Physiological defects of lumbosacral vertebral arches on computed tomography images in children

Surgery for spina bifida occulta: spinal lipoma and tethered spinal cord

The technical evolution of the surgery for spina bifida occulta (SBO) over the course of a half-century was reviewed with special foci placed on the spinal lipoma and tethered spinal cord. Looking back through history, SBO had been included in spina bifida (SB). Since the first surgery for spinal lipoma in the mid-nineteenth century, SBO has come to be recognized as an independent pathology in the early twentieth century. A half-century ago, the only option available for SB diagnosis was the plain X-ray, and pioneers of the time persevered in the field of surgery. The classification of spinal lipoma was first described in the early 1970s, and the concept of tethered spinal cord (TSC) was proposed in 1976. Surgical management of spinal lipoma with partial resection was the most widely practiced approach and was indicated only for symptomatic patients. After understanding TSC and tethered cord syndrome (TCS), more aggressive approaches became preferred. A PubMed search suggested that there was a dramatic increase of publications on the topic beginning around 1980. There have been immense academic achievements and technical evolutions since then. From the authors' viewpoint, landmark achievements in this field are listed as follows: (1) establishment of the concept of TSC and the understanding of TCS; (2) unraveling the process of secondary and junctional neurulation; (3) introduction of modern intraoperative neurophysiological mapping and monitoring (IONM) for surgery of spinal lipomas, especially the introduction of bulbocavernosus reflex (BCR) monitoring; (4) introduction of radical resection as a surgical technique; and (5) proposal of a new classification system of spinal lipomas based on embryonic stage. Understanding the embryonic background seems critical because different embryonic stages bring different clinical features and of course different spinal lipomas. Surgical indications and selection of surgical technique should be judged based on the background embryonic stage of the spinal lipoma. As time flows forward, technology continues to advance. Further accumulation of clinical experience and research will open the new horizon in the management of spinal lipomas and other SBO in the next half-century.

Physiological rapid growth of spinal lipoma in the early postnatal period

OBJECTIVE

Spinal lipomas are congenital malformations. They do not express tumorous growth but are found to increase in volume like other normal subcutaneous fat tissue during the early postnatal period. To understand the natural course of volume changes in spinal lipomas, the authors measured the changes in size of spinal lipomas together with the normal subcutaneous fat in relation to BMI.

METHODS

A total of 27 patients with conus spinal lipoma excluding lipomyelomeningocele who underwent MRI twice before surgery (on initial diagnosis and immediately preoperatively) were included. Patients' ages at the time of the first MRI ranged from 0 to 32 months (mean 2.9 months, median 1 month). Candidates were categorized by age into three groups: < 1 month, 1-2 months, and ≥ 3 months. The growth rate of the spinal lipomas (in three directions), change in thickness of the normal subcutaneous fat, growth rate of the normal spinal canal (dorsoventral direction), and change in BMI were retrospectively analyzed between the three groups.

RESULTS

The mean interval between MRI studies was 83.1 days. During this time, the mean lipoma growth rates were 199%, 149%, and 133% in the dorsoventral, lateral, and craniocaudal directions, respectively (with 100% representing the first measurement). The mean change in the thickness of the normal subcutaneous fat was 183%. The mean growth of the normal spinal canal was 111%. The mean increase in BMI was 124%. These rates were all significantly higher in the younger groups. There was no significant difference in the growth rates between the lipoma and the subcutaneous fat in every age group. In contrast, the growth rate of the lipoma significantly exceeded that of the spinal canal in patients younger than 3 months. The subarachnoid space around the lipoma became obstructed in 35.3%, and spinal cord distortion occurred in 48.1% of the patients younger than 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal lipomas rapidly increase in volume before the age of 3 months and especially in infants younger than 1 month. Their features closely correlate with the physiological growth of the normal subcutaneous fat and the increase in BMI. The rapid growth of lipomas suggests the importance of close observation in this period, keeping in mind the typical anatomical changes of lipomas and their surrounding structures.