Endoscopic treatment of primary grade V vesicoureteral reflux using hyaluronic acid copolymer (DX/HA)

Proprietary non-animal stabilized hyaluronic acid/dextranomer gel (NASHA/Dx) for endoscopic treatment of grade IV vesicoureteral reflux: Long-term observational study

BACKGROUND

Since 1993, children aged >1 year with persistent grade III-V vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and febrile urinary tract infections (UTIs) attending Uppsala University Hospital have undergone endoscopic injection with proprietary non-animal stabilized hyaluronic acid/dextranomer gel (NASHA/Dx; Deflux®).

OBJECTIVE

Investigate long-term incidence of UTI, bladder dysfunction, ureteral reimplantation and overall clinical findings following endoscopic injection of NASHA/Dx.

STUDY DESIGN

Children with grade IV VUR diagnosed by voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) and dilating VUR persisting for >1 year were included in this study. 15-25 years after endoscopic treatment, patients' hospital charts were studied. Information on bladder function and UTIs was obtained via questionnaire, 8-18 years after endoscopic treatment.

RESULTS

185 patients (69 boys, 116 girls) were included in the study; 237 grade IV VUR ureters were treated. All study patients were diagnosed with VUR after a febrile UTI (i.e. pyelonephritis). According to the last voiding cystourethrogram, 69% of ureters showed a positive response (VUR grade 0-I), 7% had VUR grade II and 23% had VUR grade ≥ III. 46 patients (25%) required ureteral reimplantation during follow-up. Among patients treated during the second 5-year period compared with the first (1998-2003 versus 1993-1998), there was a significant decrease in the rate of ureteral reimplantation (31% vs 16%; p = 0.0365). This difference may be attributable to developments over time in the injection technique. UTIs occurred in 30 patients (21% of the evaluable population): 28 females and 2 males. Febrile UTIs were reported in 14 patients (10%), all females. Forty-nine patients (34%) had bladder problems (e.g. underactivity, overactivity, incontinence). Five patients underwent ureteral reimplantation 'late', 6-10 years after the last endoscopic injection. In one male patient, calcification around the NASHA/Dx implantation site was observed during routine examination 2 years after endoscopic treatment; no intervention was required. No safety issues were observed in the remaining 97% of the study population.

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents the longest published follow-up of Grade IV VUR patients undergoing endoscopic treatment. Three-quarters of patients did not need ureteral reimplantation. Optimal injection technique and higher injection volume were associated with a reduced ureteral reimplantation rate. Treatment with NASHA/Dx was durable and well tolerated: long-term risks of UTI, bladder dysfunction and recurrent VUR were low.

Endoscopic injection for primary vesicoureteric reflux: Predictors of resolution and long term efficacy

AIM

We investigated the efficacy of endoscopic-Deflux-injection in treating primary-vesicoureteric-reflux (VUR) and identified factors to predict resolution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Records of children treated with Deflux for primary-VUR from 1995 to 2016 were reviewed, and outcomes were investigated.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight ureters (35 bilateral, 18 unilateral) in 53 children underwent 124 injections. Thirty-five (66%) patients had single injection (13 unilateral, 22 bilateral). Fifteen (28%), two (37%), and one (2%) patients had two, three, and four injections, respectively. Overall success rate by ureters was 57% after single injection. Complete resolution occurred in 65% of ureters with VUR below grade III, 63% of grade III, 40% of grade IV, and 70% of grade V VUR. Four patients had reimplantation. The median follow up duration was 60months (range 20-216months). Univariate analysis showed that lower VUR grade (p=0.03) and absent renal scars (p=0.04) were statistically significant predictors of resolution. In multivariate analysis, absent renal scars were statistically significant (p=0.01).

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated efficacy of endoscopic-Deflux-injection as the first line treatment for primary-VUR. Absent renal scar and lower VUR grade were statistically significant predictors of resolution after single injection.

TYPE OF STUDY

Case-Control / Retrospective Comparative Study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

The Swedish infant high-grade reflux trial: Study presentation and vesicoureteral reflux outcome

INTRODUCTION

High-grade vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in infants is associated with congenital renal abnormalities, recurrent UTI, and bladder dysfunction. Endoscopic treatment (ET) is a well-established method in children with low to moderate reflux grades, but there is a lack of randomised controlled trials regarding the use of ET versus continuous antibiotic prophylaxis in infants with high-grade VUR.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine whether high-grade VUR in infants can be treated with endoscopic injection and whether ET is superior to antibiotic prophylaxis in the treatment of VUR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre, 1-year follow-up trial comprised 77 infants (55 boys, 22 girls) <8 months of age with VUR grade 4-5 (n = 30/n = 47). Of the infants, 52 (68%) had bilateral VUR. Thirty-nine were randomised to antibiotic prophylaxis and 38 to ET (with prophylaxis until resolution). Voiding cystourethrogram, ultrasound, renal scintigraphy, and free voiding observation were performed at study entry and after 1 year to evaluate VUR grade, and renal and bladder function.

RESULTS

VUR grade ≤2 was seen in 22 (59%) infants in the endoscopy group and eight (21%) in the prophylaxis group at follow-up (p = 0.0014). The success rate in the endoscopy group was 100% in unilateral grade 4, falling to 31% in bilateral grade 5 (p = 0.0094). Correspondingly, the results in the prophylaxis group were 40% in grade 4 down to 0% in bilateral grade 5 (p = 0.037) (Table). Logistic regression analyses identified ET, VUR grade 4, unilaterality, and low residual urine at baseline as positive predictors of VUR down-grading to ≤2 (area under ROC curve 0.88). In four patients with reflux resolution after one injection, dilating reflux recurred at the 1-year follow-up. One patient had a UTI possibly related to ET. In our material four patients required re-implantation, of whom one was obstructive after injection.

DISCUSSION

The opportunity to offer even small infants with high-grade VUR an alternative, minimally invasive treatment option is a great advance in paediatric urology. In this high-risk group, bilateral VUR grade 5 stands out with its poor bladder function and low chance of resolution. The recurrence rate of dilating VUR after successful ET is consistent with previous studies. The limitations are the relatively small number of patients and the short follow-up.

CONCLUSION

High-grade VUR in infants can be treated with injection therapy and the resolution rate is higher than that of prophylaxis treatment. The complication rate is low and VUR grade 4, unilaterality, and low residual urine are favourable for the resolution and down-grading of VUR.

Downgrading of high-grade vesicoureteral reflux is a reliable option in the treatment of children with grade IV‒V reflux accompanied by breakthrough infections

PURPOSE

To evaluate incidence of urinary tract infection (UTI) and natural history of downgraded vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children with high-grade VUR following endoscopic correction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied 54 children (13 males and 41 females) with a mean age of 1.8 years who underwent endoscopic correction of Grade IV‒V VUR due to breakthrough infections while on antibiotic prophylaxis. Reflux was Grade IV in 40 (74%) and V in 14 (26%) patients comprising 95 renal refluxing units (RRU). Reflux was corrected in 72 (76%) RRU. 18 (34%) patients/23 (24%) RRU demonstrated downgrading of VUR. 21 of the 23 RRU showed Grade II and 2 Grade III VUR, and were taken off antibiotic prophylaxis and allocated to observation. Patients were followed for 2-22 years (median 14 years).

RESULTS

Technetium 99m dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scan demonstrated preoperative renal scarring in 21 (78%) of the 23 RRU with downgraded VUR. None of the children developed febrile UTI after surgery. 1 RRU showed renal function deterioration. 8 (44%) of the 18 patients underwent follow-up voiding cystourethrogram, and in 7 (88%) there was either spontaneous resolution of VUR or downgrade to Grade I VUR.

CONCLUSIONS

Downgrading of VUR is a reasonable option in patients with high-grade VUR suffering from breakthrough infections while on antibiotic prophylaxis. It leads to the cessation of febrile UTIs, further spontaneous resolution of VUR and may potentially avoid renal damage.

Intraureteral injection of NASHA/Dx gel under direct ureteroscopic visualization for the treatment of primary high-grade vesicoureteral reflux

OBJECTIVE

To present a preliminary experience with the modified technique of extravesical intraureteral injection of non-animal-stabilized hyaluronic acid/dextranomer (NASHA/Dx) gel under direct ureteroscopic visualization for the treatment of primary high-grade vesicoureteral reflux (VUR).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The medical records of all pediatric patients (age range, 0-14 years) who underwent intraureteral injection of NASHA/Dx gel under direct ureteroscopic visualization for the treatment of primary high-grade VUR during the period June 2006-June 2010 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine children (61 boys, 28 girls; M:F ratio, 2.1) underwent intraureteral injection of NASHA/Dx gel under direct ureteroscopic visualization for the treatment of primary high-grade VUR during the study period. VUR completely disappeared after the injection of NASHA/Dx gel into 105 (73%) of 144 ureters, with no further treatment required. Thirty-five (24.3%) required a second injection, and 2 (1.4%) required a third injection for resolution of their VUR. No intraoperative complications were observed. No ureteral obstruction during follow-up was observed using ultrasound or micturition studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraureteral injection of NASHA/Dx gel under direct ureteroscopic visualization is safe and effective in the treatment of primary high-grade VUR, including cases with ureteral duplication, if the ureteral meatus is easy to pass through without mechanical dilation. This approach represents an effective and safe alternative to antibiotic prophylaxis alone and open surgery.