue mesh was generated from the preoperative scan and registered to the postoperative scan, after which the advancement was visualised. A total of 68 patients were included: 28 had undergone LFIII, 27 MB, and 13 FB. The included diagnoses were Apert (n = 23), Crouzon (n = 34), and craniofrontonasal syndrome (n = 11). After LFIII, most soft tissue advancement was seen around subnasale and pronasale (mean 15.1 ± 5.9 mm and 14.7 ± 5.7 mm, at age 7-12 years). After MB, a greater hard tissue than soft tissue advancement was seen for most landmarks, showing a high positive correlation. In patients undergoing FB without distraction (n = 10), mean preoperative inter-canthal distance was 48.9 mm, this reduced by 6.9 mm postoperatively. This study provides a comprehensive overview of the outcomes after midface surgery using 3D quantification for a better understanding of the soft tissue changes and their relationship to hard tissue changes.

Comparison of Piezosurgery and Conventional Osteotomy for Orbital Hypertelorism Surgical Correction

The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and effect of piezosurgery with conventional osteotomy in a box-shifting procedure for orbital hypertelorism (ORH) correction surgery. This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical record of 10 ORH patients aged from 5 to 12 years, and they were second-degree ORH with an interorbital distance (IOD) of 35 to 37.8 mm. Three of them received the osteotomy with piezosurgery (the piezosurgery group), whereas the other 7 patients received osteotomy with the conventional osteotomy method (the control group). They were compared with age and preoperative IOD. All the patients' IOD was effectively improved to normal range after the surgery. The results showed that the application of piezosurgery did not prolong the surgery time (piezosurgery group: 8.3±0.5 hours; control group: 8.7±1.4 hours, P =0.68). Furthermore, the patients in the piezosurgery group had less drainage volume (piezosurgery group: 79.1±12 mL; the control group: 170±41.3 mL, P =0.0065) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (piezosurgery group: 8.3±2.0 d; control group: 12.43±2.29 d, P =0.029). There were 2 patients who had wound infections, 1 in the piezosurgery group and 1 in the control group, respectively. However, 1 patient in the control group suffered from cerebrospinal fluid leakage. On the basis of the results, the application of piezosurgery benefited the patients on a better and smoother recovery course with less drainage and shorter hospital stays. The advantages of piezosurgery are the fine and precise osteotomy and the protection for soft tissue, which make it a comparatively safe and effective tool for craniofacial surgery, especially for young patients.