Comprehensive assessment of prognosis after laparoscopic portoenterostomy for biliary atresia

Laparoscopic versus open portoenterostomy for treatment of biliary atresia: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Our goal was to compare laparoscopic portoenterostomy versus open portoenterostomy for the treatment of biliary atresia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the databases EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane, we carried out a thorough literature search up to 2022. Studies comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for the treatment of biliary atresia were included.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies comparing laparoscopic portoenterostomy (LPE) (n = 689) and open portoenterostomy (OPE) (n = 818) were considered appropriate for meta-analysis. Age at surgery time was lower in the LPE group than OPE group (I² = 84%), (WMD - 4.70, 95% CI - 9.14 to - 0.26; P = 0.04). Significantly decreased blood loss (I² = 94%), (WMD - 17.85, 95% CI - 23.67 to - 12.02; P < 0.00001) and time to feed were found in the laparoscopic group (I² = 97%), (WMD - 2.88, 95% CI - 4.71 to - 1.04; P = 0.002). Significantly decreased operative time was found in the open group (I² = 85%), (WMD 32.52, 95% CI 15.65-49.39; P = 0.0002). Weight, transfusion rate, overall complication rate, cholangitis, time to drain removal, length of stay, jaundice clearance, and two-year transplant-free survival were not significantly different across the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic portoenterostomy provides advantages regarding operative bleeding and the time to begin feeding. No differences in remain characteristics. Based on the data presented to us by this meta-analysis, LPE is not superior to OPE in terms of overall results.

Biochemical Evaluation of Laparoscopic Portoenterostomy for Treating Biliary Atresia and Redo for Failed Portoenterostomy

Background: Postoperative outcomes of portoenterostomy (PE) and redo-PE were evaluated using selected biochemical markers (SBM) and biochemical status categories (BSC). Methods: Subjects were 70 consecutive PE performed for biliary atresia. SBM were aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT), cholinesterase (ChE), and platelet count (PLT) assessed at 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months, and thence, annually for a maximum of 10 years. BSC were as follows: all SBM normal (N-SBM), normal AST/ALT (N-SLT), normal ChE (N-ChE), normal PC (N-PLT), all abnormal (A-SBM), abnormal AST/ALT (A-SLT), abnormal ChE (A-ChE), and abnormal PC (A-PLT). Subjects achieving jaundice clearance (JC) and surviving with native livers (SNL) also had gamma glutamyl transpeptidase assessed. Redo-PE indicated for failed PE was assessed postoperatively using the same SBM/BSC protocol. Results: PE were laparoscopic (LPE; n = 40) or open (OPE; n = 30). Mean age/weight at PE and duration of follow-up were similar. For JC, LPE = 34/40 (85.0%) and OPE = 22/30 (73.3%); P = .23. For SNL, LPE = 29/40 (72.5%) and OPE = 16/30 (53.3%); P = .10. LPE and OPE were similar for SBM/BSC, except for a single significant increase in ALT in OPE at 6 months. Redo-PE was performed 17-180 days (mean 67.1 days) after primary PE. AST was significantly increased at the last preredo assessment 3 months after primary PE; P < .05. After redo, AST decreased and SBM/BSC results were equivalent to nonredo subjects. Conclusion: Postoperative biochemical data for all PE cases were comparable; redo-PE would appear to be viable for restoring SBM, and AST could be valuable as a single marker of deterioration in redo cases.

Laparoscopic versus Open Pediatric Surgery: Three Decades of Comparative Studies

INTRODUCTION

 Despite its wide acceptance, the superiority of laparoscopic versus open pediatric surgery has remained controversial. There is still a call for well-founded evidence. We reviewed the literature on studies published in the last three decades and dealing with advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopy compared to open surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 Studies comparing laparoscopic versus open abdominal procedures in children were searched in PubMed/MEDLINE. Reports on upper and lower gastrointestinal as hepatobiliary surgery and on surgery of pancreas and spleen were included. Advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery were analyzed for different types of procedures. Complications were categorized using the Clavien-Dindo classification.

RESULTS

 A total of 239 studies dealing with 19 types of procedures and outcomes in 929,157 patients were analyzed. We identified 26 randomized controlled trials (10.8%) and 213 comparative studies (89.2%). The most frequently reported advantage of laparoscopy was shorter hospital stay in 60.4% of studies. Longer operative time was the most frequently reported disadvantage of laparoscopy in 52.7% of studies. Clavien-Dindo grade I to III complications (mild-moderate) were less frequently identified in laparoscopic compared to open procedures (80.3% of studies). Grade-IV complications (severe) were less frequently reported after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis and more frequently after laparoscopic Kasai's portoenterostomy. We identified a decreased frequency of reporting on advantages after laparoscopy and increased reporting on disadvantages for all surgery types over the decades.

CONCLUSION

 Laparoscopic compared with open pediatric surgery seems to be beneficial in most types of procedures. The number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remains limited. However, the number of reports on disadvantages increased during the past decades.

Comparative study of open and laparoscopic Kasai portoenterostomy in children undergoing living donor liver transplantation for biliary atresia

PURPOSE

The effectiveness of laparoscopic Kasai portoenterostomy (Laparoscopic-KPE) for biliary atresia (BA) has been reported but remains controversial. We reviewed our own cases and cases described in previous studies of liver transplantation (LT) for BA after Laparoscopic-KPE to investigate the efficacy of Laparoscopic-KPE.

METHODS

Subjects were children of  ≤ 2 years old with LT for BA after KPE who underwent Laparoscopic-KPE (n = 10) or Open-KPE (n = 115) between 2009 and 2020. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce the effect of treatment selection bias. The clinical data regarding the preoperative characteristics and surgical results were compared.

RESULTS

The rates of hypoplastic portal vein and retrograde portal vein flow were lower in the Laparoscopic-KPE group than in the Open-KPE group (0 vs. 40.0%, p = 0.02 and 0 vs. 35.0%, p = 0.04). There was no marked difference in the operation time or duration of hepatectomy. For portal vein reconstruction, a vein graft was not required in the Laparoscopic-KPE group (0 vs. 35.0%, p = 0.03). No patients in the Laparoscopic-KPE group developed portal vein complications or required re-laparotomy for bowel perforation or re-bleeding, in contrast to the Open-KPE group (0 vs. 15.0% and 0 vs. 10.0%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic-KPE may reduce postoperative complications that necessitate re-laparotomy in LT.

Laparoscopic vs open portoenterostomy in biliary atresia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Hepatoportoenterostomy remains the cornerstone of treatment for biliary atresia. Current employed techniques include laparoscopy and open surgery. This study aims to determine if either method provides an advantage. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted. Nineteen studies were included. Mean operative time 34.98 (95% CI 20.10, 49.85; p ≤ 0.00001) was longer in laparoscopic while bleeding volumes - 16.63 (95% CI - 23.39, - 9.86; p ≤ 0.00001) as well as the time to normal diet - 2.42 (95% CI - 4.51, - 0.32; p = 0.02) were lower in the laparoscopic group. No differences were observed in mean length of stay - 0.83. Similar complication, transfusions, postoperative cholangitis 0.97, and transplant free survival rates 1.00 (0.63, 1.60; p = 0.99) were seen between groups. Laparoscopic portoenterostomy provides advantages on operative time and bleeding as well as to normal diet when compared to open procedures. Both procedures showed no differences in length of stay, complications, cholangitis, and importantly, native liver survival. Level of evidence: III.

Comparison of laparoscopic portoenterostomy and open portoenterostomy for the treatment of biliary atresia

BACKGROUND

Although open portoenterostomy (OPE) is considered the standard treatment for biliary atresia (BA), laparoscopic portoenterostomy (LPE) is conducted and reported by many investigators. Data on the safety and efficacy of LPE remain controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the safety and efficacy of LPE and OPE for the treatment of BA.

METHODS

Three electronic databases were searched: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The eligible studies were limited to those published in English. The following keywords were used: "biliary atresia," "laparoscopic portoenterostomy," "Kasai portoenterostomy," "open portoenterostomy," "surgery," and "treatment."

RESULTS

Nine studies, including 434 patients, were analyzed. The operative time of LPE was significantly longer than that of OPE (MD = 40.55 min, 95% CI 4.83-76.27 min, P = 0.03). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the time of hospital stay, the volume of intraoperative blood loss, or the rates of cholangitis, early clearance of jaundice or two-year survival with the native liver. The subgroup analyses revealed that the rate of early clearance of jaundice in the LPE group was significantly higher than that in the OPE group in studies published after 2016 (95% CI 1.04-1.75; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The present meta-analysis provides evidence that LPE is a feasible option for patients with BA. LPE should be revaluated by further studies and longer follow-up.

[Advantages of Kasai procedure through minimally invasive approach in children with biliary atresia (in Russian only)]

AIM

To compare early and long-term results of different surgical interventions in children with biliary atresia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis included medical records of children with biliary atresia who were treated at the Filatov Munitsipal Children's Hospital and National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology from 2000 to 2018. There were 91 patients. All patients were divided into three groups. Group 1 - conventional Kasai procedure (n=24), group 2 - laparoscopic Kasai surgery (n=45), group 3 - Kasai procedure through minimally invasive approach (n=22). Groups were comparable.

RESULTS

Duration of Kasai procedure through minimally invasive approach was 69±12,97 min that was significantly less than in groups 1 and 2 (p_1,3=0,006085; p_2,3=0,000024). ICU-stay was minimal in group 3 (1.27±0.55 days, p_1,3<0,05; p_2,3<0,05). Abdominal drainage time was maximal in group 2 (11.28±6.37 days) and minimal in group 3 (5.86±2.39 days, p_2,3=0.0002). Early and 2-year postoperative surgical efficiency was similar in all groups. There were no surgical complications in group 3. In group 2 one child had gastrointestinal bleeding followed by successful medication. There were 3 surgical complications in group 3: adhesive intestinal obstruction, small and large intestine perforation and 2 cases of gastrointestinal bleeding. There was one lethal outcome in the first group. Overall annual survival in children with native liver was 81.8%, 2-year - 51.7%.

CONCLUSION

Kasai procedure through minimally invasive approach is justified and rational method with certain benefits of open and laparoscopic interventions and can be considered as a method of choice in treatment of children with biliary atresia.

Liver transplantation for deterioration in native liver function after portoenterostomy for biliary atresia in Japan: Short- versus long-term survivors

PURPOSE

We reviewed our post-Kasai portoenterostomy biliary atresia (BA) patients who required liver transplantation (LTx) for deterioration in native liver (NL) function to investigate mortality in relation to age at LTx.

METHODS

BA patients indicated for LTx when less than 18years old (U18; n=17) and when 18 or older (18+; n=13) were compared. All achieved jaundice clearance postoperatively (TBil ≤1.2mg/dL (≈20μmol/L)).

RESULTS

In U18, living-donor (LD) LTxs were performed at a median of 6.1years (range: 0.5-16.7; n=14) and cadaveric (CD) LTxs at a median of 1.3years (1.1-1.5; n=3). In 18+, LDLTxs were performed at a median of 28years (18-37; n=8), and 1 case died from graft versus host disease. CDLTxs were indicated in 5, but 4 died at a median of 30years (26-32), a mean of 1.4years (0.7-1.8) after NL deterioration commenced. One case is awaiting CDLTx. At the time of review, all U18 and 7 LDLTx cases in 18+ were clinically stable. Mortality rates were 0% in U18 and 38% in 18+ (P=.006).

CONCLUSION

Our results highlight the extremely grave prognosis for long-term BA patients requiring LTx when 18 or older because of poor donor availability in Japan.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Minimally Invasive Hepatobiliary Surgery

Comparative studies and large-scale case series that confirm the advantages of laparoscopy in children with hepatobiliary diseases are scarce, and the use of laparoscopy remains a matter of debate. This article reviews the current literature on the role of laparoscopic and robotic surgery in pediatric patients with choledochal cyst, biliary atresia, gallbladder diseases, and hepatobiliary malignancies. Studies were identified through a search of the MEDLINE database. Laparoscopy may be beneficial for resection of choledochal cyst and cholecystectomy. However, more data are required before recommendations on the use of minimally invasive techniques for other hepatobiliary conditions can be published.

Laparoscopic portoenterostomy for biliary atresia: single-center experience and review of literatures

AIM

The aim of this report was to present the laparoscopic portoenterostomy (LapPE) procedure developed by the Department of Pediatric General and Urogenital Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine (JLapPE). We also attempted to obtain an understanding of the current status of laparoscopic portoenterostomy in the world as reported in the English literature to compare with our experience.

METHODS

There were 22 BA patients who had JLapPE between 2009 and 2016. BA classification was type III (n = 19) and type II (n = 3). There was 1 case of syndromic BA and 1 case was positive for cytomegalovirus. A systematic search in PubMed of all BA patients treated by LapPE in the English literature was conducted. Jaundice clearance (JC) and survival with the native liver (SNL) were compared.

RESULTS

Mean age at JLapPE was 67.1 days (range 29-119). Mean postoperative follow-up was 4.6 years (1.3-8.3). Mean operative time was 514 min (240-662) and mean blood loss was 13.4 g (3-21). Postoperative JC (Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 mg/dL) was 77.3% (17/22) at 3 months and 90.9% (20/22) at 6 months. SNL at 6 months of age was 90.9% (20/22); at 1 year of age was 77.3% (17/22), at 2 years of age was 73.7% (14/19); and at 3 years of age was 81.3% (13/16).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite recent reports that outcome of LapPE for BA may be unfavorable compared with the conventional open portoenterostomy, our results would suggest that JLapPE can be performed successfully, because it is performed exactingly according to a standard protocol. JLapPE will continue to be our procedure of choice for treating BA.

Advances in paediatric gastroenterology

Recent developments in paediatric gastrointestinal surgery have focused on minimally invasive surgery, the accumulation of high-quality clinical evidence, and scientific research. The benefits of minimally invasive surgery for common disorders like appendicitis and hypertrophic pyloric stenosis are all supported by good clinical evidence. Although minimally invasive surgery has been extended to neonatal surgery, it is difficult to establish its role for neonatal disorders such as oesophageal atresia and biliary atresia through clinical trials because of the rarity of these disorders. Advances in treatments for biliary atresia and necrotising enterocolitis have been achieved through specialisation, multidisciplinary management, and multicentre collaboration in research; similarly robust clinical evidence for other rare gastrointestinal disorders is needed. As more neonates with gastrointestinal diseases survive into adulthood, their long-term sequelae will also need evidence-based multidisciplinary care. Identifying cures for long-term problems of a complex developmental anomaly such as Hirschsprung's disease will rely on unravelling its pathogenesis through genetics and the development of stem-cell therapy.

2016 CAPS ethics session/Ein debate: 1. Regionalization of pediatric surgical care 2. Ethical introduction of surgical innovation 3. Addressing stress in a surgical practice: resiliency, well-being, and burnout

The following is the conference proceeding of the Second Ein Debate from the 48th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Association of Paediatric Surgeons held in Vancouver, BC, from September 22 to 24, 2016. The three main topics for debate, as prepared by the members of the CAPS Ethics Committee, are: 1. Regionalization of care: pros and cons, 2. Innovation in clinical care: ethical considerations, and 3. Surgeon well-being: caring for the caregiver. The authors of this paper, as participants in the debate, were assigned their positions at random. Therefore, the opinions they express within this summary might not reflect their own viewpoints. In the first discussion, arguments for and against the regionalization of pediatric surgical care are discussed, primarily in the context of a case of BA. In the pro argument, the evidence and lessons learned from different European countries are explored as well as different models to provide the best BA care outside of large teaching centers. In the counterargument, the author explains how regionalization of care could be detrimental for the patient, the family, the regional center, and for the health care system in general. In the debate on surgical innovation the authors define surgical innovation. They review the pertinent ethical principles, explore a model for its implementation, and the role of the institution at which the innovation is proposed. In the third section, surgeon well-being is examined, and recent literature on surgeon resiliency and burnout both at the attending and resident level is reviewed.

Bowel perforation after liver transplantation for biliary atresia: a retrospective study of care in the transition from children to adulthood

PURPOSE

We evaluated the outcomes of liver transplantation (LT) in pediatric and adult patients with biliary atresia (BA). We focused on bowel perforation after LT (BPLT) as the most common surgical complication and analyzed its risk factors.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of 70 BA patients who underwent LT. The patients were divided into three groups according to the timing of LT: within the first year of age (Group A), between 1 and 12 years of age (Group B), and after 12 years of age (Group C). The outcomes of LT and the clinical presentations of BPLT were compared. The surgical variables of patients with and without BPLT were analyzed to assess the risk factors.

RESULTS

The timing of LT did not affect patient survival. The incidence of BPLT was significantly higher in Group C. In Group C, BPLT progressed to severe peritonitis. No cases of BPLT-associated mortality were observed. A multivariate analysis revealed that a prolonged operative time for LT was an independent risk factor (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

The clinical course after transplantation was complicated after adolescence. BPLT should be strongly suspected and relaparotomy should be performed in a timely manner for patients undergoing LT after adolescence.

Outcomes of laparoscopic Kasai portoenterostomy for biliary atresia: A systematic review

AIMS

Biliary atresia (BA) is a rare disease for which mainstay of treatment consists of open Kasai portoenterostomy. The aim of this review was to assess the outcomes of laparoscopic Kasai portoenterostomy, which offers potential benefits of minimally invasive surgery. Outcomes identified were postoperative cholangitis rates, incidence of adhesions at subsequent liver transplantation, native liver survival rates and actuarial survival rates.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed and Cochrane databases using the keywords hepatic portoenterostomy, biliary atresia and laparoscopy. Robotic cases were excluded.

RESULTS

Ten studies (n=149 patients) were included in this review. The mean age at the time of operation was 66 (range 14-119) days. The mean operative time was 261 (range 120-662) minutes. The rate of postoperative cholangitis was 34% (range 11%-50%). The mean native liver survival rate was 57% (range 33%-78%) at 6months and 47% (range 8%-76%) at 2years. Mean actuarial survival rate was 87% (range 54%-100%) at 2years. Subsequent adhesions were reported in 4 patients. Two patients had dense adhesions and 2 had no adhesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Although laparoscopic Kasai portoenterostomy is a feasible operation, outcomes in terms of native liver survival rates and actuarial survival rates are unfavourable compared to conventional surgery. There is no evidence that laparoscopic Kasai is associated with fewer adhesions at subsequent liver transplantation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

TYPE OF STUDY

Treatment study.