Disorders of sex development (DSD): not only babies with ambiguous genitalia. A practical guide for surgeons

Contexts of care for people with differences of sex development: Diversity is still missing in the laboratory routine

The 2006 Chicago consensus statement of management of disorders/difference of sex development (DSD) has achieved advantages in clinical care and diagnosis for patients and families affect by DSD. This article provides a brief overview of contexts of care for physicians, and points out specific challenges in clinical practice that have arisen from the transformations of the sex/gender system in recent years. We focus on the impact of diagnosis and laboratory measurements. Both laboratory measurements and hormonal therapies still depend on the binary system. One problem is the lack of reference intervals for the different forms of DSD, which means that diversity is often neglected. In the following, we will give a brief insight into this complex topic.

"Waking up" the sleeping metaphor of normality in connection to intersex or DSD: a scoping review of medical literature

The aim of the study is to encourage a critical debate on the use of normality in the medical literature on DSD or intersex. For this purpose, a scoping review was conducted to identify and map the various ways in which "normal" is used in the medical literature on DSD between 2016 and 2020. We identified 75 studies, many of which were case studies highlighting rare cases of DSD, others, mainly retrospective observational studies, focused on improving diagnosis or treatment. The most common use of the adjective normal was in association with phenotypic sex. Overall, appearance was the most commonly cited criteria to evaluate the normality of sex organs. More than 1/3 of the studies included also medical photographs of sex organs. This persistent use of normality in reference to phenotypic sex is worrisome given the long-term medicalization of intersex bodies in the name of a "normal" appearance or leading a "normal" life. Healthcare professionals should be more careful about the ethical implications of using photographs in publications given that many intersex persons describe their experience with medical photography as dehumanizing.

The role of ultrasound to evaluate the disorders of sex development: a pictorial essay

Ultrasonography is usually the first modality used to evaluate patients with disorders of sex development (DSD). To determine the sex in patients with DSD, the following four categories are carefully evaluated: chromosomal, gonadal, anatomical internal genitalia, and external genitalia. However, in the clinical setting, the only information that sonographers have prior to ultrasound examination is the appearance of the external genitalia. The following DSD presentations are commonly observed: (1) male external genitalia present at birth, without testis in the scrotum or with a small penis; (2) female external genitalia present at birth, with an inguinal hernia or clitoromegaly; (3) neonates with ambiguous genitalia at birth; and (4) female or male external genitalia without sexual maturity. In this retrospective study of several clinical cases, we demonstrated an ultrasound-based sex determination approach for these clinical presentations. We found that sonographers evaluated the external genitalia in relation to the distal urethra within the corpus spongiosum and corpus cavernosum and the presence or absence of follicles within the detected gonads to determine the sex of the patient.

Mental health status of children with disorders of sexual development and their correlates

Disorders of sexual development (DSD) refer to the congenital abnormalities of chromosomes, gonads, or gender anatomy. Children with DSD usually experience more stress. The present study aims to evaluate the mental health status of children with DSD, and to explore the potential relevant factors. We included 30 children with DSD and 30 age- and gender-matched children without DSD as the control group. All the children and their parents completed the scales of the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA). Children over 8 years old (n = 22) completed the Screen Scale for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED), the Depression Self-rating Scale for Children (DSRSC), and the Egna Minnen av Barndoms Uppfostran-own memories of parental rearing practices in childhood. DSD children had significantly higher somatic anxiety, mental anxiety, and total anxiety scores than the control group (p < 0.001). The scores of the SCARED, anxiety, and depression subscales of DSD children were higher than those of control children (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively). The correlation analysis showed that the score of generalized anxiety was positively related to age and entertainment. The regression analysis showed that age was a major factor that affected generalized anxiety in DSD children, and neuroticism was a major factor of anxiety disorder and separation anxiety in DSD children. Children with DSD have obvious anxiety problems, which are associated with family environmental factors (entertainment, success, and conflicts) and age. It is important to focus emphasis on emotional stability in children with DSD for detecting anxiety-related emotional disorders early.

Clinical profile and management challenges of disorders of sex development in Africa: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To review the published literature regarding disorders of sex development (DSD) in Africa which will highlight clinical characteristics, and challenges of evaluation and treatment of DSD.

CONTENT

We performed systematic review of articles published on DSD in Africa between January 2001 and December 2020.

SUMMARY

Eighteen studies involving 1980 patients from nine countries were analyzed. Overall mean age at presentation was 9.3 years (range 1 day-33 years) with 52.5 and 45.1% reared as females and males, respectively, prior to presentation. Following evaluation however, 64% were assigned female sex, 32.1% were assigned male sex, and 21.8% of the cases required sex reassignment. Only 7 (38.9%) of the publications reported medical treatment of DSD, 4 (22.2%) reported on psychosocial management and 5 (27.8%) documented multidisciplinary team management. Barring regional variations, the documented challenges of management include delayed presentation, loss to follow up, financial challenges, and lack of facilities for care of DSD. Comparison of the cases managed in the last decade (2011-2020) with those managed in the earlier decade (2001-2010) showed a trend towards earlier presentation and reduced rate of sex reassignment in the last decade. However, the challenges persisted.

OUTLOOK

Barring regional differences, a high proportion of DSD in Africa may have delayed presentation with inappropriate sex of rearing, inadequate evaluation and need for sex reassignment. Specific efforts to improve time to diagnosis, patient evaluation, improvement of healthcare funding, and collaboration with more developed countries may improve the care of patients with DSD in Africa.

Towards improved genetic diagnosis of human differences of sex development

Despite being collectively among the most frequent congenital developmental conditions worldwide, differences of sex development (DSD) lack recognition and research funding. As a result, what constitutes optimal management remains uncertain. Identification of the individual conditions under the DSD umbrella is challenging and molecular genetic diagnosis is frequently not achieved, which has psychosocial and health-related repercussions for patients and their families. New genomic approaches have the potential to resolve this impasse through better detection of protein-coding variants and ascertainment of under-recognized aetiology, such as mosaic, structural, non-coding or epigenetic variants. Ultimately, it is hoped that better outcomes data, improved understanding of the molecular causes and greater public awareness will bring an end to the stigma often associated with DSD.

Applying Single-Cell Analysis to Gonadogenesis and DSDs (Disorders/Differences of Sex Development)

The gonads are unique among the body's organs in having a developmental choice: testis or ovary formation. Gonadal sex differentiation involves common progenitor cells that form either Sertoli and Leydig cells in the testis or granulosa and thecal cells in the ovary. Single-cell analysis is now shedding new light on how these cell lineages are specified and how they interact with the germline. Such studies are also providing new information on gonadal maturation, ageing and the somatic-germ cell niche. Furthermore, they have the potential to improve our understanding and diagnosis of Disorders/Differences of Sex Development (DSDs). DSDs occur when chromosomal, gonadal or anatomical sex are atypical. Despite major advances in recent years, most cases of DSD still cannot be explained at the molecular level. This presents a major pediatric concern. The emergence of single-cell genomics and transcriptomics now presents a novel avenue for DSD analysis, for both diagnosis and for understanding the molecular genetic etiology. Such -omics datasets have the potential to enhance our understanding of the cellular origins and pathogenesis of DSDs, as well as infertility and gonadal diseases such as cancer.

Management of 46,XY Differences/Disorders of Sex Development (DSD) Throughout Life

Differences/disorders of sex development (DSD) are a heterogeneous group of congenital conditions that result in discordance between an individual's sex chromosomes, gonads, and/or anatomic sex. Advances in the clinical care of patients and families affected by 46,XY DSD have been achieved since publication of the original Consensus meeting in 2006. The aims of this paper are to review what is known about morbidity and mortality, diagnostic tools and timing, sex of rearing, endocrine and surgical treatment, fertility and sexual function, and quality of life in people with 46,XY DSD. The role for interdisciplinary health care teams, importance of establishing a molecular diagnosis, and need for research collaborations using patient registries to better understand long-term outcomes of specific medical and surgical interventions are acknowledged and accepted. Topics that require further study include prevalence and incidence, understanding morbidity and mortality as these relate to specific etiologies underlying 46,XY DSD, appropriate and optimal options for genitoplasty, long-term quality of life, sexual function, involvement with intimate partners, and optimizing fertility potential.

Incidence and diagnoses of disorders of sex development in proximal hypospadias

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based guidelines on evaluation of boys with proximal hypospadias for the possibility of a disorder of sex development (DSD) have yet to be developed. We aimed to investigate the incidence and diagnoses of DSD in patients with proximal hypospadias.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of consecutive boys who underwent proximal hypospadias repairs from 2006 to Sept 2017. Data collected included scrotal anomaly, testes position/palpability, micropenis, DSD investigations, and surgical techniques.

RESULTS

165 patients were eligible for the study. 14 (8.5%) were diagnosed to have DSD. The diagnoses were 46,XX testicular DSD [n = 1], 46,XY DSD [n = 7; partial gonadal dysgenesis (PGD) = 3; 5α-reductase type 2 deficiency = 3; 17α-hydroxylase deficiency = 1], Sex Chromosome DSD [n = 6; 45,X/46,XY PGD = 4; Klinefelter = 2]. 3/7 (43%) patients with PGD had gonadal germ cell neoplasms. Of the DSD patients, 6/14 (43%), 11/14 (79%) and 11/14 (79%) had undescended/impalpable testes, micropenis and penoscrotal transposition/bifid scrotum, respectively, significantly higher prevalence rates than those without DSD diagnosis (p-values <0.05). 10/14 (71.4%) DSD patients underwent 2-stage repair compared with 57/151 (37.7%) of others without DSD diagnosis (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients presenting with proximal hypospadias and one or more of the coexisting anomalies of micropenis, undescended/impalpable testes, and penoscrotal transposition/bifid scrotum should warrant DSD evaluation. Presence of bilaterally descended testes in scrotum does not preclude the possibility of DSD.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.