Comparison of laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure versus conventional herniotomy in extremely low birth weight infants

Comparison of laparoscope-assisted single-needle laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure versus open repair for pediatric inguinal hernia

Background

Laparoscopic-assisted repairs for pediatric inguinal hernia have gained gradual acceptance over the past decade. However, consensus about the optimal management is still lacking. The aim of this study is to compare outcomes of a modified laparoscope-assisted single-needle laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) versus open repair of pediatric hernias/hydrocele in a single institution.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical data of children who underwent laparoscope-assisted single-needle LPEC and open repair (OR) for inguinal hernia from 2014 to 2019. Data collection included demographics, laterality of hernia, surgical time and time to follow-up. We also reviewed and analyzed the evidence of recurrence, the incidence of metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia (MCIH), and other complications.

Results

In our cohort, 961 patients in the OR group and 1098 patients in the LPEC group were analyzed retrospectively. Mean operative time was significantly shorter in the LPEC group (22.3 ± 3.5 min) than in the OR group (27.8 ± 5.9 min) for bilateral hernia repair (p < 0.001). Postoperative recurrence was 1.3% (13/1035) in the OR group and 0.5% (6/1182) in the LPEC group (p = 0.056). Iatrogenic cryptorchidism occurred statistically more frequently in the OR group than in the LPEC group (0.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.013). In addition, the incidence of MCIH was 3.7% (33/887) in the OR group and 0.3% (3/1014) in the LPEC group (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Comparing to open technique, laparoscope-assisted single-needle LPEC provides a simple and effective option for pediatric inguinal hernia/hydrocele repair with excellent outcomes, a low incidence of recurrence, and reduced MCIH.

Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Repair, Laparoscopic Versus Open Approach: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Last 10-Year Evidence

Aim: Since the first description of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy (LH), a lot of studies have compared outcomes between LH and open herniorrhaphy (OH) with inconsistent results. We designed this study to assess outcomes between both techniques now that pediatric surgeons have enough confidence with it. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of articles published in the last 10 years. Results: Twenty-seven articles reporting on 91,653 patients (26,920 LH and 64,733 OH) were included. No significant differences were found in overall operative time (OT) (P = .07). Subgroup analysis revealed significantly shorter OT for LH in unilateral (-8.87 minutes, P = .03) and bilateral hernias (-16.86 minutes, P = .004), but longer in unilateral hernias in females (+7.47 minutes, P = .006). Recurrence rate was similar (odds ratio [OR] 1.05, P = .66). Less complications were reported in LH (OR 0.51, P = .03). Contralateral patent processus vaginalis average rate was 39.61% and its closure reported a significant decrease of contralateral metachronous hernia (OR 0.11, P < .00001). Conclusion: Although OH is still considered the gold standard by some authors, LH has proven to be not only as safe as OH but also to have additional advantages that should make pediatric surgeons implement it in their daily practice and not in selected cases alone.

The detail profile of cause of recurrences after laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) in children: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic repairs for children with inguinal hernia have been established with various technical modifications. Laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) is one of the most recognized techniques. Although the rate of complications of LPEC is similar to conventional repairs, the major cause of recurrence is still incompletely understood. The purpose of this study is to evaluate detail profile of the cause of recurrence in children treated with LPEC.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using the combinations of the following terms "pediatric inguinal hernia", "LPEC", "complication", and "recurrence" for studies published between 2002 and 2020. The relevant cohorts of recurrence of LPEC in children were systematically searched for clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

35 studies met defined inclusion criteria, reporting a total of 121 patients who had recurrence after LPEC. The mean age at primary operations was 46.7 ± 52.0 months. The gender proportions were 63.9% (male) and 36.1% (female). The rate of treatment side was 44.5% (right), 37.0% (left) and 18.5% (bilateral). The hernia sac was closed with absorbable suture materials (5.3%) and non-absorbable (94.7%). The recurrence occurred in 6.9 ± 8.5 months postoperatively. Operative findings of reoperation were loosening of the knot of internal rings (61.1%), low ligation of the inguinal canal (16.7%), and skipping (22.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that male infants have a higher risk of recurrence after LPEC, and the majority of recurrences can occur in a year postoperatively. It is important to confirm carefully that the suture is tight and high without skipping.

Risk factors for metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia after laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for unilateral inguinal hernia in children

PURPOSES

We use the laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) method as the standard procedure for pediatric inguinal hernia. Despite judging there to be no contralateral patent processus vaginalis (PPV) at the time of the first LPEC, we experienced five cases in which metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia (MCH) developed, so we report the characteristics, including the predictors.

METHODS

For pediatric inguinal hernia, the LPEC method was used in 1277 cases from 2005 to 2019 in our department. Of these, 374 patients underwent unilateral LPEC, and we compared the 5 patients with MCH onset and the 369 without MCH onset. The items to be examined were the gender, age, presence of a low birth weight, initial-onset side, and contralateral internal inguinal ring classification.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the gender, age, initial-onset side, or contralateral internal inguinal ring classification between the two groups. Low-birth-weight infants were significantly more common among those with MCH than among those without MCH.

CONCLUSIONS

The only predictor of a contralateral onset after LPEC for pediatric inguinal hernia was a low birth weight. Therefore, for the above-mentioned unilateral LPEC cases, the possibility of a contralateral onset after LPEC due to acquired factors rather than congenital factors should be considered.

Modified Laparoscopic Percutaneous Extraperitoneal Closure Using a Sledge-Shaped Needle for Inguinal Hernia and Hydrocele in 1199 Pediatric Patients

Background: The objective of the study is to determine the safety and efficiency of the modified laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) to treat pediatric patients with inguinal hernia or hydrocele. Methods: From January 2014 to July 2018, the patients with inguinal hernia or hydrocele who were operated on using modified LPEC were included. We modified LPEC with a sledge-shaped needle and reinforcement flag. By means of medial umbilical fold, the reinforcement surgery should be performed on the patients with huge internal rings (diameter >1.5 cm). Operative time, complication rate, incidence of reinforcement, and contralateral patent processus vaginalis were described between inguinal hernia and hydrocele. Results: In this study, 764 patients with inguinal hernia and 435 patients with hydrocele were successfully performed by the modified LPEC. The 383 (50.1%) patients with inguinal hernia and 266 (61.1%) patients with hydrocele were identified with a contralateral patency of internal ring and underwent simultaneous prophylactic surgery. During surgical procedures, the medial umbilical fold reinforcement (inguinal hernia/hydrocele = 50/1) was performed on 51 patients. Hernia recurrence occurred in 2 cases. All patients had a good cosmetic appearance without additional dissection. Conclusion: Modified LPEC using a sledge-shaped needle and applying the medial umbilical fold reinforcement is a safe and effective surgical procedure.

Comparison of laparoscopic percutaneous internal ring suturing method and open inguinal hernia repair in children under 3 months of age

Objective: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in younger infants has not been completely accepted worldwide. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasiblity of laparoscopic percutaneous internal ring suturing method in children aged younger than 3 months and compare the recurrence and complication rates with open repair; which may still be mentioned as the gold standard procedure.

Material and Methods: A total of 387 children underwent inguinal hernia repair in the clinic between 2016 and 2019. One hundred and forty of them were under 3 months old and divided into two groups; children who underwent laparoscopic percutaneous internal ring suturing (Group 1) and open surgery (Group 2). Selection of the surgical method was regardless of weight, sex or any patient characteristics other than surgeon’s choice. Operation durations, complications and recurrences were compared between the two groups.

Results: A total of 140 patients underwent surgery due to inguinal hernia. Group 1 included 85 and Group 2 included 55 children. There were two recurrences in each group (p> 0.05). Operative durations were shorter in Group 1 for both; unilateral and bilateral repairs (< 0.0001). There were no intraoperative complications in any group. There was one major postoperative complication in Group 2: iatrogenic undescended testis, and none was observed in Group 1. In the laparoscopic group, 47% of the children who were diagnosed to have unilateral hernia were revealed to have bilateral inguinal hernias (n= 31).

Conclusion: Laparoscopic percutaneous internal ring suturing method seems favourable in terms of operative time. It also has the advantage of detecting contralateral patent processus vaginalis or asymptomatic contralateral inguinal hernia.

Comparison of surgical outcomes between laparoscopic percutaneous extracorporeal closure (LPEC) and open repair for pediatric inguinal hernia by propensity score methods and log-rank test analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite a number of studies comparing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LH) and open herniorrhaphy (OH), the putative advantage of LH remains controversial due to a paucity of firm evidence. We hypothesized that LH has both advantages and disadvantages compared to OH and sought to clarify them by comprehensively analyzing the retrospective data using the combination of multiple statistical methods.

METHODS

Operative data for inguinal hernia during the period from February 1999 to December 2019 were examined. The patients were assigned into two groups according to the surgical procedure: laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC, n = 2410) and OH (n = 2038). Operative and anesthesia times and incidence of postoperative complications were evaluated using the propensity score methods and log-rank test.

RESULTS

In comparison with OH, operative time of LPEC was longer for unilateral repair (21.59 ± 8.1 min vs 18.01 ± 8.0 min; p < 0.001) and shorter for bilateral repairs (28.55 ± 10.1 min vs 33.23 ± 11.7 min; p < 0.001), while anesthesia times were longer for both unilateral repair (57.67 ± 10.1 min vs 40.62 ± 11.9 min; p < 0.001) and bilateral repairs (65.95 ± 12.5 min vs 56.35 ± 15.1 min; p < 0.001). LPEC significantly reduced the risk of metachronous contralateral hernia (MCLH) (0.52% vs 9.29%; p < 0.001), but the recurrence rate was higher (0.21% vs 0.04%; p = 0.002) than OH. Orchiectomy due to testicular atrophy or torsion was required in 3 cases of OH (0.19%), whereas it was not seen in LPEC.

CONCLUSIONS

LPEC had a less risk of MCLH and testicular complications but was associated with a higher recurrence rate and longer anesthesia time. Propensity scoring techniques can enhance the robustness of retrospective comparisons between groups over several years of data collection, which is frequently required in pediatric surgery studies.

Risk factors influencing ascending testis after laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for pediatric inguinal hernia and hydrocele

BACKGROUND

We investigated the risk factors influencing ascending testis following laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) for inguinal hernia or hydrocele.

METHODS

Boys undergoing LPEC between 2014 and 2018 had their medical records and operative movies reviewed. Group A patients required orchiopexy after LPEC. Group B patients did not. Their baseline characteristics were reviewed. The path of the LPEC needle (not crossing the spermatic duct at first circuit [Not Crossing]), whether the second entry of the LPEC needle was different from the first hole (Different Hole), peritoneal injury requiring re-ligation (Re-ligation), and hematoma (Hematoma) were evaluated. The quantitative factors of significant difference were set as a cut-off value.

RESULTS

There were 5 patients (7 sides) in Group A and 162 patients (237 sides) in Group B. Birth weight was lower in Group A (p = 0.035). Not Crossing was 7 sides (100%) in Group A and 97 sides (41%) in Group B (p = 0.002). Hematoma was 2 sides (29%) in Group A and 11 sides (5%) in Group B (p = 0.047). Cut-off value of birth weight was 932 g (AUC 0.78).

CONCLUSION

Birth weight < 932 g and operative findings (not crossing over the spermatic duct on the first circuit and hematoma) indicated an increased risk of ascending testis after LPEC.