Review of the evidence on the management of blunt renal trauma in pediatric patients

Presence of Microscopic Hematuria Does Not Predict Clinically Important Intra-Abdominal Injury in Children

OBJECTIVE

Screening for blunt intra-abdominal injury in children often includes directed laboratory evaluation that guides need for computed tomography. We sought to evaluate the use of urinalysis in identifying patients with clinically important intraabdominal injury ( ci -IAI).

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients less than 18 years who presented with blunt mechanisms at a level I trauma center between 2016 and 2019. Exclusion criteria included transfer from an outside facility, physical abuse, and death within thirty minutes of arrival. Demographics, physical exam findings, serum chemistries, urinalysis, and imaging were reviewed. Clinically important intraabdominal injury was defined as injury requiring ≥2 nights admission, blood transfusion, angiography with embolization, or therapeutic surgery.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty patients were identified. One hundred sixty-five had a completed urinalysis. For all patients an abnormal chemistry panel and abnormal physical exam had a sensitivity of 88.9% and a negative predictive value of 99.3%. Nine patients had a ci -IAI. Patients with a ci -IAI were more likely to have abdominal pain, tenderness on exam, and elevated hepatic enzymes. When patients were stratified by the presence of an abnormal chemistry or physical exam with or without microscopic hematuria, urinalysis did not improve the ability to identify patients with a ci -IAI. In fact, presence of microscopic hematuria increased the rate of false positives by 12%.

CONCLUSIONS

Microscopic hematuria was not a useful marker for ci -IAI and may lead to falsely assuming a more serious injury.

Management of high-grade pediatric renal trauma in tertiary referral hospital in Indonesia: A case series and literature review

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Genitourinary tract injuries constitute 10 % of all traumas, with renal injuries being common in pediatric cases due to reduced perirenal fat and abdominal wall muscle development. However, very few reports of pediatric renal trauma in Indonesia have been reported. In this case series, We present a case series of high-grade renal injury and review the literature on pediatric renal trauma in Indonesia.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present four cases with renal trauma as the subjects of this case study. The 13-year-old boy, who was the initial patient, complained of hematuria and abdominal pain after falling from a tree. The second patient, the 13-year-old boy, presented with left lower back pain and hematuria after being elbowed in the left waist. The third patient, a 14-year-old boy, had been in a motorcycle accident and got grade 5 renal injury according to AAST classification. The final case involved a 4-year-old boy who experienced recurrent hematuria caused by a pseudoaneurysm following blunt renal trauma.

DISCUSSION

Trauma is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in children, with approximately 3 % of children assessed in pediatric hospital trauma departments having had trauma. With appropriate management according to guidelines, mortality can be avoided.

CONCLUSION

The case series highlights the significance of treating pediatric renal trauma patients individually according to their hemodynamic state and degree of impairment.

Pediatric renal trauma: 17 years of experience at a major Scandinavian trauma center

Background

Children are at increased risk of renal injuries from blunt trauma due to their anatomic constitution. The kidney is injured in 5-20% of pediatric patients with blunt abdominal trauma. During the last decades, the management of pediatric renal injuries has evolved toward non-operative management (NOM) unless the patient is hemodynamically compromised. The aim of the present study was to assess contemporary treatment strategies and evaluate outcomes in pediatric patients with renal injuries admitted to a major Scandinavian trauma center.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of all trauma patients under 18 years admitted to our institution from January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2019 with main focus on patients with renal injury. Outcomes for two time periods were compared, 2003-2009 (Period 1; P1) and 2010-2019 (Period 2; P2), and the study cohort was also stratified into age groups, survivors and non-survivors and severity of renal injury.

Results

In total, there were 4230 pediatric patients included in Oslo University Hospital Trauma Registry during this 17-year period and of these 115 (2.7%) had a renal injury. Nephrectomy was performed in four (3.5%) of the patients, angiographic embolization five (4.3%) and ureteral stent placement was performed in six patients (5.2%) due to urinary extravasation. Seven patients died, implying a crude mortality of 6.1%, with one exception secondary to traffic-related incidents. None of the deaths were attributed to renal injury and mortality fell to 1.2% in P2.

Discussion

This study on contemporary pediatric renal trauma care is one of the largest from a single institution outside the USA. Our results clearly show that NOM, including minimally invasive procedures in selected cases, is achievable in more than 90% of cases with low mortality and morbidity.

Level of evidence

Level IV.

[Blunt abdominal trauma in children and adolescents: treatment concepts in the acute phase]

Fatal accidents due to blunt force trauma are the leading cause of death in children and adolescents [1]. Abdominal trauma is the third most common cause of death after traumatic brain injury and thoracic injuries [2]. Abdominal injury is seen in approximately 2-5% of children involved in accidents [3]. Blunt abdominal injuries are common sequelae of traffic accidents (for example as seat belt injury), falls, and sports accidents. Penetrating abdominal injuries are rare in central Europe. Spleen, liver, and kidney lacerations are the most common injuries after blunt abdominal trauma [4]. In most situations, nonoperative management (NOM) has become the gold standard with the surgeon leading the multidisciplinary treatment [5].

The characteristics, management and outcomes of high- and low-grade renal injuries in paediatric trauma patients at a major trauma centre

Introduction

Children, given anatomical variations, are at increased risk of renal injury following trauma. The management of paediatric renal injuries has, similar to other solid organ injuries, largely shifted towards conservative management; however, hemodynamically unstable patients may still warrant surgical exploration or interventional techniques. The aim of this study is to describe the local incidence, demographics, morbidity and outcomes associated with high- and low-grade renal injury in a paediatric major trauma population.

Method

This was a 5-year retrospective review of trauma registry data and chart analysis of all paediatric renal injuries from major trauma at a North American level 1 paediatric trauma centre between January 2016–31 December 2020. Data was analysed using SPSS v27 with p < 0.05 considered significant.

Results

Of 1334 major trauma patients, 45 suffered a kidney injury (20 high-grade and 25 low-grade injuries), of which 93.3% underwent conservative management with no difference in outcomes between groups. 80% of patients had concurrent injuries (a quarter requiring surgery for these), with a trend towards higher rates of chest injuries in high-grade renal injury patients ( p = 0.08). Bicycle injuries were statistically more likely to cause high-grade renal injury ( p = 0.02). Angiography was utilized infrequently (3/45 patients, 6.6%), and no patients underwent embolization in our study population. Overall mortality (4.4%) and length of stay were unaffected by grade of injury.

Conclusion

Paediatric renal injury is an uncommon injury in major trauma patients (3.4%). Most cases can be managed conservatively regardless of the grade of injury. Renal injury patients are likely to have concurrent injuries, often requiring surgery. Further studies are needed to measure the success and utilization of interventional radiology techniques for management in children.

Implementation of a Standardized Renal Trauma Protocol at a Level 1 Trauma Center: 7-Year Protocol and 10-Year Institutional Review

Objective

Current urologic renal trauma guidelines favor conservative management. In 2012, we implemented an institution-wide renal trauma protocol to standardize management. This protocol details initiation of DVT (deep vein thrombosis) prophylaxis, cessation of bed rest, and frequency of laboratory studies. We hypothesized that low-grade injuries (grade I–III) could be managed without urologic consultation and that our chemical DVT prophylaxis regimen would not pose an increased risk of hemorrhage requiring transfusion.

Methods

We performed a cross-sectional analysis of a prospectively maintained database containing all renal trauma at our institution from 2009 to 2019. We segregated injuries based on grade, presence of multi-organ trauma, and evaluated the presence and types of intervention, initiation of chemical DVT prophylaxis, and post-DVT prophylaxis hemorrhage requiring transfusion.

Results

We identified 295 cases of renal trauma, of which 62 were isolated injuries. Forty-three of the isolated renal injuries were transferred from outside facilities, 70% of which were classified as low-grade injuries. There were 220 low-grade lacerations and 75 high-grade lacerations. No grade I or II lacerations required any interventions. Two (2.5%) grade III lacerations required IR embolization. Twenty-five (41%) grade IV lacerations required intervention, of which five were nephrectomy. Seven (54%) grade V lacerations required intervention, of which 5 were nephrectomies. Upon review of our protocol with early ambulation and DVT prophylaxis, there were no cases of isolated renal injury where initiation of either treatment resulted in delayed hemorrhage requiring transfusion or surgical intervention.

Conclusion

Only 2/220 low-grade renal lacerations required intervention. Our data suggest that grade I and II renal lacerations can be managed safely without urologic consultation. Consultation is warranted for grade III injuries given the possibility of initial understaging. Furthermore, we believe our renal laceration protocol in our admittedly small, isolated sample has shown our DVT prophylaxis initiation to not pose increased risk.

Impact of trauma center designation in pediatric renal trauma: National Trauma Data Bank analysis

INTRODUCTION

The pediatric kidney is the most common urinary tract organ injured in blunt abdominal trauma. Trauma care in the United States has been established into a hierarchical system verified by the American College of Surgeons (ACS). Literature evaluating management of pediatric renal trauma across trauma tier designations is scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the differences in the management and outcomes of renal trauma in the pediatric population based on trauma level designation across the United States.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a review of the ACS - National Trauma Data Bank database. Pediatric patients (age 0-18 years) who were treated for renal injury between years 2011-2016 were identified. Our primary outcome was the difference in any complication rate amongst Level I versus Non-Level I trauma centers. Management strategies were evaluated as secondary outcomes. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to adjust for baseline differences between cohorts. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to determine the independent effects of individual factors on complications, operative intervention, minimally invasive procedure, and blood transfusions.

RESULTS

Overall, 12,097 pediatric patients were diagnosed with renal trauma between 2011 and 2016 using target ICD-9 and AAST codes. After PSM, there was a total of 1623 subjects withing each group. No difference was identified between groups for occurrence on any complication [105 (6.5%) vs 114 (7.0%), p = 0.576. There were no differences in the rate of minimally invasive interventions [67 (4.1%) vs 48 (3.0%), p = 0.087], operative intervention [58 (3.6%) vs 68 (4.2%), p = 0.413], or nephrectomy [42 (2.6%) vs 47 (2.9%), p = 0.667] between Level I and Non-Level I trauma designations, respectively. Length of stay was longer in the Level I cohort compared to Non-Level I (days (SD)) [6.9 (8.8) vs 6.2 (7.9), p = 0.024. When specifically looking at risk factors associated with operative intervention, higher renal injury grade and injury severity score were highly correlated, whereas, trauma level designation was not found to be predictive for more aggressive management.

DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION

Our results corroborate with previous literature that renal injury grade and injury severity score are strong predictors of morbidity, invasive management, and complications. Pediatric renal trauma was managed similarly across trauma center designations, with the rate of complication and intervention more prevalent in patients with high grade renal injuries and concomitant injuries. Further studies are necessary to identify patients who will benefit most from transfer to a level I center.

Renal artery angiography in pediatric trauma using a national data set

INTRODUCTION

With limited pediatric renal trauma management literature, treatment pathways for children have been extrapolated from the adult population. A shift to non-operative management has led to higher renal preservation rates; however, characterization of endovascular intervention in the pediatric trauma population is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

This study uses the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB), to evaluate renal outcomes after use of renal artery angiography. We hypothesized that patients undergoing renal artery angiography for renal trauma are unlikely to require additional surgical interventions.

STUDY DESIGN

All children ≤18 years old treated for traumatic renal injuries from 2012 to 2015 were identified by the Abbreviated Injury Scaled Score (AISS) codes in the NTDB. AISS codes were converted to American Association for Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grades. ICD-9 codes were used to identify patients that had renal artery angiography, and additional renal interventions such as nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, percutaneous nephrostomy tube or ureteral stent placement.

RESULTS

536,379 pediatric trauma cases were in the NTDB from 2012 to 2015, with 4506 renal injury cases identified. A total of 88 patients had renal artery angiography (ICD-9 88.45). Only 10% (n = 9) of patients who received renal artery angiography underwent an additional urological intervention. Of those nine, two patients were excluded due to renal angiography taking place after nephrectomy was performed. The remaining seven patients had high grade laceration (AAST grade 4-5). Overall, two patients underwent post angiography nephrectomies, two patients had partial nephrectomies, one percutaneous nephrostomy tube was placed (prior to partial nephrectomy), one aspiration of a kidney (prior to ureteral stent placement), and three had ureteral stent placements.

DISCUSSION

The limitations of this study include: the NTDB is a national dataset that is not population based, inclusion is limited to the first hospitalization, inaccuracies exist in encounter coding, and the database is lacking laterality of the renal injury. Based on nonspecific nature of ICD-9 coding for angioembolization, we are unable to discern the number of cases that subsequently had angioembolization after or at the time of angiography.

CONCLUSION

Renal artery angiography in children remains a rare procedure, 88/4,506, in children with renal trauma. In pediatric trauma cases that undergo renal artery angiography additional procedures are more common with higher grade injuries. Further studies are needed to create pediatric specific trauma management algorithms.

Renal ultrasound to evaluate for blunt renal trauma in children: A retrospective comparison to contrast enhanced CT imaging

INTRODUCTION

The standard imaging modality for hemodynamically stable blunt abdominal trauma patients is a contrast enhanced CT scan, which is reflected in the current AUA urotrauma guidelines. This comes, however, with radiation exposure and the potential sequalae of IV contrast administration in the pediatric patient.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesize that ultrasound imaging would be able to diagnose and rule out clinically significant renal injuries when compared to the gold standard of CT scan in the setting of pediatric blunt abdominal trauma.

STUDY DESIGN

All children <18 years of age who were evaluated for blunt abdominal trauma who had a CT scan and ultrasound imaging of kidneys were identified. The ultrasound images were reviewed by four reviewers who were blinded to CT results and all clinical information. The ability of ultrasound to diagnose and rule out clinically significant renal injury was evaluated by diagnostic test performance characteristics including sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value.

RESULTS

There were 76 patients identified, 24 of which had a renal injury (1 bilateral) diagnosed by CT scan for a total of 25 injuries in 152 renal units. There were six grade I-II injuries and 19 grade III-V injuries. The sensitivity of the four blinded reviewers by ultrasound alone to detect the 19 grade III-V injuries ranged from 79 to 100% with NPV between 97 and 100%. Three of the four reviewers identified all 19 grade III-V injuries by ultrasound. When combined with significant hematuria, all 19 grade III-IV injuries were identified. Of note, all patients with a grade III-V injury of the kidney had significant hematuria. Of the grade I-II renal injuries, all reviewers identified 1/5 or 2/5 by ultrasound alone.

DISCUSSION

The limitations of this study include: its retrospective nature, limited number of patients and reviewers, quality of the ultrasound machine. and experience of technologist, radiologist and urologist. A major limitation is the inability to assess other solid organ injuries during this initial study.

CONCLUSIONS

When compared to a CT scan as the gold standard, kidney ultrasound images had a sensitivity of 79-100% to detect grade III-V injuries and NPV of 97-100% by four blinded reviewers. All grade III-V injuries had either an episode of gross hematuria or microscopic hematuria >50 RBC/hpf. A prospective study that includes full abdominal imaging is needed to confirm that ultrasound can safely be used in place of CT scan for evaluation of hemodynamically stable blunt trauma patients.

Kidney and uro-trauma: WSES-AAST guidelines

Renal and urogenital injuries occur in approximately 10-20% of abdominal trauma in adults and children. Optimal management should take into consideration the anatomic injury, the hemodynamic status, and the associated injuries. The management of urogenital trauma aims to restore homeostasis and normal physiology especially in pediatric patients where non-operative management is considered the gold standard. As with all traumatic conditions, the management of urogenital trauma should be multidisciplinary including urologists, interventional radiologists, and trauma surgeons, as well as emergency and ICU physicians. The aim of this paper is to present the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) and the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) kidney and urogenital trauma management guidelines.

High grade renal trauma due to blunt injury in children: do all require intervention?

Introduction:

The aim of this study was to analyze the presentation and management of major grade renal trauma in children.

Method:

A retrospective study was performed including data collected from the patients who were admitted in Pediatric surgery with major grade renal injury (grade 3 and more) from January 2015 to August 2018. Demography, clinical parameters, management, duration of hospital stay and final outcome were noted.

Results:

Out of 13 children (9 males and 4 females), with age range 2-12 years (mean of 8 years), reported self-fall was the commonest mode of injury followed by road traffic accident. The majority (10/13, 75%) had a right renal injury. Eight children had a grade IV injury, one had a grade V injury, and four children had grade III injury. Duration of hospital stay varied from 3 to 28 (mean of 11.7) days. Three children required blood transfusion. One child required image guided aspiration twice and two required pigtail insertion for perinephric collection. All the 13 children improved without readmission or need for any other surgical intervention.

Conclusion:

Children with major grade renal trauma due to blunt injury can be successfully managed without surgical intervention and minimal intervention may only be needed in select situations.

Characteristics and Management of Blunt Renal Injury in Children

BACKGROUND

Renal trauma in the pediatric population is predominately due to blunt mechanism of injury. Our purpose was to determine the associated injuries, features, incidence, management, and outcomes of kidney injuries resulting from blunt trauma in the pediatric population in a single level I trauma center.

METHODS

This was a retrospective chart and trauma registry review of all pediatric blunt renal injuries at a regional level I trauma center that provides care to injured adults and children. The inclusion dates were January 2001-June 2014.

RESULTS

Of 5790 pediatric blunt trauma admissions, 68 children sustained renal trauma (incidence: 1.2%). Only two had nephrectomies (2.9%). Five renal angiograms were performed, only one required angioembolization. Macroscopic hematuria rate was significantly higher in the high-grade injury group (47% vs. 16%; P = 0.031). Over half of the patients had other intra-abdominal injuries. The liver and spleen were the most frequently injured abdominal organs.

CONCLUSION

Blunt renal trauma is uncommon in children and is typically of low American Association for the Surgery of Trauma injury grade. It is commonly associated with other intra-abdominal injuries, especially the liver and the spleen. The nephrectomy rate in pediatric trauma is lower compared to adult trauma. Most pediatric blunt renal injury can be managed conservatively by adult trauma surgeons.

Nonoperative Management of Blunt Solid Organ Injury in Pediatric Surgery

In the last decade, higher rates of nonoperative management of liver, spleen, and kidney injuries have been achieved. An algorithmic approach may improve success on a national level. Factors for success include management strategy based on physiologic status of the child, early attempt at resuscitation using blood products, and appropriate use of adjuncts. Shorter hospitalizations are appropriate for children who have not bled significantly, and discharge instructions facilitate the safety of early discharge. Although routine imaging is not required for liver or spleen injury, symptoms should prompt reevaluation. Reimaging of renal injuries remains in common use.

Renal Artery Injury Secondary to Blunt Abdominal Trauma - Two Case Reports

BACKGROUND

Blunt abdominal trauma is routinely encountered in the Emergency Department. It is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality amongst the population below the age of 35 years worldwide. Renal artery injury secondary to blunt abdominal trauma however, is a rare occurrence. Here, we present two such cases, encountered in the emergency department sustaining polytrauma following motor vehicle accidents.

CASE REPORT

We hereby report two interesting cases of renal artery injury sustained in polytrauma patients. In these two cases we revealed almost the entire spectrum of findings that one would expect in renal arterial injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

Traumatic renal artery occlusion is a rare occurrence with devastating consequences if missed on imaging. Emergency radiologists need to be aware of the CT findings so as to accurately identify renal artery injury. This case report stresses the need for immediate CT assessment of polytrauma patients with suspected renal injury, leading to timely diagnosis and urgent surgical or endovascular intervention.

Diagnosis value of multi-slice spiral CT in renal trauma

Computed tomography (CT) is most commonly used as a noninvasive approach in diagnosis of internal organ injures. Use of multi-slice spiral CT becomes more popular in diagnosis of trauma because of its ability to generate 3D volumetric information. This study evaluated the diagnostic value of multi-slice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) with enhanced scanning in renal trauma. In total, 126 patients with kidney injury underwent MSCT scanning from a single hospital in the southern of China between January 2012 and February 2016. According to kidney injury grading standards of American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST), 30 were diagnosed and classified in level I, 26 in level II, 42 in level III, 17 in level IV, 11 in level V. The outcomes of MSCT enhanced scanning achieve a 100% diagnostic accuracy rate, which was confirmed by surgical findings. We concluded that the enhanced MSCT scan permits reliable detection of renal trauma and the associated organ or tissue injuries, providing important clinical value for the diagnosis and classification of renal trauma or internal organ injures.

Management of Abdominal Solid Organ Injury After Blunt Trauma

Injury to the solid abdominal organs-liver, spleen, kidney, and pancreas-is one of the most common injury patterns in pediatric blunt trauma. Pediatric trauma centers are becoming increasingly successful in managing these injuries without operative intervention. Well-validated guidelines have been established for liver and spleen injury management, and operative intervention is reserved for patients who show evidence of active bleeding after resuscitation. No such guidelines yet exist for the management of traumatic injury of the kidney or pancreas. Exploratory laparotomy remains the treatment of choice in patients suffering hemodynamic collapse, but interventional radiologic or endoscopic procedures are increasingly used to manage all but the most devastating solid organ injuries. [Pediatr Ann. 2016;45(7):e241-e246.].

The role of interventional radiology for pediatric blunt renal trauma

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to appraise the role of interventional radiology in children with blunt renal trauma.

METHODS

The clinical data, injury severity score, days of hospital stay, outcomes and complications of pediatric renal trauma were recorded and evaluated. The two groups: the transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) group and the non-TAE group were compared for clinical features and laboratory data.

RESULTS

Eighteen pediatric patients (12 boys, 6 girls with average age 12.4 ± 4.7 years) with blunt renal injury were included in the study. Six patients underwent angiography because of contrast medium extravasations in the kidney found on computed tomography of which four subsequently underwent a TAE. The clinical features and laboratory data of patients in the TAE and non-TAE groups were not significantly different. All patients were managed successfully by conservative treatment without complications except one in the non-TAE group who required nephrectomy due to renal arterial hypertension directly related to trauma. Both groups had relatively good results and all patients had normal renal function at follow-up.

CONCLUSION

TAE is an alternative therapeutic modality for blunt renal injury in children who have contrast medium extravasations in the kidney on angiography.

Management of children with solid organ injuries after blunt torso trauma

BACKGROUND

Management of children with intra-abdominal solid organ injuries has evolved markedly. We describe the current management of children with intra-abdominal solid organ injuries after blunt trauma in a large multicenter network.

METHODS

We performed a planned secondary analysis of a prospective, multicenter observational study of children (<18 years) with blunt torso trauma. We included children with spleen, liver, or kidney injuries identified by computed tomography, laparotomy/laparoscopy, or autopsy. Outcomes included disposition and interventions (blood transfusion for intra-abdominal hemorrhage, angiography, laparotomy/laparoscopy). We performed subanalyses of children with isolated injuries.

RESULTS

A total of 12,044 children were enrolled; 605 (5.0%) had intra-abdominal solid organ injuries. The mean (SD) age was 10.7 (5.1) years, and injured organs included spleen 299 (49.4%), liver 282 (46.6%), and kidney 147 (24.3%). Intraperitoneal fluid was identified on computed tomography in 461 (76%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 73-80%), and isolated solid organ injuries were present in 418 (69%; 95% CI, 65-73%). Treatment included therapeutic laparotomy in 17 (4.1%), angiographic embolization in 6 (1.4%), and blood transfusion in 46 (11%) patients. Laparotomy rates for isolated injury were 11 (5.4%) of 205 (95% CI, 2.7-9.4%) at non-freestanding children's hospitals and 6 (2.8%) of 213 (95% CI, 1.0-6.0%) at freestanding children's hospitals (difference, 2.6%; 95% CI, -7.1% to 12.2%). Dispositions of the 212 children with isolated Grade I or II organ injuries were home in 6 (3%), emergency department observation in 9 (4%), ward in 114 (54%), intensive care unit in 73 (34%), operating suite in 7 (3%), and transferred in 3 (1%) patients. Intensive care unit admission for isolated Grade I or II injuries varied by center from 9% to 73%.

CONCLUSION

Most children with solid organ injuries are managed with observation. Blood transfusion, while uncommon, is the most frequent therapeutic intervention; angiographic embolization and laparotomy are uncommon. Emergency department disposition of children with isolated Grade I to II solid organ injuries is highly variable and often differs from published guidelines.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic/epidemiologic study, level III; therapeutic study, level IV.

Blunt Renal Trauma

The pediatric patient is especially prone to blunt renal trauma due to the size and location of pediatric kidneys. No clear guidelines have been established for the management of these injuries in children to achieve the highest rate of renal salvage with low morbidity. Wide-ranging literature exists on this subject, but consists of vastly different management strategies. This review is written to summarize the different approaches to blunt renal trauma and highlight opportunities for further research.

Prospective observational study with an abbreviated protocol in the management of blunt renal injury in children

BACKGROUND

There are no published management schemes for blunt renal injuries. We are conducting a 2-center prospective observational study with a fixed management scheme.

METHODS

Children with CT proven renal injuries were enrolled with permission. Ambulation is allowed when able regardless of grade. Discharge occurs when tolerating a diet and pain is controlled regardless of hematuria. Urinalysis occurs at follow up in 2-4weeks and repeated as indicated.

RESULTS

Between 9/2008 and 9/2012, 70 patients were enrolled. Mean age was 11.8years (3-17), and 70% were male. The mean grade of injury was 2.8±1.1 [1-5]. One nephrectomy (1.4%) was performed for a grade 5 injury. Other renal interventions included an embolization for the hilar bleed and one cystotomy for a clot. Mean LOS was 2.9days±2.4days. In patients without other major injury, LOS was 1.9±1.7days (0.4-8days). There were 5 (7%) readmissions: 3 for pain, 1 for hematuria, and 1 for a bladder clot. 58 patients (83%) gave urinalysis samples at initial follow up (med 18days), where 31 (53%) were positive for blood.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with blunt renal injury may benefit from management without strict bedrest guidelines. Hematuria appears to have little influence on recovery.

Closed kidney injury

The purpose of this article is to discuss the prevalence of blunt renal trauma and the nature of the problem, including the risk of renal injury with sports participation and epidemiology. Patient history of mechanism of injury, as well as examination findings, will risk-stratify patients to determine who needs immediate surgical intervention, who requires imaging, and what patients do not need further imaging. Computed tomography is readily available, fast, and accurate in the diagnosis of renal injury. Discussion of the athlete with congenital renal disease and the solitary kidney concludes this article.

[Functional damages after blunt renal trauma in children]

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term functional outcome of renal injuries.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients under 16 sustaining renal trauma and admitted to our department between 1990 et 2010. There were 66 renal lesions categorized as follows: grade I to III, 33, grade IV, 28 and grade V, 5. Whatever their initial status, all children were followed using ultrasonography or computed tomography. After complete healing, data of technetium-99m-dimercaptosuccinic acid nuclear were collected.

RESULTS

There was no bilateral injury. Thirteen patients proceeded to laparotomy leading to nephrectomy in three cases, partial nephrectomy in two others cases. Four renovascular injuries required interventional radiologic management. Nine urinomas were managed with eight stentings and one percutaneous drainage. Percentage of renal function by technetium-99m-dimercaptosuccinic acid nuclear scanning concerning 26 patients was analysed. Split percentage of renal function was 43.4% (±6.2%), 35.7% (±5.3%) et 30.3% (±12.2%) (mean±SD); P=no significant, for grade I-III, IV and V, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Functional outcome after blunt renal trauma appeared influenced by injury grade. Functional sequelae existed even with low-grade traumas. In keeping with literature, these results justified a close follow-up in which radionuclide study was the essential element.

Nonoperative management of blunt renal injury: a need for further study

BACKGROUND

Blunt renal injury in children is usually managed without an operation. However, there are no published guidelines for nonoperative management. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective review to examine the natural history of these injuries and to identify potential recommendations for management.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of our most recent 12-year experience with blunt renal injury was performed.

RESULTS

One hundred eleven trauma patients were identified as having a renal injury. Mean age was 10.8 +/- 4.4 years with a weight of 43.1 +/- 20.8 kg and 65% of the patients were males. In patients with an isolated renal injury (n = 65), the mean length of bed rest was 3.8 +/- 1.9 days, resulting in a mean length of hospitalization of 3.8 +/- 3.1 days. There were no transfusions, and the only operation for renal trauma was a nephrectomy in a patient with existing end-stage obstructive nephropathy of that kidney. There were 15 patients discharged with persistent hematuria, none of which had long-term sequelae.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest the risk of significant injury from blunt renal trauma is low, and clearance of hematuria is not likely an important parameter such that bed rest with serial blood and urine monitoring may not be justified. There is clearly a role for the prospective application of a more liberal management protocol.