Efficacy of oral antibiotics in children with post-operative abscess from perforated appendicitis

Antibiotic treatment of post-appendectomy abscesses in children, regardless of size: a twelve years' experience

Intra-abdominal abscesses are a common issue after appendectomy. Antibiotics have shown efficacy in treating smaller abscesses, while larger ones have traditionally been treated with drainage. This study assesses the efficacy of antibiotics for post-appendectomy intra-abdominal abscess (PAA) in children regardless of size. Case-control study of children with PAA admitted at our hospital from 2010 to 2022. The efficacy of antibiotics was compared between abscesses less and more than 6 cm in diameter. The Institutional Review Board has approved this study. A total of 1766 appendectomies were performed from 2010 to 2022 with an incidence of PAA of 5% (n = 89): age 9.3 IQR 5.8, 63% male (n = 56). Sixty-seven patients presented with a ≤ 6 cm abscess (controls) and 22 children had a > 6 cm PAA (cases). Length of intravenous antibiotics were higher in cases (15 IQR 7 days) than controls (12 IQR 4 days), p = 0.003. The efficacy of antibiotics in controls was 97% whereas 86.4% in cases (p = 0.094), reoperation was needed in 2/67 controls and 3/22 cases, with no differences in complications or readmission. The length of stay was longer in cases (15 IQR 6 days) than controls (13 IQR 5 days), p = 0.042. Antibiotics seem a safe treatment for PAA in children regardless of the size. However, this approach is associated with a longer period of intravenous antibiotics and hospital stay, although not with a higher rate of therapeutic failure, complications or reoperations.

The Management of Post-appendectomy Abscess in Children; A Historical Cohort Study and Update of the Literature

INTRODUCTION

Recent studies have shown that specific cases of post-appendectomy abscess (PAA) in children could be treated conservatively. However, due to the lack of high-quality evidence, choice of treatment still depends on preferences of the treating surgeon, leading to heterogeneity in clinical practice. Therefore, we aimed to provide an update of recent literature on the management of PAA in children and subsequently evaluate the outcomes of a large multicenter cohort of children treated for PAA.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in Pubmed and Embase, selecting all randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, and case series published from 2014 and onward and reporting on children (<18 years) treated for a PAA. Subsequently, a historical cohort study was performed, including all children (<18 years) treated for a radiologically confirmed PAA between 2014 and 2021 in a tertiary referral center and two large peripheral centers. Medical charts were reviewed to compare non-invasive (i.e., antibiotics) and invasive (i.e., drainage procedures) treatment strategies. Primary outcome was the success rate of treatment, defined as no need for further interventions related to PAA or its complications.

RESULTS

The search yielded 1,991 articles, of which three were included. Treatment success ranged between 69-88% and 56-100% for non-invasive and invasive strategies, respectively. Our multicenter cohort study included 70 children with a PAA, of which 29 (41%) were treated non-invasively and 41 (59%) invasively. In the non-invasive group, treatment was effective in 21 patients (72%) compared to 25 patients (61%) in the invasive group. Non-invasive treatment was effective in 100% of unifocal small (<3 cm) and 80% of unifocal medium size PAA (3-6 cm), but not effective for multiple abscesses.

CONCLUSION

Non-invasive treatment of especially unifocal small and medium size (<6 cm) PAA in children seems to be safe and effective. Based on these results, a standardized treatment protocol was developed. Prospective validation of this step-up approach-based treatment protocol is recommended.

Reduction of surgical site infections in pediatric patients with complicated appendicitis: Utilization of antibiotic stewardship principles and quality improvement methodology

BACKGROUND

The rate of surgical site infection (SSI) after appendectomy for complicated appendicitis (CA) was high at our children's hospital. We hypothesized that practice standardization, including obtaining intra-operative cultures of abdominal fluid in patients with CA, would improve outcomes and reduce healthcare utilization after appendectomy.

METHODS

A quality improvement team designed and implemented a clinical practice guideline for CA that included obtaining intra-operative culture of purulent fluid, administering piperacillin/tazobactam for at least 72 h post-operatively, and transitioning to oral antibiotics based on intraoperative culture data. We compared outcomes before and after guideline implementation.

RESULTS

From July 2018-October 2019, 63 children underwent appendectomy for CA compared to 41 children from January-December 2020. Compliance with our process measures are as follows: Intra-operative culture was obtained in 98% of patients post-implementation; 95% received at least 72 h of piperacillin-tazobactam; and culture results were checked on all patients. Culture results altered the choice of discharge antibiotics in 12 (29%) of patients. All-cause morbidity (SSI, emergency department visit, readmission to hospital, percutaneous drain, unplanned return to operating room) decreased significantly from 35% to 15% (p=0.02). Surgical site infections became less frequent, occurring on average every 27 days pre-implementation and every 60 days after care pathway implementation (p=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Utilization of a clinical practice guideline was associated with reduced morbidity after appendectomy for CA. Intra-operative fluid culture during appendectomy for CA appears to facilitate the selection of appropriate post-operative antibiotics and, thus, minimize SSIs and overall morbidity.

Eliminating Use of Home Oral Antibiotics in Pediatric Complicated Appendicitis

BACKGROUND

Postoperative oral antibiotic management at discharge for perforated appendicitis varies by institution. A prior study at our institution led to a decrease in antibiotic therapy in patients without leukocytosis. A subsequent protocol change eliminated the white blood cell count check and oral antibiotics if discharge criteria were met by postoperative day seven. We hypothesized this change could be made without an increase in abscess or readmission rates.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients with perforated appendicitis over two 1-year periods after institutional review board approval (262061). In the pre-protocol group, a white blood cell count was checked at discharge and patients with leukocytosis were prescribed oral antibiotics to complete a total of 7 d. In the post-protocol group, no white blood cell count was checked and patients were discharged home without antibiotics.

RESULTS

There were a total of 174 patients with complicated appendicitis in the two 1-year periods with 129 (74%) patients with perforated appendicitis discharged before postoperative day seven. The pre-protocol group included 71 children, and post-protocol included 58 children. There were no differences between mean postoperative days to discharge (2.57 versus 3, P = 0.0896), postoperative abscess rate (12.7% versus 12.1%, P = 1.0000), or readmission rate (12.7% versus 17.2%, P = 0.6184). None of the patients in the post-protocol group were discharged home with oral antibiotics compared with 22.5% in the pre-protocol group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

For pediatric patients with perforated appendicitis discharged before postoperative day seven, stopping antibiotics at the time of discharge significantly decreased our home antibiotic use without an increase in postoperative morbidity.

A Standardized Protocol for Nonoperative Management of Complicated Appendicitis in Children Reduces Resource Utilization

INTRODUCTION

 To standardize care and reduce resource utilization, we implemented a standardized protocol (SP) for the nonoperative treatment of complicated appendicitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 We conducted a prospective, historically controlled, study of patients <21 years with complicated appendicitis managed nonoperatively using an SP from January 2017 to November 2018. The primary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), antibiotic days, peripheral inserted central catheter (PICC) utilization, discharge on intravenous antibiotics, and predischarge imaging. Secondary outcomes were protocol adherence and the rates of adverse events (AE) including return to emergency department (ED), readmission, failure of nonoperative treatment, and interval appendectomy complications.

RESULTS

 Protocol adherence was 67.9%. In total, 741 children were treated for appendicitis of which 58 (30 pre-SP and 28 post-SP) were treated nonoperatively for complicated appendicitis at presentation. Patients were well matched for age, admission white blood cell, sex, body mass index, race, and the proportion requiring percutaneous drainage. After implementing the SP, fewer children had PICCs (100.0 vs. 57.1%, p ≤ 0.001), fewer were discharged on intravenous antibiotics (90.0 vs. 42.9%, p < 0.001), and total antibiotic days were reduced (14.0 vs. 10.0, p = 0.006). There was no difference in LOS (5.5 vs. 6.0 days, p = 0.790) or the proportion undergoing ultrasound (36.7 vs. 39.3%, p = 0.837) or computed tomography scan (16.7 vs. 3.6%, p = 0.195) prior to discharge. There were nonsignificant trends toward reduced AEs (46.7 vs. 35.7%, p = 0.397), returns to ED (40.0 vs. 28.6%, p = 0.360), and readmissions (26.7 vs. 17.9%, p = 0.421). The proportion failing nonoperative treatment (10.0 vs. 3.6%, p = 0.612) and experiencing complications of interval appendectomy (3.3 vs. 3.6%, p = 0.918) were not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

 Implementing an SP for treating complicated appendicitis nonoperatively reduced resource utilization without negatively affecting clinical outcomes.

Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Acute appendicitis (AA) is among the most common causes of acute abdominal pain. Diagnosis of AA is still challenging and some controversies on its management are still present among different settings and practice patterns worldwide. In July 2015, the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) organized in Jerusalem the first consensus conference on the diagnosis and treatment of AA in adult patients with the intention of producing evidence-based guidelines. An updated consensus conference took place in Nijemegen in June 2019 and the guidelines have now been updated in order to provide evidence-based statements and recommendations in keeping with varying clinical practice: use of clinical scores and imaging in diagnosing AA, indications and timing for surgery, use of non-operative management and antibiotics, laparoscopy and surgical techniques, intra-operative scoring, and peri-operative antibiotic therapy.

METHODS

This executive manuscript summarizes the WSES guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of AA. Literature search has been updated up to 2019 and statements and recommendations have been developed according to the GRADE methodology. The statements were voted, eventually modified, and finally approved by the participants to the consensus conference and by the board of co-authors, using a Delphi methodology for voting whenever there was controversy on a statement or a recommendation. Several tables highlighting the research topics and questions, search syntaxes, and the statements and the WSES evidence-based recommendations are provided. Finally, two different practical clinical algorithms are provided in the form of a flow chart for both adults and pediatric (< 16 years old) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2020 WSES guidelines on AA aim to provide updated evidence-based statements and recommendations on each of the following topics: (1) diagnosis, (2) non-operative management for uncomplicated AA, (3) timing of appendectomy and in-hospital delay, (4) surgical treatment, (5) intra-operative grading of AA, (6) ,management of perforated AA with phlegmon or abscess, and (7) peri-operative antibiotic therapy.

Intravenous versus intravenous/oral antibiotics for perforated appendicitis in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The use of oral (PO) antibiotics following a course of certain intravenous (IV) antibiotics is proposed in order to avoid the complications of IV medications and to decrease the cost. However, the efficacy and safety of sequential IV/PO antibiotics is unclear and requires further study.

Methods

The databases, including PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library, were searched. Studies comparing outcomes in patients with perforated appendicitis receiving sequential IV/PO and PO antibiotics therapy were screened. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the Jadad score were used to evaluate the quality of the cohort and the randomized controlled portions of the trial, respectively. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I² value. A fixed or random-effect model was applied according to the I² value.

Results

Five controlled studies including a total of 580 patients were evaluated. The pooled estimates revealed that sequential IV/PO antibiotic therapy did not increase the risk of complications, with a risk ratio (RR) of 0.97 (95% CI 0.51–1.83, P = 0.93) for postoperative abscess, 1.04 (95% CI 0.25–4.36, P = 0.96) for wound infection and 0.62 (95% CI 0.33–1.16, P = 0.13) for readmission.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates that sequential IV/PO antibiotic therapy is noninferior to IV antibiotic therapy regarding postoperative abscess, wound infection and readmission.