Successful treatment of severe refractory anastomotic stricture in an infant after esophageal atresia repair by endoscopic balloon dilation combined with systemic administration of dexamethasone

Magnetic compression stricturoplasty in patients with severe stricture after simultaneous esophageal atresia and duodenal obstruction repair: A case report

Combined esophageal atresia (EA), tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) and duodenal obstruction result in various challenges in management, and a well-defined management protocol is still lacking. Esophageal stricture is the most common complication after EA repair. The use of magnetic compression alimentary tract anastomosis has been reported in children. By searching the literature, the present study reports the first case of simultaneous repair (EA repair followed by duodenal obstruction repair) and magnetic compression stricturoplasty for refractory esophageal stricture after EA repair in two male neonates. One of the neonates received delayed treatment of duodenal obstruction, and the other successfully underwent a simultaneous emergency operation of these combined anomalies. These two infants developed refractory strictures despite multiple endoscopic dilatation procedures during the postoperative follow-up period. Magnetic compression stricturoplasty procedures were successfully performed under fluoroscopic and endoscopic guidance without any leakage or complication. At the follow-up 10-months after stricturoplasty, the two patients achieved durable esophageal patency in the absence of dysphagia. Combination of early chest and abdominal X-ray detection is recommended to avoid a delayed diagnosis and treatment, as well as the synchronous operation for EA/TEF repair and duodenoduodenostomy in a single surgery for combined EA/TEF and duodenal obstructions. Therefore, magnetic compression stricturoplasty is a feasible and efficient method for establishing early patency of the esophagus in patients with refractory EA stricture.

Intralesional Steroid Injection Therapy for Esophageal Anastomotic Stricture Following Esophageal Atresia Repair

OBJECTIVES

The role of intralesional steroid injection (ISI) in the treatment of anastomotic stricture in patients with esophageal atresia remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ISI.

METHODS

A total of 158 patients with esophageal atresia with at least 1 ISI for the treatment of esophageal anastomotic stricture between 2010 and 2017 were identified. The change in stricture diameter (ΔD) was compared between procedures with dilation alone (ISI-) and dilation with steroid injection (ISI+).

RESULTS

A total of 1055 balloon dilations were performed (452 ISI+). The median ΔD was significantly greater in the ISI+ group: 1 mm (interquartile range [IQR] 0, 3) versus 0 mm (IQR -1, 1.5) (P < 0.0001). The ISI+ group had greater percentage of improved diameter (P < 0.0001) and lesser percentages of unchanged and decreased diameters at subsequent endoscopy (P = 0.0009, P = 0.003). Multivariable logistic regression confirmed the significance of ISI on increasing the likelihood of improved stricture diameter with an adjusted odds ratio of 3.24 (95% confidence interval: 2.15-4.88) (P < 0.001). The ΔD for the first 3 ISI+ procedures was greater than the ΔD for subsequent ISI+ procedures: 1 mm (IQR 0, 3) versus 0.5 mm (IQR-1.25, 2) (P = 0.001). There was no difference in perforation incidence between ISI+ and ISI- groups (P = 0.82).

CONCLUSIONS

ISI with dilation was well tolerated and improved anastomotic stricture diameter more than dilation alone. The benefit of ISI over dilation alone was limited to the first 3 ISI procedures.

Magnetic Compression Stricturoplasty For Treatment of Refractory Esophageal Strictures in Children: Technique and Lessons Learned

INTRODUCTION

Esophageal stricture is the most common complication following repair of esophageal atresia (EA). In general, these strictures are successfully managed using endoscopic techniques including bougie and balloon dilation, stenting, and chemotherapeutic agent application. If these techniques are unsuccessful, patients require segmental esophageal resection and reanastomosis or esophageal replacement. Magnetic compression anastomosis has been described in children. Herein we report our experience with magnetic compression stricturoplasty to treat refractory strictures after EA repair.

METHODS

We reviewed our experience using magnets to treat refractory strictures in 2 patients. Both patients failed multiple standard interventions. Because of near complete esophageal obstruction, both patients were candidates for esophageal replacement or segmental resection/anastamosis. In both patients, we applied neodymium-iron-boron magnets using fluoroscopic and endoscopic guidance.

RESULTS

The magnets were successfully positioned in both cases. Magnets were left in place for 7 and 10 days allowing for gradual compression stricturoplasty/anastamosis. Upon removal of the magnets, recanalization was visualized endoscopically and self-expanding stents were placed. There were no leaks or significant early complications. By 31 months post-magnetic stricturoplasty, both patients achieved durable esophageal patency without dysphagia.

CONCLUSION

Magnetic stricturoplasty was successful at establishing early patency of the esophagus in 2 patients with recalcitrant EA strictures. Fundamental knowledge of magnetism was critical in configuring magnet arrays for surgery. In both cases, early follow-up is promising. Further follow-up will define the long-term success of this technique.

Anastomotic Strictures after Esophageal Atresia Repair: Incidence, Investigations, and Management, Including Treatment of Refractory and Recurrent Strictures

Improved surgical techniques, as well as preoperative and postoperative care, have dramatically changed survival of children with esophageal atresia (EA) over the last decades. Nowadays, we are increasingly seeing EA patients experiencing significant short- and long-term gastrointestinal morbidities. Anastomotic stricture (AS) is the most common complication following operative repair. An esophageal stricture is defined as an intrinsic luminal narrowing in a clinically symptomatic patient, but no symptoms are sensitive or specific enough to diagnose an AS. This review aims to provide a comprehensive view of AS in EA children. Given the lack of evidence-based data, we critically analyzed significant studies on children and adults, including comments on benign strictures with other etiologies. Despite there is no consensus about the goal of the luminal diameter based on the patient's age, esophageal contrast study, and/or endoscopy are recommended to assess the degree of the narrowing. A high variability in incidence of ASs is reported in literature, depending on different definitions of AS and on a great number of pre-, intra-, and postoperative risk factor influencing the anastomosis outcome. The presence of a long gap between the two esophageal ends, with consequent anastomotic tension, is determinant for stricture formation and its response to treatment. The cornerstone of treatment is endoscopic dilation, whose primary aims are to achieve symptom relief, allow age-appropriate capacity for oral feeding, and reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration. No clear advantage of either balloon or bougie dilator has been demonstrated; therefore, the choice is based on operator experience and comfort with the equipment. Retrospective evidences suggest that selective dilatations (performed only in symptomatic patients) results in significantly less number of dilatation sessions than routine dilations (performed to prevent symptoms) with equal long-term outcomes. The response to dilation treatment is variable, and some patients may experience recurrent and refractory ASs. Adjunctive treatments have been used, including local injection of steroids, topical application of mitomycin C, and esophageal stenting, but long-term studies are needed to prove their efficacy and safety. Stricture resection or esophageal replacement with an interposition graft remains options for AS refractory to conservative treatments.

Steroid pulse therapy prevents restenosis following balloon dilatation for esophageal stricture

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of intravenous steroid pulse therapy following balloon dilatation for esophageal stenosis and stricture in children.

METHODS

The study enrolled six children, including three with congenital esophageal stenosis and three with anastomotic strictures after surgery for esophageal atresia, all of whom were treated by balloon dilatation combined with high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy. Methylprednisolone was injected intravenously at a dose of 20 mg/kg/day for 2 days, starting from the day of dilatation, followed by 10 mg/kg/day for 2 days, for a total of 4 days.

RESULTS

Esophageal stricture recurred in all three patients with congenital esophageal stenosis despite repeated balloon dilatation without methylprednisolone. However, the symptoms of dysphagia improved and did not recur after systemic steroid pulse therapy following balloon dilatation. Symptoms also resolved in all three patients with anastomotic strictures following balloon dilatation with systemic steroid pulse therapy. All six patients remained asymptomatic after 6-21 months follow-up, with no complications.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy following balloon dilatation is safe and effective for the treatment of esophageal stenosis and strictures in children.

Advances in prevention and treatment of esophageal stenosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is one of endoscopic minimally invasive techniques, referring to submucosal dissection of lesions greater than 2 cm using a variety of electric scalpels. At present ESD has become the most common choice of treatment for early esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions. With the wide application and development of esophageal ESD technology, post-ESD esophageal stenosis, as a major complication of esophageal ESD, has affected endoscopic treatment for the larger scope of early esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions and has plagued digestive endoscopy experts. For this complication, there have been no universally accepted treatment guidelines in the world. Scholars of different countries are taking efforts to develop different treatment or prevention strategies, looking forward to finding a better solution to the treatment or prevention of this complication. In this paper, we focus on the recent progress in the prevention and treatment of post-ESD esophageal stenosis.

Efficacy of short period, low dose oral prednisolone for the prevention of stricture after circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was developed in Japan and has been performed on many patients with early stage esophageal cancer; however quality of life in patients with postoperative stricture is drastically decreased and repeat, periodic endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) is usually required over long periods. In this study, we evaluate the efficacy of short period, low dose oral prednisolone in controlling post-procedural esophageal stricture.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In total, 33 patients who underwent semicircular or complete circular ESD for esophageal superficial squamous cell carcinoma were included in this study. They were divided into two groups: those who underwent large-circumference ESD with no preventative treatment for stricture (ESD alone group) and those who received systemic steroid treatment for stricture (oral prednisolone group). We compared the two groups in terms of stricture rate and total number of EBD sessions. The ESD alone group underwent no preventative treatment. The oral prednisolone group started with 30 mg/day prednisolone on the second day post-ESD, and continued with a gradually tapering prednisolone dose, finally discontinuing systemic steroid administration 3 weeks later.

RESULTS

The stricture rate after ESD was significantly lower in the oral prednisolone group (3 of 17 patients; 17.6 %) than in the ESD alone group (11 of 16 patients; 68.7 %) (P < 0.01). The number of EBD sessions was significantly lower in the oral prednisolone group than in the ESD alone group (median 4.6, range 2 - 10 vs. median 8.1, range 1 - 18; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Short period, low dose oral prednisolone showed promising results for the prevention of stricture after ESD for early stage esophageal cancers.

Stricture occurring after endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal and gastric tumors

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a widely accepted treatment for early gastric and esophageal cancer. Compared to endoscopic mucosal resection, ESD has the advantage of enabling en bloc removal of tumors regardless of their size. However, ESD can result in a large artificial ulcer, which may lead to a considerable deformity. Circumferential mucosal defects of more than three-fourths the esophageal circumference, long longitudinal mucosal defects (>30 mm), and lesions in the upper esophagus are significant risk factors for the development of post-ESD strictures of the esophagus. In the stomach, a circumferential mucosal defects more than three-fourths in extent and longitudinal mucosal defects >5 cm are risk factors of post-ESD stricture. If scheduled early, regular endoscopic balloon dilation is effective in controlling and preventing post-ESD stricture. Moreover, intralesional steroid injections or oral steroids can achieve remission of dysphagia or reduce the need for repeated endoscopic balloon dilation. However, further study is needed to improve the prevention of stricture formation.

Esophagitis with eosinophil infiltration associated with congenital esophageal atresia and stenosis

BACKGROUND

The esophagus is physiologically devoid of eosinophils, so their presence would suggest some underlying pathology. The prevalence of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has steadily increased in Western countries. Previous studies have described EoE in association with congenital esophageal atresia (CEA), which is the most common congenital anomaly of the esophagus. However, the association remains unclear.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective histological analysis examining for eosinophil infiltration in the esophagus of patients with CEA following surgical repair or congenital esophageal stenosis (CES) who underwent esophageal biopsy or surgical resection in our hospital between 2005 and 2012.

RESULTS

There were 6 patients with CEA following surgical repair or CES who had eosinophil-dominant infiltration in the esophagus. All had associated allergic disorders, including food allergies in 4. Moreover, all except for one fulfilled the histological criteria of EoE. Impairment of eosinophil infiltration and symptomatic improvement were observed in those treated with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), either alone or in combination with steroids after esophageal dilatation.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that CEA repair or CES in conjunction with allergic conditions and coexisting gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may induce greater esophageal eosinophilic inflammation. In addition, esophageal dilatation followed by PPI treatment, alone or with steroids, may be a therapeutic strategy that can provide symptomatic relief by reducing eosinophilic inflammation in esophageal strictures or GERD associated with CEA or CES.

Management of complications associated with endoscopic submucosal dissection/ endoscopic mucosal resection for esophageal cancer

Endoscopic resection of early esophageal cancer (EEC) is an established therapy in Japan and is increasingly becoming accepted and used regularly in other countries. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), an application of conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), has been developed to allow the resection of larger lesions in an en bloc manner; the earliest results so far have been promising even in EEC. ESD allows precise assessment of the histopathological curability of resected specimens, reducing local recurrence. However, ESD has relatively high complication rates; notification of perforation risk is essential especially in the esophagus. Bleeding during ESD can be managed by endoscopic closure with endoclips, and delayed bleeding is rare. Esophageal stricture following semicircular or complete circular esophageal ESD was relatively frequent even when treated by multiple pre-emptive endoscopic balloon dilation. Endoscopic triamcinolone injection, temporal stenting and innovative transplantation of autologous tissue-engineered epithelial cell sheets have shown promising results for the prevention of luminal stricture following semicircular esophageal ESD. In cases of circumferential ESD, however, giving oral prednisolone can offer a unique treatment option for the prevention of intractable post-procedural stricture of the esophagus.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for removal of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms: A technical review

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is now the most common endoscopic treatment in Japan for intramucosal gastrointestinal neoplasms (non-metastatic). ESD is an invasive endoscopic surgical procedure, requiring extensive knowledge, skill, and specialized equipment. ESD starts with evaluation of the lesion, as accurate assessment of the depth and margin of the lesion is essential. The devices and strategies used in ESD vary, depending on the nature of the lesion. Prior to the procedure, the operator must be knowledgeable about the treatment strategy(ies), the device(s) to use, the electrocautery machine settings, the substances to inject, and other aspects. In addition, the operator must be able to manage complications, should they arise, including immediate recognition of the complication(s) and its treatment. Finally, in case the ESD treatment is not successful, the operator should be prepared to apply alternative treatments. Thus, adequate knowledge and training are essential to successfully perform ESD.

Usefulness of oral prednisolone in the treatment of esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) permits en bloc removal of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, postprocedure stricture is common after ESD for extensive tumors, and multiple endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) is required for recalcitrant cases.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of oral prednisolone in controlling postprocedure esophageal stricture.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Endoscopy department at a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent complete circular or semicircular ESD for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma involving more than three fourths of the lumen were treated with either pre-emptive EBD or oral prednisolone.

INTERVENTION

Preemptive EBD was started on the third day post-ESD and continued twice weekly for 8 weeks. Oral prednisolone was started at 30 mg/day on the third day post-ESD , tapered gradually, and then discontinued 8 weeks later. An additional EBD was performed on demand in both groups whenever dysphagia appeared.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT

The incidence of esophageal stricture and number of EBD sessions required to relieve dysphagia.

RESULTS

Stricture at 3 months after ESD was found in 7 of 22 patients in the preemptive EBD group but only 1 of 19 in the oral prednisolone group (P < .05). The average number of EBD sessions required was 15.6 in the preemptive EBD group and 1.7 in the oral prednisolone group (P < .0001). After complete circular ESD, 32.7 EBD sessions were needed on average in the preemptive EBD group, whereas fewer were needed in the oral prednisolone group (P < .05).

LIMITATIONS

Nonrandomized study.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-ESD esophageal strictures were persistent even if treated preemptively with multiple EBD sessions, but oral prednisolone may offer a useful preventive option.

Management of esophageal stricture after complete circular endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) permits removal of esophageal epithelial neoplasms en bloc, but is associated with esophageal stenosis, particularly when ESD involves the entire circumference of the esophageal lumen. We examined the effectiveness of systemic steroid administration for control of postprocedural esophageal stricture after complete circular ESD.

Methods

Seven patients who underwent wholly circumferential ESD for superficially extended esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were enrolled in this study. In 3 patients, prophylactic endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) was started on the third post-ESD day and was performed twice a week for 8 weeks. In 4 patients, oral prednisolone was started with 30 mg daily on the third post-ESD day, tapered gradually (daily 30, 30, 25, 25, 20, 15, 10, 5 mg for 7 days each), and then discontinued at 8 weeks. EBD was used as needed whenever patients complained of dysphagia.

Results

En bloc ESD with tumor-free margins was safely achieved in all cases. Patients in the prophylactic EBD group required a mean of 32.7 EBD sessions; the postprocedural stricture was dilated up to 18 mm in diameter in these patients. On the other hand, systemic steroid administration substantially reduced or eliminated the need for EBD. Corticosteroid therapy was not associated with any adverse events. Post-ESD esophageal stricture after complete circular ESD was persistent, requiring multiple EBD sessions.

Conclusions

Use of oral prednisolone administration may be an effective treatment strategy for reducing post-ESD esophageal stricture after complete circular ESD.