A pediatric specific shock index in combination with GMS identifies children with life threatening or severe traumatic brain injury

Assessment of neural function recovery in premature infants at high risk of brain injury using amplitude integrated electroencephalography and GMs scales

Preterm infants are a high-risk group for brain injury, and it is important to evaluate the neurological recovery of preterm infants. Therefore, this paper evaluates the neurological recovery in preterm infants at high risk of brain injury by amplitude-integrated EEG and GMs scale. The study collected basic information on preterm infants and performed amplitude integrated EEG examination and GMs scale evaluation. Amplitude integrated EEG examination attaches electrodes using multielectrode arrays onto specific areas of the premature head to record brain wave activity to monitor electrical activity in the preterm brain in real time and amplify and process through the signals received by the electrodes to obtain more detailed EEG data. The GMs scale evaluates the developmental and functional status of the child and allows an objective assessment of the development and recovery of neurological function by observing their performance in motor, language, cognition, and social interaction. Analysis of the data by statistical processing. The results showed that early brain injury was evident in high-risk infants. Amplitude integrated EEG parameters can have some predictive value for brain injury. There were also differences in GMs scale assessment between brain injury and non-brain injury. Amplitude integrated EEG combined with GMs scale has certain value in predicting brain injury and can provide an important basis for early intervention in children with preterm brain injury and help to improve their neurodevelopmental outcome.

Shock index and shock index, pediatric age-adjusted as predictors of mortality in pediatric patients with trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This study aimed to assess the predictive ability of the shock index (SI) and the shock index, pediatric age-adjusted (SIPA) for mortality among pediatric patients with trauma (aged ≤ 18 years). A systematic search used PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to identify pertinent articles published from their inception to 13 February 2023. For each SI and SIPA, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated. We planned a priori meta-regression analyses to explore heterogeneity using the following covariates: country, clinical setting, type of center, data source, and cutoff value. Twelve studies were included based on the inclusion criteria. Among them, nine studies with 195,469 patients were included for the SIPA at the hospital, four studies with 4,970 patients were included for the pre-hospital SIPA, and seven studies with 606,445 patients were included to assess the ability of the SI in predicting mortality. The pooled sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence interval for predicting mortality were as follows: 0.58 (0.44-0.70) and 0.72 (0.60-0.82), respectively, for the SIPA at the hospital; 0.61 (0.47-0.74) and 0.67 (0.61-0.73), respectively, for the pre-hospital SIPA; and 0.71 (0.59-0.81) and 0.45 (0.31-0.59), respectively for the SI. The DOR were 3.80, 3.28, and 2.06 for the SIPA at the hospital, pre-hospital SIPA, and SI, respectively. The AUC were 0.693, 0.689, and 0.618 for the SIPA at the hospital, pre-hospital SIPA, and SI, respectively. The SI and SIPA are simple predictive tools with sufficient accuracy that can be readily applied to pediatric patients with trauma, but SIPA and SI should be utilized cautiously due to their limited sensitivity and specificity, respectively.

Validation of motor component of Glasgow coma scale in lieu of total Glasgow coma scale as a pediatric trauma field triage tool

INTRODUCTION

Prehospital trauma triage and disability assessment of pediatric patients can be challenging on the field, especially in the pre-verbal age group. It would be useful if the same triage tool and criteria can be used for both adults and children to risk-stratify the need of higher acuity of trauma care.

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate if using only the motor component of Glasgow Coma Scale (mGCS), as a quick field trauma triage tool, was non-inferior to total GCS (tGCS), and if mGCS <6 was non-inferior to tGCS <14, in predicting the need for intensive care or mortality in the pediatric population.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients <18-years-old, who presented to our emergency department (ED) with moderate (Injury Severity Score (ISS) 9-15) to severe (ISS > 15) traumatic injuries from January 2012 to December 2021. Using ED triage data, mortality and the need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission were used as surrogate outcomes to investigate if mGCS <6 was non-inferior to tGCS <14, and the area-under-the-receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUROC) was used as a measure of comparability.

RESULTS

Among 582 included for analysis, the median age was 7-years-old (2-12), and most were male (63.4%). 22.4% patients demised or required ICU care. mGCS <6 had an AUROC of 0.75 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.79), which was non-inferior to tGCS <14; AUROC 0.76, (95% CI 0.72 to 0.81), for identifying children requiring ICU management or demised. The results shown here were based on the AUROCs that were used to evaluate the discriminatory ability of tGCS <14 and mGCS <6 in prediction of mortality and the need for ICU care.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that mGCS was significantly associated with tGCS, and was non- inferior to the latter as a triage tool in pediatric trauma. It validated the use of mGCS <6 in lieu of tGCS <14 in the pre-hospital field triage of pediatric patients, in identification of children at risk of death or requiring ICU care. Larger prospective, observational studies using on-scene data would be required for more robust validation and determine optimal cut-offs.

Predicting morbidity and mortality in Australian paediatric trauma with the Paediatric Age-Adjusted Shock Index and Glasgow Coma Scale

BACKGROUND

Paediatric age-adjusted shock index (SIPA) has emerged as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in trauma. Poor sensitivity and low generalisability demonstrated in previous studies have limited its use. We evaluate the use of SIPA in the general Australian paediatric trauma population and the combination of SIPA with GCS.

METHODS

All patients from January 2015 to August 2020 at a major Australian paediatric trauma centre were reviewed. Pre-arrival SIPA (pSIPA) and arrival SIPA (aSIPA) were calculated. If SIPA was elevated or the Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 13, SIPA with mental state (SIPAms) was marked positive for pre-arrival (pSIPAms) and arrival (aSIPAms) respectively.

RESULTS/DISCUSSION

Data from 480 patients were analysed. pSIPA and aSIPA poorly predicted outcomes of morbidity. Only aSIPA predicted mortality. However, both pre-arrival and arrival SIPAms variables predict mortality, major trauma (ISS≥12), hospital LOS, need for ICU admission, and major surgery. Furthermore, median ISS and lactate were significantly higher in positive pSIPA, aSIPA, pSIPAms, and aSIPAms groups than negative. aSIPAms has a sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 70% for major trauma.

CONCLUSION

Broad inclusion criteria reduce SIPA's ability to predict morbidity. Combining it with GCS improves this and is most valuable when calculated at arrival. In addition, the score is more reliable for major trauma (ISS≥12). Future studies should evaluate the use of SIPAms in activation criteria.

Pediatric age-adjusted shock index as a tool for predicting outcomes in children with or without traumatic brain injury

BACKGROUND

The pediatric age-adjusted shock index (SIPA) accurately identifies severely injured children following trauma without accounting for neurological status. Understanding how the presence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) affects the generalizability of SIPA as a bedside triage tool is important given high rates of TBI in the pediatric trauma population. We hypothesized that SIPA combined with TBI (SIPAB+) would more accurately identify severely injured children.

METHODS

Patients (1-18 years old) in the American College of Surgeons Pediatric Trauma Quality Improvement Program database (2014-2017) with an elevated SIPA upon arrival to a pediatric trauma center were included. Pediatric age-adjusted shock index combined with TBI was defined as elevated SIPA with Glasgow Coma Scale score of ≤8. Pediatric age-adjusted shock index without TBI (SIPAB-) was defined as elevated SIPA with Glasgow Coma Scale score of >9. Patients were stratified into SIPAB+ and SIPAB-. A subanalysis of patients with isolated brain injury and those with brain injury and multisystem injuries was also performed. Data were compared through univariate models and three separate logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Overall, 25,068 had an elevated SIPA, with 12.3% classified as SIPAB+ and the remainder SIPAB-. Patients classified as SIPAB+ received more blood transfusions within 4 hours of injury and had higher mortality rates. On logistic regression, SIPAB+ patients had significantly higher odds of early blood transfusion and a combination of both. Mortality and early blood transfusion were also higher in SIPAB+ patients on subanalysis for patients with isolated TBI and those with multisystem injuries.

CONCLUSION

The use of SIPAB+ as a bedside triage tool accurately identifies traumatically injured children at high risk for early blood transfusion and/or death while incorporating the presence of neurological injury. This is true for patients with isolated TBI and those with multisystem injury, indicating its utility in predicting outcomes for TBI patients with elevated SIPA regardless of presence of concomitant injuries. Incorporation of this as a triage tool should be considered to better predict resources in this population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic, level III.

Metrics of shock in pediatric trauma patients: A systematic search and review

INTRODUCTION

Shock-index (SI) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) are metrics for identifying children and adults with hemodynamic instability following injury. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the quality of these metrics as predictors of outcomes following pediatric injury.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a literature search in Pubmed, SCOPUS, and CINAHL to identify studies describing the association between shock metrics on the morbidity and mortality of injured children and adolescents. We used the data presented in the studies to calculate the sensitivity and specificity for each metric. This study was registered with Prospero, protocol CRD42020162971.

RESULTS

Fifteen articles met the inclusion criteria. seven studies evaluated SI or SIPA score, an age-corrected version of SI, as predictors of outcomes following pediatric trauma, with one study comparing SIPA score and SBP and one study comparing SI and SBP. The remaining eight studies evaluated SBP as the primary indicator of shock. The median sensitivity for predicting mortality and need for blood transfusion was highest for SI, followed by SIPA, and then SBP. The median specificity for predicting these outcomes was highest for SBP, followed by SIPA, and then SI.

CONCLUSIONS

Common conclusions were that high SIPA scores were more specific than SI and more sensitive than SBP. SIPA score had better discrimination for severely injured children compared to SI and SBP. An elevated SIPA was associated with a greater need for blood transfusion and higher in-hospital mortality. SIPA is specific enough to exclude most patients who do not require a blood transfusion.

Predictive value of the shock index (SI) compared to the age-adjusted pediatric shock index (SIPA) for identifying children that needed the highest-level trauma activation based on the presence of consensus criteria

OBJECTIVES

In previous studies, SIPA was shown to be better than the SI in identifying children who have an elevated ISS, required transfusion, or were at a high risk of death. No comparison has been made to the consensus-based criteria that identify patients requiring the highest-level trauma activation. The objective of this study was to determine if the SIPA was more accurate than the SI in identifying children with increased need for trauma team activation as defined by the criterion standard definition, and secondly the sensitivity and specificity of the SI and SIPA.

METHODS

Retrospective review of prospectively collected trauma based data. Children aged 1-17 years admitted to a pediatric level 1 trauma center between 1/1/16 and 12/31/17 and met the prehospital criteria for level 1 or 2 trauma activation were included. We evaluated the ability of SI > 0.9 at ED presentation and elevated SIPA to predict need for trauma activation based on consensus criteria. SIPA cutoffs were > 1.22 (age 4-6), >1.0 (age 7-12), and > 0.9 (age 13-17).

RESULTS

Among 3378 children, 1486 (44%) had an elevated SI and 590 (18%) had an elevated SIPA. There were 160 (5%) patients who met at least one consensus criterion. Broadly, sensitivity and specificity analyses reveal poor sensitivity for both SI and SIPA (59.4% versus 43.1% respectively) measures but a moderate specificity for SIPA (83.8%). Both SI and SIPA have a poor PPV (6.4% versus 11.7%) but high NPV (96.6% versus 96.7%). Overall, SIPA has higher accuracy than SI in predicting consensus criteria 82% versus 57%).

CONCLUSION

SIPA is more accurate than the SI in identifying children who meet a consensus criterion defining the need for highest-level trauma activation. The low PPV and sensitivity suggest that SIPA alone, while somewhat less likely to lead to overtriage than SI is not ideal for ruling in the need for level one resources as defined by the consensus criteria. Prognosis study, retrospective.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Comparison of Prehospital Calculated Age-Adjusted Pediatric Shock Index (SIPA) to Those Calculated in the ED for Identifying Trauma Patients That Needed the Highest-Level Activation Based on Consensus Criteria

Background: The shock index (SI) is defined as the ratio of the heart rate to systolic blood pressure and a pediatric age-adjusted SI (SIPA) is more specific than the standard adult cutoff of 0.9 in identifying the sickest children presenting to a trauma center.Goal: To utilize prehospital vital signs to calculate the SIPA score and compare them to the SIPA calculated in the trauma bay to determine if they have the same validity in identifying critically ill children as determined by the consensus based standard criteria for trauma activation.Methods: Retrospective study using a cohort of patients transferred by EMS to a free standing, urban, level one, pediatric trauma center aged 1 to 16 years inclusive, and seen between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2017. Vital signs collected during the patch call from the EMS agency were used to calculate the EMS SIPA. The first set of vital signs collected in the trauma bay was used to calculate the ED SIPA. Patients were dichotomized to an elevated or non-elevated ED SIPA and an elevated or non-elevated EMS SIPA.Results: Our cohort consisted of 2651 patients. 546 (20.6%) patients had an elevated EMS SIPA and 438 (16.5%) had an elevated ED SIPA. When compared to their non-elevated counterparts, EMS and ED SIPA were both able to identify patients who met consensus criteria in all areas except the need for IR intervention, and unstable spinal fracture/spinal cord injury. For these criteria, the ED SIPA was better than the EMS SIPA. Sensitivity and specificity analysis reveal poor sensitivity for both measures but a high specificity for ED and EMS SIPA. Both SI and SIPA have a poor PPV but high NPV.Conclusions: This study utilized prehospital vital signs to calculate the SIPA score and compare them to the SIPA calculated in the trauma bay. Both scores had similar test metrics when based on the consensus based standard trauma criteria and could be utilized in the triage traumatic injuries.

Bio-Shock Index: Proposal and Rationale for a New Predictive Tool for In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury

BACKGROUND

We proposed a novel prognostic tool for the prediction of in-hospital mortality based on a combination of hemodynamic parameters and biomarkers in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). We hypothesized that a combination of shock index (SI) with high sensitive troponin T (HsTnT), the Bio-Shock Index (Bio-SI), has better prognostic power than its individual components.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted (2011-2018) for patients with TBI. Patients were categorized into 2 groups (low and high Bio-SI) based on the receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

A total of 2619 patients were admitted with TBI, and 1471 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and 73% had high Bio-SI (≥10). High Bio-SI values were associated with more intraventricular hemorrhage (P = 0.001), brain edema (P = 0.001), and had lower mean arterial pressure (P = 0.001), admission Glasgow Coma Scale score (P = 0.001), and higher SI (P = 0.001), serum lactate (P = 0.001), HsTnT values (P = 0.001), and Rotterdam score (P = 0.03). Patients with high Bio-SI had a prolonged hospital (P = 0.003) and intensive care unit stay (P = 0.001); longer ventilatory days (P = 0.001) and had higher rates of pneumonia (P = 0.001), sepsis (P = 0.001), and in-hospital mortality (P = 0.001). The Bio-SI showed high sensitivity and negative predictive value (91.4% and 94.4%, respectively) as compared with elevated SI (50.2% and 87.6%, respectively) and positive troponin (79.7% and 93.7%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The Bio-SI is potentially a better tool than its individual components to predict in-hospital mortality among patients with TBI; however, HsTnT alone outperforms SI. Prospective studies and multicenter trials studying troponin levels and SI in all patients with TBI with the inclusion of outcome scores will prove or disprove the predictability of the new index.

Trends in pediatric-adjusted shock index predict morbidity in children with moderate blunt injuries

PURPOSE

Trending the pediatric-adjusted shock index (SIPA) after admission has been described for children suffering severe blunt injuries (i.e., injury severity score (ISS) ≥ 15). We propose that following SIPA in children with moderate blunt injuries, as defined by ISS 10-14, has similar utility.

METHODS

The trauma registry at a single institution was queried over a 7 year period. Patients were included if they were between 4 and 16 years old at the time of admission, sustained a blunt injury with an ISS 10-14, and were admitted less than 12 h after their injury (n = 501). Each patient's SIPA was then calculated at 0, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h (h) after admission and then categorized as elevated or normal at each time frame based on previously reported values. Trends in outcome variables as a function of time from admission for patients with an abnormal SIPA to normalize as well as patients with a normal admission SIPA to abnormal were analyzed.

RESULTS

In patients with a normal SIPA at arrival, elevation within the first 24 h of admission correlated with increased length of stay (LOS). Increased transfusion requirement, incidence of infectious complications, and need for in-patient rehabilitation were also seen in analyzed sub-groups. An elevated SIPA at arrival with increased length of time to normalize SIPA correlated with increased length of stay LOS in the entire cohort and in those without head injury, but not in patients with a head injury. No deaths occurred within the study cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with an ISS 10-14 and a normal SIPA at time of arrival who then have an elevated SIPA in the first 24 h of admission are at increased risk for morbidity including longer LOS and infectious complications. Similarly, time to normalize an elevated admission SIPA appears to directly correlate with LOS in patients without head injuries. No correlations with markers for morbidity could be identified in patients with a head injury and an elevated SIPA at arrival. This may be due to small sample size, as there were no relations to severity of head injury as measured by head abbreviated injury scale (head AIS) and the outcome variables reported. This is an area of ongoing analysis. This study extends the previously reported utility of following SIPA after admission into milder blunt injuries.

Age-adjusted shock index: From injury to arrival

BACKGROUND

Studies have demonstrated the superiority of the shock index, pediatric age-adjusted (SIPA) in predicting outcomes in pediatric blunt trauma patients. However, all have utilized SIPA calculated on emergency department (ED) arrival. We sought to evaluate the utility of SIPA at the trauma scene and describe changes in SIPA from the trauma scene to the ED.

METHODS

We used 2014-2016 Trauma Quality Improvement Program Data to identify blunt trauma patients 1-15 years old with an injury severity score (ISS) > 15. We calculated SIPA using vitals obtained at the trauma scene and on ED arrival. Outcome measures included ISS, transfusion within 24 h, intensive care unit (ICU), hospital length of stay (LOS), ventilator days, and mortality.

RESULTS

We identified 2917 patients, and 34.2% had a persistently elevated SI from the injury scene to ED arrival, whereas 17.9% had a persistently elevated SIPA. An elevated SIPA at the trauma scene was more predictive of greater ISS, LOS, and ventilator requirements. Furthermore, a SIPA that remained abnormal was associated with greater ISS, LOS, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Prehospital SIPA values predict worse outcomes in pediatric trauma patients, and their change over time may have greater predictive utility than a single value alone.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II TYPE OF STUDY: Prognosis Study.

Cushing's sign and severe traumatic brain injury in children after blunt trauma: a nationwide retrospective cohort study in Japan

OBJECTIVE

We tested whether Cushing's sign could predict severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) requiring immediate neurosurgical intervention (BI-NSI) in children after blunt trauma.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using Japan Trauma Data Bank.

SETTING

Emergency and critical care centres in secondary and tertiary hospitals in Japan.

PARTICIPANTS

Children between the ages of 2 and 15 years with Glasgow Coma Scale motor scores of 5 or less at presentation after blunt trauma from 2004 to 2015 were included. A total of 1480 paediatric patients were analysed.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients requiring neurosurgical intervention within 24 hours of hospital arrival and patients who died due to isolated severe TBI were defined as BI-NSI. The combination of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heart rate (HR) on arrival, which were respectively divided into tertiles, and its correlation with BI-NSI were investigated using a multiple logistic regression model.

RESULTS

In the study cohort, 297 (20.1%) exhibited BI-NSI. After adjusting for sex, age category and with or without haemorrhage shock, groups with higher SBP and lower HR (SBP ≥135 mm Hg; HR ≤92 bpm) were significantly associated with BI-NSI (OR 2.84, 95% CI 1.68 to 4.80, P<0.001) compared with the patients with normal vital signs. In age-specific analysis, hypertension and bradycardia were significantly associated with BI-NSI in a group of 7-10 and 11-15 years of age; however, no significant association was observed in a group of 2-6 years of age.

CONCLUSIONS

Cushing's sign after blunt trauma was significantly associated with BI-NSI in school-age children and young adolescents.

Trends in pediatric adjusted shock index predict morbidity and mortality in children with severe blunt injuries

PURPOSE

The utility of measuring the pediatric adjusted shock index (SIPA) at admission for predicting severity of blunt injury in pediatric patients has been previously reported. However, the utility of following SIPA after admission is not well described.

METHODS

The trauma registry from a level-one pediatric trauma center was queried from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2015. Patients were included if they were between 4 and 16years old at the time of admission, sustained a blunt injury with an Injury Severity Score≥15, and were admitted less than 12h after their injury (n=286). Each patient's SIPA was then calculated at 0, 12, 24, 36, and 48h after admission and then categorized as elevated or normal at each time frame based upon previously reported values. Trends in outcome variables as a function of time from admission for patients with an abnormal SIPA to normalize as well as patients with a normal admission SIPA to abnormal were analyzed.

RESULTS

In patients with a normal SIPA at arrival, 18.4% of patients who developed an elevated SIPA at 12h after admission died, whereas 2.4% of patients who maintained a normal SIPA throughout the first 48h of admission died (p<0.01). Among patients with an elevated SIPA at arrival, increased length of time to normalize SIPA correlated with increased length of stay (LOS) and intensive care unit (ICU) LOS. Similarly, elevation of SIPA after arrival in patients with a normal initial SIPA correlated to increased LOS and ICU LOS.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a normal SIPA at time of arrival who then have an elevated SIPA in the first 24h of admission are at increased risk for morbidity and mortality compared to those whose SIPA remains normal throughout the first 48h of admission. Similarly, time to normalize an elevated admission SIPA appears to directly correlate with LOS, ICU LOS, and other markers of morbidity across a mixed blunt trauma population. Whether trending SIPA early in the hospital course serves only as a marker for injury severity or if it has utility as a resuscitation metric has not yet been determined.

TYPE OF STUDY

Prognostic.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Prospective validation of the shock index pediatric-adjusted (SIPA) in blunt liver and spleen trauma: An ATOMAC+ study

BACKGROUND

Age-adjusted pediatric shock index (SIPA) does not require knowledge of age-adjusted blood pressure norms, yet correlates with mortality, serious injury, and need for transfusion in trauma. No prospective studies support its validity.

METHODS

A multicenter prospective observational study of patients 4-16years presenting April 2013-January 2016 with blunt liver and/or spleen injury (BLSI). SIPA (maximum heart rate/minimum systolic blood pressure) thresholds of >1.22, >1.0, and >0.9 in the emergency department were used for 4-6, 7-12 and 13-16year-olds, respectively. Patients with ISS ≤15 were excluded to conform to the original paper. Discrimination outcomes were compared between SIPA and shock index (SI).

RESULTS

Of 1008 patients, 386 met inclusion. SI was elevated in 321, and SIPA elevated in 282. The percentage of patients with elevated index (SI or SIPA) and blood transfusion within 24 hours (30% vs 34%), BLSI grade ≥3 requiring transfusion (28% vs 32%), operative intervention (14% vs 16%) and ICU admission (64% vs 67%) was higher in the SIPA group.

CONCLUSION

SIPA was validated in this multi-institutional prospective study and identified a higher percentage of children requiring additional resources than SI in BLSI patients. SIPA may be useful for determining necessary resources for injured patients with BLSI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II prognosis.

Management of the Pediatric Neurocritical Care Patient

Pediatric neurocritical care is a growing subspecialty of pediatric intensive care that focuses on the management of acute neurological diseases in children. A brief history of the field of pediatric neurocritical care is provided. Neuromonitoring strategies for children are reviewed. Management of major categories of acute childhood central neurologic diseases are reviewed, including treatment of diseases associated with intracranial hypertension, seizures and status epilepticus, stroke, central nervous system infection and inflammation, and hypoxic-ischemic injury.