An appendiceal leiomyoma in a child with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

Sarcomas other than Kaposi sarcoma occurring in immunodeficiency: interpretations from a systematic literature review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In immunodeficiency, an increased sarcoma risk is confirmed for Kaposi's sarcoma. Whether rates of other sarcoma subtypes are elevated in the setting of immunodeficiency is not known. We therefore reviewed published case reports on HIV and AIDS patients and organ transplant recipients with sarcomas. For comparison, we assessed sarcomas in the U.S. general population using Surveillance Epidemiology End Results (SEER) data.

RECENT FINDINGS

A total of 176 non-Kaposi sarcoma were identified, 75 in people with HIV and AIDS and 101 in transplant recipients. Leiomyosarcomas (n = 101) were the most frequently reported sarcomas, followed by angiosarcomas (n = 23) and fibrohistiocytic tumors (n = 17). Leiomyosarcomas were reported with two age peaks, in children and young adults. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) was detected in the tumor cells in 85 and 88% of leiomyosarcomas in HIV-infected people and transplant recipients, respectively. Angiosarcomas and fibrohistiocytic tumors were most frequently reported in men. Among kidney transplant recipients, 20% of sarcomas arose at the site of an arteriovenous fistula. In comparison, leiomyoscarcomas, angiosarcomas, and fibrohistiocytic tumors comprised 16.9, 3.8, and 18.7% of sarcomas in the U.S. general population.

SUMMARY

Leiomyosarcoma and angiosarcoma may occur disproportionately in immunodeficiency. Leiomyosarcomas appear causatively linked to EBV, whereas angiosarcomas might be correlated with an arteriovenous fistula. Additional studies are necessary to understand the contribution of immunodeficiency to the cause of these sarcomas.

Surgical implications of human immunodeficiency virus infections

Pediatric HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) is a pandemic predominantly in sub-Saharan Africa. Approximately 2.2 million children aged less than 15 years are infected with HIV, representing almost 95% of the total number of children globally infected with HIV. Therefore, increasing numbers of HIVi or -exposed but uninfected children can be expected to require a surgical procedure to assist in the diagnosis of an HIV/acquired immune deficiency syndrome-related complication, to address a life-threatening complication of the disease, or for routine surgery encountered in HIV-unexposed children. HIVi children may present with both conditions unique to HIV infection and surgical conditions routine in pediatric surgical practice. HIV exposure confers an increased risk of complications and mortality for all children after surgery, whether they are HIV infected or not. This risk of complications is higher in the HIVi group of patients. These findings seem to be independent of whether patients undergo an elective or emergency procedure, but the risk of an adverse outcome is higher for a major procedure. Surgical implications of HIV infection are comprehensively reviewed in this article.

Treatment for leiomyosarcoma and leiomyoma in children with HIV infection

BACKGROUND

Smooth muscle tumour (SMT) composed of leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma recently has been described in many HIV-infected children. Leiomyosarcoma has become the second most frequent malignancy in children with HIV infection or other immunodeficiency diseases in the United States. Although leiomyosarcoma accounts for only 2% to 4% of childhood soft tissue sarcomas, the prognosis is poor in HIV-infected compared with non-infected patients. The development of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated SMT in children with acquired immunodeficiency virus (AIDS) decreases health, reduces quality of life, and often results in death. Some researchers, therefore, ascribe cause of death to SMT in the majority of these cases, not to AIDS. Currently, the optimal therapeutic strategy is controversial and there is a need to identify the efficacy and safety of different interventions for AIDS-associated SMT on overall survival and disease-free survival in children.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of current therapeutic interventions for previously untreated children with AIDS-associated leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the following electronic databases by subject headings and text words:Cochrane HIV/AIDS Group trials register (November 2009); Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials on Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2009); MEDLINE (January 1966 to November 2009); EMBASE (January 1985 to November 2009); NLMGateway database and AEGIS; Chinese Biomedical Disc (CBMDisc 1978 to November 2009); VIP (1989 to present); and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI 1994 to 2009). We also searched physicians data query protocols, proceedings, and abstracts from AIDS and cancer conferences, and the reference lists from identified trials for unidentified trials to discover any unpublished or currently on-going relevant trials. All the trials were searched by comprehensive electronic databases or hand searching. The search was not limited by language.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We searched for published or unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or controlled clinical trials (CCTs) of therapy for leiomyosarcoma and leiomyoma in children with AIDS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors screened the results of the search independently to select relevant studies. The full text of all potentially relevant studies was retrieved and the qualities were assessed by the two authors using predetermined criteria. No eligible RCTs or CCTs were identified.

MAIN RESULTS

We were unable to find any RCTs or CCTs of interventions for treating AIDS-associated SMT in children.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

We could not find any RCTs or CCTs of intervention for treating AIDS-associated SMT in children with HIV infection, and currently, the clinical practice of treating SMT in HIV-infected children is based on descriptive studies and simply situational analyses. Thus there is insufficient evidence to establish the efficacy and acceptability of these interventions, and we recommend a case-by-case treatment of patients until evidence becomes available.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH

In future, high-quality RCTs are urgently needed before any final conclusion can be drawn. Rigorously designed, multicenter, randomised, double-blind controlled trials are required to evaluate these interventions as a way of improving the survival and decreasing mortality in that population. Policy makers and researchers should prioritise funding for these trials to increase the quantity and quality of such studies and provide strong evidence for the effectiveness of therapies for AIDS-associated SMTs. Meanwhile, safety and adverse events should be critically assessed by standardized monitoring or an effective self-report system, and attention should be paid to long-term adverse effects in children with HIV infection.