Feasibility of complex minimally invasive surgery in neonates

Experience of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Neonates with Congenital Malformations in a Tertiary Care Pediatric Hospital

Aim:

The aim of this study is to report the experience with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in neonates with congenital malformations in a tertiary care pediatric hospital.

Materials and Methods:

Design: descriptive study. All neonates undergoing MIS from 2013 to 2018 were included in the study. Perinatal data, characteristics of surgery, type and duration of analgesia, postoperative mechanical ventilation duration, postoperative hospitalization, and postoperative morbidity and mortality surgery-related rates were recorded.

Results:

Seventy-one neonates were included. Gestational age and weight at surgery ranged from 24 to 41 weeks and from 1350 g to 4830 g, respectively. Procedures performed were esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula repair, congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair, diaphragmatic plication, fundoplication/gastrostomy, intestinal atresia repair, and pancreatectomy. The median follow-up period was 14 months. Five neonates (7%) were converted to open, for surgical difficulties. Nine (12.6%) neonates had intraoperative complications, with decreased oxygen saturation as the most common complication. The median duration of analgesia and postoperative mechanical ventilation was 3 days in most procedures. The morbidity and mortality rates were 36.6% and 2.8%, respectively.

Conclusions:

In this first experience with MIS in neonates, the duration of analgesia and hospitalization was shorter for some procedures. However, intraoperative and postoperative complications were still high, which was possibly attributed to the learning curve. Thus, it is expected that the frequency of the complications presented in this study will be reduced in future.

Umbilical access in laparoscopic surgery in infants less than 3 months of age: A survey of the American Pediatric Surgical Association

PURPOSE

Laparoscopy is commonplace in pediatric surgery. Abdominal access via the umbilicus may present a unique challenge in neonates and young infants predisposing them to complications. We hypothesized that these complications may occur more than described in the literature.

METHODS

Members of the American Pediatric Surgical Association (APSA) were anonymously surveyed in February of 2018 via REDCap™ regarding technique of umbilical access in infants less than 3 months of age and complications experienced during umbilical access. Approval was obtained from the IRB and the APSA Outcomes and Evidence-based Practice Committee.

RESULTS

The response rate was 31.3% (329/1050). 62.3% of respondents performed 21 or greater neonatal laparoscopic procedures annually. 34 of 322 respondents reported a direct complication from umbilical access for laparoscopy in this age group (10.6%). Surgeons described 37 specific cases with complications related to umbilical access, with laparoscopic pyloromyotomy making up 47.2% (17/36). CO₂ embolism was the most common complication; 15.4% of surgeons reported not knowing about the possibility of CO₂ embolism. 41% of surgeons confirm intraabdominal placement of the umbilical trocar prior to insufflation. There was no association between any complication and where the umbilical trocar was placed (above/below/through umbilicus) or placement technique in patients with no umbilical cord stump. There may be an association between complication and where the umbilicus is entered in patients with an umbilical cord stump still in place (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Umbilical access for laparoscopy in neonates and infants less than 3 months of age can present a unique challenge and result in significant complications. All techniques and methods had complications. Surgeons should be aware of these risks and be prepared to manage them emergently if they arise.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V, expert opinion.

Neonatal and Infant Appendicitis

Neonatal appendicitis is a rare disease with a high mortality rate. Appendicitis is difficult to diagnose in neonatal and infant populations because it mimics other more common conditions in these age groups. Furthermore, signs and symptoms of appendicitis are often nonspecific in nonverbal patients and a high index of suspicion is necessary to initiate the appropriate diagnostic work-up. The keys to successful management of appendicitis in infants include keeping the diagnosis on the differential in the setting of unexplained intra-abdominal sepsis, following a diagnostic algorithm in the work-up of infant abdominal pathology, and performing appendectomy once the diagnosis is confirmed.

Changing the Learning Curve in Novice Laparoscopists: Incorporating Direct Visualization into the Simulation Training Program

OBJECTIVE

A major challenge in laparoscopic surgery is the lack of depth perception. With the development and continued improvement of 3D video technology, the potential benefit of restoring 3D vision to laparoscopy has received substantial attention from the surgical community. Despite this, procedures conducted under 2D vision remain the standard of care, and trainees must become proficient in 2D laparoscopy. This study aims to determine whether incorporating 3D vision into a 2D laparoscopic simulation curriculum accelerates skill acquisition in novices.

DESIGN

Postgraduate year-1 surgical specialty residents (n = 15) at the Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, at Western University were randomized into 1 of 2 groups. The control group practiced the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery peg-transfer task to proficiency exclusively under standard 2D laparoscopy conditions. The experimental group first practiced peg transfer under 3D direct visualization, with direct visualization of the working field. Upon reaching proficiency, this group underwent a perceptual switch, changing to standard 2D laparoscopy conditions, and once again trained to proficiency.

RESULTS

Incorporating 3D direct visualization before training under standard 2D conditions significantly (p < 0.0.5) reduced the total training time to proficiency by 10.9 minutes or 32.4%. There was no difference in total number of repetitions to proficiency. Data were also used to generate learning curves for each respective training protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

An adaptive learning approach, which incorporates 3D direct visualization into a 2D laparoscopic simulation curriculum, accelerates skill acquisition. This is in contrast to previous work, possibly owing to the proficiency-based methodology employed, and has implications for resource savings in surgical training.

The Role of Laparoscopy in the Acute Neonatal Abdomen

Introduction.The surgical treatment of the acute neonatal abdomen still poses a challenge in pediatric surgery. Various underlying etiologies require different surgical procedures. Until today the role of laparoscopy in the surgical treatment of the acute neonatal abdomen is controversial. The aim of this study was to analyze our experiences with laparoscopy and to perform a review of the literature. Methods. Retrospective, single-institution study including all term and preterm neonates initially undergoing laparoscopy due to an acute abdomen. Results. Altogether, 17 neonates presenting with an acute neonatal abdomen initially underwent laparoscopy. Unnecessary laparotomy could be avoided in 9 of 17 (53%) neonates. After diagnostic laparoscopy, 2 patients did not require any further surgical intervention. Eight neonates presented midgut atresia intraoperatively, 5 of them underwent laparoscopic-assisted correction. Successful laparoscopic derotation of an acute volvulus (n = 1) and laparoscopic appendectomy (n = 1) could be performed. Conversion to open surgery was necessary in 8 neonates (47%) due to creation of a stoma (n = 5), multiple intestinal bands causing poor visualization (n = 2), and bowel necrosis (n = 1). Conclusions. Laparoscopy is a useful diagnostic tool to evaluate the need for further surgical intervention in the acute neonatal abdomen and enables immediate surgical treatment of acute volvulus, appendicitis, or intestinal atresia. In case of conversion to laparotomy, precise localization of the incision is guaranteed. Minimization of the surgical trauma and avoidance of unnecessary laparotomy are the most important benefits of the minimal-invasive approach for the critically ill neonate.

Comparison of Laparoscopic Appendectomy with open appendectomy in Treating Children with Appendicitis

Objective:

To analyze feasibility and curative effect of laparoscopic appendectomy in the treatment of pediatric appendicitis and compare it with open appendectomy.

Methods:

Two hundred and sixty patients were selected for this study and randomly divided into open appendectomy group (130 cases) and laparoscopic appendectomy group (130 cases). Patients in open appendectomy group underwent traditional open appendectomy, while patients in laparoscopic appendectomy were treated with laparoscopic appendectomy. Incision length, blood loss during operation, duration of operation, time to leave bed, anus exhausting time, time to take food, catheter drainage time, urinary catheterization time, time of using antibiotics, use of pain killer and incidence of complications such as incision infection, residual abscess and intestinal obstruction were compared between two groups.

Results:

We found relevant indexes including length of incision, amount of bleeding and duration of operation in laparoscopic appendectomy group were better than open appendectomy group after surgery; and differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Indexes such as time to out of bed, time to take food, exhaust time, drainage time, catheterization time and application time and use of antibiotics in laparoscopic appendectomy group were all superior to open appendectomy group, and differences had statistical significance (P<0.05). Incidence of complications in laparoscopic appendectomy group was much lower than open appendectomy group and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion:

Laparoscopic appendectomy has advantages of small trauma, sound curative effect, low incidence of complications and rapid recovery and can effectively relieve pain of children suffering from appendicitis. Hence it is worth promotion and should be preferred.

Are paediatric operations evidence based? A prospective analysis of general surgery practice in a teaching paediatric hospital

BACKGROUND/AIM

Paediatric surgical practice should be based upon solid scientific evidence. A study in 1998 (Baraldini et al., Pediatr Surg Int) indicated that only a quarter of paediatric operations were supported by the then gold standard of evidence based medicine (EBM) which was defined by randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The aim of the current study was to re-evaluate paediatric surgical practice 16 years after the previous study in a larger cohort of patients.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was performed in a tertiary level teaching hospital for children. The study was approved by the local research ethics board. All diagnostic and therapeutic procedures requiring a general anaesthetic carried out over a 4-week period (24 Feb 2014-22 Mar 2014) under the general surgery service or involving a general paediatric surgeon were included in the study. Pubmed and EMBASE were used to search in the literature for the highest level of evidence supporting the recorded procedures. Evidence was classified according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (OCEBM) 2009 system as well as according to the classification used by Baraldini et al. Results was compared using Χ (2) test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

During the study period, 126 operations (36 different types) were performed on 118 patients. According to the OCEBM classification, 62 procedures (49 %) were supported by systematic reviews of multiple homogeneous RCTs (level 1a), 13 (10 %) by individual RCTs (level 1b), 5 (4 %) by systematic reviews of cohort studies (level 2a), 11 (9 %) by individual cohort studies, 1 (1 %) by systematic review of case-control studies (level 3a), 14 (11 %) by case-control studies (level 3b), 9 (7 %) by case series (type 4) and 11 procedures (9 %) were based on expert opinion or deemed self-evident interventions (type 5). High level of evidence (OCEBM level 1a or 1b or level I according to Baraldini et al. PSI 1998) supported 75 (60 %) operations in the current study compared to 18 (26 %) in the study of 1998 (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The present study shows that nowadays a remarkable number of paediatric surgical procedures are supported by high level of evidence. Despite this improvement in evidence-based paediatric surgical practice, more than a third of the procedures still lack sufficient evidence-based literature support. More RCTs are warranted to support and direct paediatric surgery practice according to the principals of EBM.

Minimal invasive surgery in the newborn: current status and evidence

The evolution of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in the newborn has been delayed due to the limited working space and the unique physiology. With the development of smaller instruments and advanced surgical skills, many of the initial obstacles have been overcome. MIS is currently used in specialized centers around the world with excellent feasibility. Obvious advantages include better cosmesis, less trauma, and better postoperative musculoskeletal function, in particular after thoracic procedures. However, the aim of academic studies has shifted from proving feasibility to a critical evaluation of outcome. Prospective randomized trials and high-level evidence for the benefit of endoscopic surgery are still scarce. Questions to be answered in the upcoming years will therefore include both advantages and potential disadvantages of MIS, especially in neonates. This review summarizes recent developments of MIS in neonates and the evidence for its use.

Minimal access surgery in newborns and small infants; five years experience

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES:

The aim of this study was to assess and present the outcome (initial experience and lessons learnt) of minimally invasive surgery for various indications in neonates and small infants (< 5 kg) at a single medical centre.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

A retrospective analysis was performed on 65 patients (age day 2 to 10 months) managed with minimal access surgery (MAS) for various indications, between 2005 and 2010. We analyzed demographic information, procedures, complications, outcomes, and follow-up and overall feasibility of the procedure.

RESULTS:

No serious complications except one death in congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) (due to other comorbidities) occurred. Intra operative hypercarbia and hypoxia were observed more frequently in thoracoscopic procedures. Intra operative hypothermia was not common and was well tolerated. Conversion to open procedure (n = 5), post operative ileus (n = 3), port site infection (n = 5) were other complications.

CONCLUSION:

MAS in neonates and small infants is a technically demanding but a feasible choice available. Some prior experience in older children is required for safe and effective outcome. Good quality optics, video equipments and instruments are required for safe and effective procedure. Intra operative measurement of oxygen saturation and temperature, and diligent post operative ICU care are mandatory for safe and successful outcome.

Three-dimensional vision enhances task performance independently of the surgical method

BACKGROUND

Within the next few years, the medical industry will launch increasingly affordable three-dimensional (3D) vision systems for the operating room (OR). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of two-dimensional (2D) and 3D visualization on surgical skills and task performance.

METHODS

In this study, 34 individuals with varying laparoscopic experience (18 inexperienced individuals) performed three tasks to test spatial relationships, grasping and positioning, dexterity, precision, and hand-eye and hand-hand coordination. Each task was performed in 3D using binocular vision for open performance, the Viking 3Di Vision System for laparoscopic performance, and the DaVinci robotic system. The same tasks were repeated in 2D using an eye patch for monocular vision, conventional laparoscopy, and the DaVinci robotic system.

RESULTS

Loss of 3D vision significantly increased the perceived difficulty of a task and the time required to perform it, independently of the approach (P < 0.0001-0.02). Simple tasks took 25 % to 30 % longer to complete and more complex tasks took 75 % longer with 2D than with 3D vision. Only the difficult task was performed faster with the robot than with laparoscopy (P = 0.005). In every case, 3D robotic performance was superior to conventional laparoscopy (2D) (P < 0.001-0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

The more complex the task, the more 3D vision accelerates task completion compared with 2D vision. The gain in task performance is independent of the surgical method.

The risks of minimal access surgery in children: an aid to consent

AIM

The aim of this study was to determine the risk of complications and conversions for minimally invasive procedures in children, thus allowing properly informed consent.

METHODS

Data were retrieved for all minimally invasive surgical procedures performed between 1995 and 2009.

RESULTS

There were 2352 cases performed in 2288 (1428 were male) patients. Of these, 2210 cases (94%) were laparoscopic, and 143 (6%), thoracoscopic. The median age at operation was 6 years and 4 months. The overall complication rate was 3.6%, with the risk of early reoperation at 1.7%. The risk was highest for fundoplication and pyloromyotomy at 3.2% and 4%, respectively. The risk of an infective complication was 0.5% and was highest for appendicectomy and nephrectomy. The risk of visceral injury overall in this series was 0.4%. Visceral injury, explicable only by port insertion, occurred in just under 1 in 1000 cases. The conversion rate was 2.3%. The lowest rates were observed with appendicectomy, fundoplication, and pyloromyotomy. Thoracoscopic cases, nephrectomies, and procedures for an underlying oncological diagnosis had a higher conversion rate.

CONCLUSION

Informed consent requires knowledge of the risks of surgery. This series may serve as an aid for other units in obtaining consent for minimally invasive surgery in the pediatric population.

Laparoscopic surgery for acute neonatal appendicitis

We present the first two cases of acute neonatal appendicitis operated on through the laparoscopic approach. Acute neonatal appendicitis is uncommon and rarely considered by clinicians when assessing the neonatal acute abdomen. Our two cases demonstrate the potential value of diagnostic laparoscopy in the acute neonatal abdomen that poses a diagnostic dilemma. Furthermore, technical modifications of well-established laparoscopic techniques in the older child enable its use in neonates as a therapeutic tool.

Minimally invasive surgery in the neonate

The advent of minimally invasive surgical techniques in the neonate has been delayed due to the limited working space and the unique physiology of the newborn. In the last decade, with the introduction of new instruments and techniques, many of the initial problems have been solved making minimally invasive surgery feasible for a variety of indications in the neonate and a favored approach in specialized centers around the world. Although an increasing number of reports document the feasibility of this exciting technique, data demonstrating its benefit compared to conventional surgery is limited. This review focuses on recent developments in minimally invasive surgery in neonates and the evidence for its use.