Inguinal hernia repair by Bianchi incision in boys: a retrospective study

Comparison of scrotal and inguinal orchiopexy for palpable undescended testis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

Scrotal and inguinal orchiopexy are two commonly used surgical approaches for palpable undescended testis (UDT), each with distinct advantages. However, the optimal approach remains a matter of debate, warranting a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to guide clinical decision-making.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, to select RCTs comparing scrotal and inguinal orchiopexy for palpable UDT. Eight RCTs were selected for meta-analysis. Outcome measures included operative time, hospitalization duration, total complications, wound infection or dehiscence, testicular atrophy or hypotrophy, and testicular re-ascent rate. The evaluation of the study's quality was conducted by utilizing the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool.

RESULTS

Scrotal orchiopexy showed significantly shorter operative time compared to the inguinal approach (WMD: - 15.06 min; 95% CI: - 21.04 to - 9.08). However, there was no significant difference in hospitalization duration (WMD: - 0.72 days; 95% CI: - 1.89-0.45), total complications (OR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.70-1.66), wound infection or dehiscence (OR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.27-1.99), testicular atrophy or hypotrophy (OR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.38-2.78), and testicular re-ascent (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 0.67-3.06) between the two approaches. A small proportion of cases (7.3%) required conversion from scrotal to inguinal orchiopexy due to specific anatomical challenges.

CONCLUSION

Both scrotal and inguinal orchiopexy are safe and effective for palpable UDT, with comparable outcomes in terms of hospitalization and complications. Scrotal orchiopexy offers the advantage of shorter operative time. Clinicians can use this evidence to make informed decisions on the surgical approach for palpable UDT.

Comparison of the Detection and Ligation of Patent Processus Vaginalis Between Laparoscopy-Assisted Transscrotal Orchiopexy and Single Scrotal Incision Orchiopexy

This study aimed to compare the detection and ligation of patent processus vaginalis (PPV) between laparoscopy-assisted transscrotal orchidopexy (LATO) and single scrotal incision orchiopexy (SSIO) for low palpable undescended testis (UDT). We performed a retrospective medical record review of transscrotal orchidopexies performed for low palpable UDT at our institution from 2017 to 2019; 33 and 39 boys underwent LATO and SSIO, respectively. Data collection included patient demographics, incidence of PPV, operative time, and clinical outcomes. All 95 testes were delivered into the scrotum. There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to patients' age, side, and mean operative time. The incidence of PPV in the LATO group was significantly higher than that in the SSIO group (56.52 vs. 34.69%, P = 0.04). The incidence of contralateral PPV in the LATO group was 45%. One patient in the SSIO group underwent unilateral PV ligation and laparoscopic exploration revealed bilateral PPV owing to metachronous contralateral hydrocele. One patient in the LATO group demonstrated obliterated PV in the initial transscrotal procedure, but an ipsilateral PPV was found in the latter laparoscopic procedure. In conclusion, LATO has a higher detection rate and higher ligation of the PPV than SSIO, suggesting that, LATO may help reduce recurrent PPV-related issues. However, long-term follow-up results are needed to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages in a larger case series.

Comparison of Single-Incision Scrotal Orchiopexy and Traditional Two-Incision Inguinal Orchiopexy for Primary Palpable Undescended Testis in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the safety, efficacy, and cosmetic results of single-incision scrotal orchiopexy (SISO) and traditional two-incision inguinal orchiopexy (TTIO) for primary palpable undescended testes (PUDTs) in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search of all relevant studies published on PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science database, and Wanfang data until July 2021 was conducted. The operative time, hospitalization duration, conversion rate, wound infection or dehiscence, scrotal hematoma or swelling, testicular atrophy, reascent, hernia or hydrocele, analgesics needs, and cosmetic results were compared between SISO and TTIO using the Mantel-Haenszel or inverse-variance method.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies involving 2,627 children (1,362 SISOs and 1,265 TTIOs) were included in the final analysis. The conversion rate of SISO was 3.6%. The SISO approach had a statistically significant shorter operative time than the TTIO approach for PUDT (weighted mean difference-11.96, 95% confidence interval -14.33 to -9.59, I² = 79%, P < 0.00001) and a shorter hospital stay (weighted mean difference-1.05, 95% confidence interval -2.07 to -0.03, P = 0.04). SISO needed fewer analgesics and had better cosmetic results than TTIO. SISO had a similar total, short-term, or long-term complication rate with TTIO.

CONCLUSION

Compared with TTIO, SISO has the advantages of shorter operative time, shorter hospitalization duration, less postoperative pain, and better cosmetic appealing results. SISO is a safe, effective, promising, and potential minimal invasive surgical approach for PUDT. SISO is an alternative to TTIO in selected cryptorchid patients, especially for lower positioned ones.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42021268562.

Side predilection in congenital anomalies of the kidney, urinary and genital tracts

BACKGROUND

There appear to be various patterns of sidedness with relation to the common urogenital malformations observed in pediatric urology. The objective of this statistical review was to synthesize this data and to assess if these patterns are significant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighteen urogenital conditions were investigated and for each condition the five largest studies that noted laterality were included. The sidedness of each condition was then analysed for statistical significance.

RESULTS

Three conditions had a statistically significant higher proportion on the right side: palpable undescended testis (63%, p = 0.0002), inguinal hernia (59%, p = 0.0001) and hydrocele (60%, p = 0.003). Three conditions were significantly more common on the left side: impalpable undescended testis (59%, p = 0.0008), renal agenesis (54%, p = 0.02) and vesico-ureteric junction obstruction (71%, p < 0.0001) while both pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction (62%, p = 0.09) and absent vas deferens (61%, p = 0.11) were trending towards significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Various urogenital malformations display a predilection for one side. Proximal malformations tend to be more frequently seen on the left side, where as inguinoscrotal malformations are more frequently observed on the right. There is an increasing body of literature regarding aetiological factors for these conditions. However, our current understanding of the pathophysiology of these conditions does not completely explain this pattern of observation.

Laparoscopic versus open repair for inguinal hernia in children: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

We compared the outcomes of laparoscopic surgery (LS) with those of open surgery (OS) for unilateral and bilateral pediatric inguinal hernia.

METHODS

Using a nationwide claim-based database in Japan, we analyzed data from children younger than 15 years old, who underwent inguinal hernia repair between January 2005 and December 2017. Patient characteristics, incidence of reoperation, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and duration of anesthesia were compared between LS and OS for unilateral and bilateral hernia.

RESULTS

Among 5554 patients, 2057 underwent LS (unilateral 1095, bilateral 962) and 3497 underwent OS (unilateral 3177, bilateral 320). The incidence of recurrence was not significantly different between OS and LS (unilateral: OS 0.2% vs. LS 0.3%, p = 0.44, bilateral: OS 0.6% vs. LS 0.6%, p = 1.00). The incidence of metachronous hernias was significantly higher in the OS group than in the LS group (4.8% vs. 1.0%, p < 0.001). The surgical site infection rate was significantly lower after OS than after LS for unilateral surgeries (0.9% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.002). There was no difference between OS and LS in the length of hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

Both OS and LS had a low incidence of recurrence in children; however, the incidence of metachronous hernias was lower for LS, which may influence operative technique decisions.