Laparoscopic versus open repair of recto-bladderneck and recto-prostatic anorectal malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopically assisted anorectoplasty versus conventional procedures for anorectal malformation: a retrospective nationwide database study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopically assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) and conventional procedures (CPs) for anorectal malformation (ARM) using a national inpatient database in Japan.

METHODS

Using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, we identified patients who underwent anorectoplasty for high- or intermediate-type ARMs from 2010 to 2019. Primary outcomes were postoperative rectal prolapse, anal stenosis, and general complications. Secondary outcomes were the duration of anesthesia and length of hospital stay. We performed 1:2 propensity score-matched analyses to compare the outcomes between the LAARP and CP groups.

RESULTS

We identified 1005 eligible patients, comprising 286 and 719 patients who underwent LAARP and CP, respectively. The propensity score-matched groups included 281 patients with LAARP and 562 with CP. The LAARP group showed a higher proportion of rectal prolapse (21.4% vs. 8.5%; odds ratio, 2.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.89-4.48; p < 0.001) and longer duration of anesthesia (462 min vs. 365 min; difference, 90 min; 95% CI 43-137; p < 0.001) than the CP group. No significant differences were found in other outcomes.

CONCLUSION

LAARP had worse outcomes than CP in terms of rectal prolapse. Thus, we propose that LAARP may require technical refinement to improve patient outcomes.

Laparoscopic-assisted anorectal pull-through vs. posterior sagittal anorectoplasty for treating high anorectal malformations: a single-center experience

Background/purpose

Surgical management of high-type anorectal malformations (ARM) has evolved over the years with the widespread of the laparoscopic approach over the last two decades. This study aims to compare the outcome of patients with high anorectal malformation (ARM) managed with laparoscopic-assisted anorectal pull-through (LAARP) vs. the open posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) at a single Institution.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of pediatric patients, who were managed for high-type ARM at our institution, was performed for the period 2000–2015. Nine were excluded because of a lack of important data. Demographic data, surgical approach, associated anomalies, and complications were collected. Functional outcome was measured using the modified clinical scoring for the defecation function of the Japanese study group of anorectal anomalies. Comparison between groups was done using the T test for continuous variables and the Fisher-exact test for proportions. P < 0.05 is considered statistically significant.

Results

There were 82 patients with high type imperforate anus (59 males and 23 females) 73% had laparoscopy vs. 27% open. Type of fistulae were rectourethral (36), rectovesical (12), no fistula (19), and (15) cloaca anomalies. Patients underwent surgery at a mean age 8.4 (laparoscopy) vs. 10.1 (open) months (P value = 0.14). There was no difference between the two groups regarding weight at the surgery or associated anomalies, except for VACTRAL and genitourinary malformations which were more among the laparoscopic group (8 vs. 1).

There was no statistical significance for all elements of defecation function score: sensation, constipation, and soiling (P values 0.17, 0.6, 0.07, respectively). There was no difference between the two groups regarding rectal prolapse (P = 0.06), whereas rectal stenosis is more in PSARP compared to LAARP (P = 0.03). The hospital stay was significantly shorter in LAARP 7.1 vs. 9.4 (P = 0.006).

Conclusions

The defecation function and complication rate for both laparoscopic and open groups were almost similar. This may justify the preference of the laparoscopic approach over the open one, given its minimally invasive nature.

A Comparison of Sexual Function in Male Patients with Anorectal Malformations Between the Conventional and Laparoscopic Approaches

Aim: To compare the incidence of erectile dysfunction and ejaculatory anomalies in male patients with anorectal malformation (ARM) after treatment with the sacroperineal approach (Group S) or laparoscopically assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP; Group L). Methods: Male patients who underwent repair of high- or intermediate-type ARMs at our center and aged ≥15 years as of November 2020 were enrolled. Patients with intellectual disabilities or chromosomal disorders were excluded. Sacroperineal anorectoplasty has long been routinely performed at our hospital, and LAARP was introduced as a standard procedure in 2000. The medical records of the outpatient clinic were retrospectively reviewed, and questionnaires were sent in November 2020. Data regarding erectile dysfunction, ejaculatory anomalies, and associated anomalies were collected and compared between the two groups. Results: Answers were obtained from 7/22 patients in Group S (32%) and 10/17 patients in Group L (59%). Patient characteristics were similar, but the median age at the time of replying was significantly different (22 [18-29] years in Group S and 19 [15-20] years in Group L, P = .0060). None of the patients had erectile dysfunction, but 3 patients in Group S (43%) and 5 patients in Group L (50%) had ejaculatory failure, with no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusions: The incidence of sexual dysfunction in male patients with ARM might be higher than that in the healthy population. Patients might abscond from their follow-up visits as they age; therefore, providing patients with accurate information on this issue before puberty is essential.

Laparoscopic Approach in Anorectal Malformations: How We Do It

Laparoscopy has a major role in the treatment of anorectal malformations (ARM) since Georgeson et al. introduced the laparoscopic assisted anorectoplasty in 2000. The majority of ARM can be repaired through a posterior sagittal incision without the need to enter the abdomen. Some ARM types require an abdominal approach to detach the rectum from the urinary tract in males or the vagina in females. Those malformations benefit from laparoscopy. In this article, we aimed to highlight the technical aspects relevant to the current laparoscopic repair of ARM.

Laparoscopically assisted anorectoplasty-Surgical procedures and outcomes: A literature review

Anorectal malformation includes various types of anomalies. The goal of definitive surgery is achievement of fecal continence. Twenty years have passed since laparoscopically assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) was reported by Georgeson. Since LAARP is gaining popularity, its long-term outcomes should be evaluated. Presently, there is no evidence regarding the optimal method of ligating and dividing the fistula correctly and creating the pull-through canal accurately. Rectal prolapse and remnant of the original fistula (ROOF) tend to develop more often in LAARP patients than in posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) patients; however, robust evidence is not available. Prolapse may be prevented by suture fixation of the rectum to the presacral fascia; however, if prolapse occurs, the indication, timing, and the best method for surgical correction remain unclear. Most patients with ROOF are asymptomatic, and there is controversy regarding the indications for ROOF resection. This article aimed to detail the various modifications of the LAARP procedures reported previously and to describe the surgical outcomes, particularly focusing on rectal prolapse, ROOF, and fecal continence, by reviewing the literature. Functional outcomes after LAARP were almost similar to those noted after PSARP, and we have demonstrated that LAARP is not inferior to PSARP with respect to fecal continence. Although there is controversy regarding the application of LAARP for recto-bulbar cases, we believe that LAARP is still evolving, and we can achieve better outcomes by improving the procedure.

Sacral Curvature in Addition to Sacral Ratio to Assess Sacral Development and the Association With the Type of Anorectal Malformations

Introduction: Sacral ratio (SR) is currently the only measurement to quantitatively evaluate sacral development in patients with anorectal malformations (ARM). This study proposes sacral curvature (SC) as a new indicator to qualitatively assess the sacrum and hypothesizes that sacral development, both quantitatively and qualitatively, can be an indicator to predict the type of ARM. The study aims to investigate the difference of SR and SC between ARM types and the association with the type of ARM. Methods and Materials: This study was retrospectively conducted between August 2008 and April 2019. Male patients with ARMs were enrolled and divided into three groups based on the types of ARM: (1) rectoperineal fistulae, (2) rectourethral-bulbar fistulae, and (3) rectourethral-prostatic or rectobladder-neck fistulae. SC was measured in the sagittal views of an MRI or a lateral radiograph of the sacrum. Results: Included in the study were 316 male patients with ARMs. SRs were 0.73 ± 0.12, 0.65 ± 0.12, and 0.57 ± 0.12 in perineal, bulbar, and prostatic/bladderneck fistula, respectively (p < 0.01). The SCs in perineal fistulae and bulbar fistulae were significantly higher than that in prostatic/bladderneck fistulae (0.25 ± 0.04, 0.22 ± 0.14, and 0.14 ± 0.18, p < 0.01). When SR ≥ 0.779, there was an 89.9% of possibility that the child has a perineal fistula. When SR ≤ 0.490 and SC ≤ 0, the possibilities of the child having prostatic/bladderneck fistulae were 91.6 and 89.5%, respectively. SC < 0 was also noted in 27 (27.8%), 19 (10.5%), and no (0%) patients of prostatic/bladderneck, bulbar, and perineal fistulae (p < 0.01), respectively. Sacral defect was noted in 63% of patients with SC ≤ 0, compared to none with SC > 0 (p < 0.01). Conclusions: The higher the rectal level is in an ARM, the lower are the objective measurements of the sacrum. SC ≤ 0 is associated with sacral defects and implies a high likelihood of prostatic/bladderneck fistulae.

Rectal Prolapse After Laparoscopically Assisted Anorectoplasty for Anorectal Malformations

Aim: To clarify the characteristics of patients with rectal prolapse after laparoscopically assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP), estimate the causes, and evaluate its impact on postoperative bowel function. Methods: The medical records of patients who underwent LAARP for high- or intermediate-type anorectal malformation between 2000 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical data were compared between patients with (Group P) and without prolapse (normal, Group N). Fecal continence was evaluated using the clinical assessment score for fecal continence developed by the Japanese Study Group of Anorectal Anomalies. For patients who underwent pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before LAARP, atrophy, or asymmetry of the anal sphincter and levator ani was evaluated by a radiologist. Results: Of the 49 patients, 29 (59%) had rectal prolapse after LAARP (Group P) and 20 did not (Group N). We found no significant difference in gender, type of malformations, incidence of associated spinal or lumbosacral anomalies, procedure time, and postoperative bowel function at ages 4, 8, 12, and 16 years. However, LAARP was performed significantly earlier in Group N (median [range], 180 [123-498] days) than in Group P (210 [141-570] days). In Group P, 18 patients (62%) developed prolapse before colostomy takedown. Eight of 26 patients who underwent surgical prolapse repair required redo procedures. Twenty-five patients who underwent preoperative pelvic MRI showed no significant relationship between the muscular abnormalities and the incidence of postoperative rectal prolapse. Conclusions: Although recurrence is common, performing LAARP at a younger age might prevent postoperative prolapse development.

Thirty Years of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Children: Analysis of Meta-Analyses

INTRODUCTION

 In the last three decades, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been widely used in pediatric surgery. Meta-analyses (MAs) showed that studies comparing minimally invasive with the corresponding open operations are available only for selected procedures. We evaluated all available MAs comparing MIS with the corresponding open procedure in pediatric surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 A literature search was performed on all MAs listed on PubMed. All analyses published in English, comparing pediatric minimally invasive with the corresponding open procedures, were included. End points were advantages and disadvantages of MIS. Results of 43 manuscripts were included. MAs evaluating the minimally invasive with the corresponding open procedures were available for 11 visceral, 4 urologic, and 3 thoracoscopic types of procedures. Studies included 34 randomized controlled trials. In 77% of MAs, at least one advantage of MIS was identified. The most common advantages of MIS were a shorter hospital stay in 20, a shorter time to feeding in 11, and a lower complication rate in 7 MAs. In 53% of MAs, at least one disadvantage of MIS was found. The most common disadvantages were longer operation duration in 16, a higher recurrence rate of diaphragmatic hernia in 4, and gastroesophageal reflux in 2 MAs. A lower native liver survival rate after laparoscopic Kasai-portoenterostomy was reported in one MA.

CONCLUSION

 In the available MAs, the advantages of MIS seem to outnumber the disadvantages. However, for some types of procedures, MIS may have considerable disadvantages. More randomized controlled trials are required to confirm the advantage of MIS for most procedures.

Minimal dissection of posterior wall of rectum reduces rectal prolapse in laparoscopic assisted anorectal pull-through

PURPOSE

To determine if minimal dissection of the posterior wall of rectum can reduce rectal prolapse after laparoscopic assisted anorectal pull-through (LAARP) in male anorectal malformation (ARM) with rectourethral fistula.

METHODS

Eighty-six male patients with ARM who underwent LAARP in our center between 2007 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 45 cases of prostatic urethral fistula, 24 bulbar urethral fistulas, and 15 bladder neck fistulas. Two patients had no fistula. To prevent rectal prolapses, we markedly shortened the length of posterior rectal dissection from mid-2016. Dissection of posterior wall of rectum was performed minimally around the level of the fistula and the dissected portion of the posterior rectum was significantly shorter than the previous cases. For comparative analysis, patients were divided into two groups (before and after application of minimal dissection of posterior wall of rectum): Group A, from 2007 to mid-2016 and Group B, from mid-2016 to 2018.

RESULTS

There were 60 patients in Group A and 26 patients in Group B. Demographic characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups. The median follow-up duration was 52.4 months for Group A and 26.9 months for Group B. Group B had lower incidence of rectal prolapse (11.5%) than Group A (68.3%) (p < 0.001). Upon our subgroup analysis based on types of fistula, patients with recto-prostatic urethral fistula and recto-bulbar urethral fistula showed significant reduction in the incidence of rectal prolapse (both p < 0.001). However, patients with recto-bladder neck fistula showed no statistical significance (p = 0.264).

CONCLUSION

Minimal dissection of the posterior wall of rectum can reduce rectal prolapse in LAARP.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III. Retrospective Comparative Treatment Study.

Laparoscopic surgical technique to enhance the management of anorectal malformations: 330 cases' experience in a single center

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) is considered to benefit the patients with vesico-prostatic fistula. The aim of this study is to present the details of our LAARP technique for improving the short- and long-term outcomes in the patients with high and intermediate types of anorectal malformations (ARMs).

METHODS

330 patients with high-type (174 cases) and intermediate-type (156 cases) anorectal malformation (aged 8 days to 15 years) underwent LAARP from 2001 to 2019. LAARP was performed for full mobilization and resection of the dilated rectum, intra-rectal closure of the fistula, visualization, and enlargement of the center of the longitudinal muscle tube (LMT) from pelvic and perineal aspects.

RESULTS

LAARP was performed in all patients and no patient was converted to open procedure. The urethral diverticulum was found in three patients (1.02%, 3/294) according to postoperative protocol voiding cystourethrogram but was not associated with any symptoms such as urinary tract infection and dysuria. Rectal prolapse requiring surgical intervention developed in 25 (7.6%) of 330 patients. Anal stricture occurred in three patients and re-do anoplasty was performed 5 months after LAARP. Anal retraction occurred in two patients and re-pull-through was conducted at 5 and 6 days, respectively, after LAARP. 228 patients who were older than 3 years were followed up. The median follow-up period was 5.8 years (range 3-15 years). 217 patients (95.2%) had voluntary bowel movements; 202 patients (88.6%) were free from soiling or with grade 1 soiling; 30 patients (13.6%) and 25 patients (11.3%) suffered from grade 1 and grade 2 constipation, respectively, while no patient had grade 3 constipation.

CONCLUSION

Our experience demonstrates that the LAARP has advantages on rectal mobilization and resection, intra-rectal fistula closure and accurate tunnel formation in the LMT with minimal trauma. The improvement of the short-term and long-term outcomes after LAARP has been shown not only for high-type ARM but also for intermediate-type ARM.

Quality of life and defecative function 10 years or longer after posterior sagittal anorectoplasty and laparoscopic-assisted anorectal pull-through for anorectal malformation

PURPOSE

In our center, patients with anorectal malformation, including males with recto-vesical (RV)/recto-bladder neck (RBN)/recto-prostatic urethral (RU) fistulas, and females with recto-vaginal (RV) fistulas have been treated by posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) before 2000, and by laparoscopic-assisted anorectal pull-through (LAARP) thereafter. We would like to compare the quality of life (QOL) and long-term defecative function between these two groups of patients 10 years after reconstructive surgery.

METHODS

Patients who underwent LAARP between 2001 and 2005 were compared with historical controls treated with PSARP between 1996 and 2000. Degrees of continence were graded by the Krickenbeck classification and Kelly's score. QOL was assessed by Hirschsprung's disease/Anorectal Malformation Quality of Life (HAQL) questionnaire. Results were compared using Chi-square test and t test.

RESULTS

There were 14 LAARP and 7 PSARP patients. All attained voluntary bowel movements. Moderate to severe soiling (Krickenbeck Grade 2 and 3) was found in 3/14 LAARP (21.4%) and 1/7 PSARP (14.3%) patients, p = 1.00. Constipation requiring use of laxatives was present in 3/14 LAARP (28.6%) and 1/7 PSARP (14.3%) patients, p = 0.62. Mean Kelly's scores were 3.79 ± 0.98 (LAARP) and 4.71 ± 1.25 (PSARP), p = 0.12. No patient required Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE). The QOL scores based on the HAQL questionnaire were comparable between the two groups in all areas except social functioning, in which the LAARP patients attained a significantly lower mean score (26.4 vs 71.7, p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The 10-year outcome between LAARP and PSARP patients in terms of QOL and defecative function is comparable. Impairment in social functioning in these patients is reflected by the self-reported lower level of functioning.

Long-term follow-up for anorectal function after anorectoplasty in patients with high/intermediate imperforate anus: a single center experience

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and postoperative anorectal function in the patients with high/intermediate imperforate anus (HIA/IIA) treated in our institution. In addition, we report our novel procedure, laparoscopically assisted anorectoplasty with anterior perineal incision (LAARP-API), which allows direct approach to the anterior edge of the puborectal sling and muscle complex, and is useful for the creation of a pulling-through route for the rectal pouch.

METHODS

From 1976 to 2016, 22 patients with HIA and 43 patients with IIA underwent sacroperineal/sacroabdominoperineal pull-through anorectoplasty (SP/SAP), Potts procedure (Potts), SP with API (SP-API) or LAARP-API. Clinical data and anorectal function of those patients were retrospectively evaluated using the Japanese clinical score.

RESULTS

Of the 22 cases of HIA, 15 were treated by SAP, 2 were SP and 5 were LAARP-API. Of the 43 cases of IIA, one was treated by SAP, 31 were SP, two were Potts and nine were SP-API. The mean score of anorectal function of HIA/IIA both increased with age. In IIA, the score after SP-API was significantly higher than the score after SP.

CONCLUSION

Long-term outcomes of our anorectoplasty for HIA/IIA are good with excellent anorectal function score.

Simulation in Pediatric Video Surgery: Training with Simple and Reproducible Exercises Elaborated by Residents

Background: Most residents do not have a defined program for simulation training in video surgery in Brazil. The training takes place for the most part in vivo or in short courses. The goal of this article is to describe and evaluate a set of exercises using low-cost materials, created by the residents themselves, to enable basic skills training in video surgery. Materials and Methods: Seven exercises were elaborated aiming to simulate main maneuvers performed in video surgery. The residents were guided by a written and video description showing the execution of the exercises, performed the exercises, and answered a questionnaire. After 3 weeks of free training, the residents performed the exercises and answered the questionnaire again. Results: Seven residents started the study; however, 6 completed the two steps. Among the participants, 83% received in vivo video surgery training, and only 2 (33%) received some supervised simulation training in minimally invasive surgery before this time. All participants considered the set of seven exercises representative of the actual skills in video surgery. There was no difficulty in acquiring the materials or in assembling them to carry out the training. All the participants had a shorter training time than initially proposed, on average 1 day/week for 20 minutes. Conclusions: A simple set of exercises can be elaborated by the residents themselves and make feasible the simulated training in video surgery even without the availability of sophisticated and expensive materials. The presence of a tutor and the scheduling of exclusive training seem necessary for more satisfactory results.

Long-term outcomes and complications after laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty vs. posterior sagittal anorectoplasty for high- and intermediate-type anorectal malformation

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) is a minimally invasive procedure in which the levator ani muscle is left to potentially improve postoperative fecal continence. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate postoperative complications and long-term outcomes of fecal continence after LAARP and compare them to those after posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP).

METHODS

Forty-five male patients with high and intermediate anorectal malformation (aged ≥ 4 years) who underwent LAARP or PSARP (LAARP 29, PSARP 16) from 1999 to 2013 were included. Postoperative complications and postoperative fecal continence were retrospectively evaluated and compared. Postoperative complications were also compared before and after introducing a urethroscope during fistula resection.

RESULTS

Complications after LAARP and PSARP were seen in 12 vs. 2 cases (p = 0.09) of mucosal prolapse and in 9 vs. 1 case (p = 0.07) of posterior urethral diverticulum (PUD), respectively. The incidence of PUD decreased after introduction of a urethroscopy from 40% in 8/20 cases to 11% in 1/9 cases. No significant difference was found in terms of fecal continence in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Through our study, greater improvement of postoperative fecal continence after LAARP has not been shown. LAARP was at higher risk for mucosal prolapse and PUD. However, precise dissection of the urethral fistula could be performed after the introduction of urethroscopy.

Clinical characteristics, prognosis, and its risk factors of anorectal malformations: a retrospective study of 332 cases in Anhui Province of China

Objective: To analyze the clinical characteristics and prognosis of anorectal malformations (ARMs) and explore the influencing factors of postoperative anal function in Anhui Province of China.Methods: We performed a retrospective study of ARM patients diagnosed from 2013 to 2016 at Anhui Provincial Children's Hospital. A total of 332 infants with ARM were enrolled in the survey. Demographic characteristic and clinical data were collected. Follow-up study was required to evaluate anal function after the operation and Logistic regression analysis was used for analyzing the influencing factors of prognosis.Results: A total of 253 males and 79 females were studied, with a ratio of 3.2:1. Abdominal distention was the most common presenting symptom, followed by vomiting. Of the cases, 53.0% (176/332) combined with other congenital malformations. The incidence of other malformations in intermediate and high ARM group was significantly higher than that in the low ARM group. Of the cases, 280 underwent anoplasty. 188, 73, 19 cases were treated with one-stage perineal anoplasty, posterior sagittal anorectoplasty, laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through, respectively. The result of follow-up study showed that the excellent and good rate of postoperative anal function was up to 83.3%. Type of ARM, combined with other malformations and the times of anoplasty were related to the anal function postoperatively.Conclusions: ARM occurs mainly in male infants. The incidence of associated abnormalities in ARM patients was high. Intermediate- and high-type, combined with other malformations and more times of anoplasty increased the risk of anal dysfunction postoperatively. Multicenter, prospective randomized-controlled studies were needed to clarify the curative effect of different surgical approaches.

Is measuring the residual rectourethral fistula during laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through for male high/intermediate type imperforate anus beneficial? Mid-term follow-up

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

We evaluated routine intraoperative residual rectourethral fistula measurement (IRRFM) in 20 consecutive male imperforate anus with recto-bulbar (RB; n=12) or recto-prostatic (RP; n=8) fistula during laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through (LAARP) for preventing incomplete fistula excision (IFE) on mid-term follow-up.

METHODS

Twenty consecutive LAARP performed at a mean age of 10months (range: 3-30) followed-up for a mean of 4.8years (range: 1.5-9) were reviewed. IRRFM involves using a calibrated catheter and a cystoscope to measure the distance between where dissection was ceased at the rectal end and the urethral orifice (Figure). Dissection and IRRFM were repeated until the fistula was <5mm, then tied, and divided. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and pelvic ultrasonography were used to exclude IFE and cyst formation.

RESULTS

Residual fistula was 4-18mm on initial IRRFM. Unless measured, dissection cannot proceed to <5mm safely with poentical for urethral injury or IFE. With experience, initial IRRFM were shorter, especially in RP (Table 1). Before the IRRFM era, our incidence of cysts was 2/11 (18%), but here we found no evidence of cyst formation on MRI, no dysuria, and no urinary tract infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Mid-term review demonstrates that IFE can be prevented successfully by IRRFM during LAARP.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case Series with no Comparison Group, Level IV.

Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Management of Anorectal Malformations

Imperforate anus, a variant of anorectal malformation (ARM), is a common congenital anomaly requiring surgical attention in the newborn period. It may present with a variety of anatomic configurations, largely dependent on the presence and location of a fistula. The location (or characteristics) of a fistula, which usually lies between the gastrointestinal tract and the genitourinary tract or perineum, is often used in determining the type and timing of operative management. This article discusses the work-up and management, modes of treatment and their postoperative outcomes, and continued controversy regarding the use of minimally invasive surgical approaches to ARM.

Controversies in anorectal malformations

Anorectal malformations are uncommon but complex congenital anomalies that require an individualised strategy of care for each step of the treatment process. These steps, which include preoperative evaluation, operative reconstruction, and postoperative care, are each unique and vitally important to overall patient outcomes. In this Review, we discuss some of the pivotal decisions that should be made at each stage of patient care. Through this process, we highlight some of the more controversial aspects of caring for patients with anorectal malformation and offer insights into various management philosophies.

A systematic review of the quality of conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric surgery

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to evaluate quality of conduct and reporting of published systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric surgery. We also aimed to identify characteristics predictive of review quality.

BACKGROUND

Systematic reviews summarise evidence by combining sources, but are potentially prone to bias. To counter this, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was published to aid in reporting. Similarly, the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) measurement tool was designed to appraise methodology. The paediatric surgical literature has seen an increasing number of reviews over the past decade, but quality has not been evaluated.

METHODS

Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we performed a systematic review with a priori design to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses of interventions in paediatric surgery. From 01/2010 to 06/2016, we searched: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Web of Science, Google Scholar, reference lists and journals. Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data. We assessed conduct and reporting using AMSTAR and PRISMA. Scores were calculated as the sum of reported items. We also extracted author, journal and article characteristics, and used them in exploratory analysis to determine which variables predict quality.

RESULTS

112 articles fulfilled eligibility criteria (53 systematic reviews; 59 meta-analyses). Overall, 68% AMSTAR and 56.8% PRISMA items were reported adequately. Poorest scores were identified with regards a priori design, inclusion of structured summaries, including the grey literature, citing excluded articles and evaluating bias. 13 reviews were pre-registered and 6 in PRISMA-endorsing journals. The following predicted quality in univariate analysis:, word count, Cochrane review, journal h-index, impact factor, journal endorses PRISMA, PRISMA adherence suggested in author guidance, article mentions PRISMA, review includes comparison of interventions and review registration. The latter three variables were significant in multivariate regression.

CONCLUSIONS

There are gaps in the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews in paediatric surgery. More endorsement by journals of the PRISMA guideline may improve review quality, and the dissemination of reliable evidence to paediatric clinicians.

Laparoscopically Assisted Anorectal Pull-Through versus Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty for High and Intermediate Anorectal Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

Anorectal malformations (ARMs) are one of the commonest anomalies in neonates. Both laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through (LAARP) and posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) can be used for the treatment of ARMs. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare these two approaches in terms of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched from 2000 to August 2016. Both randomized and non-randomized studies, assessing LAARP and PSARP in pediatric patients with high/intermediate ARMs, were included. The primary outcome measures were operative time, length of hospital stay and total postoperative complications. The second outcome measures were rectal prolapse, anal stenosis, wound infection/dehiscence, anorectal manometry, Kelly's clinical score, and Krickenbeck classification. The quality of the randomized and non-randomized studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) respectively. The quality of evidence was assessed by GRADEpro.

Results

From 332 retrieved articles, 1, 1, and 8 of randomized control, prospective and retrospective studies, respectively, met the inclusion criteria. The randomized clinical trial was judged to be of low risk of bias, and the nine cohort studies were of moderate to high quality. 191 and 169 pediatric participants had undergone LAARP and PSARP, respectively. Shorter hospital stays, less wound infection/dehiscence, higher anal canal resting pressure, and a lower incidence of grade 2 or 3 constipation were obtained after LAARP compared with PSARP group values. Besides, the LAARP group had marginally less total postoperative complications. However, the result of operative time was inconclusive; meanwhile, there was no significant difference in rectal prolapse, anal stenosis, anorectal manometry, Kelly's clinical score and Krickenbeck classification.

Conclusion

For pediatric patients with high/intermediate anorectal malformations, LAARP is a better option compared with PSARP. However, the quality of evidence was very low to moderate.

Application of anchoring stitch prevents rectal prolapse in laparoscopic assisted anorectal pullthrough

BACKGROUND

Rectal prolapse has been reported after laparoscopic assisted anorectal pullthrough in children with anorectal malformation. We report our clinical outcome and study the application of an anchoring stitch to tack the rectum to the presacral fascia and the occurrence of rectal prolapse.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective review of all children who had undergone laparoscopic assisted anorectal pullthrough for anorectal malformation from 2000 to 2015 was performed. Patients were divided into two groups (group I: with anchoring stitch, group II: without anchoring stitch). Outcome measures including rectal prolapse, soiling, voluntary bowel control, and constipation, and Kelly Score were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were thirty-four patients (group I, n=20; group II, n=14) undergoing laparoscopic assisted anorectal pullthrough during the study period. The median follow up duration for group I and group II was 60months and 168months, respectively. All patients had stoma performed prior to the operation. Both groups consisted of patients with high type (30% vs 57%, p=0.12) and intermediate type (70% vs 43%, p=0.12) anorectal malformation. Seven (35%) patients in group I and 3 (21%) in group II had concomitant vertebral and spinal cord pathologies (p=0.408). The mean operative time was significantly shorter in group I (193±63min vs 242±49min, p=0.048). Rectal prolapse occurred less in group I, 4 (20%) vs 9 (64%) patients in group II and was statistically significant (p=0.008). Median time to development of rectal prolapse was 7months in group I and 5months in group II (p=0.767). Mucosectomy was performed in 15% of group I and 36% of group II (p=0.171). Soiling occurred less in group I (55% vs 79%, p=0.167). Voluntary bowel control (85% vs 93%, p=0.499) and constipation (55% vs 64%, p=0.601) were comparable in both groups. 75% in group I and 71% in group II achieved a Kelly score of 5 or above (p=0.823).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed application of anchoring stitch reduces rectal prolapse and soiling in laparoscopic assisted anorectal pullthrough. Treatment Study-Level III.

Advances in minimally invasive neonatal colorectal surgery

Over the last two decades, advances in laparoscopic surgery and minimally invasive techniques have transformed the operative management of neonatal colorectal surgery for conditions such as anorectal malformations (ARMs) and Hirschsprung’s disease. Evolution of surgical care has mainly occurred due to the use of laparoscopy, as opposed to a laparotomy, for intra-abdominal procedures and the development of trans-anal techniques. This review describes these advances and outlines the main minimally invasive techniques currently used for management of ARMs and Hirschsprung’s disease. There does still remain significant variation in the procedures used and this review aims to report the current literature comparing techniques with an emphasis on the short- and long-term clinical outcomes.

Outcome in anorectal malformation type rectovesical fistula: a nationwide cohort study in The Netherlands

PURPOSE

Outcomes of patients with an ARM-type rectovesical fistula are scarcely reported in medical literature. This study evaluates associated congenital anomalies and long-term colorectal and urological outcome in this group of ARM-patients.

METHODS

A retrospective Dutch cohort study on patients treated between 1983 and 2014 was performed. Associated congenital anomalies were documented, and colorectal and urological outcome recorded at five and ten years of follow-up.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were included, with a mean follow-up of 10.8years. Associated congenital anomalies were observed in 89% of the patients, 61% considered a VACTERL-association. Total sacral agenesis was present in 17% of our patients. At five and ten years follow-up voluntary bowel movements were described in 80% and 50%, constipation in 80% and 87%, and soiling in 42% and 63% of the patients, respectively. Bowel management was needed in 90% and one patient had a definitive colostomy. PSARP was the surgical reconstructive procedure in 83%. Urological outcome showed 14 patients (81%) to be continent. No kidney transplantations were needed.

CONCLUSION

In our national cohort of ARM-patients type rectovesical fistula that included a significant proportion of patients with major sacral anomalies, the vast majority remained reliant on bowel management to be clean after ten years follow-up, despite "modern" PSARP-repair. Continence for urine is achieved in the majority of patients, and end-stage kidney failure is rare.

Laparoscopic-Assisted Anorectal Pull-Through for High Imperforate Anus: 14 Years Experience in a Single Center

PURPOSE

To report our 14 years experience with the laparoscopic-assisted anorectal pull-through (LAARP) for the treatment of male neonates with high imperforate anus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed all medical charts of patients who underwent LAARP from January 2001 to January 2015 collecting information regarding demographic data, associated anomalies, type of fistula, pelvic floor muscles tropism, surgery (operative time, conversion to open technique, and complications), and follow-up. Follow-up data were obtained through the use of validated questionnaires that aim to assess the intestinal function in terms of constipation and continence.

RESULTS

At the Department of Pediatric Surgery of the University of Bologna, 13 male patients were operated in the study period (our protocol consisted of colostomy at birth followed by delayed LAARP). Mean age at operation was 4.75 months (range 1-14). There was one conversion to open technique due to a strong tension from the colostomy (this patient was excluded). Functional results were acceptable at a minimum 2-year-long follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

LAARP is a good choice for the correction of the high imperforate anus. Short-term outcomes are similar to those after posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP). Long-term outcomes should be better assessed.

Laparoscopic approach in the management of anorectal malformations

Seventeen years have passed since the first description of the laparoscopic approach for anorectal malformation and approximately 68 articles have been published on the subject. In this review article, we aim to describe the advantages as well as the indications and contraindications of this approach when dealing with each specific type of anorectal malformation, according to what has been described in the literature and to our own experience. The ideal and undisputable indication for laparoscopy remains for cases in which the abdomen needs to be entered to repair the malformation. Only 10% of male patients with anorectal malformation are born with a recto-bladder neck fistula that requires an abdominal approach, this represents an ideal indication for laparoscopy. In females, only the complex cloacae with a common channel length greater than 3 cm are the ones that require a laparotomy; they represent about 30% of the cloacae. However, the repair of this type of cloacae also requires sophisticated and technically demanding maneuvers that have never been done laparoscopically. In cases of recto-urethral prostatic fistulas the malformation can be repaired either way: laparoscopically or posterior sagitally. In all other malformations: recto-perineal fistula, recto-urethral bulbar fistula, anorectal malformation without fistula, rectal atresia, recto-vestibular fistula; no justification for laparoscopy could be found; and in some cases, laparoscopy is contraindicated. In the published reports, there is no evidence supporting the idea that laparoscopic repair results in better functional results when compared with non-laparoscopic operation; there is a tendency to omit information relevant to bowel control such as the characteristics of the sacrum and the presence or absence of tethered cord; and most authors do not compare results between comparable malformations.